NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael Sigman

Michael Sigman

Posted: April 8, 2010 09:42 AM

A few months ago Mookie, our beloved cat, was diagnosed with renal failure. Our choice was to let her die or, in effect, provide dialysis by injecting her with fluids every day for the rest of her life. Though giving the shots was no fun, we felt lucky to be with Mookie as she gradually faded until one day she seemed ready to let go. Our vet confirmed that Mookie was in pain and would die soon under any circumstances, so we decided to stop the injections. Mookie died peacefully the next morning.

It's become a cliche to observe that we should be so lucky as our pets -- that we escort our animals out of this life with greater compassion than our fellow humans. But the old way of dying may be dying.

Dr. Lewis M. Cohen -- a Massachusetts-based physician who treats patients with kidney failure -- specializes in palliative medicine, defined by the World Health Organization as "the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment." His compelling and eye-opening new book No Good Deed (Harper, $25.99) explores complex end-of-life issues with clarity and, despite his own strong opinions, an openness to disparate points of view.

Most readers will be shocked to learn that some two million Americans die each year following what Cohen calls a "structured decision to limit life-sustaining treatment." Because technology keeps offering opportunities for people to survive longer, most of us will one day have to decide if and when excruciating suffering is worth prolonging a life that would soon end anyway.

Cohen illustrates the hazards of practicing palliative care -- often incorrectly conflated with Dutch-style euthanasia and Kevorkian-like doctor-assisted suicide -- via harrowing true stories as gripping as a Robin Cook novel. The centerpiece is the tale of Amy and Kim, two veteran, respected nurses whose common-sense efforts to ameliorate a dying woman's suffering are rewarded by an accusation of murder by Olga (name changed), a devoutly religious nursing assistant. Kafkaesque police tactics, personal betrayals, prolonged investigations and psychological traumas ensue.

No Good Deed interweaves this and other page-turnable tales with explication and analysis of the conflicts roiling around palliative care. Though Cohen's position is clear -- he favors palliative care and opposes criminal prosecution of practitioners like Amy and Kim -- he lays out the opposing view with empathy and without judgment.

There are millions of Americans like Olga -- whose own life was turned upside-down by her attempt at whistle-blowing -- who don't view overwhelming suffering as a worst case scenario, but see iniquity in actions that take death out of God's hands. Cohen hears out Bobby Schindler Jr., Terri Schiavo's brother, who represents a "sanctity of life coalition" of conservative politicians and religious groups -- and some disability rights activists -- who believe Schiavo was murdered five years ago. To them, only God can make life-or-death decisions, and palliative care should be criminalized. (Schiavo, who had existed in a vegetative state for 15 years, had her life support terminated by court order after five lawsuits and fourteen appeals.)

Then there are those, Cohen himself passionately among them, who don't see death as an evil to be avoided at all costs. They believe each individual has the autonomy to make reasonable end-of-life decisions, and that prosecuting doctors and nurses for anything short of criminal malfeasance is a travesty that will only ruin innocent lives and increase patient suffering.

Going after compassionate professionals like Amy and Kim wastes law enforcement resources that could be spent tracking down the real killers among doctors or nurses, whose profession gives them cover to get away with murder for years or decades. Cohen walks the reader through several hair-raising examples, including that of Dr. Harold Shipman, who during the latter part of the 20th century murdered at least 215 patients, mostly elderly women.

But those are the exceptions. The greater danger may be that even unsuccessful prosecutions of good-faith palliative caregivers like Amy and Kim -- combined with real or perceived threats from extremist right-to-lifers -- creates a chilling effect causing doctors and nurses to vastly under-treat pain.

As medical technology and practices continue to improve, it becomes more and more absurd to insist that everyone suffering the end stages of terminal diseases must be kept alive regardless of their wishes. Even leaving aside what Bobby Schindler calls "the whole autonomy thing," such a system would collapse under its own weight. Before long we'd have millions of centenarians hooked up to ventilators for years at a cost so astronomical we'd have to wrap our brains around the term "quadrillions."

Cohen's calm, catholic approach to the debate over how we die doesn't extend to liars. He not only takes on Sarah Palin's grotesque characterization of counseling in this area as "death panels;" he argues that gravely ill people are generally grateful for just such an opportunity.

In the last chapter, Cohen revisits Amy, Kim and Olga, who have more or less come to terms with -- but are forever scarred by -- their experiences. Amy, good caregiver to the last, tries to reconcile her point of view with Olga's, saying, "Whatever you believe is fine, if you are comfortable with it." Good try, but here you can't simply agree to disagree, because what Olga believes -- that Amy should rot in jail - isn't fine. As long as the irresistible force of good faith palliative care comes up against the immovable object of uncompromising "right to life," no one will be satisfied.

In a sense, this debate is tougher even than the impasse over abortion rights. Relatively few women have abortions, but everyone dies. And virtually no woman wants to have an abortion, but most people do want, and demand, the autonomy to make informed end-of-life decisions.

With the implementation of health-care reform, the fifth anniversary of Terri Schiavo's death and the forthcoming release of the HBO movie You Don't Know Jack, starring Al Pacino as Dr. Jack Kevorkian, the issues raised by Dr. Cohen in No Good Deed are more front and center than ever.

So the battle will go on, enhanced by this wise, open-hearted book.

 

Follow Michael Sigman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/majorsongs

 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:11 PM on 04/12/2010
When to hold on, when to let go. When to fight for life, when to acquiesce to the inevitable. How to help others with these decisions....
Tough issues..... worthy of meditation. Good topics that lead to good actions and better human beings.

The practice of escorting a being out of life is a very intense and personal experience. It can also be deeply and profoundly rewarding.

I have experienced this with both humans and other beings and it never fails to leave me changed - almost always in a good way though there is often a period of adjustment and assimilation. It isn't pleasant but its real and it gives one a glimpse of truth if one is ready to see it.
photo
Erzsebet Gilbert
author, expat, traveler
12:37 PM on 04/10/2010
What must be considered in this debate is at the very least a straining towards empathy for the dying. No matter our discomfort with the idea of willful death, we have to try to understand the feelings and the wishes of those who are suffering. In all mortal honesty, I can't say how I would react to such a state, but I can try to imagine these emotions, and allow the dying their choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
03:50 AM on 04/09/2010
i always wondered why our pets received the most compassionate alternatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomFox
10:20 AM on 04/09/2010
That is a good question. My wife and I are owned by four beautiful cats whose lives we've been part of for 6-8 years. They are wonderful companions and I hope they have long lives...but we will certainly be the poorer when they are gone. They bring us immense joy and we are grateful to be their companions.

They will certainly receive compassionate alternatives from us.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Michael Sigman
02:50 PM on 04/09/2010
They say our dogs live for us, but we live for our cats.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tabaqui
One of those weirdo hippy-dippy types.
12:56 AM on 04/09/2010
If you truly believe that only God can 'decide on life or death', than the patient should be removed from all life-sustaining machines and left in God's care. That sounds fair, doesn't it?

I have never agreed with people who think that life should be sustained 'no matter what' - it's cruel and pointless. I wish our society wasn't so terrified of discussing end-of-life options and making final-care decisions.
11:22 PM on 04/08/2010
My 87-year-old dad was discharged from the hospital when they could do nothing more there for his incurable condition, pain, dementia and agitation. Finding no hospice facility near enough to allow for prolonged visits from the family, we had made advance arrangements with a nearby nursing home and a visiting hospice care service. A hospice veteran aptly named Angelica responded to a phone call from me on Thanksgiving Day when the nursing home staff was stretched thinner than thin. She spent four hours improving my dad's palliative care as well as gently explaining to us the expected progression of events and how best to respond. Medically and spiritually, she was more skilled than I ever expected a nurse could be. Even knowing his documented wishes through an advance health care directive, we would have felt too paralyzed to carry them out without her supportive, caring advocacy. Angelica helped us connect the dots when our tears made them impossible to see. Through her efforts, I was able to hold his hand, confident he could hear words that comforted us both as they magically poured out of my heart, then quietly out of my mouth. Thanks to her sensitive guidance, I remained next to his bed through the next morning when he passed away. Never thought I could hold it together after all that to make those dreaded final phone calls. It still was heart-breaking, but we all found courage, comfort and love when we needed it the most.
04:02 PM on 04/09/2010
Amen my friend. I too went through the same with my mom. Not a day goes by that I don't think about her, and the strength that Hospice provided to me and my family. I know atheists think its lights out when we die, but watching how the situation unfolded with my mom, I highly doubt that is the case. Regardless of beliefs, everyone deserves love and dignity, especially at that final moment.

I had spent almost a week straight by her side without sleep, and if it wouldn't have been for Hospice, I don't think I would have had the strength to make it through.

We all deserve to choose how we leave this planet, and I for one will not let some conservative freak tell me what they think is in my best interest or think that they have a right to act on my behalf.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edgarcaycedoc
08:48 PM on 04/08/2010
The book "How We Die" provides a good look at end of life care and decisions (sorry I can't remember the author. Another good book is "The Last Goodnights" by a lawyer, John West, who assisted his parents (at their request) in their suicides. ISBN for "The Last Goodnights" is 978-1-58243-448-3. As someone in his sixties, I have a great dread of being forced to live through either dementia or an extremely painful death. If should happen that I am in either position, my family has been instructed to move to either Washington State or Oregon, where--after establishing residency--I will take advantage of their enlightened view of death.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Smith
05:47 PM on 04/08/2010
Thank you, Mike. Have added this one to my wishlist.
I know I'm stating the obvious, but it's a bitter irony that the folks who tend to bring us military solutions to diplomatic problems and argue for a gun in every closet are the same people who pretend that only god has the right to take a life. At some point, the hypocrisy has to make a person's head explode, but I'm still waiting to see it happen.
The truth is that for any American who values freedom and control of one's own body, this is the ultimate line in the sand. I hope it's a long ways off, but if I ever get to the point where life is nothing more than a medical exercise, I will exit on my own. And if I'm mentally fit to make the decision but physically unable to follow through, I hope that there will be a compassionate soul who can assist me without fear of prosecution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bessielil
trying to organize hummingbirds
04:27 PM on 04/08/2010
The idea that doctors would over treat to postpone death and under treat regarding pain management would be 'cruel and abusive treatment' in my lexicon. I'm heading for the closest palliative care physician I can find when the time comes. We torment people with invasive poisons and terrible side effects to gain a few more months of suffering. The Schaivo case was a horrible example of government intrusion that contradicted every educated opinion about existence in a vegetative state. A book like Dr. Cohen's is sorely needed to challenge the thinking of all of us regarding end of life care.
03:55 PM on 04/08/2010
I agree I "don't see death as an evil to be avoided at all costs."
Death is neither good nor evil, and irregardless of words from a pulpit or
rostrum, it can not be avoided. Period.

This whole thing is a mixed bag of beliefs.

I agree that resources are wasted by prosecuting people like Amy and Kim.
But, surprise!, I wouldn't hedge my bets by using those same resources to
track down the "real killers" among doctors or nurses.
Actually, there is no difference. Both cases ignores the (uggh) "victim". This
is strictly a culturally "terrible" act--from the cultures point of view (Olga) whether
the assistance is provided by "qualified" nurses, doctors, care-givers or
whoever.

No one dies-- no one --until THEY are ready.

People in my family have been "broadcasting" their impending deaths ever
since I was a child and no one thought they were crazy. We took them seriously.
We didn't talk much about it, but paying attention to the signs, we knew when
it was coming as far as a year in advance. And if family is observed around a
terminally ill person, it can be seen that those closest to the patient will know
when the hour is getting close.

We get so caught up in multitasking that we forget we know these things. We
quit reading the signs begging to be seen and read only the monitor.
Allow people to die as they lived, in dignity.
09:50 AM on 04/09/2010
From Huffington Post Front page 04/09/10, re West Virginia coal mine blast:

"If anything happens to me, I'll be looking down from heaven at you all. I love you. Take care of my baby. Tell her that daddy loves her, she's beautiful, she's funny. Just take care of my baby girl."

Those were the chilling words in a note from Josh Napper, a West Virginia coal miner who was killed in the Massey mine explosion on Monday.

The note was written to Napper's girlfriend, Jennifer, over Easter weekend -- just days before his fears were realized. It was described to CNN's John Roberts by Pam Napper, Josh's mother."

We're not crazy, we're not stupid, we're not alone, we're not machines, we're not the product of "survival of the fittest", we didn't 'just happen', we ARE unique in all the world.
No one dies until they are ready. No one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
medicontheedge
big loud broad
02:41 PM on 04/08/2010
As a healthcare provider for over 25 years, I am increasingly sickened and saddened by those who flog these poor souls who are trying to die when it is time to.

The elderly population alone who are abused in this way breaks my heart. Continued, aggressive, painful, and yes, expensive, interventions and treatments that do NOTHING to relieve pain or improve quality of life are foisted on people by their FAMILIES, abbeted by a medical profession that is afraid to bluntly discuss these issues with families.

I've seen the patients OWN end of life decisions disregarded by medical staff, at the behest of family members who bring thier OWN issues to the fore when dealing with a family members imminent death, or worse, the lingering suffering that occurs when people who need to die because it is TIME are not allowed to do so with dignity and comforted as much as possible.

We really do treat our animals better than people.
02:11 PM on 04/08/2010
Great observations, passionate, powerful and informed. Another exceptional book on the topic at hand is Sherwin B. Nuland's 1995 best seller, "How We Die." It may be a little more clinical than Dr. Cohen's book, but ultimately comes to grip with most of the same issues Dr. Cohen examines. Mike is right, though--the national conversation should be about these reasoned examinations of death and dying, and informed choices, not the hyperbolic ranting about death panels we've been subjected to for the past year-plus. Shame on Grassley, Palin, Limbaugh, et al. for dumbing down such an important issue.
01:14 PM on 04/08/2010
I love this debate Michael, (this one being about Dying as opposed to the one about Death.) Most people are afraid of dying; you get old (often) and sick a lot of the time. Kind of sensible to be a bit nervous about that crapshoot. But Death- there's the really interesting question! I tend to view it as a win/win. You either cease and are food for the worms, which is fine- you won't be there to notice the little guys dining. Or there is something else. Which is pretty exciting. Either way- you quit aching, presumably and or you find out a lot more about the nature of the universe, (presumably). My general feeling these days is for the- it's unimaginably wonderful option. Like a Commodore computer from the early 80's- we thought was so amazing- as compared to the computer equivalent in a hundred years. That's how I think it might be...anything that man or religion has imagined about death and the nature of the universe, is like a Commodore.
12:04 PM on 04/08/2010
I had a chance to read Dr. Cohen's book, and after the first chapter, I was unable to put it down. The writing is gripping, the author's perspective is unique, and the stories scattered throughout the book are insightful and enlightening. It must be said that this book is applicable to every person in America right now, because if you haven't been forced to deal with these questions yet, you eventually will. I highly recommend picking "No Good Deed" up as soon as possible; just make sure you have some spare time...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:33 AM on 04/08/2010
It is certainly a personal matter of choice and respect that each of us must reckon with as aging, dying and death is a given and with the luck of the draw, each of us has compassionate caregivers, physician, and family when it comes our time to transition.

I have had my share of loved ones transition, these are but two in the past six months. Dori had a heart attack and exited quickly at the ripe old age of 82. She never wanted to be in an assisted care facility as they were "full of old people". Her zest for living life while she had it was evident in her amazing spirit. I think she wanted out fast and without intrusion. Most recently, Harry finally let go with the loving assistance of Hospice, his compassionate physician, family members and aides. They say pneumonia is a friend to the elderly and I would have to agree as this 87 year old man was deteriorating rapidly for the past year ... mind, body and spirit. To make the decision to not treat the pneumonia was a difficult one to make, yet the most compassionate. I cannot say enough good things about Hospice and it is truly a godsend for what the dying process involves for all involved.