iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Most Progressive Movement on the Planet


What if there was a global movement that had the potential to eliminate poverty and war in our lifetimes by expanding opportunity for the world's poorest people? Most people would regard such a movement as an extraordinary source of hope and progress; it could lay claim to being the most progressive movement on the planet. What is this movement?

Most development economists now agree that the legal institutions of a nation are a primary determinant of how wealthy a nation is. Some sets of legal rules support economic activity and allow for widespread opportunity and wealth creation, other sets of legal rules inhibit economic activity, reduce opportunity, and perpetuate poverty. Given this context, those who care most about alleviating poverty are those who promote those legal systems that allow for widespread opportunity and wealth creation.

One metric of such legal rules is the Fraser Economic Freedom Index, which shows that of the 141 nations ranked, the ten nations with the least economic freedom are:

1. Zimbabwe

2. Angola

3. Myanmar

4. Republic of Congo

5. Niger

6. Venezuela

7. Guinea-Bissau

8. Central African Republic

9. Chad

10. Rwanda

11. Burundi

12. Democratic Republic of Congo

13. Togo

14. Nepal

15. Gabon

With the exception of the four oil producing nations, Angola, Venezuela, and Chad, these are among the poorest nations on earth. Without oil, Angola and Chad would also be among the poorest. Venezuela is rapidly destroying its ability to create wealth. Meanwhile, the world's most economically free nations are:

1. Hong Kong (considered as an independent region)

2. Singapore

3. New Zealand

4. Switzerland

5. U.K.

6. Chile

7. Canada

8. Australia

9. U.S.

10. Ireland

11. Estonia

12. Iceland

13. Denmark

14. Finland

15. Austria

With the exception of Chile and Estonia, both of which only recently reached the top ranks of the economically free, these are among the wealthiest nations on earth. Moreover, due to decades of sustained economic growth, Chile is now a middle-income nation, with approximately the same GDP per capita as Russia (the GDP of which is inflated through oil and gas wealth; without these, Chile is now richer on a per capita basis than Russia). Estonia, the Baltic Tiger, is a high income nation, now neck-and-neck with Portugal and rising fast.

In order to think about the value of good legal institutions in a different way, consider that the average wage of an uneducated day laborer in Mexico is $6, whereas that same individual can cross the border into the U.S. and, as an illegal alien, earn $60 per day. While those progressives whose vision is limited to the U.S. might protest the injustices faced by the migrant worker within the U.S., from the perspective of the average Mexican laborer, suddenly earning ten times as much is extremely appealing -- this is why countless Mexicans risk death in order to cross into the U.S. Wouldn't you be tempted to get into a nation where your income would go up tenfold?

To get your mind around the value of legal institutions in a different way, consider the ways in which real estate developers lobby local governments for changes in zoning regulations. Often a change in zoning from residential to commercial can cause land values to double or triple overnight. Similarly, when a piece of land in a developing world nation, with poor legal institutions, is converted into a special economic zone with higher quality legal institutions, land values can skyrocket tenfold or more.

Compare photos of Dubai, before and after free zone designation, and photos of Shenzhen before and after free zone designation to get a sense of the increase in land values resulting from free zone designation. Although Dubai and Shenzhen have dubious reputations, the principal of massive wealth creation through free zones need not be associated with sweatshop manufacturing. In principal one could design an improved legal system that applied Fair Trade principles and used the land value gains to support women's issues. I've proposed both a Women's Empowerment Free Zone as well as a Fair Trade free zone. The Women's Empowerment Free Zone concept is designed to provide well-funded trust funds around the world dedicated to supporting women and children's causes; a highly progressive proposal.

In a world in which about a third of the world lives on less than a dollar per day, one might expect a sense of urgency around opportunities to alleviate poverty through improving legal systems. And there are many scholars, development experts, and advocates working to improve legal systems so that poverty will end sooner. But it turns out that changing legal systems by means of research, persuasion, education, and legislation is a slow, uncertain process that takes decades.

It is in this context that several innovative thinkers are exploring faster, more dynamic, more entrepreneurial approaches to providing the world's poor with access to world-class legal systems. As we all know, IT entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley and elsewhere have utterly transformed out world. When millions of individuals are allowed to use their creativity to create innovations, and then make those innovations available to millions of others through entrepreneurship, problems that previously seemed impossible to solve are solved quickly and easily. Those of us who were alive in the 1970s remember slide rules, adding machines, typewriters, and expensive long distance calls. The IT revolution has made all of that obsolete.

What if we could apply the power of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship to the problem of poverty reduction? More importantly, what if we could apply the power of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship to the most highly leveraged aspect of wealth creation, legal system creation itself?

This is the new frontier of poverty alleviation, one in which cutting-edge thinkers are exploring the possibility of creating new legal systems at sea, in localized free cities and zones, in granting NGOs a greater level of sovereignty, in allowing local regions more legal autonomy, and more. The leading venue for exploring this world of entrepreneurial legal system creation is cleverly named "Let a Thousand Nations Bloom," the home to the most progressive movement on the planet, despite the fact that not everyone understands this.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
runswithscissors
Hobson's Choice ≠ Free Will
10:40 PM on 07/15/2009
Nearly every nation on the least economically free list has a history of exploitation by outside nations, a few of these coincidently enough appear on the most economically free list. This, along with basic geography (i.e. access to resources), has far more to do with any measure of economic freedom than a nation's legal system.

BTW, this was probably the clumsiest attempt that I've ever seen of making the hard right agenda appear progressive. You don't make any attempt to define economic freedom, leaving me to conclude that in this instance it means "most capitalist." I draw this conclusion based on the fact that this list ranks Chile and Estonia higher than economic powers Germany, France, and Japan. It also fails to take standard of living into account (a sure measure of economic efficacy), proven by Sweden's absence from the list and Denmark's relatively low ranking. In the end, what you said was that in order to be the most capitalist nation, you need capitalist laws. You're going to have to have to do a whole lot better than that
01:11 AM on 07/16/2009
Please consider that in the "most free" list, 1-3 and 7-10 were all previously exploited by #5, in the sense that these are all former British colonies. The difference is that they have retained free market institutions since being liberated from colonial oppression, whereas many African and other nations have not. Adopting free market institutions is not easy, but history shows this is an almost guaranteed path to economic prosperity (if that's what you want; if you don't want that, no reason to pay attention to these debates).
photo
runswithscissors
Hobson's Choice ≠ Free Will
04:01 PM on 07/16/2009
Economic prosperity for who? If you're going to try and covince me that the people of Singapore are the world's 2nd best off financially, I'm going to need to hear what information you're basing this on. Fact is that a whole pile of wealth concentrated at the top of the economic ladder doesn't do a damn thing the average person of that nation, unless the legal system is designed to promote some degree of economic equality. This is why this list is meaningless, because the average citizen of France, Germany, Japan, or Sweden lives far more comfortably than just about any nation listed above.

You mention African nations specifically, which is telling because they are the most exploited nations in the world today, mostly at the hands of multinationals looting their resources in the name of "free trade" or pharmaceutial companies taking advantage of the continent as a dumping ground for toxic and/or ineffective medicines. And I'm supposed to be convinced that giving these same businesses even more access is the key to improving the continent? Again, you're going to have to do a lot better than that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SparkyAdams
09:12 PM on 07/15/2009
Oh dear, the Fraser Institute is a rightwing propaganda organization trying to pass itself off as a think tank.
12:42 PM on 07/16/2009
If you prefer the World Bank's Doing Business Index, their results are very similar to those of the Fraser Institute. Long before that, Hernando de Soto documented that excessive obstacles to business formation and weak property rights were a severe problem throughout the developing world. Of course, Bill Clinton describes de Soto's organization as "the most important poverty alleviation organization on the planet." The simple fact is that it is easier to start a legal business anywhere in Denmark than it is in any developing world nation. Here is another article explaining the link between obstacles to business formation and poverty, http://www.cceia.org/resources/ethics_online/0026.html. The World Bank Doing Business site has dozens such articles. In Mexico it costs more than $500 to have a business document notarized, an obstacle that prevents the poor from creating legal businesses and thereby entering the middle class. Everyone who cares about the world's poor should be outraged by these obstacles.