- BIG NEWS:
- Glenn Beck
- |
- ABC
- |
- CBS
- |
- Oprah
- |
Who's tweaking whom?
I have come to believe that the nearly daily back and forth between the White House and Fox News is good for both sides. I have further come to believe it's good for the political class in general. For one thing, the fight is deeply self-referential and true inside baseball (who is doing what to whom on the basis of what strategy and what future benefit); for another it sets up the ultimate liberal-conservative face-off. In one corner the new young president (with all his promises of bipartisanship) and in the other Fox Chief Roger Ailes, that dark figure who has been bending media to the conservative cause since the Nixon administration.
Politico, the arbiter of political baseball, floated the rumor on Friday that "friends and associates" were encouraging Ailes to run for president in 2012.
Before getting to my relative affection for Ailes, let me note that he will be 73 in 2012; he's vastly overweight (and sensitive about it); he has health problems and can't walk very well; he's ghoulish looking; he's deeply and nuttily paranoid (he discusses freely, albeit in lowered voice, the plans of radical Muslims to storm his house in New Jersey); and he may not be capable of doing 15 minutes without an offensive utterance.
Suffice it to say that nobody is encouraging Ailes to run for president.
Continue reading on newser.com
Follow Michael Wolff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NewserColumns
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
As I wrote on a comment that never made it past the moderator on another thread, Politico feels honor bound to report any Washington rumor. Ailes would be a horrible candidate and wouldn't like the pay cut. All the weaknesses of Steve Forbes and Dick Cheney combined. Probably close to their weight combined.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with