iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michele Simon

GET UPDATES FROM Michele Simon
 

Advocates Beat Big Chicken in Maryland to Ban Arsenic in Feed

Posted: 05/28/2012 11:20 am

Who is ready for some good news? I thought so.

Last week, Maryland became the first state in the nation to ban the use of arsenic in chicken feed. Wait, what? Chickens are fed arsenic, a known carcinogen? Yup and the feds say it's kosher, despite admitting the dangerous chemical may wind up in your dinner. (The chicken industry uses it to kill bugs and promote growth, cancer risks be damned.)

Many groups have tried to stop the practice for years but of course Big Chicken has fought back hard. Kudos to Food and Water Watch, which explains how the good guys won this time: "Given the enormous power of our opponents, like the big chicken industry and pharmaceutical companies who fought against us for three years, this victory is a real testament to the power of grassroots organizing." We can beat back food industry lobbying one state (or city or county) at a time. It just take a lot of hard work.

 

Follow Michele Simon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Appetite4Profit

FOLLOW FOOD
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:06 AM on 05/30/2012
Get with the programme. The linear no-threshold model of toxicity is so last year. Of course it was always errant nonsense.

Tiny quantities of a perfectly natural chemical such as arsenic do no harm. In fact I would be less surprised if any unbiased research found it was good for you in the quantities found in chickens than if such research found it was harmful. Grow up and deal with the real-world problems; arsenic in chicken is not one of them.
09:23 AM on 05/30/2012
Rich, reason based, factual arguments have no place in the HuffPo comments section. Big Business is evil, and any assurances that their practices provide more practical benefits than imaginary risks is counter to this dogma.