More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michele Willens

GET UPDATES FROM Michele Willens
 

Face It: They Break Horses, Don't They?

Posted: 11/30/11 06:20 PM ET

I haven't been on a horse in many years, though as a young girl I rode every weekend and collected my share of the plastic versions. As an urban creature now, I rarely come across them -- other than the painfully tolerant variety leading tourists through Central Park. But I think I join a lot of others in being drawn to stories about them. Witness the worldwide success of the puppet-driven War House on stage and the soon-to-be-released film by Steven Spielberg. We all read Seabiscuit and learned how one horse literally captured the spirit of a nation.

So I was somewhat intrigued by an urgent shout-out I received from my friend, the actress Wendie Malick (Lost in Cleveland, Don't Shoot Me) about the upcoming 40th anniversary of the "Wild Roaming Horses and Burros Act." Never heard of it either? It turns out that none other than Richard Nixon signed it into law, but according to Malick and others, it has been gradually eroded by powerful ranching, mining and drilling interests. As a result, today there are more horses languishing in government holding facilities than remaining wild. And now it seems the House of Representatives has voted to revisit discussions of horse slaughterhouses in the U.S.

I confess, my first instinct was to delete, ignore, prioritize elsewhere. Hey, we shoot soldiers, don't we? Then again, I have a Boomers soft spot for celebrities who actually know and care about what is going on in Washington. And I am well aware of how powerful women can be when they are fired up and start getting organized. We have helped end wars, (Another Mother for Peace) created legislation to punish those who drive drunk, (MADD) kept toxic dumps far away from our children. (Love Canal) So my ears perked, my curiosity aroused, maybe even some of the old fighting spirit threatening to come out of hibernation.

Malick obviously knows how to convince with authority and yes, dramatic flair, but this is no performance."To see these magnificent creatures chased by helicopter for hours and finally captured and hauled into a concentration camp, is to witness utter terror, followed by despair," says the actress, who was invited to attend a Bureau of Land Management "roundup" two years ago. This is far from a one night stand for her. She owns horses and is developing a television film based on the popular book Wild Horse Annie and The Last of The Mustangs. She may be best known for her comedic portrayals of, shall we say, the vain and self absorbed, but her love of animals rivals that of her current TV Land co-star, Betty White.

I can't pretend to share that devotion. The last pet I had was a toad named Toby who our father accidentally ran over entering our Santa Monica driveway in the '50s. But I do believe those we elect could better be spending their time getting along and dealing with debt than reopening an old law that allows horses to run free. In her book Mustang: The Saga of the Wild Horse in the American West, author Deanne Stillman reminds us that, "horses have carried our mail, fought our wars, tilled our land and ferried us across that land." Or as Malick says, "around our collective campfire, Americans and horses have been intertwined since our beginning."

Joining a collective campfire with passionate women sounds awfully good at this time of year when we are supposed to be thinking of others; and at this time of life when we may have forgotten our better angels.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:18 PM on 12/04/2011
btw, the Wild Free Roaming Horses & Burros Act passed both houses of Congress without a single dissenting vote. The horse is native to North America, yes they were gone for a time (although some think that there is evidence that not all migrated to Europe). They are reintroduced/returned native species. Don't believe the BLM hype about horse population doubling every 4 yrs. Horses in the wild do not reproduce as reliably nor do their offspring automatically survive. Livestock, mining, and drilling cause far more damage to the public land. And the livestock grazing on subsidized land costs taxpayers $132mil annually and 97% of that subsidized beef is exported.

From the National Academy of Sciences: "the Phase I Report explored several biases in the census data, cited or calculated rates of increase based on a number of published values for reproduction and survival rates, as well as sex and age ratios, and concluded annual rates of increase of 10 percent or less. Forage use by wild equids remains a small fraction of the total forage use by domestic animals on western public ranges, regardless of whether the actual number of equids is in accord with the censuses or somewhat higher. Hence the ration of forage used by livestock to that of feral equids is about 23:1."
01:17 PM on 12/04/2011
and the horses are not starving or on the verge. Ask any one of the humane observers at the roundups or the photographers who watch the herds constantly (and rely on herds of healthy horses to make a living). Approx 7200 horses & burros were removed last fiscal year and at least about 8300 were removed in the current year. The horses were originally given 53.5mil acres, with priority. Now wild herds have 34.3 mil acres but in practice they are only allowed on 27mil acres (with livestock). From the 2008 GAO rpt: "livestock are managed on 160 million acres of BLM lands, compared to the 29 million BLM acres that are available for wild horses and burros. we found that BLM’s decisions on how many wild horses to remove from federal rangelands were not based on direct evidence that wild horse populations exceeded what the range could support and that removals were often not accompanied by reductions in livestock grazing levels or range management to increase the land’s capacity.
01:16 PM on 12/04/2011
The BLM can get approval to move herds and designate other BLM land for the horses. The BLM should restore the horses back to 53.5mil acres - the amount of land they received in 1971. Many of the horses in holding could be returned to the wild which could be annual cost savings of $20mil (my guess based on $45mil current annual cost of holding).

Having the BLM mis-manage the mustangs and burros is like letting the fox guard the henhouse. If a rancher, mining, oil, gas, or energy project wants land that is protected for the horses, BLM decides the land can no longer support any horses. BLM goes to great lengths to hide roundups & holding conditions from the public and the press. This is not homeland security, it's horses & burros!

A telling sign is that the recent forum at NYU School of Law, sponsored by the Environmental Law Journal and Environmental Studies Program called it's discussion "Managed to Extinction?" to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Act. BLM refused to attend because they don't answer to the public. What are they hiding?
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
10:53 PM on 12/01/2011
Maybe Ms. Malick can tell us what she would do when too many horses overrun our ranges. Wild horse herds double after every 4 years. The land can't support all those animals. Riparian areas and native wildlife and native plant communities will suffer. So, is this acceptable to Malick and the rest of the wild horse advocates, or do they have a solution they're posing?

By the way, the Wild Roaming Horses and Burros Act explicitly authorizes the Sec of Interior to remove excess horses. So yes, let's celebrate the act. Wild horses are neat, and should a part of our public lands. But not at the expense of native ecosystems. Limits must be set and excess horses must be removed one way or another.
10:03 PM on 12/01/2011
There are good arguments on both sides of this issue. In the meantime, you and the HP editors should have doublechecked the names of your "friend's" television credits: Try "Hot in Cleveland," and "Just Shoot Me!"
02:58 PM on 12/01/2011
Sophia think too much of herself, what am I supposed to do?

Beat her.

gag.
07:26 AM on 12/01/2011
I much prefer the now viable option of equine birth control to vastly reduce the numbers rather than take horses lives or keep them in concentration camps. These horses don't need to pay the ultimate price for yet another man-made imbalance. It's not their fault.

Let's face it, this 'problem' is a transparent one - it has far more to do with cattle ranchers wanting to make room for their locusts-on-the-hoof! Hunting of Earth's Native elk, deer, and bison in the name of killing them for their own good is still allowed - it too is big business. The animal AG industry has done far more to create eco-assaults on our one shared Earth than these horses. Stop killing the big predators and let them and the hooved creatures work it out on THEIR home on the range!

Alas, we'll soon have horse flesh in every trendy restaurant in town and then we'll see that horses too are a big business - no one will be controlling their numbers any more than they control beef cattle populations. Our Earth is already history!
02:33 AM on 12/03/2011
Equine birth control. What a great idea. As a horse owner, I find the idea of slaughtering or eating horses completely disgusting.
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
12:49 AM on 12/01/2011
Vast and deadly differences occur in animals. Our native species, like the pronghorn antelope, bison, elk and deer are biological diversity, the glue, the nuts, the rivets and the bolts of man's only spaceship, the Earth. Conversely, introduced, transported, hooved locust are an Earth killer, just like the so called wild horses the Spanish transported and introduced while they were conquering the Native Americans.

The European horse is stealing life from our NATIVE, American animals. They devour and steal the habitat/homes, food, shelter, cover and nurseries from Earth's strands in the web of all life. While the horse from Europe was biological diversity in Europe, in the New World he is a killer of the Earth. Only native species of animals and plants of our continent are biological diversity in the New World, while introduced, transported animals and plants are an immense extinction agent in America.

We can have horses, devouring our ecosystems, unnaturally and deadly to our ecosystems or we can have the animals that Earth chose for our side of the Earth, like pronghorn antelope, deer, elk, moose and wolves or we can choose Earth slaughtering alien, introduced, planet killers, like the European horse. Only an idiot would pick the horse above our native biological diversity as our lives depend upon our biological diversity because they are the creators and saviors of this continent's ecosystems.
10:54 PM on 11/30/2011
You do realize that these horses are not native to North America and if the population was not controlled by these measures that 1) the western lands would be destroyed as huge herds of the feral horses try to find enough food and 2) a good number of the horses would starve to death as there is not enough forage for them, especially if the herds get too large.
I'm always glad when people stand up and support for what they believe in, but I trust the experts and not a Hollywood star.