More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Krause

Mike Krause

Posted: April 23, 2010 05:51 PM

Modest Sentencing Reform Bill is Long Overdue

What's Your Reaction:

On April 15, the Colorado House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Bill 1352, which nibbles at the edges of some of the more egregious aspects of the disastrous War on Drugs by reforming some of Colorado's controlled substance statutes.

This is a hugely important step for Colorado lawmakers in taking back their prerogative to both write, and when necessary, re-write the state's criminal code from the irrational drug law regime foisted on Coloradans by the federal government

In 1992, Colorado lawmakers enacted the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (UCSA, Article 18 of Colorado's criminal code), the act was written to "complement" the federal Controlled Substances Act, and designed to bring state drug laws in to conformity with federal drug laws. The act, among many other things, created numerous new drug offenses in Colorado, and sentencing enhancements for those offenses.

In our Constitutional Republic, the authority and responsibility to write the state's criminal law lies with the legislature. In other words, the 1992 General Assembly willingly subjugated its prerogative to write Colorado's criminal law to the dictates of federal drug war bureaucrats.

In a 1992 issue paper, published before the UCSA was enacted, Independence Institute Research Director Dave Kopel laid out the dangers in allowing unelected and unaccountable federal employees to decide Colorado law, asking:


Is an increment of presumed advantage in the drug war worth the price of warrantless searches, extreme and irrational punishments, pointless additional prison crowding, expansion of prosecutors' power to take property from people never found guilty of a crime, and further abdication of state powers to federal bureaucrats?

The drug policy reform recommendations incorporated into House Bill 1352 are actually quite modest, having been exhaustively vetted by both the Drug Policy Task force of the Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice and by the voting members of the Commission itself, which includes representatives of the Attorney General's Office, the Public Defenders Office, the Department of Public Safety, prosecutors, chief's of police, county sheriffs, drug treatment providers, legislators, and numerous other interested parties.


The Independence Institute has long advocated drug law reform. In this 2005 issue paper, "Getting Smart on Crime: Time to Reform Colorado's Drug Offense Sentencing Policies," I recommend lowering both use and possession of illegal drugs from felony crimes to misdemeanors and the creation of sentencing grid for controlled substance offenses separate and distinct (and much less draconian) from the sentencing structure for violent and property crimes.

Here is what HB 1352 does with regard to drug possession offenses:

· Creates a separate statute for the crime of possession of drugs.

· Reduces the crime of drug use from a class 6 felony to a class 2 misdemeanor.

· Redefines the quantity of drugs that is considered "simple possession" from 1 gram or less to 4 grams or less of a schedule I or II drug and 2 grams or less of methamphetamine. "Simple possession" would be a class 6 felony.

· Standardizes that possession for personal use of amounts greater than "simple possession" quantities is a class 4 felony.

· Reduces possession of schedule III-V drugs (i.e. prescription drugs) to a misdemeanor.

· Reduces the penalty for fraud and deceit in connection with controlled substances from a class 5 to a class 6 felony.

· Requires cost savings from this bill to be evaluated annually by the division of criminal justice and reported to the legislature and that some of the cost savings will be allocated to expand and enhance substance abuse treatment.

Here is what HB 1352 does with regard to marijuana offenses:

· Redefines the quantity of marijuana possession that determines crime classifications at various levels including possession of 2 ounces or less (petty offense), possession of more than 2 ounces but no more than 6 ounces (class 2 misdemeanor), possession of more than 6 ounces but less than 12 ounces (class 1 misdemeanor), and possession of more than 12 ounces (class 6 felony).

· Redefines the quantity of marijuana concentrate possession that determines crime classification at various levels including possession of 3 ounces or less (class 1 misdemeanor) and possession of over 3 ounces (class 6 felony).

· Creates a graduated penalty for marijuana cultivation including cultivation of 6 or fewer plants (class 1 misdemeanor), cultivation of between 7-29 plants (class 5 felony) and cultivation of 30 or more plants (class 4 felony).


The bill is sponsored by Colorado Springs Republican Representative Mark Waller and by Senators Pat Steadman (D-Denver) and Shawn Mitchell (R-Broomfield) and enjoys broad bi-partisan co-sponsorship.


Colorado's drug laws have mostly been off limits to any meaningful reform for most of the last couple decades. Hopefully HB 1352 is the start of a broader re-thinking of Colorado's long-running devotion to Washington DC's prohibitionist interdiction and incarceration-based drug control strategy.

 
On April 15, the Colorado House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Bill 1352, which nibbles at the edges of some of the more egregious aspects of the disastrous War on Drugs by reforming s...
On April 15, the Colorado House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed House Bill 1352, which nibbles at the edges of some of the more egregious aspects of the disastrous War on Drugs by reforming s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
08:29 AM on 04/27/2010
government under guise of protecting our young people made the chemical that make clean crank illegal !! then the drug went nation wide and did nothing but harm our young !!

bring back the clean stuff
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:58 AM on 04/27/2010
What on Earth are you talking about?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
09:51 AM on 04/29/2010
the chem to make clean meth was out lawed ! and after that this drug goes ,Nation wide

yeah this drug has a history ! and it not a good one !!
05:20 AM on 04/27/2010
Isn't it about time? But what will some counties do for revenue when the DEA stops sending checks? County jails are like motels, and they get $$$ from that. One county jail is full of "offenders" so they send them to other jails, for a fee. This is an industry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Pass The Pakalolo
03:04 PM on 04/26/2010
lame..

it's time to set the plant free..

it's time to fully legalize!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wassilij
shamanlight
01:43 PM on 04/26/2010
That picture looks absolutely Divine!!!
01:23 PM on 04/26/2010
If the Federal Prohibitions were such a good idea, states and cities and towns wouldn't be taking steps to roll back the Fed laws. The fact is that they are in rebellion against Federal lawmakers who do not have a clue about drugs, drug laws and enforcement. Yet those same Federal lawmakers who know nothing about the problems they create continue to insist that their solution is the best one...
arrogance that leads to the misery of others...
01:07 PM on 04/26/2010
Will any of these new avenues of defense be available to "offenders" that have already been sentenced?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:36 PM on 04/26/2010
No; retroactive application of laws is expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
08:27 AM on 04/27/2010
if that true how did telcoms get retroactive immunity
01:04 PM on 04/26/2010
Did you miss this part:

· Redefines the quantity of marijuana possession that determines crime classifications at various levels including possession of 2 ounces or less (petty offense), possession of more than 2 ounces but no more than 6 ounces (class 2 misdemeanor), possession of more than 6 ounces but less than 12 ounces (class 1 misdemeanor), and possession of more than 12 ounces (class 6 felony).

?
01:27 PM on 04/26/2010
Decrim serves no one... it creates a no-mans land for producers and dealers but lightens up on the end user a little.... How much does it cost to be prosecuted for those misdemeanors? How much of an impact on one's job and life will these misdemeanors create and is reducing the possession law an effective tactic at controlling marijuana? Decrim has no answer or poor answers to all of the above... Legalization provides the best answers to the entire problem...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:07 PM on 04/26/2010
Have to agree here. A few years ago in Chicago, the penalty for minor possession was changed to a ticket fine instead of a mandatory court appearance because all too often the arresting officer had actual work to do (like solving actual crimes) and would not show up in court. The city considered all these dismissed cases to be "lost revenue", and found it more effective to just write a ticket like a traffic offense. It seems pretty clear that there's no public safety motivation at work, rather just the usual desire to increase revenue through fines.
photo
Snafu
My dog rules!
12:14 PM on 04/26/2010
Simple possession for marijuana should be 1 oz or under, maybe even a quarter pound. Most adult users buy between 7grams to an ounce. Making it 4 grams just means more deals, higher profit for the dealer, and basically means only high school kids will get a pass since they are the only ones that buy small amounts. Screw it, just make it legal.

Marijuana shouldn't even be classified with coke, heroin and meth. Sugar and caffeine will kill you fast than weed ever will.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wassilij
shamanlight
01:44 PM on 04/26/2010
Fanned!