More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Lux

Mike Lux

Posted: October 27, 2010 02:02 PM

Robbing You With a Fountain Pen

What's Your Reaction:

Yesterday I wrote a post on the steadily increasing physical and rhetorical violence happening on the right wing of the political spectrum. It is a sad and scary story, one that conservatives try to brush away by saying both sides are responsible when almost none of it is coming from the progressive side of the aisle. The ironic thing is that I underestimated the depth of violence and threats, as I have had many examples sent to me since I wrote the piece that I had forgotten or didn't know about it, plus it has since come out that the person who stomped on the MoveOn activist's head in Kentucky turns out to be closely affiliated with the Rand Paul campaign.

Today, though, I want to write about another form of thuggery, because I think this story is the biggest reason people should vote and vote Democratic. More about that in a moment. First, I think it's appropriate to quote Woody Guthrie's classic line:

Yes, as through this world I've wandered
I've seen lots of funny men;
Some will rob you with a six-gun,
And some with a fountain pen.
And as through your life you travel,
Yes, as through your life you roam,
You won't never see an outlaw
Drive a family from their home.

I think the lawlessness reflected in the physical violence on the campaign trail coming from so many on the right, and the blatant disregard for the rule of law by the big banks trying to railroad so many people out of their homes without the proper paper work, are more related than conventional wisdom would suggest. The fact that banks and their "servicers" have apparently committed massive document fraud and have in some cases actually hired thugs to break into people's homes and change their locks during foreclosure proceedings, and the fact that they lied to and bet against their own clients in investment deals is all part of a pattern: people with too much power and an Ayn Randian view of the world. Ayn Rand, the Social Darwinists of the 1880s, the big Wall Street banks, libertarian candidates like Rand Paul and these thugs who work on their campaigns all make the same arguments: power is morality, greed is good, compassion is weakness, buyer beware. While they call for civility, and argue against class warfare and populism, they believe in turning the Golden Rule of the Bible on its head and replacing it with another one: he who has the gold, rules. And if the rule of law gets in their way, they just ignore it or use their political power to change the law. If politicians or public opinion create a problem for them, they use their money to dump millions into lobbying to change the law, or dump millions into secretive groups to buy elections.

Violence is just another means to a political end, and so is the lawlessness of falsified affidavits and paperwork to push massive numbers of people from their homes. Here's where my argument about politics comes in, and I know there are some of you who may find it ironic given that the administration (especially some of the folks at Treasury) has been closer to the big banks at times than it should have been. Here's the deal, though: the financial reform bill in the end got stronger as it went through the process rather than weaker only because the Democrats controlled Congress. Alan Grayson and Maria Cantwell and Sherrod Brown and Ted Kaufman were able to get concessions they would have never gotten had they been in the minority. Elizabeth Warren was able to out-negotiate Chris Dodd on the consumer protection agency only because the Democrats were in control- Richard Shelby only would have shut her down.

And speaking of Elizabeth Warren, who according to sources at the White House has done a superb job of quietly putting together the building blocks of that new agency, the Republicans will do everything in their power to make her job tougher if they take control of Congress. They will try to harass her and intimidate her every way they can. Fortunately, no one can intimidate Elizabeth Warren, and she will destroy them in the media when they try to take her on, but her work standing up for homeowners and consumers will be far easier if Wall Street's best friends don't run Congress. The hit jobs on her will keep coming (did you see this ridiculous piece on her aide Raj Date, who folks on Capitol Hill told me was one of the strongest advocates during the financial reform fight for a progressive financial reform bill), but her job is made easier if the Democrats stay in control.

The best argument for the Democrats in these elections is that the sharks are in the water, and the thugs are in the street. Democrats can and do drive us crazy sometimes, but when the Ayn Rand Social Darwinists on Wall Street and the streets of Kentucky argue that the strong should rule over the weak, it is better to strengthen the hand of our advocates like Warren and Grayson and Sherrod (rather than Scott) Brown. There are some who rob you with a gun, and some with a fountain pen -- some who kick you in the head and some who throw you out of your home -- and it is better to have a sheriff who will be on your side at least some of the time.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:02 PM on 10/28/2010
Would be good to go back to local democrats and ask why they support B of A given all we now know...
10:45 AM on 10/28/2010
Part of what makes me so frustrated is lack of mobilization or community "getting together" regarding the big banks and this mess. Check out http://www.knowyourmortgagebanker.com/blog/influence-bank-behavior. Could not we do something similar with banks? If we all started pulling money out of, say, B of A then deposits shrink; if we put pressure on local governments to move deposits, then B of A deposits shrink. At some they become a smaller bank based solely on their own behavior. Yes?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Lorianne
ama vitam
08:48 PM on 10/27/2010
DNCC borrows $1.2 million from BOA (may have used donor/contact lists as collateral)
http://www­.democrati­cundergrou­nd.com/dis­cuss/duboa­rd.php?az=­view_all&a­ddress=389­x9399889

This Appears To Be Worthy of JAIL - RIGHT NOW
http://mar­ket-ticker­.org/akcs-­www?post=1­70485
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:35 PM on 10/27/2010
Fear is your God--you live on your knees.

Stand UP, man...
07:34 PM on 10/27/2010
Sadly, the line of out in the open impropriety was crossed when Halliburton got its first no bid Iraq contract. When there was no meaningful backlash from the public or its elected representatives, the Republicans knew they could loot and pillage the public trough just like in the 'good old days', when Warren Harding was President. We cannot rebuild the broken Republic until the scourge of the Salivating Lust of RAVENOUS GREED is destroyed. The first step along this path is to de-fang the Billionaire Bullies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:48 PM on 10/27/2010
The sharks have been in the water since 1929 and especially since clown Reagan. That most people STILL vote against their common good is shocking....... and about to be tragic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
04:25 PM on 10/27/2010
Mr. Lux -- I like you a lot. My question to you is what does the Progressive Base do on November 3rd? Are you going to consign us to stay in the Democratic salt mines and "do as we are told" until 2013?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:52 PM on 10/27/2010
Progressives need to find a new candidate for 2012. The Obama betrayal is too huge to ignore. Next month, if there is any doubt over the enormity of Obama's sins, the Dems will end all unemployment benefit extensions because of "deficit reduction" and then extend tax cuts to the wealthy.

All with Obama's blessing.
04:20 PM on 10/27/2010
Read your piece. You have a lot of thinking to do about just why the democrats are on the verge of a complete slaughter next Tuesday. And I don't buy it that some mean guys roughed up a bunch of move-on'ers. Maybe the non liberal/leftist democrat/prog sees a gathering threat to the constitution and the very freedoms that made this country great. It's with great disgust that many Americans see Obama and crew filing suit against AZ while refusing to address our border problems. And don't even get me started on the health care fiasco. Liberals/leftist democrats/progs made their bed and it's time for them to sleep in it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:50 PM on 10/27/2010
"Liberals/leftist democrats/progs made their bed and it's time for them to sleep in it."

You want to go back to Bush policies? Be careful what you wish for. People just want jobs. If the GOP fails to produce, don't expect voters to re-elect. After Nov. the GOP will have about 3-6 months to produce.

It will be your Waterloo.
03:49 PM on 10/27/2010
When a Democrat is in the office then there's right wing extremists. I won't bother to list those since their in the news lately. I'm not convinced that the WHOLE of the Tea Party is in the list but, whatever.

When a Republican is in the office then there's left wing extremists. This would include groups like the Black Panthers in the 60's and "Eco Terrorists" and Anarchists today. Here's an FBI link so you know it's not just an opinion.
http://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/animal-rights-extremism-and-ecoterrorism

My opinion is that there's always a very small minority of loony's from both sides but most of this is wind created to drive people to either the new sites to create advertising or the poles.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
04:26 PM on 10/27/2010
OK who were the Left wing extermists during Reagan, Bush and the other Bush- Do you distinguish between dissent and extremism? If so, please provide a working definition of both.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:51 PM on 10/27/2010
You are asking mr. simpleton to think. He hasn't a clue and doesn't know he hasn't a clue.
08:27 PM on 10/27/2010
Not sure what the hold up is buy you can start with President William McKinley and his assassination in 1901.