More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mike Lux

Mike Lux

Posted: March 22, 2010 11:12 AM

The Big Change Moment

What's Your Reaction:

I meant to get something posted first thing this morning, but after working 30 years for universal health care, I decided to sleep in a little this morning.

You know, for all the ups and downs of this process, for all the compromises we had to make to get here, when you see the tens of millions of dollars insurance companies were pouring into lies to defeat this bill, and see John Lewis called a nigger, and Barney Frank called a fag, and see all supporters of this bill called Stalinist, it makes you pretty confident you're on the right side of history.

Is this the change we have been looking for? Only partly. Insurers and other big corporations remain far too powerful, and we will have to keep working hard to improve health care policy in America. We need a public option to provide Americans better choice in their health care system; we need for the federal government to be able to negotiate with the big pharmaceutical companies; we need the insurance anti-trust exemption to get repealed, and for the federal government to do more to regulate insurance rate increases; we need to repeal the Hyde Amendment. Many other changes and improvements will be important to keep fighting for in the years to come.

Yet for all those things we still need, we have won an enormous amount in this bill. You know the list of things we accomplished- universal coverage, an end to pre-existing condition clauses and lifetime caps, more people eligible for Medicaid, more young people able to stay on their parents' insurance policies, an end to the Medicare drug donut hole, and more. These are bigger changes than we have seen in health care policy since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid, and maybe even bigger that them, since this means almost every American will have insurance. Most importantly, health care will be a right instead of a privilege.

That is progressive change, and big change. That builds the narrative in this country that we are all in this together, that we are our brothers' and sisters' keepers, that we are a beloved community. Flawed as this bill is, as many improvements as will be needed, this is a very big deal. It gets us over this massive hurdle that nothing big can be done to change health care, or in general. It sets the stage of another of those Big Change Moments I wrote about in my book, The Progressive Revolution: those eras where big change was possible and really happened. It gives us hope again that this era may join the 1860s, early 1900s, 1930s and 1960s as a time when the country truly was able to move forward more than just a little bit at a time.

The politics of this remain complicated. Many of the best and most popular features of health care reform were bargained away, and many of the best things in the bill won't kick in until 2014. Until jobs start being created and the big banks' power over our economy knocked down a peg or two, Democratic political fortunes remain uncertain. But maybe this bill can help build hope and courage for doing the next things that need to be done. We still have millions of new jobs to create, big banks to be better regulated and broken up, climate change and immigration reform and the Employee Free Choice act to pass. We have a very big and very important agenda in front of us, and with health care done, that gives some momentum to moving forward.

I am still in awe that this actually got done. After seeing the Nixon/Kennedy compromise fall apart, and Carter walk away from the battle entirely, in my youth; after watching the successful demonization of all things government by Reagan in the 1980s; after being a part of the most painful political failure of my life in the Clinton health care war room; and after seeing Rahm Emanuel and others continually advise Obama to scale back his ambitions for health care reforms over the past year, I didn't know I would ever live to see this happen. Having seen what happened in 1994, I was pretty sure that no one would have the courage to take this up again for at least a generation if we failed. But the President hung tough. Readers of mine know I have been very critical of Obama at times on how he managed this health care fight, but I am enormously grateful that he brushed past all the advice to give up, and that he hung tough. And Speaker Pelosi, who argued passionately to keep pushing for comprehensive reform, and then delivered the votes twice in tough, tough circumstances, gets enormous credit as well.

To not walk away, to stand and fight for big change even when the going gets very tough and the politics are dicey (at best): that is the measure of great leadership. Hopefully, this result gives everyone in the Democratic Party the courage to keep going to give us another Big Change Moment.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:10 AM on 03/24/2010
It is mind boggling how this legislation passes as reform. 500 billion dollars in cuts from Medicare are being used to fund this bill. Taxes for Medicare will increase and now this public money is being funneled to private insurance companies to pay for this bill. What about our Seniors? No one here plans on reaching the age of 65?

How does forcing people to buy crappy and/or expensive insurance qualify as health care? What good is a policy if you cannot afford the costs associated with it. How does insurance equal health care?

There are no caps on premiums which will to continue to increase. Older Americans are discriminated against, insurance companies allowed to charge them up to 300% more.

No imports of prescriptions are allowed and biologic drugs have had their patents extended keeping cheaper generics off the market. Many of these drugs fight cancer and costs thousands of dollars.

This bill will not provide universal coverage, according to the CBO, it would still leave 24 million US residents without coverage by 2019.

."Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization for Women decried the inclusion of "a sweeping anti-abortion provision" that "ultimately achieves the same outcome as the infamous Stupak-Pitts Amendment, namely the likely elimination of all private as well as public insurance coverage for abortion."
This bill enshrines the insurance industry as the only game in town and extends the monopoly that pharmaceutical and medical companies have over our health care system.
09:01 PM on 03/22/2010
Mandates without a robust regulator and a public option is a recipe for skyrocketing costs and abuse of consumers. This bill is gonna make a few people very rich, save a few lives, and destroy the middle class.
07:41 PM on 03/22/2010
I agree with everything in this post except repeal of the Hyde Amendment. I do not believe in aborting the unborn unless it is to save the life of the mother. To be for health care reform doesn't mean you have to be in favor of the public paying for abortions and apparently the House of Representatives and the Senate agree.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDK0590
09:22 AM on 03/23/2010
What is does mean, in an enligtened society, is that the law says that a woman should have the right to choose, rather tan have some man, religionist, or maralist make her medical and life decisions for her.

What it means is te Separation of Church and state. Wat is means is that women should not be treated differently than a man in her medical care.

Taxpayer dollars be damned, they've been used to take more than one life with our permission, and without our permission or knowledge. Now, if they're used in paying for a womans private medical treatment? I do not care, as long as she is not being denied a medical procedure just because the above named people dsagree with er choices, or her right to make them.


I don't know which disgusts me worse-the hypocritical ignorance of it all, or a MAN complaining about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDK0590
09:23 AM on 03/23/2010
...and to hell with the typos...
05:21 PM on 03/22/2010
It feels very good to win ! Now we have to figure out if we 'truely' did win ! The health care refom bill is still just an "insurance reform" bill . It is a shell of what it started out as and no Universal Health Care is looming on the horizon. The opposition would not have been so fierce and the support much greater had the bill managed to at least toss a bone to the middle class. The unions supported the flawed bill in hopes of passing the Employee Free Choice Act, knowing full well that the vast majority of their membership who have insurance through their employer will not be helped out one whit by this bill. Can't be denied , previous conditions and the other items won are all great but just tip of the iceberg. The exhorbitant co-pays, out of pocket deductibles, uncovered office calls, doctor and hospital costs, pharmacy costs, and insurance premiums ; none of that has been adressed in this bill and these are the things killing the middle class. Add that to the long wait for this to kick in fully and you have yourself a pyrrhic victory ! We won but everyone was killed in the process ! Still : It's Great to trounce those bastards : at least once !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Azterix
I am what I am.
05:11 PM on 03/22/2010
Finally, the U.S. is moving in the right direction. For too long, we have let our heath care system to be a tool for greed and capitalists. They have used our fears of sickness and dying buy making Americans believed the (our) government cannot, and shall not, be an alternative to health insurance. Racism and segregation were the major culprit for that early model of heath care we have had. For that, not only the minority--blacks especially--suffered but also the voiceless whites who voted for Obama. Obama certainly delivered his campaign promise: Change. Bravo!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
03:00 PM on 03/22/2010
Passage of this bill cannot be the last word on health care.

We still need to do two very important things.

We need to

(1) Pass a bill that allows everyone the option of buying into Medicare.

(2) Revoke the anti-trust protection that allows these health insurance monopolies to collude.
06:36 PM on 03/22/2010
We've taken the first step in spite of the lies and fear mongering.

I hope the next step is even more satisfying.
02:59 PM on 03/22/2010
Great post, Mike. A lot of progressives are deeply disappointed that so much was left out of this bill, but it's important to remind ourselves that in political life change comes slowly. This is true for right and left. The right seethed for decades, chaffing under the New Deal's progressive taxation and business regulation before their hero Ronald Reagan gave them the chance to start forwarding their program.
We can't expect to undo the Reagan revolution and its voodoo economics in an instant. It'll take some time. But we've made a start. And we have a strong and newly empowered president as well as increasingly strong leaders in Congress. Have to take a few small steps before the big steps are possible, sort of like an old steam locomotive slowly chugging up to speed.
07:01 PM on 03/22/2010
Well said.

Eight years of pounding our democracy brought almost total annihilation of our government from the top down. I don't think Americans can truly face the fact, that from within we almost lost our freedom. History will tell the tale of how a few, almost cost the greatest free nation conceived by men with high standards it's democracy.

These men are still working within our government, and are determined that we are ruled by corporations and not men. The work is still long from over. We must never let up, and never feel it is done until the last of these men are gone from power.
02:56 PM on 03/22/2010
we didn't get health care reform. we got smiley face propaganda from the republicans in the the white house.
photo
Rudy2shoes
Retired Administrator
01:43 PM on 03/22/2010
This is the part where we are all supposed to go away and leave them (government) alone. They can't possibly imagine that yesterday's vote has put the issue to rest. Yes it passed, but it is till a dog and those who thought they were really getting meaningful healthcare reform are still out in the cold. (The amusing side of that coin though is the poor TB'ers who are home crying there eyes out, after being led around by their little stringies for six months, and who don't realize that they actually won.) The amount of struggle and manipulation surrounding the passage of this bill. not to mention the effective result, should be a resounding bucket of cold water for anyone who thinks that our government is still (or ever was) responsible to its people. The AIPAC lobby will have a much smoother and swifter response from a government that is, well, designed to respond to lobbies with large sums of cash in each hand. If you really want healthcare reform now is not the time to stop and waste energy sniffing the decoy. Sharpen your teeth and get right back to the hunt. This same old false drama has been played out over and over again throughout the 20th century. It is time to stop playing by their rules and play by the ones stipulated in the constitution. If you want it, then WANT IT-- and want it now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnBryansFontaine
Liberal Democrat
01:04 PM on 03/22/2010
Now that we have Health Care, let's move on to the Employee Free Choice Act :

http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/
02:18 PM on 03/22/2010
Now let me get this straight.

If I am a 61-year old uninsured adult with a chronic medical condition, this new law now requires me to take the money that I was saving for my medical bills, and give that money instead to an insurance company

The insurance company will not pay my medical bills for that pre-existing condition, unless I am somehow able to survive for the next 4 years untreated.

At that time I will be eligible for medicare, so I will have given the insurance company a pile of cash for no treatment whatever, unless I acquire a new (unrelated) condition in that 4 years.

Please tell me how I am wrong about this.