iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Miles Mogulescu

GET UPDATES FROM Miles Mogulescu
 

House Democrats: Vote Down This Budget Surrender and Prevent the Suicide of the Democratic Project

Posted: 08/01/11 12:33 AM ET

Barack Obama and Harry Reid have unconditionally surrendered the values and policies that Democrats have stood for since 1932 to the Republicans and the Tea Party, as surely as Gen. Robert E. Lee surrendered to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox.

The only question now is whether enough House Democrats will revolt and provide sufficient votes for the House to reject this atrocity, forcing the parties back to the bargaining table--hopefully with the leadership of Nancy Pelosi.

If approximately 175 out of the 193 Democrats in the House combine with about 40 dissident Republicans--who oppose the Obama/Reid/McConnell plan for their own reasons--it can probably be blocked and negotiations of somewhat more reasonable terms reopened.

If not, July 31, 2011 will likely go down in history as the day that the liberal Democratic project--the hope that corporate power could be balanced by sensible regulation, Keynesian economics, and a measure of economic security for American citizens--died, or rather committed mass suicide.

House Democrats and Nancy Pelosi--You are all that stands between the American people and unconditional surrender to the darkest forces in American society and the mass suicide of the liberal Democratic project. Stop this madness!

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 208
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jerry Vasquez
A Unapologetic liberal
12:56 AM on 08/02/2011
Miles, and then what? It is said that only a fool fights in a burning house. Additional­ly, the side
that is prepared to do what ever it takes to win, usually does.
The American citizen is being used as human shields by the tea party.
The battle between the cons and liberals will continue but the real action will be republican vs. tea party. The right was willing to crawl into bed with the tea party in exchange for regaining control of the house. They made a deal with the devil and now we all are getting screwed BUT it will be remembered­, by all, that it was the right that brought the skunk to the dance and they will eventually pay the heaviest price.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Cofta
10:13 PM on 08/01/2011
...sounds like sour grapes from here...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:19 PM on 08/01/2011
The tea party legislators did not just appear in congress---they were sent there by millions of voters. Wake up progressives. Shout with all your elitist glibness at the pols, but don't forget the polls. There's a mighty current raging against the doctrine of "share the wealth" and free needles for junkies.
12:13 PM on 08/09/2011
You are spreading gossip..get thee to church!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
faith
peace-love-brotherhood
05:39 PM on 08/01/2011
Absolutely. I have sent my notes to Ms. Pelosi, and my duly elected Congress members. Hope that everyone does. This is a very troubling moment in our nation's history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
02:31 PM on 08/01/2011
I called my Democratic Congressman and both my Democratic Senators and asked them to vote NO and to publicly call on President Obama to man up and invoke the 14th Amendment as President Harry Truman did.

The House Democrats should not be giving the votes necessary to give cover House Republicans from tea party extremists. Let Boehner pressure his own members.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
07:58 AM on 08/02/2011
Harry Truman invoked the 14th Amendment in an attempt to nationalize steel mill, not to raise the debt ceiling. And the Supreme Court shot him down.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:19 PM on 08/01/2011
"it can probably be blocked and negotiations of somewhat more reasonable terms reopened."

You are kidding right? You do realize that this is as good as it is going to get for the dems, and even it may not pass. You libs just don't realize how serious the Tea Party crowd is. They will let the nation default. Until the dems are ready to do that, they will lose more in every negotiation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
02:31 PM on 08/01/2011
I am aware of how serious the Tea Party is.

So walk away and let Wall Street beat the Tea Party politicians with their own political club.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:06 PM on 08/01/2011
What many of you aren't getting is that the Tea Party Politicians for the most part, aren't career politicians. They aren't looking to spend the next 20 years in Congress and definitely aren't worried about getting reelected. Why would the possibly care if Wall Street isn't happy with them?
03:29 PM on 08/01/2011
Do the tea party people understand that every tax break is actually a cut in someone's taxes? They approve of more spending (in the form of tax cuts) than any other group... And it stuns me that they do not understand that... maybe if logic spoke more than anger...hmmm
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:49 PM on 08/01/2011
What stuns me is that liberals don't understand that tax cuts do not equal more spending. They just don't. They may bring about the same outcome, but they aren't the same thing. You are talking about apples, and they are talking about oranges. Until real spending cuts are part of the deal (and this deal does not include real spending cuts) then you will probably see most of the Tea Party folks voting against it.
02:16 PM on 08/01/2011
The current situation is a direct consequence of liberals, minorities, and young people sitting out the 2010 elections. Democracy is not a spectator sport, and if you hate this deal, and the smallness of the recovery act, and the incomplete nature of the finance and hc reforms, the answer is to organize educate and vote. Not complaining on the huff post. The President is playing the cards the voters dealt him, though he could have done some things a bit better. You can't vote the guy in and sit back and wait for sunshine and rainbows. The right (wrong) hold their guys accountable, it's time we do the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
02:32 PM on 08/01/2011
Just another apologist for the President,

I voted in 2010 and here in California we had a progressive landslide.

It's amazing what Democrats can accomplish when they stand up and fight and not wipe their feet on their own base.
03:32 PM on 08/01/2011
Ask if they would support him with such uncritical devotion if his skin was a paler shade?
It is predictable and all he wants is their unquestioning votes.
Obama lost votes in 2010 for just this sort of pathetic complicity--what makes anyone think continuing it will change it?
04:08 PM on 08/01/2011
To the contrary, I'm quite disgusted with this "deal", and frankly the entire conversation. I believe candidate Obama said WE are the change we've been waiting for, meaning it takes effort on our part to get what we want. It seems like many liberals sit and take potshots because a.) We refuse to accept reality, and b.) We don't take immeadiate action. That's what Wisconsin, Ohio, and other are doing now, but what if they'd done that in 2010? Scott Walker would be a nobody. Also, did everyone forget the Dinos in the Senate killed the public option, watered down the stimulus, etc? It's just Obama's fault, that'sa Hannity-esque view. Lastly, playing the race card against me, whom you've never met or spoken with, is patently offensive, apology accepted!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
faith
peace-love-brotherhood
05:48 PM on 08/01/2011
I disagree Onestop.... the current situs is not the direct consequence of liberals, etc. It is the consequence culminating in the mismanagement of public funds. Trillions to fight ghosts and legends in the middle east. Billions to pay bonus packages to corporate CEO's with taxpayer money, more billions to ensure subsidies and funding for pharma, payment for the former poor actions of former American leadership which created the banking debacle and disintegration of the Glass-Steagall Act. The answer is not to organize, educate, and vote. The answer is to demand results when we do vote. To demand transparency and clarity in language, proposals, and law. Expect truth or plan on the consequences.
07:12 PM on 08/01/2011
I agree with you on all of those points. I would point out that allowing more R's into govt by either not voting or letting uniformed people vote against themselves because they got sucked in by what is a VERY effective GOP spin operation will not help. Money is so powerful because so few vote, and many of those that do vote on emotion instead of facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
powermuffn
Humble, progressive viewpoints since 1972
01:19 PM on 08/01/2011
While the author's premise is good for the soul of Democrats (to feel like you could flip off the package and say, "No way! Not this liberal, you won't!"), it isn't practical. The best that can come out of this hellacious mess is that Democrats start with the messaging NOW, and start by defining the terms of the conversation for the next 16 months with the presumption that this economy is now wholly-owned by the Republicans. They left it to Obama in 2008, and he did the best he could. When his best wasn't good enough for them, they decided to dig the hole a bit deeper, and push massive spending cuts on us, which sunk jobs even more, adding thousands and thousands of state, federal and local workers to the unemployment rolls.

Without a message, the Democrats have no chance in the next election. But getting the messaging out early, and defining the terms of the argument are always the way to get a leg up in any debate. The message is: "Welcome to the Great Recession, Part 2 - brought to you by your friendly, neighborhood Tea Party Taliban and their Republican enablers."

Sell it like you never sold anything before and get the Democrats elected in 2012!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cassie reinara
01:08 PM on 08/01/2011
I agree that for the Democrats to go along with this deal would be political suicide for the party. They already lost a lot of people when they went along with the extension of the Bush tax cuts this past December. This would be another nail in the coffin. This is tantamount the Democrats running into the Republicans robbing their house and offering to help them carry the stolen goods into the truck because they didn't want the Republicans to strain their backs!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
12:59 PM on 08/01/2011
Phony crisis resolved with a phony deal just before the phony deadline.  The cry that we have to "share the pain" hides the fact that only the working class had anything to lose and only the wealthy had anything to gain.

This is all straight out of "The Shock Doctrine".  Don't say you weren't warned.
01:26 PM on 08/01/2011
Budget Kabuki, all performed to rote by the usual players, and arriving at its predetermined ending as written in the plot: having looted the US Treasury of everything except what is locked away in trusts FOR THE PEOPLE, they are now working overtime to establish a framework to take that, as well.

Of course, to do that, they have to stay in office. Good luck with that, you sorry excuses for representatives of the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
faith
peace-love-brotherhood
05:54 PM on 08/01/2011
Absolutely, jmpurser.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
12:58 PM on 08/01/2011
Sadly, I think you're right though you may be underplaying Nancy Pelosi's part in the destruction of the Liberal Democratic Project.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
02:35 PM on 08/01/2011
We need to start talking about the new nationwide Progressive Party project..

www.progressiveparty.org
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
04:35 PM on 08/01/2011
Agreed.  Labor, women, the environment, anti-war, justice, health care, none of these interests are currently represented in DC.  And the backwards sliding banana republic we live in is the result.
12:42 PM on 08/01/2011
To cross-pollinate this thread, Here's a relevant quote from today's Paul Krugman column in the NYT:

"Make no mistake about it, what we’re witnessing here is a catastrophe on multiple levels.

It is, of course, a political catastrophe for Democrats, who just a few weeks ago seemed to have Republicans on the run over their plan to dismantle Medicare; now Mr. Obama has thrown all that away. And the damage isn’t over: there will be more choke points where Republicans can threaten to create a crisis unless the president surrenders, and they can now act with the confident expectation that he will.

In the long run, however, Democrats won’t be the only losers. What Republicans have just gotten away with calls our whole system of government into question. After all, how can American democracy work if whichever party is most prepared to be ruthless, to threaten the nation’s economic security, gets to dictate policy? And the answer is, maybe it can’t."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/opinion/the-president-surrenders-on-debt-ceiling.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
12:05 PM on 08/01/2011
Reply to PatrioticUSGlory-Yup!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
11:37 AM on 08/01/2011
What a wonderful suggestion! 215 ideologues should send this country into default and a double dip recession. Kiss your 401k good-bye. Plan on paying much higher interest on your credit cards. Forget buying a car--or a refrigerator.

The debt ceiling deal was the best that could be done given the political facts on the ground. What about the need to compromise to insure good governance do you not understand? The whole point to a compromise is that everyone should be equally unhappy with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbazid
Just smile and nod
12:11 PM on 08/01/2011
At some point you have to say enough is enough.
The Republicans have NEVER even tried to compromise.
That ALL Obama has done since day one.
Default is NOT an option and voting it down would be a disaster.
Obama should have put his foot down, evoked the 14th, and that would have been that.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
12:40 PM on 08/01/2011
That would have been that? No, that would have meant lawsuits and constitional challenges and a continued paralysis in government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Validusername
Caught in the thick of thin things
12:46 PM on 08/01/2011
I agree with everything but the last sentence. Only if there was absolutely no compromise should Obama have invoked the 14th. Have we not learned that these people would have used the continuous talk about the judicial challenge to change the subject from jobs creation. They are still going to try to change the subject but with a good deal less credibility. In my opinion, we need to focus on the long game not the winning and losing in at any given moment. By the way, the President is one of the few people in Washington who seems to understand that governance is and always has been compromise. Without compromise nothing can be done. It is either win a little, win a little or lose a little, lose a little, or could be worse, could be worse. We will destroy this country with this "my way or the highway mentality."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
12:19 PM on 08/01/2011
I said the same thing and will continue to. Even though I am getting b.i.t.c.h slapped. It's cool...I can take it.
11:15 AM on 08/01/2011
I've "had it up to here" with this kind of essay.

Mr Mogulescu himself needs to step up and say what Obama and the Dems should do instead, given that the GOP and Tea Party extremists hold the cards.

Does Mogulescu want Obama and the Dems to let GOP intransigence force the nation into default? Then say so. And say for how long that should continue. And admit frankly just damaging that will be to the nation. (And to Obama, and to the Dems, and to Progressives.)

Does Mogulescu want Obama and the Dems to let GOP intransigence force a default, and force Obama to invoke the 14th Amendment? Then say so. And acknowledge that will immediately plunge Obama and the nation into a constitutional crisis. And will result in a GOP led movement in the house to impeach Obama. A movement that would fail but which would do unimaginable damage to the nation and economy in the next 15 months.

Criticism of this debt-ceiling deal is welcome, I've got plenty of my own to share. But if folks are not fully prepared to CLAIM and OWN the harm that comes with each of the alternatives, then it's best for folks like Mogulescu to remain silent.
doctor-ruth
Read, think, and question.
12:04 PM on 08/01/2011
The constitutional crisis we would have if the 14th Amendment were invoked was a preferred resolution only 24 hours ago for some people. For those folks (and perhaps Mogulescu), the constitutional crisis that would come may be more palatable than the resulting outcomes of this plan.

I understand your bigger point, however.
12:07 PM on 08/01/2011
I don't think remaining silent is the answer at ALL. I agree with what you say, that default is a worse idea than even most of the legislators realize, and I have no idea what the solution is to this manufactured crisis, but this is an awful deal. Just awful.

"Well, they borrowed the SUV, stole the credit cards and went joyriding all over the world for decades; maxed out the cards, got more and maxed them, drove the car into the ditch, after first rolling it three or four times, but we'll never earn the money to get the car going again unless we give them the Chevy, too. Oh, and we really need to sell our house and move out so we can pay off their credit cards, because they have a lot of guns,and need lots more ammo so they can keep the place in line and protect what we used to have."

What a load of carp.