More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Miles Mogulescu

GET UPDATES FROM Miles Mogulescu
 

Michele Bachmann: The Next Vice President of the United States? Don't Laugh

Posted: 06/24/11 11:54 AM ET

On Monday Michele Bachmann officially launches her presidential campaign in Waterloo, Iowa, the town where she was born. It's not likely that she'll be the next president of the United States. But it's entirely conceivable that this wingnut whack job -- who believes she was divinely chosen by Jesus to run for office -- could become the next vice president, a heartbeat away from the presidency. Don't laugh. Be scared, very scared.

As Ezra Klein pointed out in The Washington Post "Michele Bachmann is the candidate Sarah Palin was supposed to be." If McCain had defeated, Obama in 2008 -- entirely possible if he were running in 2012 instead -- Palin would have been vice president. As I wrote in The Huffington Post last week, as laughable as the current GOP Presidential field may appear to many liberals, if the GOP manages to nominate a candidate who's not certifiably crazy (Huntsman? Romney? Pawlenty?) and pairs him with a VP candidate who can mobilize the Republican base (Bachmann? Perry?), there's a good chance the GOP can defeat Obama, particularly if unemployment remains in the 7%-9% range and Obama has neither a narrative of how and why the economy tanked, nor a credible program to create jobs.

In early 2009, liberals laughed at the likes of John Boehner and Eric Cantor. Less than 2 years later, Republicans took back the House in a landslide. There's not much I agree with Karl Rove about, but he makes a lot of strong--and very worrisome points--in his Thursday Wall Street Journal column, "Why Obama is Likely to Lose in 2012".

But back to the general election in a moment; let's first game plan Bachmann's road to becoming the Republican vice presidential nominee. Bachmann has some of the same "Mama Grizzly" qualities that made Sarah Palin such a hit with a significant segment of the Republican electorate that's angry and resentful at sophisticated elites, but she's much smarter and better educated than Palin. She has the same kind of all-American good looks as Palin which never seem to age. And she has a compelling life story that she's expert at reciting -- born in Waterloo Iowa, raised by a single mom, mother herself to 5 children and foster mom to 23 kids who all finished high school, and founder of a charter school.

But she's also a former tax lawyer which adds street cred to her talk about tax cuts. And while her law degree was from a small evangelical Christian law school affiliated with Oral Roberts University, she also received a graduate degree in taxation from William & Mary Law School, one of the top law schools in the country. She was recently interviewed in The Wall Street Journal by quintessential country club Republican Stephen Moore who founded the free market Club for Growth and is a member of the Journal's editorial board, a good tip that despite Bachmann's forays into wingnut land, corporate Republicans see her as useful. The interview made clear that Bachmann will have no problem with Katie Couric questions about what she reads. Asked by Moore what she reads on economics,

"she responds that she admires the late Milton Friedman as well as Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams...'I'm also an Art Laffer fiend [one of the originators of supply side economics]--we're very close,' she adds. "and [Ludwig] von Mises. I love von Mises,' getting excited and rattling off some of his classics like 'Human Action" and 'Bureaucracy.' 'When I go on vacation and I lay on the beach, I bring von Mises.'"


Can you imagine Sarah Palin reading a dead right-wing Austrian intellectual economist?

And Bachmann has a knack for boiling complicated issues down into easily understood talking points. She has a simple explanation of the 2008 financial crisis that blames Democratic politicians and doesn't mention the role of too big to fail banks:

"There were a lot of bad actors involved, but it started with the Community Reinvestment Act under Jimmy Carter and then the enhanced amendments that Bill Clinton made to force, in effect, banks to makes loans to people who lack creditworthiness. ..Being on the Financial Services Committee, I can assure you, all roads lead to Freddie and Fannie."

Bachmann is quick on her feet and wiped the floor with the other Republican presidential contenders at the first debate.

She's also a whack job who believes she was divinely appointed by Jesus to run for office. But that didn't stop Sarah Palin from becoming John McCain's VP pick. In one of the first of her national TV appearances, Bachmann told Chris Mathews on MSNBC, "I wish the American media would take a great look at the views of the people in Congress and find out, are they pro-America or anti-America. "(Here's a big thank you to Chris Mathews for helping create Michelle Bachmann by first giving her national TV exposure, just as Bill Maher deserves thanks for helping create Ann Coulter and Christine O'Donnell.) Bachmann claims that energy saving fluorescent light bulbs pose a "very real threat to children, disabled people, pets, and senior citizens." And she asked her constituents to be "armed and dangerous" in fighting attempts to limit global warming. She believes "Carbon dioxide is natural, it's not harmful. It is part of Earth's life cycle, and yet we're being told that we have to...reduce the American standard of living to create an arbitrary reduction is something that is naturally occurring in Earth." One of her job plans: "If we took away the minimum wage...we could potentially, virtually wipe out unemployment completely".

These off-the-chart extremist positions are why the corporate powers behind the throne in the Republican Party would never allow Bachmann to become the GOP presidential nominee. But when paired as a vice presidential nominee with a Romney or Huntsman, she could play a key role in firing up the activist Tea Party base of the Republican Party.

The Iowa caucuses in the state of Bachmann's birth are dominated by evangelical Christians and Tea Partiers. So let's say Bachmann comes in first or second in the Iowa, perhaps also playing spoiler to fellow Minnesotan Tim Pawlenty. Let's say she then comes in a strong third in New Hampshire. That puts her in a good position for another strong showing in the South Carolina primary. At that point Bachmann may have solidified her place as the leading candidate of the Republican base with only two of the more "mainstream" Republican contenders of Romney, Hunstman, and Pawlenty still in serious contention. The Republican establishment comes down hard to ensure that Bachmann doesn't get the nomination. But she continues to collect 20%-40% of the votes in most Republican primaries and caucuses. She then comes into the Republican convention and throws her support to Romney or Huntsman (not to Pawlenty since they're from the same state) in exchange for the Vice-Presidential nomination.

As I argued last week in The Huffington Post:

With unemployment likely to be above 8% come election time and no meaningful program that's likely to create large numbers of jobs other than jaw-boning, President Obama remains highly vulnerable. If Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman or Tim Pawlenty prove capable of moving far enough to the right to win the Republican nomination and then pivoting far enough to the center in the general election to appear reasonably moderate, and can add a vice presidential candidate like Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry to keep Tea Party voters in line, it's entirely conceivable that Obama, like Jimmy Carter, could be a one-term president.

No American president since FDR has won reelection when the unemployment rate on Election Day was more that 7.2% and most economists agree that in November, 2012 unemployment is likely to remain at 8%-9%. Obama can (rightfully) blame Bush's policies for causing the economic crisis, but after 4 years, the Bush recession becomes the Obama recession in voter's minds. A day after Obama recently said there are "bumps in the road" to economic recovery, the Romney campaign previewing the 2012 Republican campaign, ran an ad showing a series of unemployed Americans each standing up and saying "I'm an American, not a bump in the road".

It seems that Obama's campaign theme has morphed from "Change You Can Believe In" to "Things Could Have Been Worse", which just won't cut it. Unless Obama can provide a compelling narrative on how Republican policies of low taxes and deregulation caused the recession and cost millions of Americans their jobs and their homes, and put forth a clear program on how to create jobs and save homes, there's a good chance a Republican will defeat him in 2012. And if that happens, there's a good chance that Michele Bachmann or someone else of her ilk will end up a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

It would be a disaster for the country, with a Republican administration that would make Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush look like liberals and would further destroy the middle class. But much of the blame would go to the likes of Barack Obama, Tim Geithner, Larry Summers, Bill Daley and Rahm Emanuel who would have allowed their timid corporate centrism to avoid serious attempts to reform the economy and put Americans back to work, and given the Republicans a golden opportunity to retake political power.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:00 AM on 06/27/2011
I could care less who is elected. Corporations own the government and whatever figurehead they put in the office of president.....they still call the agenda 100% whether it is a corporate stooge with a democratic label or a corporate stooge with a republican label. Obama with his hope and change rhetoric but his 100% Pro-Corporate actions?anti-worker actions showed me this. Folks we have a corporate owned government and these elections with a "Choice" of 2 corporate owned puppets are a farce. This is not an election. It is an exercise in futility.
05:43 PM on 06/26/2011
Your analsis is totally wrong.
1. Bachmann will win the nomination by defeating Romney. She is the only that is RIGHT and GOOD.
2. Obama is the problem and PEOPLE are very scarred that he get reelected. Look what he has done to this country. Alcoa which he is visiting next tuesday created a $10.8billion joint venture in Saudi Arabia to make Aluminium there immediately after Obama became President. He is "winning the future" for Arabs who are controling the oil prices. His visit to ALCOA is to add insult to injury?
3. Obama, Clinton(s), Pelosi all campaign for Tarryl Clark but failed to unseat this faithful lady in 2010. Why? Mud will not stick. "True gold" shines brigher when rubbed and polished.
4. Obama is someone who stimulated the heart of a dying golden goose but he is the one who is squuezing its neck.
5. People should watch/hear what Bachmann has to say from her website or C-span. She has a wonderful plan for every American and hers is the way of blessings.
6. "Hardwall" created Bachmann? The reverse is true. Matthews tried in to tear her down is the fact.
05:41 AM on 06/26/2011
You make an excellent argument. I never thought Bush 2 could become Texas governor and then take the WH. It just goes to show anything is possible and things can get much, much worse. This is going to be another election where the options once more are horrible and worse.
01:46 AM on 06/26/2011
It has been enlightening reading the comments thus far. The presidential race is still early and the GOP hopefuls are emerging. Obama is already in campaign mode, and many wish he would concentrate more on doing his job of POTUS.

The sexist, negative comments and name calling by the left regarding Ms. Bachmann are what I have sadly come to expect. For a group that preaches tolerance of gays, atheists, illegal immigrants, etc., it is sad you have so little respect for a christian, educated, hard working woman who has been employed in numerous jobs and currently holds public office.

There is another thing to consider. Women are better at multitasking than men are. It is just how the female brain works. Men usually focus on one thing at a time, and you men out there know what that one thing most often is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vic22
"I write to make it right, don't like what I see"
09:24 PM on 06/25/2011
Its a shame that all people care about is their party winning, not getting the country back on track. This woman has such an aversion to truth and complex thought, I wouldn't want her leading a girl scout troop
photo
TheNative
Take what country back?
09:19 PM on 06/25/2011
Why do we still use the FDR narrative to compare to present day america. The dynamics of that era were vastly different than today. If Obama does lose it would be because he got outfoxed or didn't play his cards right.
photo
StevieRae
2012 Choice-Oligarchy or a Republic
07:49 PM on 06/25/2011
Miles, you've got to be kidding. Using Bachmann as the VP on the Republican ticket would be a Palin reducere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
tedsingingfox
Fund schools, not prisons. Classmates > inmates.
04:05 PM on 06/25/2011
she would be the thing that GUARANTEES Obama's re-election. so, please, Michele. go for it.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
01:21 PM on 06/25/2011
VPOTUS? The GOP nominee, maybe, then rest assured, she'll never make VP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 PM on 06/25/2011
Once again I'm thankful to be married to a citizen of Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
12:21 PM on 06/25/2011
This is excellent analysis. A Romney/Bachmann ticket could lead to Obama's Waterloo. It makes me sick that I voted for "yes we can" and "change" and got "we can't because of Congress and the markets" and "more of the same economic and war policies". Sickening. It almost makes me hope the Republicans trounce Obama and the centrist Democrats in 2012.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizt
former Army officer/lifelong liberal/pdx biker
01:30 PM on 06/25/2011
No body believes that you ever voted for President Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
02:00 PM on 07/04/2011
Believe what you want. I donated to Obama's 2008 campaign at least twice. And I said "almost". I wouldn't vote for a GOP ticket in 2012 under any circumstances. My point is this: what will it take to wake Obama up from his GOP-enabling political handling if events? Where was the 2008 Obama who said he would stand with union workers on the picket lines when the budget battle in Wisconsin was raging? And if he caves to the Republicans over the debt ceiling by agreeing to not raise upper income tax rated, it is all over for him for 2012 because he will have shown that the Republicans can get their way with him as if he was a Republican president. And that is like him making the case to independent and swing voters that they should elect a Republican in 2012. Cent Uygar has made a similar argument and he is no self-destructing Dem.
02:37 PM on 06/25/2011
you are either a deceiving con or a self-destructive dem. either way, i'm voting for Obama. be my guest and vote for bachmann.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheTightwireGuy
Attempting to balance reason and passion
02:51 PM on 07/04/2011
Believe what you want. While not specifically on a Romney/Obama ticket, Cenk Uygar has made a similar argument about how Obama has been making the political case for a economically-oriented center-right Republican as President, and Romney fits that bill to a T. It's high time Obamabots wake up to how centrist Team Obama is failing to reach the voters they need next year. And the weak video that kicked off his campaign is not a good sign where his campaign will try to go to find voters next year.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cydRN
11:06 AM on 06/25/2011
Let the circus begin!!

I know that there must be intelligent,articulate and yes, sane, women in the GOP. Where on earth are they? I find this pale Palin to be most entertaining, but the thought of someone so clearly nutso in a position of power is cause for alarm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davegstein
09:14 AM on 06/26/2011
Where are they indeed? Back during the lame duck budget session,I watched every GOP woman take the stage at a news conference and pledge their support to the effort to deny woman access to health care(planned Parenthood)
So they sold their souls to tow the party line.They threw their fellow woman under the bus.This did not go unnoticed with me.I hope it does not go unnoticed with every woman in this nation.Even those woman married to filthy rich that would never worry about such small details as health care should posses enough humanity and solidarity to be moved by this.But alas!,that is probably expecting to much......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cydRN
12:25 PM on 06/26/2011
I was a political organizer in the early 90's and worked with a great bunch of R women here in Denver. The group was "Republicans for Choice". They were intelligent, devoted and middle of the road. Where have these women gone? I'm a Dem, but I miss having someone with which to work toward a common goal. The Repubs have absolutely gone over the cliff.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
09:10 AM on 06/25/2011
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
justobserve
Not left nor right or center. Just a free thinker!
08:55 AM on 06/25/2011
If people on the one hand blame Obama should the unemployment rate still at 7-9% in this biggest depression in the history then at the same time blame him for the government's interference then something is twisted.
Eppur Si
One of the majority who are not part of the "99%"
11:19 AM on 06/25/2011
What is twisted is Dems failure to recognize that government interference is the REASON for the unemployment.
11:53 AM on 06/25/2011
i guess bush shouldn't have interfered then, since he started it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lizt
former Army officer/lifelong liberal/pdx biker
01:31 PM on 06/25/2011
You live in a strange alternate universe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
07:27 AM on 06/25/2011
The thought of her being VP doesn't make me scared.
Just nauseated.