When the Republican-controlled Michigan House of Representatives banned a Democratic representative from speaking because she used the word "vagina" in debating an anti-abortion bill (which has been called the "most extreme" in the nation), the story went national. Progressive sites like The Huffington Post and TPM jumped on the issue, but even mainstream media like The Washington Post also covered the controversy.
But the Michigan Republicans' reaction to the simple word "vagina" was more than just a quirky one-off story that would anger reasonable Americans and provide fodder for late-night talk show monologues. Rather, the aversion to a woman in a position of power daring to utter the word "vagina" during a debate on legislation meant to curb abortion rights is symbolic of one of the festering abscesses (yes, there are more than one) infecting the modern GOP: a destructive obsession with turning back the clock to the 1950s on the role of women in society. This obsession is not only damaging to women and our country, but it has had a disproportionate influence in directing the Republican policy agenda.
The context of Rep. Lisa Brown's use of the word is illuminating. She said: "I'm flattered you're all so interested in my vagina. But no means no." Brown's comment was squarely at the center of the issue under examination, and the word was not slang or an expletive, but rather the anatomical description of a part of a woman's anatomy that the proposed legislation would directly affect.
There was nothing offensive, off color or controversial about Brown's remark, unless the listener has an unhealthy obsession with women's vaginas, as Republicans seem to (specifically, in controlling what they and their owners can and can't do).
This obsession is apparent in the GOP agenda after the 2010 elections, which led to the party taking control of the U.S. House of Representatives and many state legislatures. The Republicans campaigned on two primary claims: 1) health care reform would hurt seniors and others (based on lies about the legislation), and 2) Democrats were to blame for unemployment, but Republicans would create jobs. So they arguably walked away from the 2010 elections with a mandate to vote to repeal health care reform and to introduce measures to create jobs.
But that's not what happened. Instead, the House of Representatives offered nothing to address unemployment, but moved quickly to institute a decades-old, right-wing agenda, including what came to be known as a "war on women." The first bill offered by the new Republican-controlled House (H.R. 1) included a provision that defunded Planned Parenthood (which provides non-abortion-related health care, like mammograms, to millions of women), a move that would be followed by several states. H.R. 3 sought to ensure there would be no taxpayer-funded abortions. And the anti-abortion fervor was, again, followed in state legislatures across the country.
It wasn't just abortion, however, when it came to the GOP war on women. From dragging their feet and trying to weaken the re-authorization of the Violence Against Women Act, to blocking the Paycheck Fairness Act (again, also true at the state level), to holding a hearing on contraception coverage that primarily only included religious men (and opposing the Obama administration's decision to require health insurers to cover contraception), Republicans in Washington spent an awful lot of time, effort and political capital trying to control women's bodies, roles and options.
When Rush Limbaugh called a woman who testified in support of contraception coverage in health insurance a "slut," it was more than just a typical Limbaugh publicity-seeking, right-wing-riling stunt. The attack and the term Limbaugh used shined a light on how many Republican men think of a woman's role in society. To them, a woman who sits in front of a congressional committee and demands contraceptive coverage is a slut, because women should not be discussing such matters in public. These Republican men think women shouldn't demand equal pay, because, really, they should be at home. They can't say it out loud, but Limbaugh articulated what they think.
It's not a coincidence that three female Republican senators -- Lisa Murkowski, Olympia Snowe and Kay Bailey Hutchison -- all expressed dissatisfaction with the Republican attacks on women.
The Tea Party-driven modern Republican party glorifies a 1950s role for women in society (not working, not having sex outside of marriage, not controlling their own bodies). It's inherent in their legislative priorities. And this vision was on full display with the Republicans in the Michigan House, who were so put off by a woman, who was serving as a member of the state legislature, using the anatomical/medical term "vagina," they felt they had to shut her up.
It makes one wonder: Would the Michigan Republican leadership have banned a male conservative representative for using the term "vagina" in the debate? Somehow I doubt it.
Voters will have to decide in November if this is the vision of women in America they want to be in control of the levers of government. Given that roughly half the electorate is made up of women, I'm guessing that the Republican obsession with women's sexuality and 1950s role in society won't go over too well. Many might take inspiration from Brown and say, "I'm flattered you're all so interested in my vagina. But no means no."
Follow Mitchell Bard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MitchellBard
Bruce Reyes-Chow: Would Jesus Have Said "Vagina?"
"She said: "I'm flattered you're all so interested in my vagina. But no means no." Brown's comment was squarely at the center of the issue under examination, and the word was not slang or an expletive, but rather the anatomical description of a part of a woman's anatomy that the proposed legislation would directly affect."
It's somewhat ridiculous not to be able to talk about the legislation you're working on candidly.
How bout "wewe," is that more to your emotional level?
Why?
Because it is a childish, bald-faced lie thats why.
The issue is not what you do with your vagina, it is what you do once you have made another life dependent upon you. You made the life. Use your vagina anyway you want but lets get past the childish, immature lies about this being an issue about the vagina.
She was silenced due to the obviously inflammatory, derogoratory lie she spewed forth and did so just for indecent shock value.
But if you think she said a lie, please enlighten us what that was.
That fact is, that if she would have substituted "lady bits" or any other word describing her vagina, she would have still earned the same sanction. It was the context, not the word for which she earned the sanction.
I am neither Republican nor Democrat, and I happen to agree with her position. But I find it completely disingenuous of her to claim it was the use of the word vagina. She is fully aware it was the context of her quip, but refuses to take responsibility or accountability for her actions not becoming a representative. In a protest and want to chant it, perfectly fine. On the street with a sign that states it, I'm all for it. Two pundits in the media throwing barbs at each other, no problem. In the chamber on the floor speaking to your fellow representatives...no way. It showed a complete lack of respect for her colleagues, the system and herself. They have no interest in her personal vagina, and they are not raping her. You can make the point with hyperbole, and that is all well and good, but to make it in a statement on the floor... deserves sanction, even though I agree with her on the subject.
The messages are pro slavery, anti gay, sexist and misogynistic, white supremistic and wholly ungrounded in reality. The OT was written by extremely superstitious MEN during the Bronze Age, and before and include stories about the deaths of millions of humans in concurrence with a morally abhorrant sky daddy.
Now these extremist evangelicals are, once again, trying to rule by fear and misinformation taking full advantage of the misinformed and vunerable members of our society.
Our Founding Fathers saw the evils of a theocracy - the church's entanglement in the monarchies of Europe - and remembered well the excesses that religion exclusionism of the ruling majority wreaked on the minority.
Any voter in this country that truly values the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution will NOT vote republican this November.
"V" is for Vagina and VICTORY !
It is my hope that the GOP, God's Own Party, continues to dig itself into a hole too deep for logical extracation and that even right leaning Republicans, especially women who don't always vote according to their husband's or her clergy's, wishes and remember that she holds the key to the future of women's rights. I lived through Eisenhower's '50's and do not wish to see that decade of ignorance and intolerance return. We shouldn't be fignting that battle again.
Think what you will of Hugh Hefner but the 22 Playboy Philosophy articles that appeared in the 60's opened once losed eyes to the possibilities of badly need cultural change in America.
I wish you well.
And that story needs to be dealt with properly. She could have used the word vagina a thousand times and she would not have earned the sanction. She could have used "lady bits" and still received the same sanction. Why would that be?
To those that just jumped to the lie that it was because of a word, you need to go back and read the story. It was the context of her statement, not the use of the word vagina. She knows that and is playing the fool, pretending to be innocent of the use of hyperbole and rhetoric, claiming her colleagues were interested in HER vagina, and that they were about to rape her. But continue to pretend it was because she said vagina. It's easier to argue against.
I fully support her point of view, and believe the people need someone to represent them who can professionally debate...respectfully. She is right, her actions were completely wrong.