NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
M.J. Rose

GET UPDATES FROM M.J. Rose

The Writing Publishing Pit and the Pendulum

Posted: 03/21/11 04:01 PM ET

In the book world today is news that a traditional NYT-bestselling novelist has turned down a half-million-dollar deal to self-publish. Barry Eisler's going to get a lot of ink.

He's a good friend, and we've had many conversations about why he doesn't want to be with a legacy publisher anymore and why I still do want to be with one. (There are too many things a publisher and I can do together -- some I can't do alone, others I don't want to do alone. And like Mike Shatzin, I'm not sure all books are going to do equally well in all formats.)

None of my conversations with Barry were like this one he had with another friend of his and that he posted on his website. Two guys... a few beers... twelve thousand words shooting the shit about the publishing industry.

That Barry is self-publishing isn't the news. Mark Twain did it. Benjamin Franklin did it. So did D.H. Lawrence, Jack Kerouac, George Orwell, Anais Nin and Sylvia Plath. Just to name a few.

What's news is that he's turned down a big traditional deal to do it, focusing on the ebook market and its promise.

Barry's decision is of particular interest to me because I was one of the first people to do the opposite. In 1998 I self-published online in order to get a traditional deal.

I was taught to think outside the box. Before my grandfather was one of the original Mad Men, he and a group of other Air Force Intelligence officers formalized brainstorming as a problem solving technique. He taught the concept that creativity can be taught at Buffalo University. My dad invented toys. My mom was a photographer.

So when my agent told me that while publishers loved a lot about my work they couldn't publish it because it was a marketing conundrum -- my reaction wasn't to slink off into the sunset.

At the time I'd just left my job as the creative director of a top NYC ad agency to work on the web. I had a few ideas about new marketing. I put my novel on my website as an ebook (in those prehistoric days people read them on Palm Pilots and Rockets). I joined the Advantage Program at Amazon and started selling my book there as a POD book (in those days we called it me going to Kinko's with 20 orders a week.)

It was an experiment. To see if there was a way to market and sell my work using the net. Turned out there was. Sales grew and grew and soon my book was the highest ranked small press title at Amazon.

I thought what I'd done was exciting. Instead I found it was something people expected me to be ashamed of.

My agent was aghast. "Self-publishing is for failed writers," she said.

MWA and The Author's Guild refused to accept me as a member.

My local indie bookseller wasn't even willing to get off a ladder and talk to me face to face about putting a few copies on a shelf.

"I don't look at self-published stuff," she'd said without even turning around. The word stuff was uttered with utter contempt.

I left the store. Stood in the street. It was February. Snow was falling. Big fat flakes landed on my cheeks and mixed with my tears. I didn't get it. In the ad business, iconoclasm was applauded. Being different was better. My friends who were independent filmmakers were praised for going it alone.

Hell, they even had their own film festival.

I hadn't known the club I was trying to get into held fast to the rule that self-published books were crap and any novelist who dared try to do it by herself would only get the back of a bookseller's head and nothing but derision.

As it turned out, I didn't stay self-published for long. My marketing efforts worked, and within three months I had a deal with a New York house and an embarrassment of media attention from the New York Times to the Today Show.

It was an exciting time. There were a lot of us trying new things on the new frontier -- Seth Godin, Doug Clegg, Douglas Ruskoff, even Stephen King, to name a few.

Authors -- all with traditional deals -- were doing non-traditional things; serializing books online, giving away free ebooks and writing original stories for the web to get new readers.

Michael Cader (then a book packager) sold Michael Gerber's self-published Amazon bestseller, Barry Trotter and the Unauthorized Parody, to Simon and Schuster. Brandon Massey (Thunderland), Victoria Christopher Murray (Temptation) and Travis Hunter (The Hearts of Men) all made the jump that same year.

At Wired, Writers Digest and Poets & Writers I reported on the changing digital landscape and wrote about how authors had to become partners with their publishers and publishers had to start treating authors as equals. How authors needed to get involved with the business of being a writer and take charge of their fate.

It's been more than a decade since I put that self-published novel, Lip Service, up on a website. Since then many hundreds of authors have gone from self-published to traditionally published.

How far is the pendulum now going to swing?

Last year Seth Godin announced he would no longer publish with traditional houses and opened his own press. John Edgar Wideman also made news when he went indie.

Self-publishing still entails many things many of us aren't interested in. We would rather not run a business. Don't want to be entrepreneurs. We want the best that a publisher offers.

But that doesn't mean we don't have issues. We do -- but that's for another blog post.

This one is about change.

It's taken a long long long time for ebooks to take off. For the price of ereaders to come down. For self-publishing to its lose its stigma.

Now self-publishers have the aura of revolutionaries and are being lauded as heroes, paving the way for freedom. I'm not sure yet that it will indeed prove to be the kind of freedom that serves us all equally. We're still in the early days on this new frontier.

But I am sure it's something I never expected would happen when I stood outside that bookstore thirteen years ago, on that cold day, in the falling snow.

 
 
 

Follow M.J. Rose on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mjrose

 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dawnz67
Mom of four wonderful kids & small business owner
10:52 AM on 03/24/2011
I write for many reasons - the love of words, the love of books, a means of self-expression. I write because its not only what I do, it is who I am. I write, first and foremost, for myself but not only for myself. Writing is essentially narcissistic. We believe our words have value and therefore want to share them with others - self-publishing can make that happen. While it is certainly not an easy route to get recongnition by, it is liberating. Voices that mainstream publishers might overlook now have a platform and that is revolutionary.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
01:19 PM on 03/23/2011
It will be interesting to see what comes of the revolution . . . Eisler turned down a big deal, Hocking accpeted one. Some of my friends are making bank with their self-published books, some of them are getting no traction at all (and this is true for both those who already have NY-bulit reps and those that don't). Interesting times, for sure.

I’m happy at the moment to be with one of the Big 6, but should the day come when I’m not happy, or should they not offer a new contract, I’m excited and relieved that there’s another option for me and my fans.

A lot of great books have died in the slush pile because they didn’t have “mass appeal” (or the editors didn’t think they did). But it’s now possible for a niche writer to make a living self-publishing. The only real barrier now (assuming talent and a quality product) is being found by readers.
12:25 PM on 03/22/2011
Great post, MJ. And yes, self publishing has come a long way and the contempt is slowing abating. I agree...those who are now self publishing--who are choosing to self-publish--are revolutionary. And every revolution needs a periodical to chronicle it, to explain it, to celebrate it. Indie music has pitchfork.com. Indie books have IndieReader (www.indiereader.com).
11:46 AM on 03/22/2011
The music industry has provided us with a perfect guide, having gone through the exact same transition already. Self-produced musicians were also looked down on a decade ago, but now it's common. They don't need the labels anymore. We won't need the big publishers anymore. Although someone has to pay for printing the books! Not everyone, not even half of future fiction readers, will be reading ebooks. That I'm sure off. Most true readers still prefer an actual book in their hands. So that's all the publishers are good for now, putting up the cash to print the books. Anyway it's exciting for sure!
12:12 AM on 03/22/2011
When did Sylvia Plath self-publish?
07:34 PM on 03/21/2011
MJ, thanks for the shout-out re: my book Barry Trotter (h/t Google Alerts). I remember using "How to Publish and Promote Online" to promote it! But in addition to being a self-pub success story, BT's also a bit of a cautionary tale.

Once I didn't get sued by the WB—I had to self-publish solely b/c of corporate fear—Barry 1 was picked up by 20 publishers, sold 850,000 copies, and made book-length parodies a cottage industry. That wouldn't have happened without self-publishing, because funny stuff (not just parody) is hellishly tough to get published corporately.

But looking back on it, I should've spent less time writing, and more time networking. Unlike 2002, authors today can connect super easily with fans; FB/Twitter would've changed my whole career. NEVER let the publisher interpose! I've been read by millions of people, and can't get a book deal because I didn't build a list back in '02-'05, when corporate muscle was pushing my work. Unless you wanna find yourself trying to convince the same suits to buy your NEXT book, spend lots of time/energy using social media to build your own army. Ironically, it's the part of my life as a writer that I like the most. (And being able to design my own books.) Sales--even in the millions--are not enough to sustain a corporate-based career if what you write is perceived as risky.--Mike G.
07:07 PM on 03/21/2011
We're still in a transitional period of the new publishing, and it will be interesting to see how it all evolves. Here's my take on why I finally decided to self-publish my novel "The Metal Girl": http://jsmedia.wordpress.com/2010/02/13/profiles-in-publishing-1-why-on-earth-would-i-want-a-book-contract/
04:38 PM on 03/21/2011
This is a really interesting development - perhaps a sign of things to come? Indie publishing does offer the author a great deal of flexibility and control, after all.

I think old fashioned baggage around 'self-publishing' will continue to melt away. The potential new benefits for both writers and readers significantly outweigh any old connotations associated with making the effort for yourself, on your terms.

It's exciting, and will be interesting to see what happens next...

All the best

Adam
www.iWriteReadRate.com
04:12 PM on 03/21/2011
I admire your work in every area--writing, marketing, pr--MJ! I thank you for your endless generosity for writers who are still making their way. I haven't had that experience with all trad. pubbed writers. As a matter of fact, I think for most people going down the self-pub road, we are still getting the side-eye from those in the industry. "Well if you want to sell 10 copies to your friends, then go ahead and self-pub," remains a popular refrain (I've read it on two facebook pages this week). I'm not sure why they want other writers to sit on the sidelines and wait to be chosen instead of making their own way. Looking out for my interests? Doesn't really take on that tone when I see it in the context of those discussions. Hopefully with the debut of The Last Letter, my sales will say everything I can't. I know I'm taking a risk, but as publishing changed I began to think waiting with a stack of novels by my side was a bigger risk than self-pubbing. I guess we'll see! Thanks again for your tremendous support.