iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
MJ Rosenberg

MJ Rosenberg

Posted: July 31, 2010 02:49 PM

I don't know why it should be a surprise that the Anti-Defamation League joined the hate mongers in opposing the mosque at Ground Zero.

The fact is that neither the ADL or its twin, the American Jewish Committee (the other old, established Jewish anti-discrimination organization) has been about opposing bigotry or even anti-Semitism for at least a decade.

They now are entirely about defending Israel -- or, at least their right-wing version of Israel. That is why you are infinitely more likely to hear Abe Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, or David Harris, chief of the American Jewish Committee talk about Ahmadedinejad, the Goldstone report, the Turkish flotilla, or the "campaign to discredit Israel" than about hate crimes against Americans (which is what they used to be about).

Even anti-Semitism is of little interest to them -- unless it is connected to Israel. In fact, Harris and Foxman have redefined anti-Semitism as opposition to Israeli policies (the Gaza war, the blockade, the occupation) rather than contempt and hatred of Jews for for simply being Jews. Check out this ad from the American Jewish Committee which is just neocon scaremongering on Iran or this recent statement by Abe Foxman denouncing Presbyterians for opposing Israeli policies on the West Bank.

And there is this -- the craziest of all. It's a video, an "Address to the Iranian People," by Malcolm Hoenlein, who is head of the Conference of Presidents of Jewish organizations, of which ADL and the AJC are members. In it, Hoenlein calls on the Iranian people to rise up and overthrow their oppressors. It's hilarious, especially since it comes from a guy whose constituent organizations are just dying to bomb the hell out of the very Iranians who he addresses with such presumptuous and unctuous compassion.

So what does this have to do with the mosque in New York? Simple. These organizations, and especially their leaders, hate and fear Muslims or, to use their term, "radical Islam." It is not because they are instinctive bigots. It is that they believe that the more acceptance there is of Muslims here at home, the less reflexive hatred there will be for Muslims abroad. And that, in their view, reduces America's sympathy for Israel.

Take this, for instance, David Harris of the AJC has made a specialty of trying to convince Americans that estimates of the number of Muslims this country are grossly inflated. His purpose is to prevent Americans from speaking about American Muslims -- as Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama routinely did -- as if they are central to America, part of the American fabric. Better that they be seen as a fringe group that can be ignored. Why else would the AJC even bother trying to discredit demographic data on Muslims? What, other than paranoia and racial animus, would even cause Harris to commission such a study: fear that one day Americans will speak of the religious makeup of their country as Protestant, Catholic, Jew...and Muslim. The fear is that such thinking could lead Congress, for instance, to start acting as if Muslims mattered too. And that Muslims who live and vote here are -- like Christians and Jews -- as American as apple pie.

Another reason for coming out against the mosque is to build relations with the American far-right. American Jews voted overwhelmingly for Obama -- and will again -- but these organizational types have not liked him from day one. And now they hate him and not because he has weakened the alliance with Israel. These guys just know that, left to his own devices, he would adopt the policy of "honest broker." They sense that, or, more precisely, fear it. They don't have to worry about that with any of the Republican likely candidates, for whom Islamophobia is in their DNA.

Bottom line. The ADL, AJC, Conference of Presidents, and the other "mainsteam" organizations are no longer Jewish organizations, let alone civil rights organizations. They are entirely about defending any and all Israeli policies and, to buttress that goal, demonizing Muslims.

That is why opposition to the mosque is a natural. The only reason that the other organizations aren't (yet) out there with Foxman is that they have better PR sense. But, who knows, they may not want Foxman to be out there as the lone Jewish Crusader.

Here's the good news. Most Jews are liberals. Only a tiny minority are members of these organizations. And even fewer are Israel-firsters. That, in fact, is why Foxman, Harris and Hoenlein are so hysterical. Their base is melting like the wicked witch in The Wizard Of Oz.

The real Israel-firsters have AIPAC which, to its credit, does not pretend to have any interest in domestic issues. These other organizations have nothing. Why not go with Islamophobia? Like its historic twin, old-fashioned Jew-hatred, it has real promise.

 

Follow MJ Rosenberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mjmediamatters

 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:58 AM on 08/02/2010
I wonder if any of the MSM is brave enough to host Mr. Rosenberg, even for a few minutes?
Been on pbs, Bill Moyer's, etc. ? Independent Len's ?
Talked about or space in CSM, The Nation ? Radio ?

Even MSNBC, which we mostly agree is rather liberal now, except for Morning Joe, I doubt
would let him on? If he can not reply does anyone know ?
06:22 PM on 08/01/2010
"The ADL, by the late 1980s had begun one of the largest private spying operations in the United States, a fact that was discovered by the San Francisco police in 1992 when it raided the ADL office after discovering that it had been working with a rogue SF cop, Tom Gerard, who had been providing the organization with personal non-public information about a host of American citizens, but, in particular, those supporting the Palestinian cause and opposing South African apartheid.

It turned out that this cop was partnering with a San Francisco weight lifter, Roy Bullock, who had infiltrated the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and a number of other organizations and had in his files the names of over 10,000 individuals and over 600 organizations, most of which were kept in what Bullock labeled as Pinko files. Bullock and Gerard were also being paid by South African intelligence officials to provide them with the same information on anti-apartheid activism that they had been collecting for the ADL."
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/07/the-back-of-the-envelope-history-of-the-anti-defamation-league.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 AM on 08/02/2010
thanks....and for the link too....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlietuna11
07:31 AM on 08/01/2010
exceptionally persuasive. i was curious why the adl was opposed.hope every one reads this article.
07:07 AM on 08/01/2010
ADL can sponsor, rally for, buddy up with any organization that interdicts the spread of Islam in America. It does not matter, for the spread of Islam is rapidly gaining steam even with the anti Islamic fervor. American Muslims generally want only peace and partnership and ADL is not getting any overtures from American Muslims since it cannot see past its hate. There are many Jewish American organizations, Rabbis and others who meet with the Muslimeen and join causes with each other when attacks and their places of worship are defaced. American homeland would find solace threw understanding and not at the current genre of hate, accusations, discrimination of any segment of the population.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pkafin
10:58 PM on 07/31/2010
MJ, what do you think an American Jew can do to get the ADL back on track. An organization like AIPAC is what it is, I assume very little can be done about their aims and objectives. That's why supporting an alternative organization like J-Street is the best response.

But, the ADL is not living up to it's mission statement. It has been different in the past. Is it your opinion that the ADL is irredeemable at this point, or is there a way to get it back on track?

This community-center/mosque opinion, while also both atrocious and embarrassing, is unacceptable to me in large part because it is inconsistent with the historical and literal underpinnings of the organization (i.e. it offends my sense of logic).
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
09:20 PM on 07/31/2010
Dear Mr Rosenberg,

I want to thank you for truth. As a Romani I have been silenced by Israelicentrics my entire life, and the argument is close to the same. If Romani's are claimed as holocaust victims as well then the Israelicentrics might loose the political footing they gain as being absolute victims.
I don't understand how and or why this is anyone's business that doesnt live in New York. It isn't at ground zero, and it isn't even a mosque. The language is absurd. I worked at a library where the students used a stairwell as a prayer room. Should the library stairwell be ordained a mosque now? I cringe with Bloomberg even as he will willingly spend money to have bike paths removed to appease the Hasids than try to unite a diverse Brooklyn. When people play politics just because they can I think it speaks volumes.

I know plenty of people that are jewish and liberal, though they have a hard time speaking out against their elders. We have one planet and we have to share it. That we forget what we learned in kindergarten it doesn't speak well of us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allejandro
06:35 PM on 07/31/2010
"The real Israel-firsters have AIPAC which, to its credit, does not pretend to have any interest in domestic issues. These other organizations have nothing. Why not go with Islamophobia? Like its historic twin, , it has real promise."

So what is the historic twin? (seems something's missing between those commas)
05:48 PM on 07/31/2010
Thanks. I've been wondering why Musllims, alone among Americans, aren't allowed to build a place of worship where they want to. I guess the First Amendment Establishment Clause doesn't apply to everyone after all.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
05:46 PM on 07/31/2010
"Here's the good news. Most Jews are liberals. Only a tiny minority are members of these organizations. And even fewer are Israel-firsters. That, in fact, is why Foxman, Harris and Hoenlein are so hysterical. Their base is gone."

I like the sound of that.

This has been very disturbing to me Mr. Rosenberg. I confess to not being well versed on all things ADL - but I did have it filed somewhere in my conscious that they were one of the bullwarks and reliabale activists against unredressed defamation. Against anybody. But seeing what they've aligned themselves with I came to the conclusion that this was entirely about aligning themselves with the Republican right wing who stirs up and protects the Israeli right wing. And I found it loathsome.

Shame on them. They've lost credibility. You can't be an anti-defamation league if you....defame. It doesn't jive.

Thanks for your article. I always look forward to seeing your name pop on the blog list when these disturbing things happen. A voice of reason.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
04:56 PM on 07/31/2010
The documentary "Defamation" is recommended. The ADL and its enormous budget has to justify itself.
photo
peterg76
Freelance medical transcriptionist
04:10 PM on 07/31/2010
Not just "entirely about defending Israel", but defending Israel at the expense of the Jewish population, which would be better off if the population at large could learn more about Islam.
06:34 AM on 08/08/2010
and about Israel. Our news/opinion is so filtered here, the taxpayer is clueless that the US sends 10 million dollars a day to Israel. No clue about what really is occurring to the people in the occupied territories or the rabid, fanatic, acts of extremist settlers.

The PR machine has worked it's magic using the words terrorist and Islam together far more than trying to educate people to prevent the biased linkage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imo Verit
03:37 PM on 07/31/2010
Thanks, I was wondering why the ADL was on the bigots' side. They didn't use to be like that.