A Congressional aide contacted me last week to tell me a story that he believed illustrated a point I often make.
His boss was visited by a group of eight senior citizens from the district. They had traveled to Washington with a group of retired teachers and decided, on the spur of the moment, to visit their representative. They had no appointment so they did not expect to see him but wanted to see the office, if nothing else.
The aide greeted the group, looked at the congressman's schedule, and decided that he could at least come out to say hello. He took the names and brought them in to his boss. The congressman perused the list and said, "The names are all Jewish. Are they from a Jewish organization?" The aide said they were not and explained that they were older people on a bus tour sponsored by a charter travel group that catered mostly to retired educators.
The congressman (a Democrat) went out and delighted the group by ushering them into his office and talking to them for a half hour. He opened by telling them how strongly he supported the Obama administration's opposition to the Palestinian bid for U.N. recognition and how much he enjoyed Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech before a joint session of Congress. He elaborated on the Israel issue for a while and then asked for questions.
There was not one reference to anything he had said about Israel or any foreign policy issue. The only issues the visitors wanted to discuss were Medicare and "why Obama doesn't fight harder" against the Republicans. As Democrats, they all intended to support Obama for re-election but were disappointed with the president, especially for extending the Bush tax cuts.
The aide said that, afterwards, the congressman chided him a little for not telling him that the group was not particularly interested in the Middle East. The aide said that he had not said that they were. It was the congressman's assumption that their Jewish names meant that they cared primarily about Israel.
Sure, the congressman made a mistake, a common one. Politicians assume that the main issue American Jews care about is Israel. To be blunt, a check to a political campaign from someone with an obviously Jewish surname will be chalked up to the Israel issue, unless the donor specifically indicates otherwise.
It isn't hard to understand how Members of Congress, and even the president, came to the conclusion that the foremost issue for Jewish donors and voters is Israel. After all, that is precisely what they hear from the lobby and its cutouts (in the media and Congress itself). The lobby promotes the idea that Jews are single-issue people and that their issue is Israel. They do that to enhance their own clout and to prevent policymakers from deviating from the lobby line.
But the polls consistently show that Jews, like most Americans, are primarily concerned about domestic issues like jobs, choice, the environment, equality, Medicare, etc. During the 2008 presidential election, the American Jewish Committee polled Jews on the issues that were most important to them. 54 percent said the economy. 11 percent said health care. 5 percent said terrorism. 3 percent said Israel.
It was against that back drop that 78 percent of Jews voted for Barack Obama in 2008, not because they thought he was "better" on Israel than uber-hawk John McCain.
This brings us to the current drop off in Jewish support for President Obama. According to the Gallup poll (published on September 16th) Obama's approval rating among Jews is now down to 54 percent (from 78 percent on Election Day 2008).
Naturally, the lobby and its acolytes are blaming Obama's significant slippage on the Israel issue. They say Jews are abandoning him because he is too tough on Prime Minister Netanyahu.
However, the fact is that there has never been an American president who has been so supportive, for better or worse, of every position taken by an Israel prime minister. No doubt some Jews oppose Obama, citing Israel, but they are the same ones who didn't like him in 2008.
Also, some may have been duped by the Republican Jewish Coalition into believing that a president that even Israel's rightist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman admires is anti-Israel! (And now there is Ed Koch who has endorsed Obama because even Koch concedes that you can't be more pro-Netanyahu than President Obama unless you are... Netanyahu.)
Let me be clear here. I don't approve of the president's support for Netanyahu which is obviously politically calculated and bad for the United States, the Palestinians, and Israel. But anti-Israel? Not only is that charge a lie but those making it know it's a lie.
No, it's not Israel that has produced the decline in Obama's standing among Jews. The reason for the decline is that Jews are Americans and support for the president is way down among all Americans. And the reason it is down among Jews, as for their neighbors, is because joblessness is above 9 percent and the economy shows few signs of recovery.
For politicians, including notably President Obama, to behave as if their Jewish constituents are more concerned about Israel than they are about their own families and their neighbors here comes very close to acceptance of the libel that American Jews are more loyal to Israel than to the United States. The fact that the lobby tells them that Jews care primarily about Israel is no excuse. To believe it and to act on that belief is offensive. Worse than offensive.
American Jews have been good and loyal Americans ever since they arrived on these shores. They understand and appreciate that America has been, since its creation, the safest place in the world to be Jewish. They understand and appreciate that the U.S. Constitution, and particularly the First Amendment's separation of church and state, have guaranteed our rights ever since George Washington himself welcomed Jews with the prayer that:
the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while everyone shall sit under his own vine and fig tree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.
This is not to say that American Jews do not care about Israel. They do. But our national homeland is the United States and those -- especially those in the lobby and pandering politicians -- who imply otherwise, insult us all.
Follow MJ Rosenberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/mjayrosenberg
Steven L. Spiegel: The Three Competing Strategies That Led to the UN
Obama's vision for Mideast peace: Israel, Palestine based on 1967 ...
Obama calls for Israel's return to pre-1967 borders - CNN
Obama Calls for Israel-Palestine Talks on 1967 Borders - Bloomberg
Obama Speech Backlash on Call to Reinstate 1967 Mideast Borders ...
Obama to AIPAC: I won't back down on Israel-Palestine border issue ...
They have been working SOOOO HARD trying to have your articles removed from HP. Throw them a bone every now and then! At least a shout out for their efforts #lol
Until 1967, the alliance had been relatively undeveloped and to say the least, nothing like what prevails today. This all changed once Israel destroyed the threat of secular Arab nationalism. The U.S. continues to rely on Israel right up to the present day as a regional "policeman on the beat" (to use Nixon's term).
Because their economy is so heavily dependent on U.S. military aid, they're effectively forced to comply. Whether its the privatization agenda of the past 35 years or halting sales of high tech military equipment to China, when Washington snaps its fingers, Israel has no choice but to comply. And yes, the settlements ultimately advance the goal of preventing an Arab nationalist movement by preventing the formation of a Palestinian homeland, something that would be an instant rallying point for the Middle East.
This certainly isn't in my, or for that matter, any ordinary American's interest. But to believe that a hegemon is taking orders from a regional hegemon is illogical to say the least.. The problem remains the same: a government run by a small clique, completely unaccountable to the public.
Haroldpom and Family
Hope you enjoy these New Year videos from Israel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlcxEDy-lr0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/39721
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxg6I8CCFPY&feature=player_embedded
I don't think the Jewish vote is what our politicians are concerned about. It's the massive pro-Israel propaganda machine that has to be appeased. Whether AIPAC, ADL, etc.. can sway the Jewish vote or not isn't even the issue, it's whether they attack you or donate that's got our politicians feverishly bowing to their every whim.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/146408/americans-maintain-broad-support-israel.aspx
Our elected officials are supposed to be the voice of the constituents, and in the case of Israel, that's what they do.
This combination betweeen the two can be toxic for everyone who want the peace.
That AIAPC really does a great job.
Why is it that your stories always have an unnamed source? You always have these stories that people tell you but you never provide a name, why is that?
This is how a free press, uncontrolled by a government or spy agency, operates, dear Bcem.
There is a reason why mj rosenberg is not employed by any reputable entity.
His style is yellow QuackingJew.
Just like he hasn't done anything bold or decisive that steers far from the safety of the status quo.
In fact he would rather sell out the Democratic party and what it stands for in the quest for bi-partisan consensus that is really an effort to innoculate his unprincipled (except in rhetoric) self against attacks from the meanies on the right--that now have his number as a pushover.