How Reforming the Farm Bill Could Improve the Health of America's Poor

Posted October 30, 2007 | 06:31 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :How Reforming the Farm Bill Could Improve the Health of America's Poor   digg: How Reforming the Farm Bill Could Improve the Health of America's Poor   reddit: How Reforming the Farm Bill Could Improve the Health of America's Poor   del.icio.us: How Reforming the Farm Bill Could Improve the Health of America's Poor

As a medical resident working in one of the poorest cities in the country, I see firsthand how poverty can contribute to poor health.

The hospital where I work is filled with people suffering from uncontrolled diabetes, high blood pressure, and other problems often exacerbated by a lack of health insurance or income. These problems and their origins are complex, of course. And millions of words have been written about how to fix them. But there is one thing the government could do right now that would make a tremendous difference to my patients and to all the nation's poor: Reform the Farm Bill currently up for reauthorization in Congress.

Wondering what the Farm Bill has to do with sick people? Despite its name, the Farm Bill doesn't just affect farmers. It's a colossal piece of legislation that to a large extent determines what foods are grown in America, how much they end up costing, and what we end up eating. In other words, it has a big impact on whether people have easy access to the nutritious foods that will help them prevent diet-related diseases. The Farm Bill's main influence stems from the enormous subsidies it gives farmers-more than $70 billion between 1995 and 2005 for food production alone. Unfortunately, more than 80 percent of this money goes to producers of sugar, oil, alcohol, meat, dairy, and feed crops. Soy, corn, and other feed crops are mostly used to fatten up cows and other animals that get turned into cheeseburgers and other high-fat, high-cholesterol products.

This subsidy system rewards farmers for growing foods that contribute to high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, and other diet-related diseases I treat every day.

Wouldn't our taxes be more wisely spent promoting healthier foods such as fruits and vegetables? That's exactly what could happen if our lawmakers vote to pass a reform of the Farm Bill proposed by Sens. Richard Lugar of Indiana and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey. The FRESH Act would cut some of these outrageous subsidies and shift some of the savings into promoting good nutrition.

The Act would improve access to healthy food for America's poor in two important ways. First and foremost, the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, always a sticking point for lower-income people, is likely to drop. Without economic incentives in place favoring meat and other unhealthy products, more farmers are likely to switch to growing produce.

Secondly, the FRESH Act would increase funding for a wide array of smart initiatives, including farm-to-school programs, farmers' markets, fruit and vegetable promotion, and the Fruit and Vegetable Snack Program that provides free, healthy snacks to school kids across around the country. The act would also expand access to fresh fruits and vegetables for WIC recipients and seniors and fund a pilot project for Food Stamp recipients.

As a doctor and former cancer researcher, I know that the more we can do to encourage healthy eating, the better off we'll all be-rich, poor, and middle class alike. An impressive body of scientific literature shows that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans, and other low-fat vegetarian foods would greatly reduce America's incidence of heart disease, diabetes, and some cancers.

It's time to align federal food policy with good nutritional science. Let's reform the Farm Bill so that it stops promoting disease and begins promoting good health.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
4
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Tree201 See Profile I'm a Fan of Tree201 permalink

Most if not all poor people in this country can afford a bag of rice, a bag of legumes like black beans and even a bag of apples. Eating healthy does not always mean eating expensively.
I've seen plenty of "lower income" people with satellite dishes attached to their homes. Whatever they waste on that expense could be put towards healthy foods.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 PM on 10/31/2007
- MamaBird62 See Profile I'm a Fan of MamaBird62 permalink

I'm recommending that everyone read "The China Study" by Dr. Colin Campbell to learn more about how eating animal products is causing so much sickness in affluent nations. Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, osteoporosis (yes, dairy makes it worse) Alzheimer's, etc. could be greatly reduced if people followed a plant-based, whole foods diet. Big Farm, Big Pharma, and Big Medicine don't want us to get that message. We took on tobacco, we can take this on too!
Thanks for the excellent blog Dr.Golubic and continued success in your important work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 10/31/2007
- LaurenB See Profile I'm a Fan of LaurenB permalink

Dr. Golubic makes some great points about the Farm Bill. It"s ironic that while USDA advises Americans to increase consumption of fruits, vegetables and whole grains, myriad government policies favor products high in cholesterol, fat and sugar, such as meat, dairy and processed foods. Subsidies need to be dramatically revamped to facilitate the availability and consumption of nutritious, disease-fighting foods"-fruits, vegetables, and whole grains"-that are known to promote good health.

As Congress funnels more money into the production of healthy foods, this will translate into a lower national risk of developing illnesses such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer, and many obesity-related illnesses. All things considered, the Farm Bill unequivocally needs reform.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 AM on 10/31/2007
- realitytrumpsbull See Profile I'm a Fan of realitytrumpsbull permalink

Um, why do our taxes have to go to provide anything? I support subsidy for ONE thing,
and that's ethanol production. If they can
turn out sugar in volume, then do it and
build another distillery to help make more
fuel ethanol. Paging Mr. Daniels, Mr. Jack
Daniels, Jack Daniels, plese come to a white
courtesy phone, paging Mr Jack Daniels...

Other'n that, people buy food, people buy
the stuff off the shelf at the store, that
revenue should go to pay for the operation
of the farms. What you put in your mouth
or how much is YOUR business...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 AM on 10/31/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Mladen Golubić›