iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Mohamed A. El-Erian

GET UPDATES FROM Mohamed A. El-Erian
 

How European Politics Could Impact Markets

Posted: 04/20/2012 8:05 am

Fed up with how all the economic, financial and policy news out of Europe have been contributing to equity market volatility?

Well, not only will this continue but, now, we must also get ready for something new over the next few weeks: the impact of elections. Here is a quick simple guide for what to look for:

Think of this particular election cycle as starting on Sunday with the first round of the presidential elections in France, where no single candidate is expected to gain a majority. It continues in a big way on May 6th with the second round in France, as well as the Greek parliamentary elections and German regional contests. And, for now, it ends on May 31st with the Irish referendum.

In each of these contests, politicians are offering voters differing interpretations of the past and, much more importantly, different visions for the future.

This is particularly true in Greece. In this struggling economy, the contest is defined primarily between those willing to continue with the austerity program agreed between the "technocratic government" and the "troika" (consisting of the European Central Bank, European Union and the International Monetary Fund), and those that would opt for something different. For investors, it boils down to a contest between a still-challenged Greek policy approach and one that would involve even greater credit and exit risks.

Issues are more nuanced in France, the euro zone's second-largest economy. This is not because of the positions of Francois Hollande, the main challenger to President Nicolas Sarkozy. He has been constant in his commitment to seek revisions to elements of the euro zone approach to reflect less austerity and more growth. The uncertainty has to do with Sarkozy. In his attempt to catch up in the polls to Hollande, he has been altering his narrative and making new promises.

If President Sarkozy fails in his re-election bid, German Chancellor Angela Merkel will lose her most important ally at the core of the Europe - thereby complicating her attempts to strengthen the institutional and economic underpinnings of the euro zone. This may explain her decision to take the unusual step of essentially campaigning for Sarkozy. And it comes at a time when many are looking at the regional elections in Germany for indicators as to whether Merkel will be able to continue to govern after next year's national elections.

Then there is the Irish referendum. In what constitutes a first highly visible test, the government is seeking the electorate's approval for the new European Fiscal Compact.

What should markets look for? For presentational simplicity, let us assume that you happen to be one of the very few people out there who limits your preferences only, and I stress only, to how your investments would be impacted. So, in simple aggregate terms:

• If you are long risk assets of any kind, and especially if you are max long, you would prefer a Sarkozy re-election in France, the emergence of a stable coalition of the major traditional parties in Greece, regional German elections that are supportive of Merkel, and the passing of the Irish referendum;

• If you are short risk assets and/or looking to add, you would prefer a win by Hollande, an ambiguous electorate outcome in Greece, setbacks for Merkel, and the rejection by Irish voters of the European changes; and

• For outcomes in between, you would need to add many months of political posturing to the other European elements that contribute to swings between risk on and risk off days in markets.

At times, elections can lead to uncertainties and, for investors, to a changing configuration of opportunities and risks. We are entering such a phase in Europe.

In addition to their consequential national impact, the series of forthcoming elections involve cross-border implications that influence prospects for regional policy coordination and, therefore, the nature and speed of the solutions for Europe's debt crisis.


Mohamed El-Erian is the co-CEO of Pimco, which oversees nearly $1.8 trillion in assets and runs the Pimco Total Return Fund, the largest bond fund in the world.

Cross-posted from CNBC.com

 
FOLLOW BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
07:53 AM on 04/23/2012
I predict a Socialist win in France, hopefully an end to austerity. The Greeks will throw the bums out, drop out of the Euro, devalue the drachma, and live happily everafter. The banks will then get it where they belong, for making such iffy loans. Perhaps if we're lucky the Euro dies and we get back to some sanity........
02:12 PM on 04/22/2012
Europe is over, its not the player it was even 30 years ago. except for germany the rest of the countries will face a slow decline,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
10:27 AM on 04/22/2012
Dr. Mohamed, we all hope Hollande gets elected and flips the finger at Merkel. The last thing EU needs now is austerity, it has been tried an did not work in Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland nor Portugal. I predict that Merkel will be gone too, Europe has had enough of the conservatives making promises that are never kept !
06:30 AM on 04/22/2012
The way this will go is that France, unable to resist the opportunity to be a decisive player no matter how, will tank the whole system by going Socialist,
04:09 AM on 04/22/2012
And what is your position? Ha ha, quite obvious. Definitely not an objective perspective.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:02 PM on 04/21/2012
Duh, The banksters robed the world, and SWAPS are still legal.
05:10 PM on 04/21/2012
With Greece, Spain, Italy and Portugal heading for bailouts, the election of another tax and spend socialist in France could accelarate the destruction of the Euro and the EU.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:04 PM on 04/21/2012
It's the banksters who robbed us.

Sweden, Germany and Holland all tax a lot but have healthy economies, given the world downturn.

Be a serf, worships the rich, they love that.

Watch "the Money Masters"
http://www.themoneymasters.com/
http://webskeptic.wikidot.com/money-masters-transcripts-part-24
Bankster now literally own us.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Estimated_ownership_of_treasury_securities_by_year.gif

Phase out fractional reserve while issuing greenbacks. That creates a debt free monetary system

“The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.” Abraham Lincoln

Finance went from 5% of our economy in 1980 to over 144% when it crashed, made up for with OUR FED 26T$ for free .004%.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financialization#Financial_turnover_compared_to_gross_domestic_product
photo
WaveRhydr
DIEBOLD-WE VOTE SO YOU DONT HAVE TO
02:04 AM on 04/22/2012
I hate to break it to you, but "tax and spend" is what a government is SUPPOSED TO DO. You republicans spend, and cut taxes on the wealthy, while bankrupting the nation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
becky bradshaw
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
11:10 AM on 04/21/2012
"Ireland had a balanced budget before the crisis hit." When the "financial crisis hit in September 2008, the bubble burst and the government announced it would cover all banks’ losses, in an attempt to calm the markets. The promise turned out to be disastrous, as the banking sector continued to implode. In January 2009, Ireland nationalized one of its major banks, and in October 2010 conducted a bailout of some others. At this point, its budget deficit had grown to 32 percent of GDP. The following month, the E.U. and IMF launched a $90 billion bailout of Ireland. This past March, the government was swept out of power, and the new government pledged to reduce the interest payments required under the E.U./IMF bailout, a promise they made good on in July."
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-european-debt-crisis-in-one-post/2011/08/05/gIQAg69QwI_blog.html)
12:12 PM on 04/21/2012
Ireland's budget wasn't balanced about 1/3 was based on VAT and Stamp Duty from the housing boom, no matter what the international market did at some point housing development would have stopped and the budget would have fallen off a cliff. It also doesn't explain how the Irish central bank and financial regulator failed utterly and completely in their duties in regards to the banks. Ireland financial crash wasn't caused by anything different to any other housing boom and bust.
09:16 AM on 04/21/2012
Sorry, but the idea risk-on needs a Sarkozy win is complete BS. The French voters understand this, and Hollande will win because France, and the EZ, will be better off than if the corrupt continue to make policy.
05:13 PM on 04/21/2012
Um Rates on French debt have been rising with every signal that Sarkozy will not be re-elected. Last week rates rose 11bps, after polls on the election were made public and on any of the news on Sarkozy losing, mostly later in the week. This is a country whose debt was once considered a safe-haven like Germany, and now investors are dumping their bonds as if it were one of the PIIGS. Whether you agree or disagree with the presumptive winners’ agenda, he is against everything that the Eurozone has been working on in order to assuage the markets, and that is now spooking the markets. If France decides to go rogue and challenge the EZ, Germany, ECB and IMF as things in the Eurozone stand right now, whether you agree with their views or not, that will have HUGE repercussions for the global markets. We are already witnessing it, which is why rates continue to rise in France and across the Euro block, except in Germany which is considered a “safe-haven” like U.S. Treasuries, in anticipation for a Sarkozy loss.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
06:55 AM on 04/22/2012
And who would it hurt? And who controls interest rates?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank1946
Tell the Truth
09:15 AM on 04/21/2012
Europe is attempting to admit failure of the Social State.

Citizens ask for security and no anxieties.

Germany owns all of Europe now ! Get a Job, next week. Working for Germans is OK.
06:16 AM on 04/22/2012
That's the amazing thing about the Germans, they could probably make any economic system work.
09:07 AM on 04/22/2012
Well here we work for Chinese or whatever multinational bids us to.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usna73
We are all in this together
08:55 AM on 04/21/2012
While your ideas are useful, I suspect that they are but a prelude to the real dilemma that stems from the outcomes:

"I suspect that the realities of the eurozone have reached a point where only two options exist:
1) The folding together of the eurozone states, with a debt pool, shared budgets, joint taxation, and fiscal union.
In other words, the nation states must abolish themselves (leaving only the shell), and Germany must cease to exist in any meaningful form. This was always the inherent logic of EMU. We are coming close to the moment when it must be decided.
2) The system blows apart. From a German point of view, Target2 means if the deed were done "twere better it were done quickly". Perhaps very quickly." : The Telegraph, Ambrose Pritchard
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CollectiveNotIndividual
08:49 AM on 04/21/2012
Several European countries are on the brink of a debt induced economic collapse. The United States also faces a sever economic crash unless our government gets its spending under control soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raymond Strand
09:09 AM on 04/21/2012
You're not making any sense. The US Government can borrow at Negative Interest Rates meaning it's a really good time to borrow. The British have cut their Government services and increased taxes to pay down the debt this is causing a downward spiral that harms growth which decreases revenue making further cuts necessary to decrease the debt.

The problem in Europe is Austerity not spending, this is depressing demand and stopping growth. You don't try to pay down the debt in the bad times the time to pay down the debt is when there is a surplus.

The US Government can't crash over debt because the debt is issued in US Dollars, which they can pay by printing more US Dollars. At worst people could stop taking US Dollars to pay for the debt which would essentially crash the entire world economy. China in particular has no interest in getting off the dollar any time soon because it would destroy their economy and the delicate balance they use to oppress over 1 billion people.
05:44 PM on 04/21/2012
The U.S doesn't borrow at negative interest rates, it still pays to borrow: Negative interest rates means that after inflation, rates become negative. That doesn't mean that the government isn't paying to borrow and that sure doesn't mean that you should borrow until your blue in the face. 4 years ago Greece was borrowing at 3%. True, we can print our own currency, but the rest of the world uses dollars as a reserve currency, and we import a lot of goods and we export as well, so openly monetizing the debt would affect trade and would jeopardize the privilege of having a reserve currency which allows us to borrow cheaply. It’s no mystery why China is expanding daily trading limits on its currency while they are starting to conduct trade in their own currency, as they complain about how the U.S abuses its reserve currency status. The problem with your premise is its lacking the true issue. The government apparatus in some countries in Europe has grown to unsustainable sizes, so that even if they were to implement pro-growth policies, the government % of the economy must decline because the private sector that supposed to fund it doesn’t create enough revenues even with very high rates, and they are trying to rebuild that and part of that means cutting the government so it doesn’t have so many liabilities and therefore the need for high taxation.
05:44 PM on 04/21/2012
The PIIGS don’t need to consume anymore goods, and they sure don’t need more cheap credit, as that is what they lived off of the last 10 years as the lost the need to be competitive when unit labor costs soared; they stopped being innovative and competitive which should create wealth and export demand; and the government grew larger than can be afforded. The only way out is to become competitive and to grow your economy. True, cutting now does have huge costs in the present and does make things worse now. But your failing to grasp the true problem and that is that those debtor nations don't really have anything that the rest of the world wants, and they have lived off of cheap credit which isn’t in an infinite supply; while surplus nations like Germany grew their export base and remained competitive while they funded the debtor nations so they would consume their goods thereby building up their export base and creating debtor nations whose sole existence relied on cheap credit because they created nothing. The only way to generate revenue is through private growth, trade surplus and government debt. Option #3 is no longer available and in fact has grown unsustainably so that it has to be cut in order for real prosperity to flourish, either now or later.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ri-Poste
Vision of a Nomad
08:46 AM on 04/21/2012
People knows in Europ now , their chance to live comfortably all of us is to Regulate the Banks System and Stop the Speculation on different Product or States !!!
Sharing more between People what we produce is the only way !!!
08:25 AM on 04/21/2012
Are they going to continue to pay Bankers to make profit on States ??
source
www.supermirchi.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
06:27 AM on 04/21/2012
I think that there should be economic 'firewalls', that prevent yo-yo-nomix in one country from causing a lot of economic hate and discontent in another country, or mass, wide-scale poverty because someone finally figured out how to break the bank on the trillion dollar scale.