iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Monique Ruffin

GET UPDATES FROM Monique Ruffin
 

President Obama Is His Brother's Keeper, Indefinitely

Posted: 01/12/12 02:23 PM ET

The other day I was at a volunteer meeting where we were each asked to introduce ourselves. There were about twelve of us in the group and I was the only person of color, or so I thought. The young man just two seats away said "Hi, my name is Tumi, I'm from Iran but I'm not a terrorist." I turned my head toward him, saying "That hurt my feelings." The room was silent. No one laughed. The introductions continued after a brief awkward silence. Later on, after the meeting, Tumi and I found ourselves alone, and he offered me an apology. "It's just my way of saying what everyone in the room is usually thinking," he explained. He went on to share with me that he is a performer and believes that humor is a way to get people to relax. I listened and then I accepted his apology. I then shared that I remember America before September 11, 2001. I remember when America was a safe refuge for thousands of Iranians to come and create successful lives, escaping religious and political persecution in their homeland. I told him it hurts me that he feels the need to defend himself when he's committed no crime and done no harm. But what hurts even more is the fact that he's now an increasingly likely target for indefinite detention by our government.

When then Senator Barack Obama started campaigning for the presidency, I was leery for many reasons. One of them was I didn't believe a black man could be elected president, so I decided to wait until I knew he was electable before throwing all my support his way. At home caring for a newborn, I had some time on my hands, which allowed me to sign up for many campaigning events. I hosted house meetings, did phone banking, blogged, donated money, knocked on doors, and did any other thing I could to assure Obama's win. In addition to my more conventional efforts, I also started a nation wide morning prayer call. The daily call asked participants to pray for the best candidate to win and for the American people to keep their eyes and hearts open as they prepared to vote in a very important election. My deepest intention for the prayer conference call was to pray for everyday citizens to have a spiritual awakening and begin to feel empowered. There were many reasons I supported Obama, but being the sentimental person that I am, each time he'd say, "I am my brother's keeper" something within me simply felt aligned. "Finally a candidate who could relate to the people," I thought.

On December 31, 2011, President Obama officially became his brother's keeper indefinitely after signing the National Defense Authorization Act. While most Americans were toasting the New Year, our president signed into law the NDAA, allowing American citizens who are suspected of any type of terrorist activity to be detained indefinitely without a trial. With the signing of this law President Obama also included a Presidential Signing Statement, which says that there are parts of the bill that he neither agrees with nor intends to act upon. However this statement is virtually meaningless and does not inhibit the president or future presidents from detaining everyday American citizens under the suspicion of terrorist activity.

This new law is scary; it actually frightens me for all Americans. For me, it is reminiscent of McCarthyism, except that those who were suspected of being communists had the right to defend themselves and could not be held indefinitely without legal representation. The NDAA fundamentally changes the fabric our nation. As terrifying as this new law is, what is more chilling is the silence surrounding this legislation. Where are Americans with our protest and rage about our liberties coming under attack? Where are the political pundits, media, viral videos and the Occupiers? The silence is deafening.

As I stated earlier, I have been a die-hard supporter of President Obama. As a single unemployed mother, I have donated five dollars here and there when I am able to for his re-election. Now I'm questioning if I have made a mistake. How can someone who says "Yes we can" and "I am my brother's keeper" also deprive people of their basic rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights? How can someone we've come to trust so deeply and support so widely be the same person that has dealt the most profound betrayal?

An attack against our constitutional liberties is not a democratic or republican issue. The divisive nature of our politics is a problem -- and we've become so disenchanted with the behavior of our elected officials that we are no longer actively paying attention or participating in our government. The result is that the carpet is being pulled from beneath our feet. Actually, it's more like getting clobbered over the head with a heavy mallet, Tom and Jerry style. It's time to wake up and stop overeating, football cheering, and housewife judging. What was unique and special about America has vanished with President Obama's signing of NDAA.

I accept that my feeling betrayed by the president's action is my personal response, for which I am accountable. However, rather than simply feeling outraged, I choose to see this in the context of a spiritual awakening. Betrayal offers the betrayed a monumental opportunity to dig deep and to discover more of themselves. A spiritual perspective asks us to look for the lessons, growth, and opportunities to use every experience to expand the divinity within us. There is no need for blame or victimhood, only the commitment to courageously show up and see ourselves as intrinsically connected to and reflective of one another. Accepting that who we are as individuals matters and impacts the whole profoundly is the opportunity at hand. We truly are our brother's keeper and when our brother steers off-track, making a choice that will impact the whole in a manner that might not serve, we must come together united and act as shining lights toward the better path. Yes, I am my brother's keep and I am my brother.

 
 
 

Follow Monique Ruffin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/moniqueruffin

 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hruss1125
Math Consultant
09:56 PM on 01/15/2012
I am so doggone tired of Monique, Matt Damon, Tavist Smiley, Cornel West, and the likes of them. Bitch, bitch, bitch. President Obama didn't do this or President Obama did that. Bottom line, He saved lots of jobs that would have been lost in the automotive industry, he fought for insurance for the uninsured, he appointed a Latino woman as Supreme Court judge, the list goes on. It's like this, you have family members that don't necessarily do everything you expect them to. Do you throw them under the bus? No. You continue to love and support them and have the good sense to know that you're not going to always agree with them. But you sure as hell don't cut their throats, my goodness.
07:20 PM on 01/29/2012
"Oh, sure, he signed into law the ability for the government to imprison me forever for looking at them funny, but he's a really, really good guy."

Yeeeaaahhhhhhhh... about that...
04:41 PM on 01/15/2012
It's the economy stupid! Europe is in recession. China heading that way. No place to sell our exports. We head back into recession. Unemployment heads backup. Obama has no bullets left. After four year of no action Democrats bail on him.  Romney wins by a land slide.

The U.S. trade deficit widened more than forecast in November as American exports declined and companies stepped up imports of crude oil and automobiles.

The gap expanded 10.4 percent to $47.8 billion, the widest since June, from a $43.3 billion shortfall in October, Commerce Department figures showed today in Washington. The deficit was larger than any of the estimates in a Bloomberg News survey of 75 economists.

The U.S. import bill was driven by demand for higher-priced crude oil at the same time American companies tempered orders for consumer goods on concern household spending will cool early this year. Exports from the U.S. declined to a four-month low, depressed by a drop in shipments to Europe.

If you are already drunk, you can't get sober by drinking more whiskey.

If you are deep in debt, you can't get by borrowing more money.

When you can't sell more products then you import you can't pay the debt.

Just because the U.S. economy is falling apart does not mean that life is over.
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
02:29 PM on 01/15/2012
Great article.

I too voted for Obama, but I saw early on that I made a huge mistake. Instead of voting against the Bush policies that tarnished our country for 8 years, I somehow helped pile on more of the very same.
photo
somewhatodd
micro-bio undetectable to the naked eye
09:33 AM on 01/15/2012
america's far left and far right are two sides of the same coin.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:27 AM on 01/15/2012
Voted for Obama - then was first disappointed, then disgusted and now downright angry! Too many of the programs, policies and personnel from the previous administration have been carried over into this administration. Now we have the NDAA - an insult to anyone who still believes in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the "rule of law".
photo
JstDarla
Gone Fishing
09:37 AM on 01/15/2012
The next bill to keep your eyes on is Enemy Expatriation Act HR3166 & S.1698
It is a must read!
07:05 AM on 01/15/2012
Is all this drama really necessary? Moreover, is it gonna help your cause? I think not! I am so tired of so called "progressives" forming circular firing squads and taking aim at the President instead of the REAL enemies.

Anyway, here is a link to an article that expresses things very well. I dare ALL of you(especially Monique the author of this overly dramatic post) to read it in it's entirety and then settle the heck down. http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/2012/01/last-word-on-ndaa-if-you-dont-like-it-stop-helping-right-wingers-win.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
09:13 AM on 01/15/2012
F/F - great article!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OurSaySo
discern the very subtle things
05:46 AM on 01/15/2012
Here is the link to the text of the Bill:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OurSaySo
discern the very subtle things
05:44 AM on 01/15/2012
Here is the onerous part of the Bill
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism
Sec. 1021. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain
covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military
Force.
Sec. 1022. Military custody for foreign al-Qaeda terrorists.
Sec. 1023. Procedures for periodic detention review of individuals detained at
United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sec. 1024. Procedures for status determinations.
Sec. 1025. Requirement for national security protocols governing detainee communications

These Sections are part of a much larger bill which is

"To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department
of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the
Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal
year, and for other purposes."

This Bill also does things like:
Subtitle B—Army Programs
Sec. 111. Limitation on procurement of Stryker combat vehicles.
Sec. 112. Limitation on retirement of C–23 aircraft.
Sec. 113. Multiyear procurement authority for airframes for Army UH–60M/HH–
60M helicopters and Navy MH–60R/MH–60S helicopters.
Subtitle C—Navy Programs
Sec. 121. Multiyear procurement authority for mission avionics and common cockpits
for Navy MH–60R/S helicopters.
Sec. 122. Separate procurement line item for certain Littoral Combat Ship mission
modules.

My point is this:

Tell Congress not to put things like Sections 1021-1025 into Bills that need to be passed in order for the military to continue functioning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
09:14 AM on 01/15/2012
Let me add: if Congress is Majority Dem. If not - do not bother...
photo
JstDarla
Gone Fishing
09:48 AM on 01/15/2012
http://youtu.be/4DNDHbT44cY

Senator Lavin talking about who added it to the bill
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OurSaySo
discern the very subtle things
07:35 PM on 01/15/2012
Ask yourself why a Constitutional Lawyer would add such language to a bill...

Is it possible that the Supreme Court will strike it down immediately as unconstitutional?

Is it possible that, as originally worded by those in Congress, that Congress left enough leeway in the language as to make an argument *for* the law being constitutional?

As the President has worded it, it runs directly against the Constitution.
Which will hold sway? This law or the Constitution?
07:48 PM on 01/14/2012
None of the individual liberties will get affected by the very same law you wrote about if each individual lives a law-abiding life. It was signed into law to protect the many and not just the few. You must look into how many lives are taken by the few men and women whose minds are focused on exacting vengeance against the US. The acts of terrorism are not confined to those from the Middle East. There are also pure-bred Americans who kill innocent people because of ideological pursuit. Remember the shooting inside the American military base? Villains in disguise could inflict more harm because they can move freely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:03 PM on 01/14/2012
Besides the obvious obliteration of our rights to due process, what worries me most is why Obama felt the need to have this power. Recall it was Senator Levin who mentioned Obama specifically asked for certain language in the Detainment clause - which negates any "regret" Obama declared since he's the one that wanted it written the way it is.

So again - WHY does Obama want the power to detain a US citizen without due process?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OurSaySo
discern the very subtle things
05:17 AM on 01/15/2012
Why did Congress stick this into a veto-proof Bill?

You don't want your President to have this power, have Congress take it away.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:33 AM on 01/15/2012
I can respect someone - even an opponent - who fights against or for something he truly believes in but I cannot respect a person who does not give his all in a fight. Since Obama said he had "reservations" about this bill, why couldn't he have had the courage to veto it, even if that veto would be overriden?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
09:17 AM on 01/15/2012
How thick are you exactly. Obama NEVER wanted this. Congress put this in the BIll - and you may be aware they are not exactly seeing eye to eye with Obama...
As long as the House is GOP lead - all legislation will be right tinged at least - and all the dems and Obama can do is try their hardest to make it as acceptable as possible. But dont put this on Obama - this on us for voting in the craziest House representatives EVER - and on those reps of course
02:31 PM on 01/14/2012
The passing of the Patriot Act was the beginning of the end of real freedom in America and both corrupt parties voted for this despicable law giving authorities dictatorial powers over American citizens. President Obama like a king has already pronounced a death sentence on an American citizen and declared Bradley Manning guilty during a public news conference before he even was on trial and now he has signed this further step towards dictatorship so we must stop pretending that Obama cares one iota about civil and human rights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:34 AM on 01/15/2012
already fanned - now faved
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:02 PM on 01/14/2012
Constitutional scholar Obama is no friend of the Constitution--or the people he was elected to serve. O the irony.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BRAINS4USA
Vote. Just do it. Always.
09:39 AM on 01/15/2012
Hi! Thanks for your baseless and clueless post. Next time try to provide a basis for your nonsense please? Obama did not make this legislation, which passed both house and senate with bi partisan majorities. They made this legislation; how is it then his fault? Care to explain or are you only interested in demeaning our President for no other reason than that it makes you feel so much better?
12:34 PM on 01/14/2012
Those are some great points
photo
madinpahuff
Domari Nolo
12:33 PM on 01/14/2012
Monique, you authored an eloquent post. Kudos to you! Regarding legislation such as The Patriot Act and The NDAA, you should take solace in facts such as this : "All laws which are repugnant to The Constitution are null and void" - Marbury v. Madison 1803. There are literally hundreds of court decisions which have the capacity to negate the legislation in the recent NDAA. I too voted for Obama in 2008, but fool me once.....
†
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
RevJimIII
Grin and Barret...
12:59 PM on 01/14/2012
I was initially excited when he ran, then I read his record/history, then I debated the issues, then I was accused of racism...    sigh..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
01:05 PM on 01/14/2012
US courts are increasingly friendly to totalitatianism. We no longer can count on them for redress.
03:53 PM on 01/14/2012
You can expect a totalitarian court system when the other totalitarian branches influence the appointment of the court judges.
photo
madinpahuff
Domari Nolo
03:57 PM on 01/14/2012
Your point is certainly debatable, however, I feel there are still enough principled citizens from which we can place into roles of stewards of our Constitution. If we were to exercise a demonstrative, cohesive message to Congress - or even our judiciary, I have the utmost of confidence that somehow those currently seated would adjust their Constitutional Compass. You can ultimately thank the Second Amendment for it. †
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
avacat
09:57 AM on 01/14/2012
The author raises a crucial point, which is that voters are so used to the skullduggery in politics, they are no longer paying attention..at least until their personal ox get gored. When that happens, it will be too late.