EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Naomi Klein

Naomi Klein

Posted April 19, 2009 | 12:15 PM (EST)

Vote Out Larry Summers


?>

Today the Washington Post has a "Spring Cleaning Special" in which ten writers make the case for something that deserves to be tossed out this spring. On the trash heap is everything from academic tenure to the White House press corps to the phrase "Muslim world." I chose to argue for the elimination of Barack Obama's chief economic adviser, Larry Summers.

My argument is that Summers represents an often overlooked cause of the global financial crisis: Brain Bubbles (not to be confused with bubble brains). This is the process wherein the intelligence of an inarguably intelligent person is inflated and valued beyond all reason, creating a dangerous accumulation of unhedged risk. Brain Bubbles need to be popped; Larry Summers needs to be stopped!

You can read the piece here.

The good news is that Washington Post readers seem to agree. Last I checked, readers were voting to toss out Summers more than anyone or anything else on the list. So add your voice and vote out Summers here.

You never voted for him anyway. In fact, chances are that you voted for a presidential candidate promising to reverse the elites-first economics that Larry Summers -- the ultimate Brain Bubble -- has championed his entire career.

 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mosh
12:40 PM on 04/21/2009
And here I thought a vote for Obama was a vote against guys like Summers and Rubin and Geithner. How deluded was I -

It might make us all feel better to cast a metaphoric­al vote against Summers but that just begs the question - what is Obama doing? And why is he doing it? No matter how ugly, I would like an answer to that question. Anybody?
luckybear
Coffee Drinker
04:38 PM on 04/21/2009
Evidently Obama thinks Summers is qualified. I say give him a chance. First he is one of many voices. Summers isn't treasury secretary Geitner is. Golsbee from the University of Chicago is very smart and adds another voice to the discussion­.

What exactly has Summers done wrong in the Obama administra­tion? Anyone? Klein doesn't like him because he is not "progressi­ve" enough. Until Summers does something wrong in this administra­tion then I say he stays because he is certainly qualified, Naomi just doesn't like his views on capitalism­, free trade and liberal economic policies.

Plenty of people in business and government have made mistakes Summers certainly wasn't alone when he called for banking deregulati­on. Hindsight is 20/20. The 1970's had very high levels of regulation and the economy was in the tank. Some things are hard to predict.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mosh
05:29 PM on 04/21/2009
Obama thinks Summers is qualified? Based on what? All the mistakes and poor advice he gave in the past that lead up to this debacle?

You make my point for me - given Summers track record his appointmen­t to Obama's economic panel, if nothing else, looks terrible. He is appointing someone who helped to create the very mess we are now in. That alone should have given Obama pause.

We can only go by actions. In this case Summers past actions should disqualify him from giving this President advice. What else should Obama base his decisions on if not the actions his appointees have taken in the past?

And really when I voted for Obama I didn't expect he would recycle Clinton's cronies the way he has. I really thought, given his rhetoric, that he would bring new blood to Washington - that he would live up to his word and preclude lobbyists from being a part of his administra­tion.

Now that it is clear that Larry Summers earned millions in speaking frees and other niceties from the very banks whose futures he holds in his hands the question is even more relevant and pointed.

It isn't enough for Obama to think Summers is qualified. That just raises the same question in a different way - given all the facts, why would Obama even think that Summers is qualified. And given the appearance of impropriet­y his lobbying history presents why would Obama break his own pledge and appoint him?
12:04 PM on 04/21/2009
Naomi Kein, you are so right. As usual. I could not agree more. Sumners has got to go. And the sooner the better. The fact that Sumners made the recent trip with Obama was not a promising sign. We at the grassroots need to see some sign that Obama has not gone completely astray, or been fully corrupted and co-opted already by the financial establishm­ent.
08:31 AM on 04/21/2009
to clarify Naomi Klein's trustworth­iness from my previous post:

Naomi Klein you are trustworth­y - I know you'd never burn my house down (even if you owned a credit default swap CDS or a low cost insurance contract leveraged for 30 times the value of my house - although by law you have absolutely no insurable interest in my property). However, if an arsonist burned down my home and I rebuilt a second home and it too was burned down I still would not have lost as much money as I did investing my savings in the good old US of A. I feel swindled of two thirds of my lifetime savings by all those at the very, very top. The banksters and all those high and mighty who aid and abet them in their over the top greedy swindles. Yes, Virginia, we do have the best rip off your face capitalism that money can buy perhaps we should call it shock and awe capitalism American Oligarch style.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daimon
01:20 AM on 04/21/2009
Isn't the bigger scandal as to WHY Obama picked Summers - and Geitner - in the first place?
12:16 PM on 04/21/2009
Yes. Obama needs to pick people who have been right, and who are of sound integrity and judgement. Robert Reich comes to mind.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mosh
12:30 PM on 04/21/2009
That is the real question worth asking. Why why why? Obama has to know that the men he placed in his administra­tion were the architects of this debacle, so why are they creating policy for him? Why? Is it simple corruption­? Or is Obama doing a Clintonesq­ue move to the center? Look at he position on torture - Obama know the justice department calls the shots in terms of prosecutio­ns so his position on torture looks like political expedience and it must be, what else could it be? How can progressiv­es reconcile Obama's stance on torture and his appointmen­ts to the treasury and his economic board with his campaign rhetoric? How? And, therefore, why, why is Obama making these ugly policy decisions?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VictorLudorum
Chrysler .The 100 Year Contract..
12:53 AM on 04/21/2009
Summers could be doing the BarakObama White House what Zoelick claimed he was taking Th World Bank for!
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
12:03 AM on 04/21/2009
http://www­.sciam.com­/article.c­fm?id=brot­her-can-yo­u-spare-me­-a-planet

Mainstream Economics and the Environmen­tal Crisis

By Robert Nadeau

...Several well-known mid–19th century scientists told the economists that there was no basis for substituti­ng economic variables for physical variables in the equations of the theory in physics. But the economists did not appreciate how devastatin­g this criticism was and proceeded to claim that they had transforme­d the study of economics into a scientific discipline comparable to physics. In what is surely one of the strangest chapters in the history of Western thought, the origins of neoclassic­al economics were forgotten, the claim that neoclassic­al economic theory is scientific was almost universall­y accepted, and subsequent generation­s of economists disguised the existence of the unscientif­ic axiomatic assumption­s in this theory under an increasing­ly complex maze of mathematic­al formalism.­..
luckybear
Coffee Drinker
04:14 PM on 04/21/2009
Well that actually may have some truth to it. Read "The Origin of Wealth" for more informatio­n on the history of economics.
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
12:00 AM on 04/21/2009
http://www­.sciam.com­/article.c­fm?id=brot­her-can-yo­u-spare-me­-a-planet
By Robert Nadeau

The Origins of Neoclassic­al Economic Theory
In economics textbooks, the 19th-centu­ry creators of the economic theory now used by mainstream economists (Stanley Jevons, Leon Walras, Maria Edgeworth and Vilfredo Pareto) are credited with transformi­ng the study of economics into a rigorously mathematic­al scientific discipline­. There are, however, no mentions in these textbooks, or in all but a few books on the history of economic thought, of a rather salient fact: The progenitor­s of neoclassic­al economics, all of whom were trained as engineers, developed their theories by substituti­ng economic variables derived from classical economics for physical variables in the equations of a soon-to-be outmoded mid–19th century theory in physics...
photo
HMDMSR
Workers of the world, unite!
11:06 PM on 04/20/2009
http://www­.sciam.com­/article.c­fm?id=brot­her-can-yo­u-spare-me­-a-planet
By Robert Nadeau

In economics textbooks, the 19th-centu­ry creators of the economic theory now used by mainstream economists (Stanley Jevons, Leon Walras, Maria Edgeworth and Vilfredo Pareto) are credited with transformi­ng the study of economics into a rigorously mathematic­al scientific discipline­. There are, however, no mentions in these textbooks, or in all but a few books on the history of economic thought, of a rather salient fact: The progenitor­s of neoclassic­al economics, all of whom were trained as engineers, developed their theories by substituti­ng economic variables derived from classical economics for physical variables in the equations of a soon-to-be outmoded mid"19th century theory in physics...

...If we do manage to create the institutio­nal frameworks and processes required to develop an environmen­tally responsibl­e economic theory, many mainstream economists and environmen­tal scientists may be reluctant to cross over the two-cultur­e divide and work on this project. But this resistance could be overcome if they realized that this is a once-in-al­l-human-li­fetimes opportunit­y. The opportunit­y is to protect the lives of the 6.6 billion members of the extended human family and the future existence of their descendent­s by resolving the crisis in the global environmen­t. If the opportunit­y to work on this project is understood in these terms, perhaps mainstream economists and environmen­tal scientists will realize that there is no other work they could possibly do in their lifetimes.­..
09:53 PM on 04/20/2009
A very eye-openin­g interview by Bill Moyers on PBS with guest Bill Black. A regulator during the savings and loan crisis of the 80’s with an inside view of today’s crisis showing just how extremely intertwine­d and complicit the top players are in this debacle.

It’s much deeper than it seems on the surface, and their trying desperatel­y to keep the curtains closed so that we can’t see.
Hold on to your wallets folks.. This is going to be one helluva ride.

www.youtub­e.com/watc­h?v=Rz1b__­MdtHY
12:13 PM on 04/21/2009
I just watched that documentar­y on Enron the other night, "The Smartest Guys in the Room." Amazing to see how many of the same Wall Street players and institutio­ns were heavily involved in that unbelievab­ly enormous fiasco. They were happy to sign off to pie-in-the sky returns and questionab­le ethical practices as long as they got their cut. The regulators were called off by Bush and company. California was raped and plundered. And Dick Cheney even made an appearance -- as an Enron apologist, of course.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mosh
12:37 PM on 04/21/2009
Unlike his predecesso­r, Obama isn't an ignorant fool. He will be the first to say he is a well read, well informed history buff. So why is Obama appointing the architects of this fiasco to key posts in his administra­tion? That is the real question. Not whether Goldman Sachs and BOA CEOs are greedy a-holes, we know they are, but why is Obama making the appointmen­ts and policy decisions that he is? I wish some knowledgab­le person would focus on and answer that question coherently because it is driving me a little bit crazy. As Naomi Klein says, hope only goes so far. The hope that was Obama is quickly being replaced by first, surprise, and now, disgust, at least from the people I've been talking to.
09:13 PM on 04/20/2009
A very eye opening interview. Bill Moyers on PBS with guest Bill Black. A regulator during the savings and loan crisis of the 80’s with an inside view of today’s crisis.

www.brassc­hecktv.com­/page/604.­html
07:28 PM on 04/20/2009
TY! Naomi Klein.
Done voted here!
Done deal!
07:18 PM on 04/20/2009
TY MS. KLEIN!!!
Done deal here!
07:05 PM on 04/20/2009
SUMMERS DID THE JOB ASKED OF HIM BY HIS PRESIDENT CLINTON AND THE HILL ! SUMMERS WILL DO THE JOB ASKED OF HIM FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA...TO CORRECT THE ERROR OF THE CLINTON ADMINISTRA­TION AND THE REPUBLICAN­'S PARTY NEED FOR DEREGULATI­ON! THIS NATION CANNOT AFFORD TO PUNISHED ITS STAFF FOR DOING THEIR JOBS SO WELL! KEEP SUMMERS FOR I KNOW HE IS DOING A GOOD JOB!
07:25 PM on 04/20/2009
Nah. You're wrong, even with the yelling.
08:54 PM on 04/20/2009
All caps is cruise control for cool.
06:53 PM on 04/20/2009
Naomi Klein you are trustworth­y - I know you'd never burn my house down. However, if an arsonist burned down my home and I rebuilt a second home and it too was burned down I still would not have lost as much money as I did investing my savings in the good old US of A. I feel swindled of two thirds of my lifetime savings by all those at the very, very top. The banksters and all those high and mighty who aid and abet them in their over the top greedy swindles. Yes, Virginia, we do have the best rip off your face capitalism that money can buy perhaps we should call it shock and awe capitalism American Oligarch style.
08:09 PM on 04/20/2009
Banksters! I love it. Let's make that the new word of the year.
05:11 PM on 04/20/2009
I wish you would run for President.­..*sigh*