More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Natale Zimmer

GET UPDATES FROM Natale Zimmer
 

Alan Simpson Embarrasses Obama, Insults Women, and, Well, Everyone

Posted: 08/25/10 10:50 AM ET

Alan Simpson, former US Senator from Wyoming and current Co-Chair of the President's Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, has crossed the line. We're all entitled to our own opinions, but not our own facts. And when he didn't like the facts, he took to personal insults and profanity. Check out his outrageous email to Ashley Carson, Executive Director of the Older Women's League, in response to her blog post from April.

Mr. Simpson dismisses the voice of advocates, stating that, "people like [OWL] babble into the vapors about 'disgusting attempts at ageism and sexism' and all the rest of that crap." This is at best inappropriate and lays bare his contempt for those who dare speak truth to power and protect those among us who are least able to advocate for themselves against the likes of Mr. Simpson. And apparently being disgusted by ageism and sexism is not worth his time. I guess it's ok to discriminate when you're a wealthy ex-senator.

Further, Mr. Simpson seems not to understand what Social Security is or how it if funded, claiming that "people on Social Security...milk it to the last degree." The fact is that Social Security is only paying out to beneficiaries money they invested in the program. It's not a lottery winning or a gift - any more than the bank giving you back what you've deposited in your savings account is a gift. If he is referring to Americans who receive disability payments, or children who receive survivor benefits, perhaps he is simply out of touch with the realities of those less fortunate than he has been. Apparently Mr. Simpson thinks American workers do not deserve to get back the money they paid in, or that they are less deserving of having their bonds paid than China, which also holds billions of dollars in US Treasury bonds. (That's right, when they talk about cutting the deficit by cutting Social Security, they're talking about defaulting on the bonds Social Security holds. Don't worry, they'll pay China - but it's ok to short American workers?)

But the greatest problem that Mr. Simpson demonstrates in this ranting email is his disrespect for women, along with a complete disdain for all government programs that help anyone, which is in line with his numerous statements decrying "entitlement" programs: "It's the same with any system in America. We've reached a point now where it's like a milk cow with 310 million tits!" (You, like me, may be wondering if this is really him - we checked his email and even called his assistant's phone - unless someone has hacked into his email, msnbc's website, and his assistant's phone, this is legit. But it's not out of character - check out this video from earlier this summer.) Such disrespect and vulgarity are characteristics not of a rational, bipartisan leader, but of a ranting ideologue bent on destroying a program that keeps millions of older American out of poverty.

Finally, my outrage turns to disgust at the suggestions that working on behalf of low-income older women is somehow not "honest work!" With people like Mr. Simpson, who is so clearly dedicated to undermining the social fabric of our country, co-chairing a commission that is intended to take a serious look at our nation's deficit woes, and suggesting that advocating for those who will be most harmed by the cuts he promotes is somehow dishonest or deceitful, he shows his true colors. Mr. Simpson is hamstrung by his own biases and prejudices, and unwilling to engage in a positive discussion with those who oppose his dogma. These are not the actions of a leader.

OWL sent a letter, along with a copy of Mr. Simpson's email, of course, to President Obama, demanding the resignation (or removal - we're flexible) of Alan Simpson from the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. We've also started an online petition, and joined with the National Council of Women's organizations to demand a better choice from the President. Call it a Women's Equality Day present - it's this Thursday, August 26. Mr. Simpson's sort of elitist, sexist, ageist and disrespectful thinking have no place in the serious conversations in Washington that affect us on Main Street. Don't let Alan Simpson steal your retirement. At the rate we're going, we're going to need every penny.

Get involved. Sign the petition. Call the White House and tell them what you think: 202-456-1111. Go to www.SocialSecurityMatters.org and find out how to get the information out. Don't Agonize, Organize!

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lqw
Justmyopinion
08:19 PM on 08/30/2010
""I've made some plenty smart cracks about people on Social Security who milk it to the last degree. You know 'em too...We've reached a point now where it's like a milk cow with 310 million tits!"
"Stop yapping your lips and listen good. This commission might be packed with millionaires, but we're looking out for little people who need Social Security."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/24/alan_simpson_social_security_n_693277.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtx47
05:34 PM on 08/26/2010
I wish the author, Natale Zimmer, educated us by giving us the exact dollar figures for the amount an average Social Security recipient contributes to SS (including employer contribution and return on investments); AND the amount this individual receives from SS and will received during their average life expectancy. Then we-all will exactly know who is whining and ranting.

Or is it that facts do not matter?
02:20 PM on 08/26/2010
I remember when Alan Simpson was tapped to go on all the news networks as an apologist for Cheney after he "accidentally" blew an elderly lawyer's face clean off his skull.

He was spinning like a top for about three straight days.

He tries to go for that no-nonsense, "down-home" mid-West persona, but he's simply a nasty, demented little man with a vicious mean streak, which is being exposed more and more.
photo
TexasDem0
USMC Vietnam combat vet
01:43 PM on 08/26/2010
Alan Simpson Embarrasses Obama, Insults Women, and, Well, Everyone. . .

And gets to keep his job because heaven forbid this administration would have the effrontery to admonish, fire, or question a Republican.
12:45 PM on 08/26/2010
From the Email:

"We’ve reached a point now where it’s like a milk cow with 310 million tits! Call when you get honest work!"

The population of the U.S. is 310,085,000. By his 'facts', only 85,000 people are not on S.S.-would the wealthy Mr. Simpson be one who is currently benefiting from S.S.? If so, he should start his cuts right there.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
booker52
avid reader
09:48 AM on 08/26/2010
Republicans seem to have a problem with middle class, their unions, their pensions and their collecting soc sec and help with medicare. They don't have a problem with massive (un-needed) payouts for military contracts, allowing businesses to ship jobs out of the country or bailing out banks too big to fail, CEO's with golden parachutes. I cry foul.
12:14 PM on 08/26/2010
Foul, yes, and more than that, the GOP are engaged in full-on class warfare when they classify teachers and first responders as entitlements. They are actively engaged in the financial destruction of the middle class.
Simpson attacked OWL with his abusive rhetoric, showing no fear in saying anything he wanted-his apology rings very false. He will dictate changes to the President-you can depend on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
12:40 PM on 08/26/2010
Obama and many other Democrats share the same problem.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:33 AM on 08/26/2010
farce.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
babaann
If I had known I would live this long.........
08:39 AM on 08/26/2010
Call when you get honest work???????

This man needs to go away and get a job where his attitude will not be a problem for others-ever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:08 AM on 08/26/2010
So, the question is why hasn't Alan Simpson been kicked off the panel? Answer: Obama has an "excessively concessionary personality." See Ralph Nader's views here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGwkxMl4U98
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
latinonationreport
01:05 AM on 08/26/2010
on-line Mike gets it pretty much right! no pun intended! Obama IS NOT/WAS NOT the extremist lib. that all the right wing wacko types wanted to paint him as being...Indeed, he's a pragmatist but has a team of inept corrupt thug politicians...He needs to trust his instinct especially on issues such as immigration reform and energy! Pres. Obama once said, "good policy makes good politics" and if he could form a coherent approach to immigration reform, he'd have much broader support from libs and conservativos!
www.latinonationreport.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hotbarb2614
proud military mother
08:48 PM on 08/25/2010
Just another Republican with a big mouth.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
08:39 PM on 08/25/2010
President Obama:

You were elected by an overwhelming margin of American voters. Prior to that, those same American voters gave their votes to a Democrat majority in both houses of our nation's congress. In spite of this, you insist upon ignoring the will of the people and look to those who hate you, and us, for your counsil. This includes many in our own party, and some of your selected staff of advisors.


After tolorating this for almost two years, as a progressive Independent who voted for you, I have to join in the growing number who would look forward to seeing a primary challenge to your candidacy in 2012. If Democrats and progressives can not be represented by the current office holders then we owe it to America to attempt to improve that situation. Democracy is not about parties. It is about issues and ideology. Obviously, you do not share mine, or perhaps that of the majority of voters who believed what you said and implied in the campaign that gained you both the candidacy and the victory you now choose to govern away from.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:28 PM on 08/25/2010
I thin you're wrong ! The majority of voters lean conservative, Obama won because he promised that he was going to be open to both Democrat and Republican ideas, he said he did not believe in blue states or red states, that he disagreed with labels such as liberal and conservative, and it was moderates, swing voters, that put Obama in the White House. If people wanted more "progressive" legislation to be pushed forward then how do you explain that Democrats are running behind very conservative Republicans in states that Obama won? How do you explain that Grassley (death panels) approval in Iowa is 60%+ and destroying the Democrats? You "progressives" are so blind that ignore the fact that what put Obama in the White House was the promise of an end to liberal vs conservative. Republicans like Collin Powell, Susan Eisenhower, Chuck Hagel, and many others that endorsed Obama, did it because they believed Obama was not the liberal that Fox wanted everybody to think, because liberals don't win national elections. I really hope that so-called liberals just create their own party and leave the Democratic party to more moderate voters.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
10:17 PM on 08/25/2010
Every "issue" poll shows that Americans are left center. Only when asked if they consider themselves liberal or conservative do they resort to the Pavlovian knee jerk reaction against the "liberal" label. Grassley's approval was much higher prior to his selling out to the GOP obstruction rhetoric. The other Republicans you listed have been absent in the political discourse since the 08 election, with the recent exception of Hagel who is backing a Democrat candidate. They are embarrassed by the tactics of the GOP.

It is only since 1980, and more so since 2000, that the defining platform of the Democrat party has been reviled as extreme, while the "mainstream" thinking of the GOPers is touted as "American". This is the usual reaction of a nation at war, and the reason the GOP is anxious to keep an ongoing war perpetually ginning up "patriotism" where any common sense questioning of our goals and methods is proclaimed anti-American. We just experienced almost three decades of disconnect from the rest of the world and our numerous misconceptions of anything "European" show how badly it has hurt us.

History shows us only too clearly what the culmination of radical nationalism and fear can turn into. We should take the first opportunity to establish a "truth" commission so that we have some body to remind us when we stray from what should be the common ground between the parties. We will never achieve agreement on "how" if we can't agree on "what".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
12:39 PM on 08/26/2010
Thanks. Obama and Simpson both are working to kill SS and are working for the corporatists. I expect no resignations.

I'm hoping the nation will produce a strong progressive challenger in 2012. A challenger who will represent the people for a change.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
07:52 PM on 08/25/2010
Obama, who appointed him, won't fire him. Obama needs desperately to extend the olive branch to republicans because when the GOP takes over America in 10 weeks and Obama stands alone, he does not want to spend the next 2 years fighting off subpoenas and impeachment.

So he figures to give the GOP the biggest New Deal prize of all; the most sucessful social program in US history, for them to dismantle, Social Security.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
oldngrumpy
My micro-bio is no longer empty
08:55 PM on 08/25/2010
Cutting Social Security benefits to match future income would effectively leave the "SURPLUS" in the general fund to balance against the deficit. Conservatives, which Obama is one of, have been eying that massive number since the 1960's and trying to figure a way to transfer it to the corporate "OWNERS" of our country. Obama could accomplish this and defuse the deficit criticism by simply allowing the commission to take it's natural course, given the ginned up furor and the rigged makeup of the panel. I am thoroughly surprised at Nancy Pelosi's involvement, and wonder just how far she may be willing to go with this sham.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
measie
05:20 PM on 08/25/2010
Here is another example of how the media drives the narrative. Mr. Simpson did not embarrass President Obama. Mr. Simpson embarrassed himself and the Republican party.
11:42 AM on 08/26/2010
Then what is unexcusable is the sound of crickets from the WH, who appointed him.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
measie
04:02 AM on 08/27/2010
The President appointed,in good faith, a Republican whose name was given to him as a nominee for this position. Another example of "bi-partisanship" gone bad.
guilatty
Something has got to make sense eventually
05:09 PM on 08/25/2010
The Social Security Administration website has a lot of great information as to how the program works, what it costs, and debunks a lot of internet myths. Social Security works. It is not that expensive. The privatization benefits are grossly exaggerated and do not account for what would happen when people do not pay in (we are not going to let them starve in the streets so forget that warming image all you Republicans--you won't either). All in all we should just enjoy its success, leave it the heck alone, and go on to something else. I could be convinced there are abuses with SSI (I have seen some sketchy things myself) so we should make sure that eligibility for SSI remains fair and sensible and that fraud is eradicated.
Other than a kneejerk and unconvincing urge to blurt constantly about government and find something to gripe about it is hard to see why Republicans don't like Social Security. Heck, most of them are on it.