"The best way to drive out the devil, if he will not yield to texts of Scripture, is to jeer and flout him, for he cannot bear scorn."
As a stand up comedian, that quote inspires me, because in my mind you don't fear evil, you make fun of it. The problem is, everyone has a different opinion of what "evil" is.
To me, evil is defined as someone out to cause harm, and with that in mind I made fun of the anti-vaccination movement. I feel that if you are willingly allowing preventable disease to exist on this planet, then you deserve to be made fun of.
After a show, someone asked me: "If something happened to your child because of a vaccination, would you remain so belligerent? Calling names doesn't help anyone."
Two salient points.
To the latter, true, calling names doesn't help. But that's what happens when all other alternatives have been exhausted. When reason, logic, facts, and rational discussion fail, what's left? When people have shown an absolute unwillingness to remove their blinders, mocking is all that remains. It's why The Daily Show exists as a counter to Fox News.
To the former?
That's more difficult.
I would be suicidal if something happened to my children, be it from vaccination or, say, disease. But if I'm being honest--and I always am--my anger toward the anti-vaccination movement stems from the place most anger comes from: fear.
Because of the anti-vaccination movement, I fear vaccinating my children.
Yes, I logically understand the minimal risk vs. enormous benefit vaccinations offer, but that's the thing with fear: It's irrational. It's irrational, it's emotional, and guess what? When going head-to-head, emotion trumps logic.
Not in the long run, thankfully; I get my kids vaccinated. But I do worry: What if my kid is the one-in-a-million where something goes wrong?
And that's the beauty with the anti-vaccination movement: all it has is fear. It doesn't have logic, reason, or anything that cannot be explained away. Trust me, I've heard (and had) all the arguments.
"Vaccines cause autism!"
A 500,000 child, multi-year study in Denmark says it doesn't matter if you got the MMR shot or not, autism rates on both sides of the needle were exactly the same.
"I only got 3 shots as a kid in the 1970s! Why do kids today get 14?"
It's called progress. Medical science can prevent more diseases today than in the 1970s. Would you bitch and moan if someday they were able to prevent cancer with a vaccination? (Note: they can, HPV, and people actually complain about it. Also: If you're so against progress, why do you have an iPhone? Shouldn't you have a big old rotary phone from the 1970s?)
"Why do we still get Polio vaccinations?"
The same reason we get measles shots. Even though it was considered eliminated in the U.S.A., it's still on the planet, and planes exist.
"They keep extra cash on hand for settlements!"
Name an industry that doesn't. We're a litigious society, and unfortunately that means payouts happen even when undeserved.
"Some doctors are against vaccinations!"
Yes, discredited ones. The "doctors" I've found against vaccinations were either taking money from an organization filing an autism lawsuit against big pharma, or selling $75 healing crystals and peddling other such snake oil.
"Wait, big pharma! You telling me they have my best interest at heart?"
No. They want money. And the best way to make money is to have an effective product.
The argument never ends, "It's like your Aunt Edna's ass. It goes on forever and it's just as frightening."
The difference between actual anti-vaxxers and me is: I search out information through accredited sources. Doctors. Scientists. Well-researched documentaries. I don't scour the Internet for conspiracy blogs. When I have worries, I speak directly with my daughter's pediatrician, and he assuages my fears kindly and competently.
(And probably rolls his eyes and feels like patting me on the head while giving me a lollipop.)
Unfortunately, with anti-intellectualism all the craze in America, being a doctor doesn't mean what it used to.
I watched a report on the anti-vaccination movement, one that showcased a woman who said, "After receiving a flu shot, I could only walk backwards." When it broke, her story went viral on YouTube; especially compelling was footage of her gimping about as she "attempted" to walk normally. The video added fuel to an already well-stoked fire, because fear is contagious and it allowed crazies to pretend nonsense is the same as scientific research.
Naturally, the woman's story was a lie and was proven as such, but people continue to lap it up and share the original video. Sensationalism always racks up more attention than retraction, and, from the report I saw: "People would believe something they saw on YouTube before they did an actual doctor."
Read that again: "People would believe something they saw on YouTube before they did an actual doctor."
I have to make fun of a person like that.
Because if I don't?
I'll go insane.