iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Neal Barnard, M.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Neal Barnard, M.D.
 

Could Processed Meat Give You Cancer?

Posted: 08/10/2011 9:12 am

Are hot dogs a political issue? Surprisingly so.

On Monday July 25, my non-profit organization, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, erected a billboard outside the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The picture was stark -- a cigarette pack emblazoned with a skull and crossbones. But sticking out of the pack were not cigarettes -- instead there were hot dogs. The message said "WARNING: Hot dogs can wreck your health."

The issue is cancer. Every year, about 143,000 Americans are diagnosed with colorectal cancer and more than 50,000 die of the disease. About half of all cases are already incurable when found. The U.S. Government and other entities have poured millions of dollars into the search for the cause. But one of the causes they found turned out to be too hot for the government to handle.

It's the ordinary hot dog. At least 58 scientific studies have looked at the issue, and the jury has rendered its verdict, which is now beyond reasonable doubt. The more hot dogs people eat, the higher their risk of colorectal cancer. And it's not just hot dogs. Any sort of processed meat -- bacon, sausage, ham, deli slices -- is in this group. And here are the numbers: Every 50 grams of processed meat you eat on a daily basis (that's about one hot dog) increases your risk of colorectal cancer by 21 percent. And just as there is no safe level of smoking, no amount of hot dogs, bacon, sausage, ham or other processed meats comes out clean in scientific studies.

The problem goes beyond colorectal cancer. An NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study found a 10 percent increased risk of prostate cancer for every 10 grams of increased intake of processed meats. Other studies have linked these same products to leukemia and ovarian cancer. Exactly how processed meats do their dirty work is not clear; it could be their nitrites, saturated fat or other ingredients.

But here's where politics come in: Even though much of this research was paid for by the U.S. government, the government also subsidizes meat. It supports feed grains to fatten cows and pigs, buys up meats for the school lunch program and helps the meat industry in countless other ways. So I think that the last thing the government wants to do is to publicize the cancer risk of one of its favorite products. I believe that this is why there are no government billboards, radio ads or television spots to warn anyone about this easily preventable cause.

At a ballgame, if you're thinking about buying your daughter a hot dog, there are no notices, no warning labels on the food product, no nothing. Meat industry lobbyists have made sure that your government won't breathe a word.

The fact is, hot dogs are not fun, cute or "All-American." If you are not convinced, just ask to see how one is made.

When good research finds a potentially fatal risk to Americans -- one as close as our refrigerators and as dear to us as our children -- the government needs to let Americans know.

And when it does not, we will.

 
Are hot dogs a political issue? Surprisingly so. On Monday July 25, my non-profit organization, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, erected a billboard outside the Indianapolis Moto...
Are hot dogs a political issue? Surprisingly so. On Monday July 25, my non-profit organization, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, erected a billboard outside the Indianapolis Moto...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 573
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
12:54 PM on 08/17/2011
Every 50 grams on a daily basis. Okay, who eats this on a daily basis. I love pig candy (bacon) but don't eat it daily, nor do I eat 50 grams worth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifencompass
03:18 PM on 08/15/2011
Where are the links to these studies???
12:35 PM on 08/15/2011
This article is well-meaning but a bit shallow. Hot dogs are not unique. All "processed meat" is packed with things you didn't ask for and which have never been proven to be safe. The term "processed" though is misleading. It suggests the additives only come into play after the animal is harvested, when in fact they are fed to the animal its whole life. The most repulsive is the excrement food animals are fed on a daily basis. Eating these animals is the same as you eating excrement yourself. The truest statement is "Meat industry lobbyists have made sure that your government won't breathe a word."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TaurusRose
just gimme some truth
05:21 AM on 08/16/2011
The scary truth. And sad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
12:12 AM on 08/15/2011
"Every 50 grams of processed meat you eat on a daily basis (that's about one hot dog) increases your risk of colorectal cancer by 21 percent." So 5 a day and will get cancer - no exceptions. Is that over a 40 year period or an 80 year period or 6 months?
You know like the song -Doctors says it'll kill me but he don't say when.
12:52 AM on 08/15/2011
In a recent post I already answered this question. But since you asked let me restate. This study done by the WCRF does not say that 50 grams increases your cancer chances by 21%. The actual study states perfectly clearly that in this test subjects were given 50g daily for 40 years and the result was a 0.55-0.35% percent increase in possible cancer per year NOT 55.0% or 35.0% that means even if you eat processed meat or red meat ever day you still only increase your chances by less than 1%. So in order to reach 21% or higher you would need to eat over 14,400 hotdogs (one every day), and even after all of that you would still have a less than a 1 in 5 chance(people who have also eaten hotdogs every day for 40 years very unlikely)of contracting colon cancer.
photo
Ms NYC
Republicans for Voldemort
09:38 AM on 08/15/2011
Thank you
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
10:13 PM on 08/14/2011
Try to eat a less processed diet in general. Once you take the time to adjust your cooking repertoire, you'll never go back.
06:09 PM on 08/14/2011
Moderation folks, moderation. Sausage is bad for you. Don't eat it every day. I try to live a relatively healthy lifestyle but I don't believe in total deprivation either. I try not to eat fried foods more that a couple of times a month. I have never smoked a cigarette in my life. I drink very moderately, maybe a couple of cold ones if I'm out on a weekend. I get aerobic exercise maybe 2 to 3 times a week. I avoid McDonalds if at all possible (even though I LOVE their regular cheeseburgers dammit). I try to get around 7 total hours of sleep a day and above all I DONT STRESS...In the last ten years I have had to call in sick maybe twice. Not twice a year, twice in ten years because of the flu and my blood pressure is normal/low. I read the back of everything I buy in the supermarket and buy accordingly but I'm not afraid to enjoy myself every once in a while either. Ham and cheese omelette with hash browns, omg....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doris french
Technically we are beyond survival?
11:13 AM on 08/14/2011
Why don't the makers of hot dogs stop putting carcinogens in the hot dogs? Nitrates are used as a preservative. Isn't the salt enough to preserve the meat?
03:05 PM on 08/14/2011
No, the regular salt (and sugar) in curing solutions will destroy most bacteria by osmotic pressure, but it won't destroy toxin-secreting bacterial spores like those responsible for botulism.  The nitrite and nitrate ions in curing salts destroy these spores by oxidative pressure.

The problem is that modern cured meats like hot dogs and "city" ham are very high in moisture. Traditionally, salting was used in combination with some amount of drying, which makes the meat much more inhospitable to microorganisms. Moist, low-acid proteins are difficult to preserve.
01:13 AM on 08/14/2011
I'm really bothered by the way this "Shocking study" has managed to spread so quickly around the internet. Before I begin let me state that I am not some hot dog salesman or anything like that, I'm just a man who "Frank-ly" likes a hot dog now and again.(lol) Now for some facts 1. This study was produced by the World Cancer Research Fund. 2. In the many studies they have performed since early 2000 the jury is not "OUT" on this issue. 3. In various studies portions have changed dramatically for subjects in the 175-10g range. 4. In this study subjects (were given 50 grams of red or processed meat daily) however the results of this seem to have been blown up by recent articles, because even though they did get an increase in cancer it wasn't 50% or 30% or even 25% subjects showed slightly less than 20%. Whats more is that it took 40 years of red meat or processed meat for that 20%. That means you would have to eat about 14,400 hot dogs(not kidding) to have a less than 1 in 5 chance of contracting cancer. Sorry this post was long but I incourage all readers of articles like these to try to track down the actual studies and not opinionated bloggers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
papagroove
05:20 PM on 08/13/2011
Industrialization hasn't been a net positive for humans yet because of how ignorantly we approached it.
Third world countries don't have the cancer rates we do, which should make you realize why "everything gives you cancer".
Its cause we continue to screw with the organic world to fit our man-made one...We take the most ignorant approach to life in the western world and I think cancer is simply the results of our actions as westernized people.
To me Cancer is simply natural selection, or evolution telling us we are doing it all wrong.
In my observation, the closer one is to nature, the less likely they are to get these evolutionary diseases.. like cancer.
Seriously, take it all the way to clothes.. skin cancer... the sun's fault? .. or our fault for wearing clothes for the last 10,000 years so now our skin cannot handle the sun's rays?. We never learned to adapt, we simply avoided.
Other animals that aren't "robed" don't seem to have the skin cancer problem we do. We really are turning into a species that cannot adapt because of how much un-natural BS we put on ourselves.

Need to eat, cool, let's build regional food processing plants instead of local community gardens and farms.
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
08:05 PM on 08/13/2011
I was with you until the last sentence. We need to be eating as much unprocessed local food as possible. Small regional processing plants are preferable to large national plants. But should we be getting our food from PROCESSING plants? Europeans are much healthier than Americans. There food is not as processed as ours. They don't put all the HFSCs and chemicals into their food as we do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Scott Davis
08:36 AM on 08/13/2011
Every year, over 150 million Americans forget everything they've been told and continue to ask the same questions over and over again. On point, there is nothing new about nitrates and nitrites causing cancers. No matter how many times you tell us what is better for us, we always want to find a way around the unpleasantness in favor of 'pleasure'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doris french
Technically we are beyond survival?
11:14 AM on 08/14/2011
What food choices are there really?

If you want a sandwich why are all the choices nitrate laden meats?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Scott Davis
06:06 PM on 08/14/2011
There are many healthier food choices than sandwich meat laden with nitrites and nitrates. The primary reason for the use of nitrites, etc., is as a food preservatives and the companies producing those sandwich meats are not compelled to find a safer means of doing so. In the seventies, the people who complained about it were called 'health nuts', 'hippie freaks' and fanatics. The most famous line from that era regarding cancer producing foods was: 'There is no medical proof that ......... causes cancer in humans,' coming from "scientists" hired by the companies themselves. That being said, food companies began to listen and certain foods were made without dangerous preservatives. Once the hub-bub died down over a ten or twenty year period, those same chemicals began appearing again in greater frequency. One example: monosodium glutamate. Check your labels.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
elcerritan
My bio is not micro
08:50 PM on 08/15/2011
? Well, they AREN'T the only choices, even if you want meat..
08:23 AM on 08/13/2011
I feel like everything causes cancer now.
photo
catsanon
Humans... Such silly creatures.
07:21 PM on 08/13/2011
I'm waiting for the study which claims that sleeping 7 to 8 hours a night causes cancer... afternoon naps cause cancer... shutting your eyes causes cancer...... sorry, getting carried away (does THAT cause cancer too?).......
06:43 AM on 08/13/2011
I can't say that I am surprised, when you consider the synthetic hormones they are shooting into chicken, beef and pork to increase the yield of the carcass, and the preservatives that they are adding to make the meat have a greater shelf life. It's not natural and our bodies aren't meant to process chemicals like those.
04:46 AM on 08/13/2011
I am very surprised to see a lot of people commenting on this post. Because normally there isn't a lot of comments on health posts, so this definitely makes me really happy. People are starting to care about their health.
I can't say that processed meat gives you cancer, but not so long ago, I saw this completely sick video, it has something to do with " Meat Glue" and how to watch out for meat that is glued together and sold much cheaper ( which I am sure they also use in all the processed meats to keep them from falling apart ). The process of it being done, was very disturbing for me.

Just think about this, If you are eating chemicals every day, several times a day, what do you think it is doing to your liver? Or to your other organs? It's kind of common sense isn't it?

http://www.lovingfit.com
01:26 AM on 08/13/2011
I believe that all cancers are caused by the HPV virus. That is a member of the same family of virus's that causes warts which act just like cancer cells and grow growths or tumors. How do you get it, it is simple, from very close contact with other people (sex, kissing) carrying HPV which is about 80% of the population of women and men. They already know that ovarian and cervical cancer are caused by HPV or the human papillomavirus virus and more research will probably show that all cancers are caused by this. With all these people hooking up all the time, it is no wonder that cancer in general is at an all time high. As there is no cure for a virus, hence there is no cure for cancer. Do a little research into HPV and viruses and you will be shocked at what you find.
04:48 AM on 08/13/2011
I wonder when our scientists will develop a cure for these things. The most surprising thing to me, is that they can clone animals, build space stations, but some how can't develop a cure for cancer.
10:18 PM on 08/12/2011
The key word is 'processed'.
04:31 AM on 08/13/2011
Very well said.