Lisa Kudrow, Josh Brolin, Chaz Bono, Christina Ricci Come out to Support LGBT Film at Outfest 2009
Outfest is one of the oldest, continuously running film festivals in Los Angeles and this year will emphasize LGBT Rights in response to Prop 8.
Outfest is one of the oldest, continuously running film festivals in Los Angeles and this year will emphasize LGBT Rights in response to Prop 8.
My issue here is not that we do not prosecute our politicians adequately but the double standard that is placed on heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
We need to make sure that everyone in our community enjoys equal rights in America whatever race, religion or nationality. Racism is a gay issue.
A suit filed yesterday in Massachusetts is a smart, novel attack on a law that is clearly unconstitutional, but also has the support of a waning, yet significant portion of the U.S. population.
In his final decade, by which time he was a multi-millionaire, without a trace of irony or even a hint that he recognized how ridiculous his denial m...
Policymakers must support efforts to collect data on LGBT people to ensure that our health care system is serving everyone.
Many of the Republicans who support Romney now liked him in 2008 but talked themselves out of it.
It's satisfying to lambast a staunch social conservative for an extramarital affair on another continent. But the real failure in this sad story is a political platform based on a personal moral code.
If the Obama administration can't pass a comprehensive overhaul of health care, then how is it going to repeal laws that a large proportion of Americans don't care about or to which many don't object?
At Monday's address, President Obama renewed thin promises while asking for patience. There was no message indicating that homophobia is the problem, not homosexuals.
One of the dirty not-so-little-secrets of the same-sex marriage debate is that the everyday benefits of marriage don't require legal marriage at all.
Proponents of full equality for gay and lesbian couples should not be arguing that marriage is a purely private matter, unconnected to the public culture we are seeking to join.
What if, instead of giving out a million dollar booty-call, the LGBT donors had suddenly crossed their collective political and economic legs, and told the DNC "No more freebies. Not without that ring."
Poor once beautiful Michael Jackson, It's fairly certan that many of us will never be able to adaquately say goodbye to him. Curating the Maysles ...
Forty years after Stonewall, not only is sexual orientation still a taboo for many in the media, all too often it serves as a focal point for hate, ridicule, and misinformation.
Originally published on Youthradio.org, the premier source for youth generated news throughout the globe. By: Rachel Krantz Hundreds of military se...
Sanford built his career on questioning other people's morals. He was on his moral high horse, all along, and now he's undermined everything.
Who is paying for the multi million dollar TV campaign? Who is funding the $500,000 New York State PAC? Who is paying for all the direct mail robo-calls and millions of direct connect calls?
It's June, that month more or less identified with weddings -- and Rainbow Pride -- and we seem to have been busily courting a new generation to embrace gay marriage.
"You saw the press conference?" "Of course I saw the press conference. Very strange." "Very strange. And you read the e-mails?" "Of course I re...
Bill Maher used to tell a joke, which is funny but not true. He'd ask the question why are we trying to stop gay people from getting married; they're ...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Very erudite comments and great leadership by Kent.. I am a Canadian and same sex marriages have been legal here for some years I believe under our equivalent to your "equal protection clause". Same sex marriage is not an issue here and is not a threat to oppo sex marraiges. Question? Are Canadian SSM's recognized in law in the US by either states or the Fed?
Not trying to start a fight but it is ironic that one of the very cases cited in the DOJ brief that has flipped people out is going to win the case for your community. I just think, you know, Karma, it exists.
J
At this point, I don't really care what argument is used to help argue for repeal of DOMA. I just hope congress gets it done in the next 3.5 years
PlaceboStudman this is in the courts, not congress. .
The Irony! It almost hurts.
The SCOTUS will make this disappear quite simply: They will choose not to review the issue, or they will declare that the "States Rights" of all the other 49 states will be abbrogated if the law is weakened by allowing Massachusetts to "secede" from the national law (and will) of the country.
The Tenth Ammendment was not enacted as a tool to propagate purile, abnormal interests.
No case here.
And here the religioconservative attacks on human rights begins
But the state of Mass has determined SSM is not "abnormal".
No point here.
Well, here is the thing, granting cert is a vote, we have the votes now. It only takes four. So your argument that SCOTUS isn't going to review it, or hear the case is as ignorant the rest of your statement.
My family is not a " purile, abnormal interest".
I do not like my family called names. Who would?
Mr Greenfield,
let me ask another question if I may. Is it acceptable for an argument to be brought up using SCOTUS's own previous rulings? while this obviously isn't the case here (I dont think), Could a plaintiff bring a case that parallels the SCOTUS California medical marijuana case where several Ca counties were forced to abide by state law in distributing medical marijuana ID cards. I'm thinking in terms of, if, say, a particular county within a state that allowed SSM decided it was not going to allow SSM because of DOMA. Could this be used as a way to make DOMA irrelevant in the same way that the medical marijuana ruling in California basically has made federal marijuana laws somewhat irrelevant?
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or