If Obama Was a Liberal We'd Have a Better Bill
If we had more liberals in Washington, instead of blathering about perfection being the enemy of the good, we'd have heard a rallying cry that mediocre is the enemy of effective.
If we had more liberals in Washington, instead of blathering about perfection being the enemy of the good, we'd have heard a rallying cry that mediocre is the enemy of effective.
Progressives who oppose this bill are not being obstructionist. Rather, they are taking the position that when real opportunities to reform health care arise, it is essential to get it right.
While our massive health care reform package was hammered out in the back offices of the Capitol, Senators still found time to bend over backwards for the Gun Owners of America.
Those fighting the passage of landmark health care policy are, once again, using the bodies of women and the care of our children as pawns. "Oh no, here we go again."
I agree with with those who note the danger of progressives attacking individual mandates in the health care bill, and how such attacks could be const...
It is possible that there is going to be a "deficit commission" to reduce our country's budget deficits. I have some questions for them to ask to help get things started in the right direction.
It's been a while since we made women stitch scarlet A's to their clothes as one of their many punishments for having babies out of wedlock. That kind...
The Senate bill is all but certain to be approved, but the question has been raised: Does reform make things worse for retirees?
To get so-called moderate Democrat Ben Nelson on board, Harry Reid had to agree to a decidedly un-moderate compromise on abortion rights.
Sometimes these things get a bit battered in delivery ...
I diligently followed the TARP debate and happenings early on. However, at this point there have been so many versions, revisions, and debates about the TARP program that I have lost track.
What I'm afraid of is that this bill makes private insurance larger and stronger -- and thus, gets us further away from curing the main problem of our health care system: perverse incentives.
Here is your Christmas present -- a big lump of coal. You are ill and need help. You want the best. Whose wise counsel and help do you seek? You want someone who is sympathetic, skilled and competent.
"By standing up to the special interests -- who've prevented reform for decades, and who are furiously lobbying against it now -- the Senate has moved...
The quality of the society we pass on to our children is what determines their well being, not the government debt.
Long ago I learned that not all doctors are healers. But this man was a destroyer. I do not remember leaving his office, or walking over a mile home in the bitter cold. I do remember vomiting at a street curb.
What does it say about our society when government requires us to purchase health insurance and fines us for not doing so yet provides no support to make this possible?
What is in the health care bill? The Senate version? The House version? I have been looking through the coverage--the vast sturm und drang about it--...
We value health care, our health care is of an exceptionally high quality, ergo we pay a lot for our health care. But what if the middle part of that statement isn't quite true?
Dear Mr. President, what have you learned from the health care debate? Hopefully you now know it was a mistake to delegate your top priority