On Nancy Pelosi and Michael Jackson
I'd like to thank Nancy Pelosi for nixing the resolution to honor Michael Jackson. It's not like Congress doesn't have anything to do. Health care, anyone?
I'd like to thank Nancy Pelosi for nixing the resolution to honor Michael Jackson. It's not like Congress doesn't have anything to do. Health care, anyone?
As details emerge of how the Fed secretly doled out more than a trillion dollars during the financial crisis, a rare bipartisan movement in Congress demands that the Fed be held accountable.
Liberal denial gives silent permission to authoritarian aggression and violence by our government. The bogeyman has shifted from communism to terrorism, but the dynamics remain the same.
Is the climate bill so compromised that we who care about clean energy and the fate of the planet should have opposed it? There are three main reasons why, despite its imperfections, we had to support it.
Even if we could improve enforcement of existing laws, should improved enforcement be the sum total of our national policy toward gun crime?
With 20,000 illegal guns from America recovered at crime scenes in Mexico over the last five years, there is no excuse for Congress and the President not to take steps now to close the gun show loophole.
Should suspected terrorists be blocked from buying guns before they commit a violent crime? The gun lobby apparently doesn't think so.
For the new Pecora Commission, Pelosi and Reid need to do better than finding a predictable list of retired and safe Democratic politicians. This is a rare chance to light a real fire on behalf of deep reform.
Knowing that he didn't have the votes to stop the clean energy jobs bill, Republican Minority leader John Boehner instead turned to a tactic familiar those who want stand in the way of progress -- delay.
If enacted, the State Secrets Protection Act would allow courts to review in camera Federal assertions of the state secret privilege.
While Waxman-Markey is weak medicine for a very sick planet, it's a whole lot better than taking the poor orb behind the Milky Way and shooting it.
The protests against these shameful, archaic rules are growing louder by the day among progressives of all stripes, gay and straight.
Why is gun control considered a "cultural" issue, when those who value guns support various forms of gun control?
Please take a moment this weekend to read Bob Herbert's column published today in the New York Times. His message is long overdue: Even with the mur...
It's finally here! The glamazons of government are going head-to-head in the ultimate political fashion smackdown. Sure these friends and frenemies ar...
It's interesting to observe when some Democratic Congressional leaders say Democrats have to be "loyal" to Obama and when it's apparently OK to join Republicans in undermining him.
Congress stood up for veterans this week, and delivered retroactive overtime payments for our stop-lossed troops, a new education benefit for children of servicemembers killed since 9/11, and increased VA funding.
Our leaders have all morphed in to one large, non-identified, political animal that proports to stand for something but has ended up standing for very little at all.
I have just finished watching the Sunday talk shows. All in all -- and this from a Sunday morning talk show junkie -- a pretty poor excuse for analysis of what's going on in Washington.
A grassroots movement working within Democratic Party structures might break the cycle of abuse the Republican minority has inflicted upon the state.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
How can the federal government ban needle exchange program
This should clearly be up to individual states
Many of you think that the 'ban' is a good thing-
The problem is that even though the 'needles'
are targeting 'drug-users', these efforts, to reduce
the spread of many diseases helps and saves us all.
Innocent children might not be born with congenital problems,
someone in your family might not become infected with
HIV/AIDS, Hep. B/C, Syphillis and other diseases.
If we don't provide a 'safe' system for drug-users to get clean,
where do you think they will get the stuff they need??
Either from crimes on businesses, homes, in our parks
and placing a 'big glut' on our medical systems.
We need to 'grow-up' and learn to be more adult
in treating drug problems that have affected
our country for decades-
Well done!
Excellent. Congress doing its job to ensure that these types of programs are sustainable through legislation. Excellent.
why is it the taxpayers responsibility to provide needles to drug addicts? If we are going to do this because of public safety issues then why not pay for vehicle maintanence such as brakes? That could affect public safety. Why not have govt cabs that take people home from bars?
You are gross.
No, he makes a valid point, and offers a reasonable alternative.
Believe it or not, but many times RWM makes valid points. We may not agree with him entirely, but he makes an honest effort to explain his positions and offer ideas. Our country is well served by that.
-----
RWM,
Good idea, I would certainly use it often!
These addicts all learned in school about smack and how dangerous it is. They still chose to start doing it. I don't want to pay for their stoopidity (intentional).
Why don't we subsidize cigarettes? Instead, they just raise the taxes on smokers about 500% over the past 10 years. Same principle
because needles are cheap and just because we can't prevent all unnecessary suffering doesn't mean we should do nothing.
And if the suffering is self-inflicted? We should start protecting people from themselves?
At what point do we stop?
I'd support all of those measures. Why not?
Why is it that you right wingers seem to have such disdain for the government helping people, or doing anything that is actually beneficial to anyone?
Yipes you care little.
Let me ask you this. As a taxpayer, would you rather help fund the clean needle exchange at a much lower cost to the taxpayer, or take a chance on the spread of HIV/AIDS, Hep C, MRSA, and any other disease that will cost the taxpayers BILLIONS (with a B) to cover the drugs to treat these life long diseases?
I vote for the clean needle exchange.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or