Unconstitutional Filibuster? Let's Do It, Let's Sue The Senate!
Lots of people agree that our government is currently bogged down in a morass of dysfunction that's so disastrous that it's basically criminal. And I ...
Lots of people agree that our government is currently bogged down in a morass of dysfunction that's so disastrous that it's basically criminal. And I ...
Lyle Denniston | Posted 01.17.2012
The Senate has been checking its tendency to talk at length by some such rule since 1917, but the insistence on 60 votes with great frequency is a thoroughly modern phenomenon and probably reflects, to a significant degree, the partisan polarization of American politics today.
Leo W. Gerard | Posted 05.25.2011
It's great that Sen. Johnny Isakson and his fellow conservative Republicans in the U.S. Senate now back the supermajority concept that the Employee Free Choice Act achieves through "card check."
Michael Moore | Posted 05.25.2011
President Obama, I don't know what your team has been up to, but they haven't served you well. And Rahm, poor Rahm, has turned into a fighter -- not of Republicans, but of the left.
Lance Simmens | Posted 05.25.2011
Senator, playing with people's lives is not a game. These childish antics only reinforce the cynicism and distrust that a frustrated and worried populace feels towards their government.
Steven P. Croley | Posted 05.25.2011
Ideally, a filibuster ensures that narrow majorities cannot impose dramatic policy changes; in fact, the speechless filibuster doesn't test the strength of competing convictions.
HuffingtonPost.com | Jeff Muskus | Posted 05.25.2011
Less than an hour after Scott Brown was sworn in as the Republican junior senator from Massachusetts, he made it clear where he stands on bipartisan c...
Zach Friend | Posted 05.25.2011
On the surface, there were 60 Democratic votes. But when you subtract two Independents, what existed was not 58 unilateral views or votes. A supermajority is a bloc, and this was never a bloc.
Sherry Bebitch Jeffe | Posted 05.25.2011
Californians have lived through years of government gridlocked by rules that require a supermajority legislature ripped by partisanship. Washington could now mirror the Golden State's breathtaking dysfunction.
Don Parker | Posted 05.25.2011
Fifty-one Senators can abolish or amend the filibuster rule at any time. They can do it today. They only have to summon the courage to act.
Ted Johnson, Maegan Carberry, Teresa Valdez Klein | Posted 05.25.2011
On today's Wilshire & Washington, it's looking grim for the Democrats. Or was this their plan all along? This week's first big headline should be the ...
Carl Pope | Posted 05.25.2011
San Francisco -- I've written a couple of posts in the past week that analyze the first year of the Obama presidency from the perspective of executive...
Lincoln Mitchell | Posted 05.25.2011
It was in the Senate this year where the goal of meaningful health care reform gave way to a bill that feels as if it was written by the insurance company lobbyists.
Matt Sundeen | Posted 05.25.2011
The "change makes us California" story is intended to scare us, but like many good tales, it's blatantly untrue. Budget reforms will not transform us into the Golden State. Almost the opposite is true.
Washington Post | Perry Bacon Jr. And Paul Kane | Posted 05.25.2011
Senate Democrats spent their first full day holding 60 votes just as they have spent the previous 2 1/2 years without such a supermajority: scrambling...
New York Times | CARL HULSE | Posted 05.25.2011
"We have 60 votes on paper," Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, said Wednesday in an interview. "But we cannot bulldoze anybody; it doesn't work...
HuffingtonPost.com | Jason Linkins | Posted 05.15.2012