Military Commissions: Government Flounders, As Admiral Hutson Nails Problems
A legal quagmire that lacks legitimacy and maintains key policies of the Bush administration's "War on Terror" is almost too awful to contemplate.
A legal quagmire that lacks legitimacy and maintains key policies of the Bush administration's "War on Terror" is almost too awful to contemplate.
by Dafna Linzer, ProPublica President Obama appeared to rule out issuing an executive order to establish indefinite detention Thursday, nearly a week...
It seemed okay in 2008 for a University Professor to harass a Muslim student and get away with it.
"Unfortunately, I wasn't scared enough, and I wasn't cautious," Anderson admitted. "I got caught because I refused to take the precautions that I probably should have."
The government will not use any statements made by the suspect in secret prisons, nor will the evidence "be very different" from that used when his alleged co-conspirators were tried by the federal court in 2001.
This special report by the Southern Poverty Law Center shows that domestic right-wing terrorism is far more prevalent than most Americans realize.
Today was supposed to be the day that the Justice Department -- after two delays -- released an unclassified version of the CIA Inspector General's 2004 Report into the interrogations of "high-value detainees."
The upcoming days will be a real test for the Iraqi forces. Now that the United States can take credit for restoring democracy to Iraq, is it sufficiently rooted to survive the US withdrawal?
Should suspected terrorists be blocked from buying guns before they commit a violent crime? The gun lobby apparently doesn't think so.
Much as we do not permit convicted pedophiles to teach kindergarten, those who have been imprisoned for plotting violence against abortion clinics should never again be permitted anywhere near such facilities.
Tony Blair is optimistic peace can be achieved in the Middle East during the administration of President Barack Obama.
Sadly, our celebrity-obsessed world is unlikely to pay much attention to the International Day in Support of the Victims of Torture, as the death of Michael Jackson dominates headlines.
Today, the renewed commitment from Russia and the U.S. to work on common ground, focusing their relationship on what unites them, creates a momentum we should built on.
Somalis are given two alluring choices: join the Islamists' fight or head to the high seas. There's no state to either welcome them or be aligned with.
In over three years of researching and reporting about the prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, I learned that many of the men were "Mickey Mouse" prisoners, with no connection to terrorism whatsoever.
The proper response to the tyranny in Iran is the continued building of a world alliance against the Iranian despot, who may or may not have legitimately won the elections last week.
By Tom Parker, Policy Director, (Counter) Terrorism and Human Rights Four Uighur former Guantanamo inmates are now in Bermuda, other detainees have b...
Democrats have apparently been cowed by intensive industry lobbying and Republican legislators' talking-points at recent hearings denouncing the new bill as a jobs-killer.
It's not just Iran. Getting news out of countries in the throes of political turmoil has always been dicey. And getting the news out has often meant using the most recent technology to thwart the authorities.
The pictures from Tehran are showing that Iranians are not monolithic in their beliefs. Demonstrably they can be both committed to God and to free and fair elections.
Khalid Saad Mohammed seized from a hospital in Pakistan and sold to the U.S. military. But the authorities in GITMO had never managed to build up a credible case against him.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Thank you for writing an excellent article but I don't know what good it will do. While now we have a name and against all odds have nearly proven the INNOCENCE of one of our Guantanamo victims I doubt that will change our attitude as a nation. We knew we were making this deal when we opened the place. We were well aware of the methods used on the people condemned there. We had no regard for justice, legality, or even sanity.
And now under President Obama we appear to be willing to do more of the same.
I salute Lt Col Vandeveld for having the integrity to cope with the reality that did not meet his expectations.
Impressive article Mr. Worthington and written with an uncompromising rigour to look for the truth.
To my knowledge Mr. Worthington is the best expert in the world right now on this subject. I just wish he had a bigger platform on US television. What he has done is historical, but the lessons from Guantanmo should be learned now so history does not repeat itself.
I worked for the Government for 40 years at the micro and macro level. Far too often facts are dismissed when they conflict with policy that has support at the highest level.
A Few Good Men is a valid example of a system that flawed beyond that of our civilian jury and criminal justice system.
Superb reporting, Andy.
You are absolutely right that floor debate on NEW Obama-blessed military commissions language - ALREADY PASSED by Carl Levin's Armed Services Committee - is "imminent" in the Senate.
From Wednesday, July 8th:
"Mr. REID. I ask unanimous consent that on Monday, July 13, after the pledge, prayer, and any leader remarks, the Senate proceed to the consideration of Calendar No. 89, S. 1390, the Department of Defense Authorization bill.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered."
And from Thursday, July 9th:
"Mr. REID. ...[Next] Monday, we will be in at 11 a.m. Senators Levin and McCain will begin managing the Defense Authorization bill... There are a lot of very big, important amendments on that bill."
Perhaps HuffingtonPost Washington reporters (Hi, Dan Froomkin) could ask some questions:
1. WHO WROTE the complex new military commissions language? Levin's Armed Services committee staffers, or the White House?
2. WHY was the public hearing on the new language held AFTER the committee had already adopted the language?
3. WHO will control the conference committee/negotiations merging the Senate (if its MC language remains) and House (H.R. 2647) defense bills? The President via Emanuel? Will those negotiations be secret, or publicly available?
4. WHY DID NO SENATOR OBJECT to consideration of this 2009 version of the 2006 Military Commissions Act?? Especially Pat Leahy, Chris Dodd, or Russ Feingold - who expressed disgust about the 2006 bill they ALL refused to filibuster, just before the Democrats regained Congress.
The Military Commissions have never been anything but a kangaroo court. I thought everybody knew that.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or