Gutenberg started this craze for ink-and-print. Before then, we had woodcuts and copyists, laboriously transcribing the prophets, the words of the Almighty, the words about the Almighty, and almighty words, mostly onto parchment... After Gutenberg, though, sales of books about non-religious subjects began to proliferate.
Finally, five hundred years after Gutenberg, in the wake of World War II, everyone went to college, either on the GI Bill or his or her parents' wallet, and a vast new market for non-fiction books mushroomed out of what had been paper-marshland. It was like agribusiness -- with a proliferation of publishers' imprints. Soon, every self-respecting graduate (whether of college or the school of knocks) wanted to "be published." It was Everyman's fifteen hours of fame calling to us, long before Andy Warhol reduced it to minutes for the pictorati.
New technology aided and abetted this publishing trend -- simplifying typesetting, mass binding, and printing itself. The advent of paperbacks allowed publishers to appeal to two classes of consumers: libraries and the "general public" -- with richer customers still buying the library hardbacks for their private libraries. Despite radio, film and television the dream of "being published" lived on in our culture -- indeed the rewards of being published were, in hindsight, remarkable. Where very few writers in history had ever been able to live off of their royalties as authors, suddenly there was a whole class of post-WWII "professional writers" who often supplemented their pay with journalism and teaching, but primarily relied heavily on the fruits of their book-labors -- fictional and non-fictional.
Money was both a lure and a problem, though, for the publishers -- and just as whole industries saw the rise of mergers, takeovers and "multi-nationals" that came to dominate what had once been multi-owned, geographically dispersed, independent firms, so mainstream publishing gradually devolved onto a few international parent companies, who amassed subsidiary imprints and benefitted from the supposed economies of scale. Even bookselling succumbed to the trend -- Barnes & Noble, Borders and other chains crowding out the independents.
For authors who were successfully "marketed" by such conglomerates (such as the Bertlesmann, Hachette, News Corporation, Pearson, etc groups) the pickings were wonderful while they lasted. Rather like the housing market -- and Wall Street!
But then came the dark cloud: a cloud that has seen the publishing industry go into sudden crisis mode -- unseen, unreported and unknown to the general public.
Have you heard of the Frankfurt Book Fair, the world's largest annual publishing get-together fest? Heard that it took place last week? Heard it reported on television, radio or in our newspapers. Heard anything about it?
No? Small wonder. The Frankfurt Book Fair, this year, has gone unreported in America, even though the bleak future that was discussed there behind closed doors (and in publishers' booths) represents probably the biggest change in writing and publishing since Johannes Gutenberg, a goldsmith, experienced what he called "a ray of light," and started up his first-ever movable-type press in 1440 in Strasbourg, then in Mainz.
Five hundred and seventy years later Frankfurt-am-Main, on October 5, 2010, found publishers from across the globe "in buoyant mood," according to London's Guardian newspaper last week -- having banished 2009's "mood of austerity," and busy toasting Alfred Knopf's advance of $2.5 million to a second-time Indian novelist Kiran Desai. (Heard of her?) This offer was based on a four-page proposal given out by Andrew Wylie, the New York literary agent. Brilliant!
But wait a minute! Wasn't it Andrew Wylie who, in July, said he was going to sell digital rights to his authors' books direct to Amazon, without bothering with publishers -- like Knopf -- at all?
Mmm. When in doubt, read the small print. On the web, that is. Track down, if you will, the London Times' brave reporter, Helen Rumbelow, who wrote a piece called "Dead Or Alive" last week from Frankfurt itself. She said the people "in charge of the world's books" had gathered for a great junket -- and had encountered instead "a bloodbath"! "Nearly a quarter of a million people will arrive today at the glowering conference hall in Germany with an unprecedented mixture of fear and excitement," she wrote. "The reason is digital." She quoted one agent talking of "an industry in total flux and chaos," another saying: "it's like wrestling in fast-setting concrete." And one previous, best-selling, chair of the Society of Authors opining: "I hope to God I'm being apocalyptic, but I'm deeply worried for the writers of the future."
Summarizing, Helen noted: "The role of agents, publishers and retailers is up for grabs." Print goes down the sink, digital takes over among young people -- but without them being willing to pay the sums people did in the old days for a hardback book, and without the same number of books actually being read. Ergo: little or nothing left (at 10 per cent) for the poor author!
One literary agent declared the secret mood of Frankfurt as "vague hysteria" -- with no-one having any idea what to do, or how to do it, "in a market changing so quickly."
Well, authors: welcome to the same world that recording musicians have known for some time! It's not the end of music, or even the end of people listening to music. It's the end of being paid to make it! None of our author-societies -- or newspapers here in America -- is willing to tell the plain truth, but it is staring us in the face, and it's called ruin by any other name!
An editor from a university press gave a confidential talk to my biographers group, here in Boston, a couple of weeks ago; she said her university press was reduced to printing only 300 copies of a new hardback.
Three hundred copies? Anyone wanting to live on (let alone fund research on) the 10 per cent royalties from 300 copies, please raise your hand!
Understand why I've been in a funk since visiting with publishers and agents in London last spring, as I explained in an earlier blog (Born Again Biographer)?
And my epiphany, as the garage door squeaked and protested, but finally opened over my four-year old, dusty hybrid (a trusty Ford Escape that I and my dog, Harvey, love)?
It's this:
The printed book is dead -- at least, the book as we have known it since Gutenberg. It's going digital not only among the young, but even the ancient. And nothing can halt that -- any more than medieval copyists and aficionados of hand-made parchment Bibles could in Gutenberg's day. E-reading is a'comin'. The party's over -- and authors will have to adapt.
Part of that adaptation involves re-thinking the roles of agents and publishers. Did authors in Gutenberg's day employ such middlemen? No - the printer acted as publisher/bookseller, securing advance subscriptions from interested customers. So what is to stop the modern -- or postmodern -- author from getting Amazon to print, market and distribute his or her work, from the manuscript e-text? Even audio-book it, if the author is willing to read it onto a digital tape? Why bother with an agent? Why bother with a publisher?
The editor who spoke to us the other week predicted the wholesale collapse of publishers, as an industry, in America in the next 24 to 48 months. Out of the ashes, yes, there will be niche areas of paper publishing -- as in educational textbooks, perhaps -- where specialist knowledge of a defined market will prevent the complete collapse of an imprint. But in terms of general printed books, fiction and non-fiction? Their future is science fiction, metaphorically as well as literally. It's a brave new world in which the author is guaranteed: Nothing! You will be your own agent/publisher -- responsible for your own digital editing, your own digital typesetting/formatting, your choice of e-jacket, your "book's" advance publicity, and its marketing -- the latter in co-operation with Amazon. Or Google, once they go into distribution.
My epiphany -- such a big word for such a simple realization -- is that my days of plenty are over. The years of the locust lie ahead. Out of the back of my beloved Ford hybrid I shall, grey-haired as I am, be in the future encouraging people to buy and download my digitized work, or hauling boxes of instant-printed books to sell at readings/talks I shall give around the country, into my dotage, on my chosen topics: the American presidency, military history, German literature, biography...
"Hang on to your day jobs!" one of our members remarked, at our biographers meeting. (Each of us is devoted to resurrecting a chosen life in biographical form, and we gain comfort from sharing our common concerns with fellow biographers.)
You know what: she's right. Writing's a great and wonderful craft, like painting or pottery, or playing jazz in front of aficianados. A few, like Kiran Desai, may actually make it big in the looming digi-world, especially if film rights attach; but for the rest of us, it's going to be a matter of returning to our roots as authors rather than as commodities -- and that may not be a bad thing. If we know at whom we're aiming our work, we can surely match 300 copies -- even exceed that modest total. We won't get rich -- but we'll be published. And proud.
Nigel Hamilton is President of Biographers International Organization (BIO), and a senior fellow in the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, UMass Boston. His Biography: A Brief History, and How To Do Biography: A Primer, appeared in 2007 and 2008 (Harvard University Press). His latest biography is American Caesars: Lives of the Presidents, from Franklin D. Roosevelt to George W. Bush (Yale 2010).
Follow Nigel Hamilton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NigelHamilton1
Bring it on.
I agree too that the digital, post-Gutenberg Revolution essentially has evolved the tools for the independent writer to go "viral," as a result of the natural selection process of readers. It's already begun. We've already entered a new age. Far from bemoaning it, charge forward, don't let the nay-sayers deter you...
Never underestimate humanity's ability to repeat what we've already been through.
www.vanithasankaran.com
Students, and their families, have been ripped off for generations by the textbook industry. As an example, and one of which I am familiar, there is the Copi/Cohen INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC (Macmillian) Every few years, since 1953, a "new and revised edition" comes out. It seems only intended to put an end to any developing secondary market -- and sufficiently modified that the latest edition be the required edition. The revisions are minor, and usually without any great value -- except for the monetary value reaped by the publisher and the authors. The NINETEENTH edition runs $54.15. Pathetic. Come on geeks! digitalize! Help your fellow students!
To quote Syndrome from THE INCREDIBLES, "When everyone's super no one will be."
Books will still need to be marketed to find their audience. Authors will still need to do book tours and readings... though signings will be more problematic. Hard to inscribe the face of someones iPad with a sharpie and get them to thank you for it.
What will soon go away are the mammoth printing presses and the great costs of manufacture in book publishing. But the rest of it will survive in most ways.
What I will sorely miss is book stores.
In order for books, magazines, newspaper, etc to disappear in the US, we still need to become a 21st century nation. Instead we are mired in the 1970s and headed for the 1570s.
different story. I like the feel of a real book & the wonderful escape from my twilight
years to whatever I'm reading. I enjoy my bookmark between the page ready to be
the mystery of the next chapter. I realize I'm a dying breed & after my generation is
gone print books will in time a curiosity. Good. Time marches on. Years from now
youngsters will hear stories of people in the long gone past reading books. I hope
they are happy.
& with the print business in hard economic times losing publishers who knows
what is going to happen in the future. Your post however was a perfect description
of how I feel about a good book. I'm 80yrs old. This does not keep me from reading
but TV does & I like to play with my PC. Years ago :) without the TV staring at me
I would read. These days I read during the day. TV makes me think of the past while
a good book is relaxing while lost in the subject or with fiction the characters.
Good luck bikelady1. Our posts prove that there is more too life than politics. Take care
Fanned & faved.
Mike
I see more questions than answers.
Things we do know:
"Writing is a great and wonderful craft."
Readers want to find books they love.
Writers want to find an audience.
Things we don't know:
Will the number of reader-writer connections made, i.e., occasions on which a "book" gets read (digital or print) increase or decrease?
Will what people pay for a "book" go up or down?
Will writers be able to get their books read without losing money? Will they make money?
Is there a role for publishers and agents to deliver books into the hands of readers? If not, what will?
One thing I do believe: the days of "vanity" publishing are numbered. By that I don't mean authors who try to get their books out there themselves. Those are just beginning. I mean big advances, multi-book publishing contracts once an "audience" is "created," PR-driven celebrity authors. That's what I call vanity publishing. Always interesting, just who puts what labels on things. Nigel Hamilton seems to be able to adjust. Bravo..
An excellent point. I agree. That's exactly what the mega-publishers have been doing for decades, increasingly with the talking-head schlock they fob off as worth the time of the reading public, for which such publishers have no respect and no sense of duty and calling of the true publisher and writer.
The mega corporate publisher's propaganda basically deceives the public about its supposedly special ability to identify and promote the most worthwhile authors, in order to create and maintain a stranglehold on who receives a hearing in the public forum. That has long been a major cultural problem in addressing the dilemmas and conflicts of our time. The Post-Gutenberg Revolution is sweeping the mega-publishers aside for very good reasons.
In the mid- to late-1980s, the type business began to change. Hot metal was gone; basic phototype was about finished; sophisticated software and printers had had their day; and the MacIntosh was knocking at the door. Ad typography was essentially over by 1990. Of course, book publishing continued, and most readers were more concerned with content than the printed word itself.
According to an article in the NY Times, 2008 was the worst year for book publishing in a generation. That is understandable in that notable NY publishers were locked in an old paradigm--traditional production technology augmented by an abundance of mega-million dollar writer contracts which didn't pay off. These publishers were too slow to change.
We are well into ebooks and Kindle readers now. Yet, I'm not attracted to them.
To me, the future is audio-books. First, there were cassettes; then CDs; and now MP3s. I listen to them quite a bit and have since 1985. They're so compatible with road trips, gardening, cleaning vegetables, and beyond. And, I like to hear writers read their books.
I am presently writing a novel, actually two, but may it be said that I love to write. I write for me. Writing is like going to see a great movie in my head. I get to create my own characters, I get to do my own casting, I get to write my own music (or at least pick music I like). It's very empowering, and tremendous fun.
If someone likes to write, the fact of not making Clanceyesque income is no deterrant. The starving artist is an icon. Art will get created, whether it's prose, poetry, painting, sculpture, music, dance or .... Those who must do it, must do it, poor or not. Sure, I hope that someone will want to read my story and like it. I write for me.