On November 29, national elections will take place in Honduras. Five months earlier, on June 28th, Honduran President Manuel Zelaya was arrested in the middle of the night by the armed forces and forcibly exiled to Costa Rica -- on the day he had proposed to hold a non-binding public poll on a popular assembly. Why? For his supposed intention of subverting the Honduran constitution to extend his time in office. Zelaya still remains under effective house arrest in the Brazlian embassy -- which is surrounded by coup leader Roberto Micheletti's troops -- after being smuggled back into the country. Read the first part of The Honduran Coup: A Graphic History here.
After a considerable delay, the US finally intervened to broker a deal on Oct 30, which has since been rejected outright by Zelaya and decried by the International community. Despite its previous solidarity with the deposed President, the US has now agreed to recognize the new elections that are scheduled for November 29, with or without Zelaya's restitution. Why the change of heart for the Obama administration?
In our follow-up to The Honduran Coup: A Graphic History, which was published online at Alternet.org in October, we look at the situation on the ground in Honduras, examining the details of the proposed accord and the background realpolitik that led to the sudden change of heart in the US's stance. See the links below each page for their sources and corroborating evidence.
I just fail to see how you all can support the deposed President when both the Congress AND the Supreme Court acted correctly in stopping someone from creating a situation South America has worked so hard to keep from it, except for the likes of Chavez and his horrid influence in the area.
George Orwell could have written a sequel to Animal Farm over the twisted logic of THAT excuse for a Coup d'Etat, my misinformed friend.
The illegal action of the military doesn't change the fact that Zelaya violated the constitution 10 ways to Sunday before he was removed. The charges against him seem to be based on some pretty incontrovertible facts.
Both the military who removed him (in violation of the courts order to present Zelaya) should stand trial. But so should Zelaya.