I'm a drug "legalizer," not an "incrementalist." I do not believe drug policy reform should end with the legalization of marijuana. Yet, when asked to contribute a foreword to the new book, Marijuana is Safer: So Why Are We Driving People to Drink, I eagerly accepted. Steve Fox of the Marijuana Policy Project, Paul Armentano of NORML, and Mason Tvert of SAFER have written the definitive answer to the question: Why is booze legal and pot is not? They've also offered the most lucid, persuasive strategy for ending this hypocrisy I've yet seen. Any book that strikes a blow for drug policy sanity deserves our support, regardless of any ideological differences. My foreword, reprinted here, explains why I support this extraordinary book:
When you pick up a book touting marijuana as a safer recreational alternative to alcohol, I imagine the last thing you are expecting is a foreword from the former chief of police of a major U.S. city. Well, if you're surprised, I guess we are off to a good start. You see, the goal of this book--and the purpose of this foreword--is to encourage you (fan and foe alike) to reassess the way you think about marijuana.
In pages that follow, you will find objective comparisons of marijuana and alcohol. You will learn about the ways in which the government and other influential institutions have maintained marijuana prohibition while simultaneously turning public opinion against its use. And you will be exposed to a plethora of statistics quantifying the damage caused by alcohol use in our society. Steve, Paul, and Mason have done a terrific job of presenting all of this information in an objective, compelling, and thoughtful manner. I am certain, whatever you may think about marijuana laws at this moment, that you will look at the issue differently by the time you reach the final chapter.
But before you dive into this book--which I truly couldn't put down the first time I read it--I'd like to give you an insider's perspective on the question of marijuana versus alcohol. By "insider," I refer to my decades of law enforcement experience, during which time I witnessed firsthand how these two substances affect consumers, their families, and public safety overall. As you can imagine, those of us who have served our communities as officers of the law have encountered alcohol and marijuana users on a frequent if not daily basis, and we know all too well how often one of these two substances is associated with violent and aggressive behavior.
In all my years on the streets, it was an extremely rare occasion to have a night go by without an alcohol-related incident. More often than not, there were multiple alcohol-related calls during a shift. I became accustomed to the pattern (and the odor). If I was called to a part of town with a concentration of bars or to the local university, I could expect to be greeted by one or more drunks, flexing their "beer muscles," either in the throes of a fight or looking to start one. Sadly, the same was often true when I received a domestic abuse call. More often than not, these conflicts--many having erupted into physical violence--were fueled by one or both participants having overindulged in alcohol.
In case you might be thinking my observations are unique, let me share the results of some informal research I have conducted on my own. Over the past four years, out of a general interest in this subject, I've been asking police officers throughout the U.S. (and Canada) two questions. First: "When's the last time you had to fight someone under the influence of marijuana?" (And by this I mean marijuana only, not pot plus a six-pack or fifth of tequila.) My colleagues pause; they reflect. Their eyes widen as they realize that in their five or fifteen or thirty years on the job they have never had to fight a marijuana user. I then ask, "When's the last time you had to fight a drunk?" They look at their watches. It's telling that the booze question is answered in terms of hours, not days or weeks.
The plain and simple truth is that alcohol fuels violent behavior and marijuana does not. As described in great detail in Chapter 7, alcohol contributes to literally millions of acts of violence in the United States each year. It is a major contributing factor to crimes like domestic violence, sexual assault, and homicide. Marijuana use, on the other hand, is absent in that regard from both crime reports and the scientific literature. There is simply no causal link to be found.
As one who has been entrusted with maintaining the public's safety, I strongly believe--and most people agree--that our laws should punish people who do harm to others. This is true whether we are talking about violent crimes like murder and assault or nonviolent crimes like shoplifting or insider trading. It is also appropriate to punish other behavior that threatens public safety such as speeding or driving through red lights. All of these laws are clearly designed to protect our citizens.
But by banning the use of marijuana and punishing individuals who merely possess the substance, it is difficult to see what harm we are trying to prevent. It bears repeating: From my own work and the experiences of other members of the law enforcement community, it is abundantly clear that marijuana is rarely, if ever, the cause of harmfully disruptive or violent behavior. In fact, I would go so far as to say that marijuana use often helps to tamp down tensions where they otherwise might exist.
That marijuana causes very little social harm is reason enough in a free society to legalize it for adults. But as Steve, Paul, and Mason so brilliantly demonstrate in this book, an even more persuasive reason is that by prohibiting marijuana we are steering people toward a substance that far too many people already abuse, namely alcohol. Can marijuana be abused? Of course. But, as this book makes clear, it is a much safer product for social and recreational use than alcohol. Where is the logic, then, in allowing adults to use alcohol but arresting them and branding them as criminals if they choose to use marijuana instead?
Let me be clear. The problem does not lie with law enforcement officials. Your police officers take an oath to uphold the law and cannot simply turn their backs when they see marijuana statutes violated. What we need is to replace the current system of prohibition with new laws that permit and regulate the sale of marijuana, an excellent framework for which is provided in this extraordinary book. Read it, and you'll agree it is time we stop driving the American people to drink. Instead, we should simply and logically allow them to use a safer alternative, if that is what they prefer.
Norm Stamper
June 2009
I'm happy to join in a conspiracy of the authors to get this book into as many hands as possible. They would like you to consider taking part in The Great Marijuana Book Bomb of 2009 on Thursday, August 20. The authors of Marijuana is Safer are making a one-day push on Amazon.com to drive the book to #1 on the site's rankings. Just visit the Book Bomb site, and enter your email address and you will receive a reminder on August 20. Or just make a note in your calendar to buy the book on Amazon.com that day. I hope you will support the effort.
Follow Norm Stamper on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CopsSayLegalize
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9077214414651731007
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8231634812734884936
so its safer than water.
Thank you for your support of ending prohibition. You have many out here who support your efforts. This madness must stop.
http://brandnewnormal.blogspot.com/
Thank you so much for your reasoned, sane, and unemotional reflections on your lifetime of experience with drug and alcohol abuse.
As a former doper ( many, many years ago); and as a recovering alcoholic (3 + years), I, too, can personally attest to the vast gulf of differences between these substances. Even today, in a social situation, I may take a "courtesy puff") before passing the joint along, because it has absolutely no meaning or stigma to me. However, I observe alcohol-fueled behaviour on a daily basis that makes me thank my lucky stars that I was able to eliminate that particular wrestling match from my own life!
These rational arguments have been presented for years. So, what's the hold-up? More acurately, where's the money? Don't you feel that these well-established gov-subsidised drug DELIVERY programs (for alcohol and tobacco) are ultimately what stands in the way of de-criminalization?
Every day, the magnitude of ignorance that I witness staggers my ability to assimilate ....
Every time you post it becomes abundantly clear that the wrong Police Chief from Seattle was selected for Drug Czar.
Obama is losing quite a bit of support on the public option and the time may be right to shake up a few seats in the house with independents or 3rd party candidates. Congress is not having the approval one would think they have, so who knows? With health care clearly on every one's mind, some of the one's opposing even medical legalization at the federal level (see above name) who also are on the wrong side of the public option may just find their butts on the unemployment line.
Many of the democrats, from Obama on down, have made it to congress because a large number of those farther to the left have made the effort with donations, support and our votes. Many of those who have been sniped at
From those who supported the dem's ascent to their current numbers won't be guranteed the next time around. Drugwar reform IS important. It does not work, costs too much, feeds the cartels and wastes valuable resources.
Your practical arguments against continued drug criminalisation are the final nail in the coffin when it comes to drug laws. For God's sake, let's stop this madness NOW!