iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Norm Stamper

Norm Stamper

Posted February 26, 2009 | 01:43 PM (EST)

Ending the "War on Drugs": The Fierce Urgency of...When?


If it accomplished nothing else, the recent rumpus over a gold-plated athlete's bong hit brings into sharp relief the need for a national, rational gut-check about America's drug policy.

But when?

We are, after all, a little busy at the moment. Struggling to hold onto our jobs, our homes, our automobiles. Our 401ks. Our children's lunch and college money. At the moment, forty-six million Americans without health insurance pray to make it through another day without stepping in front of a bus or being laid low by catastrophic illness. Energy needs and the environment vie unendingly for our attention. Terrorism, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan may have been reduced, temporarily, to background noise, the result of primal economic fears, but national security concerns still loom large.

So, what's so urgent about drug policy reform?

Dot-connecting time. Since 1971, when Richard Nixon pronounced drugs "public enemy number one" and declared all-out war them (or, more accurately, on the people who took them), we have spent $1 trillion prosecuting that war. Eight Nixon successors and 38 years later what do we have to show for our investment?

We've arrested tens of millions of Americans for nonviolent drug offenses, most for simple possession of marijuana. We've damaged or ruined the lives of countless citizens who've lost school loans, publicly subsidized housing, and jobs. And yet, drugs are more readily available--especially to our kids--at lower prices and higher levels of potency than in the history of the drug war. (If you hear some "expert" claim the war is being "won" because cocaine prices are spiking, consider this: prices, like use levels, fluctuate. By way of analogy, think of the economic pain and suffering of those impoverished oil cartels when the cost of a barrel goes up. What never fluctuates, by the way, is the immutable law of supply and demand.) Even the staunchest drug warriors are in agreement: This is one war whose mission remains unaccomplished, a costly battle with no victory in sight.

The nation's longest running armed conflict, the drug war, financed to the tune of about $70 billion a year, is an unmitigated economic disaster. Think of the money that could be invested, right now, in "shovel-ready" infrastructure improvements, or in the credit crisis, the home mortgage crisis, the energy crisis, the automobile industry crisis, the banking crisis, the education crisis, the deficit crisis...

And consider terrorism. I almost fell out of my La-Z-Boy when then-Attorney General John Ashcroft informed us that terrorist missions are financed by drug trafficking.

Finally, I thought, the highest-ranking cop in the country gets it. Terrorist are using the gains of illicit drug trafficking to secure and train weapons against us. Ashcroft famously stated that, "Terrorism and drugs go together like rats and the bubonic plague." A spot-on observation.

Intrinsically worthless weeds such as cannabis, coca, and poppies grow with abandon throughout much of the world. But cultivated and rendered into illicit drugs, they bring a heady profit (up to 17,000 percent, according to Jack Cole, Executive Director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition). Enter Al Qaeda and the Taliban. What better way to finance their deadly operations, converting marijuana, cocaine, and opium into car bombs, grenade launchers, and AK-47s.

Mr. Ashcroft failed to recognize that terrorists would have to find other means of support if these drugs were no longer illegal, and therefore no longer obscenely profitable. The truth would have been better served had the former AG said, "Prohibition and drug trafficking" go together like rodents and the plague. Simply put, prohibition has never worked, nor will it ever. In clinging to the prohibition model we are dooming ourselves to failure.

Ending the drug war, diverting funds from drug busts to prevention and treatment, taxing (and rigorously controlling) a regulated market would help pull the U.S. and the global economy away from the precipice of depression.

If it accomplished nothing else, the recent rumpus over a gold-plated athlete's bong hit brings into sharp relief the need for a national, rational gut-check about America's drug policy. But when?...
If it accomplished nothing else, the recent rumpus over a gold-plated athlete's bong hit brings into sharp relief the need for a national, rational gut-check about America's drug policy. But when?...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 206
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
09:12 AM on 03/04/2009
I have watched the War on Drugs from the sidelines for 40 years. Unlike many other social causes, I have found that the drug users like- really like- their choices. You cannot help someone who sees no need for "help". I have never seen a dealer throw someone into the back of a van and take them away and force an addiction on them. As we have seen in many countries and many struggles for Human Rights, the overwhelming force of what a population wants will not be denied. The only thing a reasonable government can do is control the quality of the product, rake in the profits, then manage the rehab and control the related crimes. At least legalization would give police and programs the funding they need.
01:34 PM on 03/03/2009
Well done Norm Stamper. There is not much I can add to the overwhelming supportive comments on here, but I will say that we have a long way to go in this fight for justice.
06:33 PM on 03/02/2009
Finally tue voice of reason is being heard. I have been involved in trying to change U.S. drug policy since 1973. The goverments efforts at disinformation have been extremely effective and have done unbelieveable damage to it's citizens. The article by Norm Stamper is finally telling the truth about the cost we all pay for "The War on Drugs" and the insanity of continuing these policies. Keep it up Norm and may we finally see progress in getting the truth out!
04:49 PM on 03/02/2009
the end of prohibition.First how do you think all the criminals of the united states stay in business. If you watch gangland on the history channel you will see the black market is what is fueling the gang violence in this great country. As a productive member of my community I feel it needs serious discussion.If you are a mother or father then you should feel the same way. Right now there are innocent law enforcement agents in mexico being targeted for simply doing their job. What is to say that the gangs of the future wont try the same thing.? Now is the time to act if Ronald Regan was still around or even Harry Anslinger they would see what their crusade of moral values has done to our country. With the prohibition of marijuana during the nixon years you saw a steady climb in cocaine use and from that crack cocaine was introduced then now were dealing with literally tons of meth there is no end in sight unless we start to think rationally and deal with the problem head on with education and treatment. Please think about the children I have used marijuana almost all my adult life and I have never been in a major accident due to being under the influence or I have not moved onto using heroin I have never ever once in my life seen so many injustices like we are seeing today. Peace and Prosperity...... to all
photo
illinoisan
We don't need no stinking badges
01:39 PM on 03/02/2009
At the moment, the best opportunity for bringing up drug policy reform is in relation to what's going on in Mexico. The media is focused on the narrative of the violence spilling over into the US.

Of course, the severest blow that could be dealt to the cartels is to regulate their product in a legal market.
11:49 AM on 03/02/2009
Finally the voice of reason in the war on drugs is getting some air time.
09:47 AM on 03/02/2009
To say says nothing of the potential tax revenue we could gain taxing the hell out of such drugs and drug users.
08:50 AM on 03/02/2009
Are we prepared to have our

Airline pilots
Bus drivers
Taxi drivers
Train engineers
Railway engineers
Airline mechanics
School teachers
Airspace controllers
Law Enforcement agents

Tested daily for impaired mental capacity ?

If so, then I say legalize it all. Tax it and make it available at every gas station. Then be prepared for the results.
09:45 AM on 03/02/2009
We don't test them daily for alcohol usage, certainly a more potent drug.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:59 AM on 03/03/2009
And god know we should!
05:19 PM on 03/02/2009
First off, ALL Law Enforcement SHOULD be tested, given the very nature of their jobs.
Impairment testing IS the Only way to Improve Workplace Safety. Period!

It is Not about what substance you ingest/consume; It Is All About How That Substance Affects You, How long it affects you and whether or not it Causes you too Be Impaired.

I understand our Air Force Pilots have to take an "Alertness Test/Evaluation" Before they fly. What is wrong with that? It allows for determining whether you are impaired or not, no matter How many cups of coffee you drank.

SEE:
http://www.bowles-langley.com/
Great info And a Demo for How efficient Alertness Testing is PLUS employers would No Longer have to buy UA's testing supplies/services.

Why? Because UA's Were Never Designed to Measure Impairment only consumption and those tests gives us All a False Sense of Security based upon those results.

Employers are Definitely getting fleeced!
01:02 AM on 03/02/2009
We could end the War on Drugs as we ended our sending troops to 'Nam; let's declare a victory & say that we have peace with honor. Legalize drugs, control & tax the sale of drugs. The narco-trafacantes will violently object but we can import heroin directly from Afghanistan, cocaine from Colombia & grow our own Marijuana. We can use C-130's to fly the drugs directly to the USA or maybe C 5's. They might be harder to hijack than the planes drug runners use. We should sell the drugs with clean works so drug users can shoot up more safely. Reusing needles spreads AIDS, hepititus & other nasty diseases. We will need to deal with treating addicts in a better way with more facilities for resident & out patient treatment but we also need to do that if drug use continues to be il-legal. We need needle exchange programs if drug use continues to be il-legal. A segment of American society is determined to use drugs, legally or not.
The War on Drugs is as useless as Prohibition was.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:24 AM on 03/02/2009
Obama could sign a blanket amnesty for pot offense every week until congress legalize it at least at the Federal level.
photo
wonketteRAWKS
Hypocrisy is prevalent in BOTH parties!
08:52 PM on 03/01/2009
How long before we lose our southwestern states to Mexican druglords?
04:09 PM on 03/01/2009
"we have spent $1 trillion prosecuting that war." That's the reason the war will never be ended. Too many people are profiting from it: Mobsters, Liquor Industry, Prison Industry, Politicians, The Drug Czar and his battalions of Narcs, etc. Did you ever wonder if either Eliot Ness or Al Capone were happy to see the end of Prohibition? Hint: they were not happy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadeba
03:49 PM on 03/01/2009
Don't take drugs, don't like them. I think you're right on the money here. Illegal drugs are a financial boon to criminals - prohibition didn't work so well, did it. The mob loved prohibition. We're now being warned about entering Mexico - the drug cartels and their bloody wars have spilled over the border. Regulate and tax drugs and put these folks out of business.

Prosecuting people for weed is costly and stupid. We can't grow hemp (possibly Mother Nature's perfect plant) because of this crazy war on weed. Of all plant matter, processed hemp results in the best biofuel.

People who want to take drugs will find a way regardless of whether it's legal or not. This madness has to stop.
photo
robadeaux
Your labels have expired....
10:51 PM on 03/01/2009
I personally know only one person who doesn't take drugs... no cigarettes, alcohol, aspirin, ibuprofen, theraflu, ta, coffee, prescription meds... nothing. Most who say they don't take drugs are usually being selective in their hypocracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ariveria
02:58 PM on 03/01/2009
we have already seen movement thanks to gov jindal and the republican party.

in his responce to obamas speech he said

"Health care decisions should be made by doctors and patients, not by government bureaucrats."

as a result the obama administration has backed down and we no longer have government bureaucrats making decisions on medical marijuana.

the republican and their less government are the leaders in ending the war on drugs
11:09 AM on 03/02/2009
Please tell me you are being facetious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:46 PM on 03/01/2009
The willingness to "declare" a war on (insert name here) is the problem. It makes for a nice headline but doesn't bring about change. War declared on anything intangible is doomed to fail. Trillions of dollars and thousands of prisoners later and what do we have to show for these wars, more bureaucracy.
Well at least we have put many, many people to work growing, processing, transporting and combating illegal narcotics, possibly the greatest single governmental works package ever, too bad it was unintended.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
returnofthejedi
Trolls have no chance!
01:33 PM on 03/01/2009
I'm not convinced it was unintended.