iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Norman Lear

GET UPDATES FROM Norman Lear
 

Business Fights Back -- "No More Mr. Nice Guy!"

Posted: 05/22/2012 8:59 am

Nicholas Kristof in this past Sunday New York Times wrote that right now any American, any child, could be sitting on a couch or a stuffed chair containing hazardous chemicals linked to cancer, fetal impairment and reproductive problems. He said he's been writing about this for years, and then raved about a kind of proof-positive piece of investigative journalism, "Playing With Fire," just published by the Chicago Tribune, which documents that tobacco companies a generation ago, facing accusations that smoldering cigarette butts were responsible for numerous house fires, lobbied secretly and successfully to get furniture manufacturers, as a matter of regulation, to put these chemicals in all their furniture in the form of flame retardants.

So what do we have now? A kid playing in your living room can breathe dust from flame retardants that are related to already banned PCBs which, in turn, have been linked to everything from brain damage to diabetes. For pregnant women, it is claimed, they can also alter brain development in the fetus.

Now, it seems to me that if Kristof and the Chicago Tribune's claims are reported incorrectly, they have committed a terrible slander against the three companies that manufacture these retardants. Beyond that, they have also impugned the integrity and humanity of every man and woman executive that run the three major companies responsible for these "killer" products, the Albamarle Corporation, ICL Industrial Products and Chemtura Corporation.

These charges have to be hogwash! Just another cheap shot against Big Business. How can so many people, and Americans no less, knowingly turn out a product capable of doing such dastardly harm? Impossible! I am tired of these pathetic attacks. I'm fed up with so many businesses -- even banks! -- being accused of doing anything, including the inflicting of unimaginable harm, for a buck.

Just about all of these charges have been vehemently denied. How many times have we seen accused business people, standing as the gentlemen they are, swearing to tell the truth and scoffing at such charges before a Committee of the House or Senate? And yet these outlandish claims and charges continue. Something more must be done to stop this. Action has to be taken. And maybe the Kristof/Chicago Tribune articles provide just the place to start.

I suggest the Albamarle, ICL and Chemtura companies go to court and sue the hell out of Nick Kristof, the New York Times, the Chicago Tribune, and probably a dozen others who were involved. It would be a first. Business fights back and says -- "Alright, we've had it -- no more Mr. Nice Guy!"

Sue them for slander, libel, defamation, calumny -- sue them until the truth is out!

 
FOLLOW BUSINESS
Nicholas Kristof in this past Sunday New York Times wrote that right now any American, any child, could be sitting on a couch or a stuffed chair containing hazardous chemicals linked to cancer, fetal ...
Nicholas Kristof in this past Sunday New York Times wrote that right now any American, any child, could be sitting on a couch or a stuffed chair containing hazardous chemicals linked to cancer, fetal ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 228
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oftenon
cartoons are the best explanation
04:45 PM on 06/05/2012
No, we need to sue YOU, Mr. Lear, for creating the Archie Bunker stereotype upon which modern conservatives model themselves, resulting in a political climate where even the starkest satire looks plausible.
09:31 PM on 05/27/2012
Terrible title.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
allen bupp
Fighting ignorance, one ideologue at a time...
09:28 PM on 05/27/2012
Actually, it's SOP for big biz to lawyer up and intimidate the crap out of whoever says bad things about them. They threaten to keep you tied up in court forever, so you drop it or settle (with a non-disclosure, of course). Even $million payout is a good investment if $billions are at stake.

That's also the big downside of torte reform. A cap on damages would mean losing would become just another "cost of doing business". (they don't mention that, do they?)

but hey! What's good for GM (or Albamarle, ICL and Chemtura) is good for America!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crimminy
06:57 PM on 05/27/2012
Mr. Lear,

Now you need to please get your friends together and make a great TV ad. You know - like the kind that were made against cigarettes. There has to be a film maker out there that can put something together. Nothing freaks out people more than a visual image. Most people don't read - sad but true....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foxynoise
06:05 PM on 05/27/2012
But, but, Norman, drug manufacturers have immunity from suit - how will they ever be able to prove the truth?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crimminy
02:14 PM on 06/01/2012
The only way is if the three chemical companies are exposed. The companies dousing our mattresses and couches with flame retardant chemicals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foxynoise
05:51 PM on 05/27/2012
For a moment - just a moment - I thought Lear had gone daffy. But in the end - I was, happily - wrong!
04:26 PM on 05/27/2012
I have often wondered how so many people could become liberal democrats voting for politicians that tax us and regulate us to death. How could people be so naive to trust politicians who have spent the nation into a nearly 16 trillion dollar debt and who borrow over 1 trillion dollars every year. How could they support politicians who drive up fuel costs or do so poorly educating their children? As the economy get worse their taxes go up and they support government who treats them like garbage, arrests them, searches them, regulates what they can do with their own property. Now I know. Its the furniture. This could start a new revolution with liberals tossing out the capitalist furniture and replacing it with tree stumps and rocks 100% organic rocks and tree stumps. I will sell any liberal on ebay as much of this new furniture as they like. What a great business opportunity.
photo
paxatman
Do no harm, Help others.
03:26 PM on 05/27/2012
American business 101..Stick it to the consumer for all their wallets can bear.
American business 102..Provide inferior products as long as possible.
American business 103..Hide behind the laws we paid Congress to create for the 1%.
photo
MCope
Just another everyman
02:02 PM on 05/27/2012
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rendy Bee Mulyono
Someone with constant stream of
01:38 PM on 05/27/2012
Is this a case of the longest river in egypt? The indignation is comical.
11:51 AM on 05/27/2012
well, the "brain damage" and "alter brain development" explains a lot about what is going on
photo
jackinjax
I had to send micro-bio out to be dry cleaned.
08:23 AM on 05/27/2012
Sometimes the cure is deadlier than the disease. It's what happens when those that know better than we what is for our own good. Do we inform people of the hazard of flammable materials to save a few from themselves, or do we force manufacturers to coat thier products with deadly carcinogens that endanger us all? It's the nanny-state gone awry!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
levee
09:14 AM on 05/27/2012
Yes, sometimes the cure is deadlier than the disease, but sometimes the need to put things into neat little aphorism boxes is the deadliest of all. Cigarettes were originally made without any regard to their potential to smolder, and considering how completely normal it would be (especially considering the advertising) for someone to feel completely comfortable toking away in their living room there ended up being a lot of catastrophes. It isn't "the nanny state" to ask citizens of a community to be responsible, it's called being neighborly. That the cure, in this case, was half-assed and intent on avoiding responsibility is not proof that there is too much government. It's proof that the reasonable solution to a problem does not come from a profit-centric corporation. The answer to our myriad dilemmas are not that hard to figure out except that there are those who confound reason with phobias about "big government" and an irresponsible deference to "the free market."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toofarleft4thisworld
The Right Is So Wrong
08:17 AM on 05/27/2012
BASF. We don't make the products, we make the products toxic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
foxynoise
05:52 PM on 05/27/2012
lol - but true! F&F
07:23 AM on 05/27/2012
How many times have we seen large companies and their executives deny charges made by consumers and then we find the executives simply lied and almost got away with it. Who knows- but until I know more I will not jump on the side of Mr. Lear whose indignation seems more based on his own insecurity rather than any facts. He may be right but his holier than thous rhetoric turns me off and does nothing to make his case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:04 AM on 05/27/2012
"...almost got away with it." When haven't they?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dwight Hebert
10:05 AM on 05/27/2012
I think Lear's whole diatribe was tongue- in-cheek. If the three companies mentioned were to sue Mr. Kristof they would expose themselves to discovery, which would open all kinds of dark closets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crimminy
06:53 PM on 05/27/2012
Exactly his point - done very well!
photo
unitron
Reverse Chron Order never stays checked
04:45 AM on 05/27/2012
What's that?

Tobacco companies responsible for stuff that's harmful to breathe?

Unpossible!