iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
 NYCity News Service

NYCity News Service

GET UPDATES FROM NYCity News Service

Trouble in Gasland

Posted: 02/ 7/11 04:30 PM ET

A first-time documentary filmmaker is outraged by the natural gas industry's "despicable" attempts to kill his movie's chances of winning an Academy Award.

Energy In Depth, a group sponsored by a coalition of natural gas companies, sent a letter to the Academy asking that Gasland -- a film about a controversial mining technique called hydro-fracking -- be removed from the Documentary Feature category.

"I'm continually amazed by all the developments," filmmaker Josh Fox said during a screening of the film at NYU this week, "both in terms of great things that have happened and real acts of courage that I have seen, and also these incredible, despicable attacks from the industry. I find them utterly irresponsible and horrific."

It marked the latest clash between Fox and Energy In Depth over Gasland, which debuted at the 2010 Sundance Film Festival. In June 2010, Energy In Depth released a point-by-point criticism of the film. Fox responded with an equally detailed rebuttal on his website in July.

The organization's letter to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which came a week after Gasland was nominated for an Oscar, contends the film falsified facts and should not qualify for the documentary category.

Jim Smith, a spokesman for the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York, which helps fund Energy in Depth, agreed that Fox's film is not a documentary. "The genre calls for facts by definition," he said in a phone interview. "This was not. It was clearly an opinion piece, entirely fiction."

Horizontal hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," is a process that uses massive amounts of pressurized water and chemicals to release natural gas from underground shale deposits.

The practice has raised concerns about environmental and health safety. In December, then-Gov. David Paterson issued a moratorium that would prevent horizontal hydro-fracking in New York until an extensive environmental study is completed by the state Department of Environmental Conservation, no sooner than July.

United For Action, a grassroots anti-fracking organization, co-sponsored the Feb. 1 screening at NYU. The group hopes the film will stir action to permanently ban fracking in New York.

Audience member Elana Bulman, 20, said Gasland inspired her. "I am like fired up about this," she said. "I am ready to get a moratorium passed and get involved in campaigns."

Michael Bopp, a spokesman for the Department of Environmental Conservation, said while he doesn't agree that everything depicted in Fox's film relates to New York, he understands the public concerns raised by the documentary. Bopp said his agency is working to protect the state by carefully studying the effects of horizontal hydro-fracking.

"We felt that this required a whole new sort of framework for environmental protection," Bopp said. "We understand the risks associated with it and we are being as diligent as humanly possible."

Fox said he will continue to campaign for a total ban on hydro-fracking and won't be deterred by opposition from the gas industry.

"They're not going to be able to spin their way out of this with PR money," he said.

Post by Alissa Ambrose

 

Follow NYCity News Service on Twitter: www.twitter.com/nycitynews

A first-time documentary filmmaker is outraged by the natural gas industry's "despicable" attempts to kill his movie's chances of winning an Academy Award. Energy In Depth, a group sponsored by a coa...
A first-time documentary filmmaker is outraged by the natural gas industry's "despicable" attempts to kill his movie's chances of winning an Academy Award. Energy In Depth, a group sponsored by a coa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:15 PM on 03/03/2011
One last thought before I move on. I'm a firm believer in the notion that. The truth can always be found somewhere in the middle. Not matter what the issue. Peace to all
11:29 AM on 03/03/2011
I spent my last 8 yrs working in the gas and oil drilling field. Simple fact worth noting. I've personally never seen or heard of Natural Gas formations being less than 5000' deep. Not to say they don't exist. I've worked both the drilling end and the production end. Water tables are pretty close to the surface. Less than 300' on average. This much I can tell you. Injection Wells do cause minor earthquakes. Google geothermal California Geysers earthquakes.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:58 PM on 02/09/2011
Let's force truth in advertiser too, while we are at it. The very fact that the frackers hide their formulas and needed exemption from the clear water act, proves they know it's terrible for the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
07:12 PM on 02/09/2011
The chemicals are widely published on the web now. They're not hidden from anyone.
There's no such thing as a clear water act. Hydraulic Fracturing has never been covered under the SDWA (if that's what you intended, it's hard to tell) since it's enactment in 1974, so you're saying an activity got an exemption from a law that that never covered it. Hydraulic fracturing was already in use for 25 years or so when they passed the SDWA so if they had intended that law to cover that activity they certainly could have written it in.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:02 PM on 02/09/2011
No, they are not publicized. what are published is PROPOSED fluids. Nice corporate try, through.. Where's the sense well data?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:33 PM on 02/09/2011
Didn't you send me to a industry report last time, claiming it was an environmental groups report? Sorry, I really don;t want to waste my time.
03:35 AM on 02/09/2011
This documentary is a must see. If you drink water or breathe air this film should be on your list.

EVERY high school should show it and EVERY POLITICIAN should see this.
07:16 PM on 02/08/2011
If hydro fracking is banned, greedy people will always find another way. Until their hearts are changed and they develop any kind of conscience, it's simply the "how" you're getting rid of, but not the "why".
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:58 PM on 02/09/2011
So give up?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
08:33 PM on 02/09/2011
There's little likelihood that there is another way. Greener ways to do hydraulic fracturing are coming out all the time, but you still have to expose more porosity by fracturing these tight shales somehow.
02:16 PM on 02/08/2011
drill a gas well, bring a soldier home
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:59 PM on 02/09/2011
no. only 5% of the world oil reserves are in the USA anymore. Install green energy, bring all the soldiers home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
07:23 PM on 02/09/2011
"only 5% of the world oil reserves are in the USA anymore" yeah... see you're not getting the base reason for this whole manufactured controversy. That USED to be true. But in the last few years it's been discovered that we have five-hundred trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale alone, enough to make us energy independent from the Middle East. And 4.3 billion barrels of undiscovered oil in the Bakken formation have just recently been predicted by the USGS. Both of these depend on hydraulic fracturing to be produced. Oil production actually INCREASED in the USA last year for the first time in 20 years. THIS is the reason why this whole false controversy has been created - certain people, like Josh Fox, do not want abundant, cheap energy in our country from our own reserves because they believe this will delay the onset of much more expensive renewables. So they believe by attacking hydraulic fracturing, they can keep our nation from using it's own resources and force a new industry to come into existence by destroying a currently viable one. There are also Wall Street interests that have made heavy bets on renewables and companies like GE that stand to make billions off of more expensive energy that do not want these new resources produced.
THAT is why hydraulic fracturing was in continuous use since 1948 and no one complained about it, until these gigantic mega-deposits were discovered here in the US.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:31 PM on 02/09/2011
Gees, look at the reserves, and figure it out: http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/10/26/am-globalist-quiz-americas-percentage-of-global-oil-reserves/

There's only so much oil in the world. America has almost none.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
11:39 PM on 02/09/2011
The discussion at your link does not include natural gas in BOE, and so what they're talking about is not even close to the real energy numbers. I looked up the bios of the two people talking and neither of them are the kind of folks I would look to for these kind of numbers, they're just reporters. That by itself doesn't make their statements wrong necessarily but it also doesn't confirm any credibility or expertise in this area. And, at no point in the discussion you linked to did they say where they got the numbers they're talking about, so really ... it's just talk until you have the actual first source of the numbers in hand.
Really, the point isn't that there is more oil in the entire rest of the world than we have here. The point is that our energy reserve numbers were thought to be permanently declining until recently, and now we know that we have many more times the energy reserves than we thought we did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russ Klettke
Business and fitness writer
06:05 AM on 02/08/2011
What I haven't seen from the natural gas industry in their defense of fracking is any explanation whatsoever for how the incidents cited in "Gasland" were not caused by the drilling practice.

T. Boone Pickens used his media-trained words, "haven't seen it in my 3,000 wells," wisely when he was a guest on The Daily Show – wise for his purposes, of course. But he and no one else has come forward to dispute that gas is flaring through home and farm water pipes cited in the movie, or to propose some alternative cause. Further, they provide no explanation for what happens to the 500-odd chemicals pumped into those massive fracking wells, or why Dick Cheney finessed a rule that prevents us from even knowing what some of those chemicals are. They simply say it's deposited safely below the water line. As if that somehow will magically prevent any of those 500+ chemicals from coming back up the wells, into the aquifers, in five or ten or fifty years.

Too many unanswered questions. And too much money driving a rationale for drilling without regard or respect for future generations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
09:56 AM on 02/08/2011
"What I haven't seen from the natural gas industry in their defense of fracking is any explanatio­n whatsoever for how the incidents cited in "Gasland" were not caused by the drilling practice."

Have you looked? Because data regarding that is easy to find. Let's examine one case at a time, starting with the the Markham well - one of the starring "scare" props of the propaganda film:

Colorado regulators in charge of protecting the environment from oil & gas activities and settling disputed claims state: "we concluded that Mike Markham’s and Renee McClure’s wells contained biogenic gas that was not related to oil and gas activity. Unfortunately, Gasland does not mention our McClure finding and dismisses our Markham finding out of hand." And that is contained here: http://goo.gl/45sBa

That document has a lot of good information in it, such as that "the water well
completion report for Mr. Markham’s well shows that it penetrated at least four different coal
beds. The occurrence of methane in the coals of the Laramie Formation has been well
documented in numerous publications by the Colorado Geological Survey, the United States
Geological Survey, and the Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists dating back more than 30
years."

Just out of curiosity, in what part of the country do you live? Because I believe that a lot of the freak-out over fire and faucet water is from people who do not live in areas where that has always happened.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:00 PM on 02/09/2011
Ever herd of "capturing regulator agencies"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
10:06 AM on 02/08/2011
OK, gee, you're apparently not looking for any of the things you feel are hidden. Again: "a rule that prevents us from even knowing what some of those chemicals are." -- that was an issue a couple of years ago but is resolved now. PA and NY have collected this chemical information from operators and service companies and published it on the web.
http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/minres/oilgas/FractListing.pdf
http://assets.bizjournals.com/cms_media/pittsburgh/datacenter/DEP_Frac_Chemical_List_6-30-10.pdf
http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/ogdsgeischap5.pdf
04:44 AM on 02/08/2011
Little town fighting back: http://citizensvoice.com/news/dallas-school-district-sides-with-opponents-of-compressor-station-1.1101535#axzz1DMExicbL

Dallas School District sides with opponents of compressor station
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris Salmon
Geologist and Computer Scientist
10:38 AM on 02/08/2011
When the holy heck did Dallas become a "little town" ??
09:28 PM on 02/07/2011
They aren't spinning this movie with money, they are spinning it with facts. Even PA regulators have said this movie is willfully dishonest and inaccurate. Fracking is not without it's dangers but the industry track record is excellent and this movie is extremely misleading.