I recall a Muslim friend of mine once asking me what I thought of the United States? I responded that the US is the kind of country which after living there for only a few years, you could grow to love it in such a way that you could sacrifice your life for it. Today, the Quran burning phenomena and anti-Mosque movement has made a mockery of that image. How can we expect this episode and the intolerance around it to not translate into a growing sentiment of "Islamophobia" and violations of American Muslims' First Amendment rights? How can it not result in discrimination and radicalism at home?
It's disturbing that, beyond the surface of public debates, Pastor Jones and those who are opposed to the building of a mosque near Ground Zero both see Islam and Muslims behind the 9/11 tragedy or somehow responsible for it.
Quran burners and anti-Mosque supporters are basically punishing American Muslims for what they have nothing to do with. These two groups, one with just 50 and the other with probably with thousands supporters, are feeding the same narrative that Al-Qaeda has been trying to establish over the past ten years; that it was not just a small radical group behind the 9/11 attacks but the whole of the Muslim community, and Islam itself, condoned it. Those who are against building the Mosque and Quran burners basically magnify what radicals claim outside US borders.
Neither Americans here, including American Muslims, nor Americans abroad, including US soldiers across the Middle East, benefit from this false narrative.
Just as many Americans hope that Pastor Jones is not viewed as representative of the great nation of America, American Muslims do not wish to be equated with Al Qaeda operatives and 9/11. Building a cultural center a few block from Ground Zero in no way harms the country, the families of 9/11 victims or non-Muslims in New York. Therefore, preventing a mosque from being built seems irrational and insensitive.
The idea that some of the family members of 9/11 victims believe that it was not just Al-Qaeda but Islam which was behind the attack is, itself, an indication of the poor job the US government has done to put that tragic event in its proper context. The mainstream media has irrefutably played a role in perpetuating such a portrait. The families of the victims have every right to be angry and upset, but angry at whom? Is it right to punish American Muslims because of what a group of Al-Qaeda members did on 9/11? Didn't the majority of American Muslims and millions of Muslims around the world condemn the attacks? Does it make sense for opponents of the mosque to ignore the voice of the majority, the majority of Muslims that are the US's most reliable ally in it's war against extremism and terrorism?
Negative stereotyping and mischaracterization of American Muslims can have grave foreign policy implications for the Obama administration as well, which is conducing a multifaceted war with Muslim extremists and working to secure a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians.
The effect of actions taken in the United States transcends its borders. The last thing the United States and the American people need is to be perceived as a nation that is hateful and intolerant of Muslims - traits contrary to American values of freedom and democracy US soldiers defend abroad.
For those Americans who have traveled abroad, and particularly those who have traveled to the Middle East, it shouldn't be difficult to see how the recent emergence of fierce intolerance of the Islamic faith can contribute to religious-based hatred, increased polarization around religious lines, the endangerment of US national security, and most importantly, damage to the fundamental values this nation was built on.
The dilemma of whether to build or not to build a place for New York's Muslims to pray is simply discriminatory and contradictory to the core values of this nation. Those in the United Stated who fuel the fire and encourage bigotry and intolerance pave the way for others to view Americans the same way. It's a lose-lose fight.
Follow Omid Memarian on Twitter: www.twitter.com/omid_m
Faiz Khan -- who has preached at least twice at the former Burlington Coat Factory building, the site of the proposed mosque -- was for years Rauf's partner in the American Society for the Advancement of Muslims, which is dedicated to promoting a better understanding of Islam.
Khan also serves on the advisory board of Muslims for 9/11 Truth and is a founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, known as MUJCA.” “Ray Locker, managing director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, said: "For someone who claims he wants the mosque project near Ground Zero to help build bridges and heal the wounds from 9/11, it's odd that one of Feisal Rauf's fellow bridge builders is someone who thinks the attacks that killed more than 3,000 people were an 'inside job' by the US government."
Yes—Lets promote peace and understanding but first start with the truth which Imam Rauf appears to be hiding.
Why don't you try viewing the world as it is?
How does your lens work? In this case, it is the idea that no religion is better or worse than any other. If a religion appears to better, it is because of cheating. If a religion appears to be worse, it is because they have been victimized in some way.
In the case of Islam, their continual outrage over everything is due to being provoked by cheating Christians and Jews.
Notice how good and bad are getting flipped. Christianity and Judaism produce societies that are doing well. Islam produces societies that do poorly. Yet, it is Christianity and Judaism that are the bad guys.
If one views the world as it really is, you can see that Islam has historically been an aggressive and violent religion. Islam is a violent political system and happens to also contain a religion. It seeks to overthrow all non-Islamic governments and install Sharia law.
Stop the flipping of good and bad, and start viewing the world as it is.
As bad as Islam is, the views of the author are even more dangerous because he flips good and bad. It is dangerous because people like the author are unable to recognize threats to society until it is too late.
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/09/13/new.york.imam/?hpt=T1
So much for the "moderate" imam!
However I am still waiting to read some writer (and especially any Muslim writer or publication) hold those who sponsor or encourage the I hate America rallies to a similar standard. Is it somehow forgivable to hold a murderous and/or injurious rally, even after the event they are protesting is cancelled?
Does anyone feel aggrieved when their shop is burned or their child is murdered/injured as a result of these rallies which are held even AFTER the object of the hatred is obtained? It would seem to me that anyone concerned about the moral implications of these events might find these consequences worth mentioning and worth a word or two of condemnation and/or ridicule. And that the weak minded persons who might be tempted to attend such a pointless 'rally' might be pitied, and solutions to people's ignorance so demonstrated sought.
I am still waiting for anyone to consider these things, and to notice how many innocent Muslims (and others) are killed and injured as a significant part of the issues.
The terrorists that attacked us on 9-11, did do this in the name of Islam. All religions should be questioned, and it seems that if you question Chrisitianty you are a open minded thought full person, but if you question Islam you must be a bigot.
But there is this funny shift that seems to go on in which people do not defend this apparent type of bigoted argument, but instead generalize from the fact that prima facie bigoted arguments are accused of being bigoted to therefore one can't challenge Islam without being called bigoted.
But this is only justified if non-bigoted arguments are being called bigoted. Otherwise it is a nonsense response.