iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Organic Authority.com
 

7 Reasons Kale Is the New Beef

Posted: 10/05/11 11:35 AM ET

Written by Jill Ettinger

Like the saying goes, the only constant is change. We may resist it all we want, but Time and its inevitable evolution of everything in its path is unaffected by our attempts to stop it. The resulting trajectory of humanity's nascent ascent appears to be positioning itself to sweep us into progressive new times, especially where our food choices are concerned, as nearly 7 billion people are now standing on the little scraps of land that we share with some 55 billion rather large animals raised for food each year. (As another famous saying goes: This town ain't big enough for the both of us.) So, beef (and all factory-farmed meat) may be going from rib-eye to relic as we transition to a greener world... literally -- as in leafy, green vegetables.

Environmentalists cite meat production as one of the biggest contributors to global warming, and the USDA's new food pyramid (MyPlate) suggests the healthiest choice is making vegetables and fruit the biggest part of every meal by reducing consumption of animal proteins. Kale is far more nutritious than other leafy greens, but these seven reasons why it is such an important futurefood may just surprise you.

1. Anti-inflammatory: Inflammation is the number one cause of arthritis, heart disease and a number of autoimmune diseases, and is triggered by the consumption of animal products. Kale is an incredibly effective anti-inflammatory food, potentially preventing and even reversing these illnesses.

2. Iron: Despite the myth that vegetarians are anemic, the number of non-vegetarians with iron-deficiencies is on the rise. Per calorie, kale has more iron than beef.

3. Calcium: Dairy and beef both contain calcium, but the U.S. still has some of the highest rates of bone loss and osteoporosis in the world. Kale contains more calcium per calorie than milk (90 grams per serving) and is also better absorbed by the body than dairy.

4. Fiber: Like protein, fiber is a macronutrient, which means we need it every day. But many Americans don't eat nearly enough and the deficiency is linked to heart disease, digestive disorders and cancer. Protein-rich foods, like meat, contain little to no fiber. One serving of kale not only contains 5 percent of the recommended daily intake of fiber, but it also provides 2 grams of protein.

5. Omega fatty acids: Healthy fats play an important role in our health, unlike the saturated fats in meat. A serving of kale contains 121 mg of omega-3 fatty acids and 92.4 mg of omega-6 fatty acids.

6. Immunity: Superbugs and bacteria are a serious risk to our health. Many of these come as a result of factory farm meat, eggs and dairy products. Kale is an incredibly rich source of immune-boosting carotenoid and flavanoid antioxidants, as well as vitamins A and C.

7. Sustainable: Kale grows to maturity in 55 to 60 days versus a cow raised for beef for an average of 18-24 months. Kale can grow in most climates and is relatively easy to grow at home or on a farm. To raise one pound of beef requires 16 pounds of grain, 11 times as much fossil fuel and more than 2,400 gallons of water.

Keep in touch with Jill on Twitter @jillettinger

Sources:

http://www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/meat-wastes-natural-resources.aspx

http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/vegetables-and-vegetable-products/2461/2

http://www.irondisorders.org/iron-deficiency-anemia

http://www.ellenskitchen.com/faqs/calcium.html

Image: Steven Jackson Photography

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:52 AM on 11/17/2011
Firstly, I am all for population control. Our earth is changing, global warming or not. The earth will change and alter. Coastal areas and the Mississippi river coastal regions will one day no longer be as inhabitable as they are now. It is happening and it is happening slowly as a warning. Please note the rain increase on the east coast. Whether this has to do with livestock and "gas", I am not here to make this point. I just no it will happen and we are not prepared, not yet.

While I am off the topic of Kale and Meat, I am on the topic of the earth and this is essentially what we and the food we eat and the source it comes from is all about. It is up to you to choose your food source. However, I suggest you do your research. Please note the amount of rain forest land that has been and is being decimated due to livestock needs. Transport issues, food source for livestock and the Kill process.

Meat has its place in our lives and some of it depending on its source and how it is prepared and how the animal was treated and fed is quite delicious.

I don't eat meat nor do I eat fish anymore, my hair and skin are quite healthy.
06:15 PM on 11/28/2011
You just "no" it will happen, do you? Where did you learn to spell, oh foreseer-of-the-future?
07:39 PM on 11/28/2011
Have you ever made a spelling error Katnrica, or perhaps any error in your lifetime? Most likely you have not and never will. Eat your kale and other healthy vegetables and be well.
03:12 PM on 11/16/2011
It is noteworthy to point out that Mitloehner's research was funded in part by the Beef Checkoff Program. Its also intersting to note how many times Mitloener's findings are based in some very weird, (deliberate?) misunderstandings of the original UN report. For example, his paper claims that "Producing less meat and milk will only mean more hunger in poor countries." Oh, no, dude. That would only be so if we produced less meat but continued eating just as much as today. If we reduce both meat production and meat consumption, poorer countries either remain the same or get access to more grain (specifically, the grain that animals are now consuming.) This guy is like any one of the scientists that the GOP hires to find reasons that global climate change is a hoax. Its all about maintaining the status quo.
04:53 PM on 10/22/2011
Kale is delicious + nutritious! I eat a lot of kale, and I do eat meat as well. I am picky about where my meat comes from, so I tend to eat more meat free dinners. One of my favorite salads is kale + quinoa with onion, creamy (danish feta), red pepper and a little vinaigrette. The warm quinoa tossed with all the other ingredients makes it creamy and delicious, packed with lots of nutrition and no meat. :)
04:24 PM on 10/21/2011
Margo- besides your 'facts' have you ever been to any livestock farm, dairy farm or the like? Do you have any personal experience with livestock? I find it crazy that most omnivores have never come face to face with an actual living, breathing cow, pig or chicken. Besides global warming and the meat and dairy industry playing huge roles in it (all the breathing, flatulation, ingestion, digestion of millions of animals for a short period of time in very tight quarters around the globe? Does not seem like the most eco-friendly no moral thing to me) focus on the article- kale being a superfood and it's addition to one's daily plate could change much about the health and well being of humans. Get rid of the big mac and grab a veggie.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
megwolff
Plant-based cook & survivor
09:15 AM on 10/06/2011
I LOVE this kale article, Jill. What's not to like about kale!?

If anyone is hesitant to try kale, they may want to start this tried and true way to becoming a kale lover. :
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/meg-wolff/the-kale-challenge-youll-_b_701100.html
12:41 PM on 10/06/2011
Thanks, Meg! I agree....what's not to like?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karl Wilder
Chef Stirring The Pot Harlem
02:58 PM on 10/05/2011
I am a vegetable lover and kale is one of the few that I can rarely stand. Finely chopped raw I find it edible but cooked in any form I can't eat.
02:20 PM on 10/05/2011
Unfortunately for the author of this article, one of the key assumptions that livestock plays a large role in global warming is patently false. The idea that livestock contributes greatly to global warming has been propelled by a 2006 UN report which used improper analysis to determine the actual contribution.

Frank M. Mitloehner, Ph.D.,Associate Professor and Air Quality Extension Specialist at UC Davis has researched and written profusely on this topic. Mitloehner says the UN’s report unfairly compared a full life-cycle calculation of livestock - including emissions from growing feed and the processing of consumer products - with a calculation for the transport sector that only included direct emissions, omitting, for example, the greenhouse gases produced during the manufacture of the car.

As such, he concludes that the UN has helped others to overplay the impact of meat and dairy production on the environment. ‹

Mitloehner makes two other points. First, he argues that a global comparison figure does not take account of regional differences.‹‹

'In Paraguay, the contribution of livestock may be as high as 50 percent because they are clear-cutting a lot of forest, and that basically takes a unit of [greenhouse-gas] sequestration away and puts cattle, which is an emissions source, there instead. In the U.S. the contribution from livestock is only around 3 percent of the total,’ he says.

http://www.capitalpress.com/results/TH-mitloehner-050710-photo--infobox