iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Pablo Eisenberg

GET UPDATES FROM Pablo Eisenberg
 

The Caste System in Higher Education

Posted: 09/04/2012 9:27 am

The caste system in higher education is alive and well, according to a report recently issued by the Center for the Future of Higher Education.

The report, "Who is Professor 'Staff'," is based on a survey of adjunct or contingent faculty members, over three-quarters of them part-time, conducted last fall by the New Faculty Majority Foundation, a national association that promotes better work conditions for adjunct faculty in colleges and universities. The report, primarily written by foundation staff, takes its title from the way adjunct professors are often described on course schedule -- a dehumanizing aspect of the adjunct experience. The report leaves no doubt that adjunct teachers are treated like second-class citizens.

The report focuses on two of the major problems adjuncts face. The first is that many, if not most, of them are hired at the last minute, weeks if not days before the start of a course. That is the reason they are listed as 'Staff,' not by their real names, leaving students to guess about who will be running their classes.

These "just-in-time" hiring practices give instructors very little or no time to prepare for their classes. Thirty-eight percent of the survey's respondents reported that they had less than two weeks' notice before the start of class; another 25 percent said that they had between two and three weeks' notice. And, regardless of the timing of their appointments, they were not paid for whatever preparation they did.

The second problem is the limited access to technology and other resources provided to adjunct faculty. Twenty-one percent of the respondents were not given either a desk or office space; another 38 percent received office space less than two weeks before the start of classes.

Forty-five percent of the adjuncts gained library privileges less than two weeks before classes began, while 47 percent received copying services less than two weeks before the start of classes. Twenty-one percent of the teachers never received curriculum guidelines; 32 percent of them received guidelines less than two weeks before classes. Access to computers was also limited.

The survey revealed the extent to which many adjuncts sacrifice time and money to shield their atrocious working conditions from their students. The report states that, "In the face of these overwhelming structural obstacles, many contingent faculty do additional work to meet their students' needs even though they are inadequately supported by their campuses." These teachers do a heroic job of protecting students from the adverse effects of the resource problems they face.

Clearly, the structural obstacles adjuncts must surmount undermine the quality of teaching and make little administrative sense. Academic administrators, nevertheless, claim that the system provides the flexibility they need to manage their programs. They apparently are little concerned with the professional needs of teachers. The report questions how much flexibility is required by administrators who have increasingly attained nearly total discretion in managing the faculty workforce. For the most part, they seem oblivious to the fact that poor working conditions and few incentives for stable teaching careers are not the blueprint for effective education.

The report concludes by stressing the need by academic institutions to be increasingly aware of the deplorable working conditions of their adjunct faculty. It suggests that its survey instrument be widely used by colleges to assess the status of their contingent teachers

The report does not deal with other significant problems that adjuncts face. Chief among them is their extremely low rate of compensation, amounting in many cases to slave labor wages. Across the country, among diverse institutions of higher education, the average pay for a course is just under $2,700. Most adjuncts, moreover, receive no health or retirement benefits, nor do they enjoy academic rights that are the privilege of tenured faculty... no arbitrary dismissals, the right to a hearing, etc.

Many adjuncts have to teach at multiple institutions in order to earn a minimal living. They are not paid for the cost of commuting to their classes. Nor are they compensated for the time they spend with students out of class or, in many instances, for serving on academic committees. Subject to the arbitrary whims and procedures of academic deans, they often are afraid to discuss controversial issues in class for fear of retribution. To add to their indignities, they are frequently looked down upon or ignored by their tenured peers. They are the Rodney Dangerfields of college life. Indeed, they get little or no respect.

Remarkably, as the number of contingent faculty has grown exponentially during the past decade, universities and colleges have done nothing to address the problem. Adjuncts are now almost 75 percent of all teachers in higher education, over half of whom are part-time. They remain the "untouchables" of our education caste system. College presidents and administrators seem to be looking the other way. When pressed on the issue, they claim they cannot afford to raise adjunct compensation or provide benefits because of budget cuts and restrictions.

The financial rationale for not improving the conditions of contingent faculty is a bogus argument. Universities and colleges have plenty of money to provide adjuncts with decent pay and benefits, if they wanted to do so. Unfortunately, they prefer to spend their funds on a number of other priorities. CEO compensation has grown enormously in recent years; some 40 CEOs currently receive over $1 million. The number of administrators, many of them superfluous, has also increased significantly as has their salaries and benefit packages. Akron University, for example, now boasts several vice presidents. These institutions are spending huge amounts in new facilities, in real estate investments and in sports programs.

Colleges and universities are neglecting the very purpose for which they were established... to provide a quality education to their students. Fortunately, adjuncts are beginning to realize that, unless they organize with the help of sympathetic faculty and administrators, labor unions and professional associations, nothing will change. Without these new efforts, not only will the large majority of our college teachers continue to be downtrodden, but our children will be deprived of the education they deserve. It's a national disgrace that can no longer be tolerated.

 
FOLLOW COLLEGE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:14 PM on 09/22/2012
Ten years ago I was an union (AFT) rep for "Professor Staff" at the University of California. It was ugly then and I am sure it is even uglier now. University administrators--like other liberal political leaders-- have been running scared from the forces of corporate greed and social conservatism for decades. It is far easier to run over your own grad students and post-grad, academic job beggars than it is to stand up a fight for a better world. So that's become the de facto "system" for academic labor. It is a one-way, downhill coping strategy. Unfortunately for everyone, eating your young IS an unsustainable over the longer term. And in 2012 it is already getting very, very late in the long term.
04:56 PM on 09/21/2012
I have a PhD and decided against pursuing a tenure track job given the long odds of getting one and not really wanting to relocate. I have been able to get a job outside of academia. What I do not understand is why adjuncts put up with these conditions. Part of the problem is that there are so many people that are willing to take adjunct jobs under the false pretense of eventually having it turn into a full time position. For me there are really only 2 reasons to adjunct 1) you like to teach and you do it on the side. 2) you have outside considerations that make being a adjunct convenient. I really sympathize with people pursuing their dreams and do not want to sound harsh; but I really think that because people are allowing themselves to be exploited these practices continue.
07:44 PM on 09/09/2012
I have been an adjunct adult ed teacher for four years, worked at the prison too for the state college I work for, but the admins, who all make high five to mid size figures, won't let me work more than 12 hours a week. Actually won't let any adjuncts work more than 20 hours, why? so they don't have to pay any benefits etc.. This is a disgrace especially in light of the fact that we are working for "public" education sans healthcare and pensions. It's time we realize that the MBA/public administrator types that have taken over running education need to be replaced by "educators" and maybe there would actually then begin to be some equity in at least "public" education venues.
08:08 PM on 09/05/2012
Hello, from EX-Professor Staff, two days into the semester, when I was shockingly fired, though they said they were rearranging classes. Why? Because I dared to ask them to be fair and not overload our writing classes with 35+ students, which we cannot teach responsibly. Because I created a petition asking exactly what you write about: stop the exploitation of this dedicated group of people working under adverse conditions at best. So please, sign and share this petition with the world: http://signon.org/sign/better-pay-for-adjuncts.fb1?source=c.fb&r_by=426534
06:09 PM on 09/05/2012
Thank you for your timely article, Pablo Eisenberg. As a former adjunct professor, I appreciate the recent attention that the Huffington Post has given to this economic exploitation of adjunct faculty. See for example, "Number Of PhD Recipients Using Food Stamps Surged During Recession" By Bonnie Kavoussi Posted: 05/07/2012 Updated: 05/08/2012 This article references an investigation by Chronicle of Higher Education writer Stacey Patton, Ph.D. As a new academic year begins, this topic merits coverage by the mainstream media.
05:44 PM on 09/05/2012
While slamming administrators, you may want to look at the realities of steering the "academic boat." The massive changes in highered and disappearing state support in public systems, caused this new administrator (faculty member for >20 years) to see things differently. We can't hire faculty...budgets will be cut another 10% this year.

When we hire new faculty, students scream "We want a new gym, a coffeeshop, new dorms. You can't use my tuition to hire FACULTY."

When staff hear "we need fairly paid faculty, they say "We have had no raise in X years. We need help to keep the place open 24 hrs, provide security, food, and every other service most cities provide?"

There are 4,000+ U.S. Universities; most don't pay administrators the amazing salaries everyone envies. The work has changed and the required accreditation, legal, and reporting requirements have grown exponentially. I work 14-16 hours per day, don't vacation and travel only to required conferences(ADA and 504 requirements). I don't complain and won't here.

Adjuncts are not paid fairly, I served as one 4 years. I survived the system and moved along until at near retirement, I'm making a living. We all choose to be involved in education because we enjoy students and teaching. I wouldn't trade my years in the classroom, nor my current job for anything. But sometimes, we must decide what's right for us. I wish each adjunct the wisdom to make the right decision.
05:23 AM on 09/05/2012
What an eye opener shocker of a piece is this? Never thought the Higher-Ed infra would be in challenged state in the US too. I have less cribs about state of affairs in India. How could one learn if the teacher is not free to teach? Perhaps lack of academic excellence has led to downturn in the US economy?
photo
JoeyDee2
I know what just passed here
03:03 PM on 09/04/2012
Greetings from Professor Staff. I am from a large family and tradition of "Staffs".

This is a topic that gets rare attention, so it's nice to see it covered here. I hope the article reaches double figures in comments. Good chance it won't and that speaks for itself.

The money is there as pointed out. There is no will to do anything about the problem because the corporatized institutions are more interested in CEOs, VPs, and sports facilities than the real life blood of the university: the faculty. It's an absurd, abusive, and corrupt system. It should also be an issue with regular faculty who may or may not realize they are being phased out.

If we can't get living wages, then let's start a fund to keep adjuncts with families off food stamps--since those are being targeted as well.
10:04 AM on 09/05/2012
JoeyDee2 -- Please consider joining New Faculty Majority: a national coalition of adjuncts and others determined to reform the appalling practice of literally shortchanging faculty and students at colleges and universities nationwide. Our mantra is that faculty working conditions are student learning conditions, and our goal is to expose the practice and to work with a broad-based coalition on strategies for reform. See www.newfacultymajority.org
photo
JoeyDee2
I know what just passed here
07:03 PM on 09/06/2012
Yes I will. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:03 AM on 09/04/2012
One of the great things about realizing that to greater or lesser degree you can educate yourself, is that you suddenly realize that all the social hierarchy and attendant artful fartery normally associated with The College Experience(R), suddenly falls by the wayside, replaced by a direct connecton with what it is you need to learn to achieve something in this life besides just dumbly staring at the world, and remarking upon the passage of time. While we are social creatures by nature, the world of academia should sort of be your informational 'crack cocaine', where the primary and sole purpose of the institution is to put more facts and knowledge into your brain, and measure your progress for purposes of obtaining a degree, all else falling secondary to the core process of instruction and advancement of general human knowledge. In english, you're there to study. If that's apparently not what you're doing, then get off campus. Period. Do, or do not, there is no 'try'. Education's one of our national institutions, our sacred cows, where apparently people do other stuff besides study, and make much ado about themselves in the process. Internet's out there. People that want to just learn something, never have to set pinky-toe 'pon the premises. Sure, it's some survival pressure, but some people just don't want to indenture themselves for the increasingly dubious privilege of calling themselves 'graduates'.