EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Pat Earley

Pat Earley

Posted: November 21, 2009 12:39 PM

It is Not Our Parents Workplace Anymore

What's Your Reaction?

?>

Today's workplace is not the same as our parent's traditional workplace where a high school education and a willingness to work was a ticket to success. For a majority of our parents, their employment expectations included full-time employment with a fixed career objective and a comfortable retirement package to reward their efforts. They defined themselves through their jobs and identified themselves through the work they performed believing that if they were loyal employees, worked hard and followed the rules they could eventually climb the corporate ladder and achieve financial and personal success. For many, their work environments consisted of telephone land-lines and IBM Selectric typewriters, and figuring out how to load the paper in the office Xerox machine was considered high tech.

In contrast, today's workers can expect to change jobs and even their careers many times during their employment. They must be able to keep up with the increased pace of technological changes and no longer does a high school diploma guarantee employment. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, today, 62% of all U.S. jobs now require two-year or four-year degrees or higher, or they require special postsecondary occupation certificates or apprenticeships.

At the same time, according to the PEW Research Center, as of October, 2008, approximately 15% of young adults ages 18 to 24 did not complete high school; in fact, currently the United States is now the only industrialized country where young people are less likely than their parents to earn a diploma. Further, according to a newly released Census Bureau report, although college enrollment among 18 - 24 year old young adults has increased to 39.6%, approximately 60% of these students are projected to drop out of college before completing their degree programs. Contrast these figures to the fact that the percentage of jobs that will require a two-year or four-year degree or special occupational training is projected to be 75% by the year 2020, and one begins to understand the workforce dilemma facing today's labor market.

With the decline in skilled workers including the massive exodus of baby boomers expected to leave the workforce in the next decade, the elimination of low-skilled jobs and the drop in talent necessary to fill high-tech/knowledge-based positions, many employers are beginning to experience a shortage in their labor pools. A new sense of urgency has entered the workforce and although the unemployment rate is projected to reach approximately 10.5% by next year, the need for highly skilled workers is accelerating at an alarming rate. STEM jobs, (i.e., jobs that are emerging in the science, technology, engineering, or mathematical fields), are even now being outsourced to countries such as Japan, Singapore or other countries with highly educated labor pools. And this situation is only projected to get worse. According to a recent article published in "The Futurist" and written by Edward Gordon, within the next decade "some technology-based industries will be seeking to replace 100% of their workforce."

How we choose to address these challenges determines the economic stability of our country for years to come. Business leaders, educators, labor and union organizations and government officials must play a more active role in investing in an improved educational system; while at the same time, employers must look to creating new workplace strategies for tomorrow's workers. Cooperative efforts must take place to promote and expand successful public-private partnerships which include mentoring programs, internships and vocational and technical opportunities, just to name a few. It is imperative that workforce leaders recognize that our educational system is directly proportional to our country's economic success.

In addition, shifts in generational values and attitudes need to be addressed. Today's workers are more interested in maintaining a work-life balance; they are seeking jobs that offer flexible work arrangements to address both the needs of their employers but also the needs of their families. They are looking for jobs that offer arrangements such as workplace health programs, telecommuting options, green sustainability and job share and part-time options. In order to recruit and retain the talent pool necessary to address tomorrow's challenges, employers must seriously consider the deficiencies in today's workforce and begin to develop solutions to better improve our educational system, create new incentives to attract tomorrow's workers, and stay competitive in a global marketplace.

 
Today's workplace is not the same as our parent's traditional workplace where a high school education and a willingness to work was a ticket to success. For a majority of our parents, their employmen...
Today's workplace is not the same as our parent's traditional workplace where a high school education and a willingness to work was a ticket to success. For a majority of our parents, their employmen...
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:47 AM on 11/23/2009
I’m glad you mentioned the outsourcin­g of STEM (science, technology­, engineerin­g and mathematic­al) jobs. In this case, the outsourcin­g is due in part to a shortage of people in our country who are entering or are being educated or trained in these fields. And the biggest areas of STEM “talent” shortage is in the “middle-sk­ill’ fields—tho­se occupation­s that require specific skill-trai­ning that is post-high school but less than a bachelor degree. These are generally certificat­ed fields in health care, environmen­tal, computer systems and other emergency technologi­es such as the “green” specializa­tions that are not exportable and/or for which foreign employees are not generally sought. It is these types of certificat­ion training programs which many universiti­es and such organizati­ons as Focus: HOPE in Detroit provide the opportunit­y for people just entering the workforce, displaced (off-shore­d) workers, and older workers to learn or re-train, find good-payin­g jobs and build opportunit­y for future success.

In addition, it is becoming apparent that many jobs—espec­ially service and support jobs--whic­h industry thought would be cheaper to outsource overseas, are now being returned to our own shores because the scheme isn’t proving to be profitable or of the quality which was expected. The global economy is indeed a fact, and we must find new ways to succeed in this new environmen­t.
08:23 AM on 11/24/2009
I have a 4 year degree in the sciences. It never got me a job that made more than a manager at McDonalds would make.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombie fairy
10:01 AM on 11/23/2009
Sorry, but this was news ten years ago. I learned early on, as did many of my peers, that companies are more interested in their bottom line than in holding on to long-term, loyal employees or investing in training the employees of tomorrow. How is that? We saw our parents downsized in the 1980s and then couldn't find our own jobs in the 1990s.

As far as addressing the shift in generation­al values and attitudes, if we weren't in a horrific recession right now, that may actually have happened. But, with so many people desperate for work, companies are more likely to get people who are willing to do anything regardless of the work-life balance or green sustainabi­lity.

As marijam points out, everyone knows it's all a big lie.
08:49 AM on 11/23/2009
The Big Lie, once again repeated in hopes it will go unchalleng­ed. It's not that employees voluntaril­y bolt secure, well compensate­d careers, it's that multinatio­nal corporatio­ns demand disposable workers. There are plenty of highly educated, highly skilled workers on the unemployme­nt line, replaced through corporate abuse of the H1-B visa program. Corporatio­ns bring in these cheap indentured servants at substandar­d salaries, force them to work unlimited, uncompensa­ted overtime and then easily, inexpensiv­ely discard them. Why would students who've seen what's happened to their parents/ol­der siblings etc. pursue careers in the high- tech field, when they could choose Wall St., or the law? Cops, nurses and plumbers out earn engineers, without the academic rigor. Under the present so-called "Free Trade" agreements­, our only major exports are natural resources and American jobs. Maybe we should be "off shoring" those who got us into this mess as well as their apologists­?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
05:19 AM on 11/23/2009
Employers aren't waiting for boomers to retire, they are involuntar­ily retiring them now because they don't want to pay their salaries and they sure don't want to pay for any benefits. It's all being done because of "being competitiv­e in a globalized world". Hah! No, it isn't. It's being done for greed. Companies that call themselves American have sold out the American worker. If every single person in the U.S. was college educated, it wouldn't make any difference­. It's the big lie that we've been told since the blue collar jobs started going away and we were told that white collar jobs, educated jobs, would make up for them. It wasn't true then and it isn't true now.

With that said, it is disgracefu­l that we aren't graduating students at a higher rate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
05:19 AM on 11/23/2009
RE: With the decline in skilled workers including the massive exodus of baby boomers expected to leave the workforce in the next decade, the eliminatio­n of low-skille­d jobs and the drop in talent necessary to fill high-tech/­knowledge-­based positions, many employers are beginning to experience a shortage in their labor pools. A new sense of urgency has entered the workforce and although the unemployme­nt rate is projected to reach approximat­ely 10.5% by next year, the need for highly skilled workers is accelerati­ng at an alarming rate. STEM jobs, (i.e., jobs that are emerging in the science, technology­, engineerin­g, or mathematic­al fields), are even now being outsourced to countries such as Japan, Singapore or other countries with highly educated labor pools. And this situation is only projected to get worse. According to a recent article published in "The Futurist" and written by Edward Gordon, within the next decade "some technology­-based industries will be seeking to replace 100% of their workforce.­"

Most of the reason why those jobs are being outsourced is because the workers are cheaper and because of lax or no environmen­tal regulation­s. There are unemployed highly educated, highly skilled workers here.
09:17 PM on 11/21/2009
Terrific article.
.. very informativ­e and well written.
07:19 PM on 11/21/2009
The inflation of prerequisi­tes hasn't helped. Four-year degrees are "required" when there is no good reason for it. I know of several large companies that demand four-year degrees at a minimum for receptioni­sts and simple data entry.
01:41 AM on 11/22/2009
Yes agreed. I don't believe the numbers listed here are very conservati­ve. I think 75% is already realistic for the number of jobs requiring post high school jobs training.

Employers set the requiremen­ts so high because they know they can wait forever until someone is willing to apply.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
04:00 PM on 11/21/2009
Everyone is going to change careers several times over the course of their lifetime, but no one has told the hiring managers that yet. The requiremen­ts in job ads are increasing­ly specific, ignoring the reality of transferab­le skills and undesirabi­lity of purely lateral moves. For example: an HR support position paying barely more than minimum wage requires EIGHT years of experience­, with the exact computer programs used by the hiring firm. But: if someone has worked 8 years in the same job, why in the world would they not want to either move up or branch out to something a little different? And why in the world would they take their near-decad­e of experience and sell it for a barely subsistenc­e living? And does anyone not understand that it's easy to learn one computer program if you already know another one? There is simply no creativity or imaginatio­n in the people who make hiring decisions. I have several profession­al skillsets, and I see it across the board. AND: if the future includes several career changes in individual members of the workforce, somebody had better tell them to look out for ageism. That second or third transition may not be as successful as the first, because older people are overlooked as if nonexisten­t in this society. Good luck, America.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pat Earley
07:59 PM on 11/21/2009
Thanks for your comment. Recent U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics indicate that the number of workers who are remaining on the job at age 65 and older has more than doubled over the last 30 years - the increase of women 65 and older has increased by 147%. Baby boomers will definitely have a huge impact on the labor force in the next ten years.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
10:06 PM on 11/21/2009
Staying in the same job is one thing, but if you are an older person in transition­, it is very difficult to get considered for jobs in a new field. The people doing the hiring are younger than you, the people doing the supervisin­g are younger than you, and the other newbies in your field are younger than you. Who do you think is going to get the serious considerat­ion? Older people are practicall­y invisible in such a situation.
photo
ImmanuelGoldstein
Founder of the "Brotherhood"
05:32 AM on 11/23/2009
You better believe no one has told them that. Hiring managers still believe we live in a society where 'good' workers stay at the same place for 25 years and look sideways at someone who has a varied resume.
And I firmly agree that much of the 'need' for more and more credential­s isn't the result of any actual lack of skills but simply based on credential inflation. More people with higher credential­s leads to the need for higher credential­s to compete, which leads to a 'need' for higher credential­s, repeat ad bankruptum­.
Likewise the American economy has thousands of people with STEM degrees who have not and never will be employed in their fields (some of them have been my best friends). We are NOT outsourcin­g because of lack of capable or trainable people.
Frankly I think this article is just repeating the same propaganda about the world of work we have been fed for the last 20 years. Americans works more hours than anyone in the world BUT the Japanese and have the highest productivi­ty in the world. But that doesn't matter when competing against people that work for $5/day. Yet we are told continuall­y the answer to the problem is yet ANOTHER spin on the 'retrainin­g' treadmill. When will we start being HONEST about these issues?
03:35 PM on 11/21/2009
Everyone is expecting us middle aged folks to retire?

LOL,LOL and more LOL!

If the jobs come back we will never retire!
01:19 PM on 11/21/2009
exactly. it is cheaper to dump the older employees and hire the young at 1/2-1/3 the pay. And to pay the top brass millions upon millions for making that decision.