Bursting the Blackwater Bubble

Posted October 9, 2007 | 12:26 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Bursting the Blackwater Bubble   digg: Bursting the Blackwater Bubble   reddit: Bursting the Blackwater Bubble   del.icio.us: Bursting the Blackwater Bubble

Blackwater CEO Erik Prince recently told Congress that his company wasn't at fault for killing 20 Iraqis. I beg to differ: it is your fault. But our entire government also shares the blame.

In Afghanistan and Iraq, incidents like this are hardly new, and will probably continue to occur. The big question is, "Why?"

Since 9/11, U.S. foreign policy has been further compartmentalized, politicized and privatized.

The Bush administration has poured billions (now nearing trillions) into the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. A significant amount of this money has been funneled -- with little or no oversight by Congress - to private firms such as Halliburton and Blackwater.

At the $20 billion mark, Halliburton continues to score lots of contracts that produce no clear results. They do not seem to be accountable for their work -- work that our highly skilled and responsible soldiers should be doing, by the way.

Blackwater, boasting a $92 million contract with the U.S. government, is just one player in an enormous military support operation. The company was specifically hired to fill military posts in Iraq -- posts that (again) should have been filled with ... yes, military personnel. After all, the military is staffed by civil servants trained to "protect and serve" versus the Blackwater personnel, who are trained "to protect the principal at all costs. If that means pissing off the Iraqis, too bad." The above attitude is also alive and well in Afghanistan, where I spent the last two months.

It's no wonder the Maliki government can't move forward. It is almost impossible for him, let alone anyone, to implement consistent policies, thanks to continual intervention by a mixed bag of external military institutions and private contractors.

Many private security firms lack any accountability, often making decisions -- including arming local recruits -- without the support of host countries and without properly training local employees. Private firms are equipping and training swat teams, police and armies without tracking whether the "trainees" are promoting the general welfare or aiding terrorist and insurgent groups.

Some of these firms are quite professional. Many do very good work. The issue here, however, is that their specific roles were never factored into broader U.S. strategies and policies. Everyone -- governmental and non-governmental aid organizations, the State Department, the military and private contractors -- is going his own way, with little or no direction from above. This is one reason the U.S. is embroiled in an unfocused and randomly managed war in Iraq.

This administration's dealings with the likes of Halliburton and Blackwater has set a precedent for a disturbingly corrupt and compartmentalized foreign policy, where individuals are expected to function in combat zones without appropriate support. While the "little guys" risk their lives for somewhat better pay, their top managers are safely schmoozing in Washington and lining their pockets with millions of dollars.

In Afghanistan, our security personnel were a very frustrated group. I later discovered that this was largely because they were overworked, under-appreciated and ill-equipped to deal with such a large project. Their company wanted the big contract, but didn't want to spend the money to ensure the job was done right and with minimal risk. Our security detail often worked 24/7, and they were exhausted, despite help from a stellar Afghan team.

Although I am in NO way defending the actions of the men responsible for killing those 20 Iraqi civilians, I place the blame where it truly lies: with the U.S. government -- the administration and the Congress.

Army General Erik Shenseki warned about going to war "on the cheap," and he was ignored. Unfortunately, the price many Afghans and Iraqis are now paying is hardly cheap -- not in terms of deaths, crippling wounds, homes lost and families scattered. (The same holds true for many U.S. soldiers.).

Oh, and one of these years, the American taxpayer will not only receive the bill for the true monetary cost of these mismanaged wars, but they will also pay the price of the loss of American status and trust. And that is due to this administration's all too many reckless errors and deceptions.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
11
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- RobertPaul See Profile I'm a Fan of RobertPaul permalink

Anyone, including Eric Prinz, that claims that Blackwater, et al, are not mercenary units is full of shit.

Shinseki said we needed 300,000 to win the Iraq war.

Rumsfeld figured 130,000 Military and 180,000 Mercenaries equals 300,000 plus....so we ought to win!

I submit that this kind of dishonesty is how a Nation dies.

The problem is that "We the People" deserve far better than this.

Only an Assh*le like Bush can believe that the truth will never come out.

But, of course, when it does he will be safely behind the skirts of his Daddy and Mommy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:43 PM on 10/09/2007
- dadw5boys See Profile I'm a Fan of dadw5boys permalink

100's of Huffington Post members have been saying get the Private Contractors out of Iraq for a long time but no one listens.
Now it is plain they are making it harder on U.S. Soldiers with these illegal shootings it is time for them to go!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 10/09/2007
- Jane22 See Profile I'm a Fan of Jane22 permalink

Good post, Patricia. This is well-documented. There has never been any acountability or even any attempt to conceal this completely dishonest cabal from rewarding their friends with these huge contracts. That the contracts to and involvement of anyone associated with members of the government is UNETHICAL is not really even seriously discussed. That it keeps going unchallenged is the true outrage here among all the rest of the outrages this regime continues to perpetrate. Kinda makes one want to go research just how many Dems have investments in these companies, too? Bet it's a lot! Why else would they continue to alienate the people of both countries they claim to be helping? Why else do you think no one wants to get busy and put a dead stop to it? Just asking! JaneC

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 10/09/2007
- BabyGorilla See Profile I'm a Fan of BabyGorilla permalink

Sounds like Blackwater's PR firm got to you. It is interesting to note that the current two headline disaters Blackwater and the sub-prime crisis (as evidenced by Countrywide Financial) both hired the same high-powered, DC connected PR firm, and it sounds like they are up to their usual dirty tricks: http://www.economicsbriefing.com/2007/10/when-you-need-fixer-who-you-gonna-call.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 10/09/2007
- Tubby See Profile I'm a Fan of Tubby permalink

"They do not seem to be accountable for their work -- work that our highly skilled and responsible soldiers should be doing, by the way."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If our troops had to start doing KP and other onerous rear echelon chores again, we'd quickly be left with a smaller army that would no longer be "highly skilled and responsible".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 PM on 10/09/2007
- mediamarv See Profile I'm a Fan of mediamarv permalink

Seen this breaking story yet?
No one is saying that Blackwater was involved... yet.
Two women killed by guards...
Bush speak:

"This is yet another failed attempt to break the will of the Iraqi people who just want to go on with their lives without violence, raise their children, earn a living and coexist together in a peaceful manner," said Lt. Col. Michael O. Donnelly, military spokesman for northern Iraq.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 10/09/2007
- nowaterboardUSA See Profile I'm a Fan of nowaterboardUSA permalink

The Blackwater situation was exactly the type of thing Eisenhower warned against in the late 50's - the ultimate misuse and corruption for profit of the military industrial complex that is allowed to flaunt the law because of huge coffers and political connections. Too bad neither party heeded his warning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 10/09/2007
- laocoon See Profile I'm a Fan of laocoon permalink

What was one of the major factors in the fall of the Roman Republic: privately raised professional legions loyal to the politician who had raised them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:20 PM on 10/09/2007
- Dandy12 See Profile I'm a Fan of Dandy12 permalink

Blackwater is an anathema. These mercenaries don't exactly carry around Dale Carnegie's little book on their rampages... Perhaps the desire to have a perpetual war on terror requires more terrorists. What better way to breed terrorists than to inflict terror upon a population??

The "up side"? Perhaps when the "government" of Iraq gets it enough together, they will not only express a desire to expel Blackwater, but the rest of what the USA has brought them also.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 10/09/2007
- flatus See Profile I'm a Fan of flatus permalink


Criminals love the cover of chaos.



    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:49 PM on 10/09/2007
- sugarmoes See Profile I'm a Fan of sugarmoes permalink

amen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 PM on 10/09/2007
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Patricia DeGennaro›