iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patrick Disney

GET UPDATES FROM Patrick Disney
 

Get Serious About Freeing American Captives in Iran

Posted: 02/23/11 11:27 AM ET

About six months after the US Embassy in Iran was overrun in 1979, the American diplomat and hostage John Limbert welcomed an emissary from the revolutionary government. Limbert's facility for the Persian language was on full display when he eerily commented about the Iranian cultural quirk known as "taarof" -- a uniquely Iranian form of hospitality: "Iranians are much too hospitable," he said, "when we insist on going you tell us 'no, no, you really must stay.'" Not until another nine months later were the hostages finally allowed to leave.

Today, the US maintains no formal diplomatic relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran -- for obvious reasons. Notwithstanding President Obama's frequent rejoinders during the campaign that the US must talk to its enemies, not just its friends, there is still no regularized means of dialogue between official Washington and Tehran. While this may not be the sole obstacle for resolving the nuclear issue, there are a number of other vital concerns that suffer from malign neglect. Among these, few are as tragic as the case of Joshua Fattal and Shane Bauer, the two American hikers detained since July, 2009, that remain in Iranian prison.

In recent weeks, the Islamic Republic opened a formal trial against the two, claiming to have "compelling evidence" that the American youths were spying for the United States. Of course, Tehran cannot reconcile that claim with the decision last September to release one of the three -- hiker Sarah Shourd -- without charge. President Obama has publicly committed to securing their release, but as has often been the case, this concern has been overshadowed by the nuclear issue.

During the US Embassy hostage crisis, public attention on the American captives in Iran waxed and waned, but the efforts of White House and State Department officials who were on the phone every night never stalled. Far from an exercise in appeasement, this dialogue was crucial to providing for the health and well-being of the hostages and for ultimately securing their release. When then-Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher was asked what led to the successful resolution of the crisis, he answered "patience, patience."

Shane Bauer and Joshua Fattal have been held in isolation for nearly twenty months, with limited access to the outside world and few provisions for their health and safety. The Swiss Embassy acts as an intermediary for the US in Iran, but there are limits to how effective this setup can be.

If the US is serious about securing the release of its citizens unjustly detained in Iran, it must get over its aversion to dealing with Iran's hardliners and set up a permanent means of official dialogue. American diplomats all around the world are still under orders not to interact with their Iranian counterparts, despite this being an important avenue for directly voicing American concerns. During the hostage crisis, the White House set up a direct phone link to the Khomeini government; there is no reason a similar "hotline" cannot be established today. When two countries have as many areas of significant disagreement as Iran and the United States, there is simply no substitute for direct, day-to-day interaction.

For the cases of Americans detained like Bauer and Fattal, or missing like former FBI agent Robert Levinson, the petty political charge that dialogue is somehow a sign of weakness rubs salt in the wounds of heartbreak that accompany a loved-one's captivity. Thirty years ago, US officials resolved to free the Embassy hostages, and they devoted significant time and energy to that cause. The situation facing Americans stuck in Iran today requires similar resolve, similar patience, and above all a willingness to do what it takes to bring them home.

 

Follow Patrick Disney on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TalkingWarheads

About six months after the US Embassy in Iran was overrun in 1979, the American diplomat and hostage John Limbert welcomed an emissary from the revolutionary government. Limbert's facility for the Per...
About six months after the US Embassy in Iran was overrun in 1979, the American diplomat and hostage John Limbert welcomed an emissary from the revolutionary government. Limbert's facility for the Per...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:22 PM on 02/24/2011
You could always stop sending spies to Iran
Or at the very least stop getting caught

Let me ask the author this. If Iran were to attempt to sabotage an American nuclear power plant would that be considered terrorism?
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
07:01 PM on 02/23/2011
"Today, the US maintains no formal diplomatic relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran -- for obvious reasons. "

Which "obvious reasons", other than AIPAC?
05:48 PM on 02/23/2011
Of course it makes sense to engage the IRI. It is in America's interests not only to open a channel of communications with Iran, but to establish full diplomatic, commercial and humanitarian cooperation with that nation. That obviously will not be happening anytime soon, as Israel's hold on the US Congress is complete, and her influence on the Executive branch too preponderant at present for that to happen.

Maybe Iran should apologize for the hostage taking back in '79, but the US must likewise apologize for its role in the toppling of Mossadegh, for its openly backing and encouragement of Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran, and the ongoing covert war being waged against Iran by the US and Israel, including the support of terrorist organizations.

I hope the hikers are released, but one cannot blame the Iranian regime for being just a little paranoid, given the events of the last 58 years.
05:26 PM on 02/23/2011
" that the American youths were spying for the United States. Of course, Tehran cannot reconcile that claim with the decision last September to release one of the three -- hiker Sarah Shourd -- without charge...."
Explain this statement you made ?. take your time. Last I checked Shourd is still charged, just skipped bail and did not show for court.....
04:10 PM on 02/23/2011
Another point this Shourd claimed she was ill, as did her mother,Breast lump, precanceros cells the works! Iran let her go on bail due to this. On Compassionate grounds. As we all know she is as healthy as a horse. So much for honesty in this as well ,leaving Oman eat the 1/2 million dollars they put up to get her back to her USA. Iran has every right to defend the borders. Iran will try them to the letter of the law. MUCH more than any Iran prisoner in USA prisons can ever dare to hope for . BTW did Shourd forget about her promise to help the 2 twin girls who's mother is held in Florida prison??? Guess she just plum forgot.......
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hass
01:29 PM on 02/23/2011
The case of the hikers is not comparable to the hostages, sorry. They were illegally inside Iranian terrirtory. What would happen to an Iranian who "accidentally" hikes across the US border?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Patrick Disney
02:28 PM on 02/23/2011
http://www.thenation.com/article/36562/us-hikers-were-seized-iraq
US Hikers Were Seized in Iraq
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
06:11 PM on 02/23/2011
There is only hearsay evidence in the article claiming that the hikers were seized in Iraq.