There is a silver (and gold) lining in the IRS flap.
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell has pointed out that the law under which the flap arose has been misinterpreted by the IRS since 1959.
The 1954 law provides special tax treatment for organizations exclusively engaged in social-welfare. In 1959, without any amendment by Congress, the IRS decided on its own that it would grant such special treatment (donor anonymity and tax-free status for organizations) that were primarily engaged in social-welfare activities.
Administrative errors are fixable by administrative action. No act of Congress is required.
With a "stroke of the pen", the IRS should announce that it is correcting the error, and returning to the original intent, indeed the original language, of the IRS law. The IRS Commissioner reports to the Deputy Secretary of the Treasury. Hence, the President, the Treasury Secretary or the Deputy Secretary have the authority to instruct the Commissioner on matters of policy.
Let us now "game" the consequences of correcting the error. Virtually all current 501(c)4 organizations would now become taxable and required to disclose their donors. It would instantly clean-up the dark money the American people generally oppose.
Those organizations would, to put it mildly, freak-out. After all, anonymous, tax-free, big money control of the political system would be threatened.
Faster than stink on you-know-what, Congress would rush to repair the damage. This would be even worse for them than the sequester-created airport lines they experienced that was very promptly remediated. It is one thing, after all, to have to stand on lines; imagine if they had to pay for their own tickets!
The fight would be all over the news, enabling the campaign finance reform forces to get air-time. The public already opposes dark money, and they would be galvanized to swing sharply behind cleaning up the system, restoring the IRS's credibility.
As the background check vote demonstrated, however, what the overwhelming majority of the American people want does not get enacted if a powerful, intense minority opposes it.
The beauty of this is that no act of Congress is required. Congress can only act to make a new set of rules.
There are three special benefits in the current system as mistakenly applied by the IRS: donor anonymity, tax-free status and the ability to engage in partisan politics under the fig-leaf of "social-welfare". "Karl Rove" and "social welfare" in the same paragraph, much less the same document, strains the English language beyond the breaking point.
There is enough opposition to anonymity in the Senate to prevent that benefit from being enacted. What politician could vote for anonymity in the light of scrutiny?
Hence, the deal would be to provide tax-exempt status for organizations doing "primarily" social-welfare work, but without donor anonymity.
That would constitute a major step forward in campaign finance reform.
The IRS flap remains another ginned up "scandal" that the right-wing loves and the lamestream media embraces. On the first day the story broke, I dissented from the feeding frenzy, pending new information that would show partisan influence. None has yet been produced.
Dave Johnson has since written a trenchant piece based upon----wait for this, now--facts in the Inspector General's report that eviscerates the basis for calling this a scandal, except the concerted, coordinated efforts, thusfar successful, to try to make it a scandal.
Moreover, these organizations had no obligation to apply for 501(c)4 status in the first place.
Correcting the 45 year administrative error would not only change the focus of the debate, it would provide much needed campaign finance reform with a "stroke-of-the-pen".
The country, long-suffering under the yoke of corruption, would see a ray of hope.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.