EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Paul Brown

Paul Brown

Posted: October 20, 2009 08:36 PM

Should New Orleans Retreat Inland?

What's Your Reaction?

?>

When religious leaders, scientists and environmental campaigners from across the world meet to discuss something as controversial as the future of the Mississippi, its delta and the city of New Orleans there are bound to be some cross words.

On the agenda of the symposium starting on Wednesday are the increasing threats of erosion, sea level rise, pollution and storms to the Mississippi basin.

It is part of a wider discussion about climate change and particularly threats to coastal cities like London and New York. The aim by the end of the week is to come to an agreed position and send a forceful message to politicians to act. It is deliberately timed just before the fateful talks in Copenhagen in a month's time which many at the symposium consider will decide the fate of mankind and most species on planet earth.

Ahead of the conference about 50 delegates from Europe and Asia arrived in Memphis on Saturday with the task of educating and updating themselves about the Mississippi.

First on the agenda was a multi-faith service at the Annunciation Christian Orthodox Church led by Metropolitan Nicholas, the Orthodox Bishop of Detroit. It was held at the Orthodox church because the delegates were there at the invitation of the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, leader of an estimated 300 million Orthodox Christians around the world. When he opens opens the symposium on a riverboat in New Orleans on Wednesday the five days of ethical and scientific debate can begin.

Second visit on Sunday was to Mud Island River Park and the superb museum of the Mississippi history. This sparked a debate about long term consequences of the near 200-year battle of man to contain the river and master its many moods.

Essential stops also included the Cotton Museum of Memphis and the National Civil Rights Museum on the site where Martin Luther King was assassinated. The Rev. Billy Kyles, who was with King when he was shot down was fresh from celebrating 50 years as pastor of Monumental Baptist Church, when he came to show delegates around.

His message was that each generation had to play its part in keeping Martin Luther King's dream alive. "A lesson is that as long as we remained non-violent the world supported us. If we had been shooting or bombing people at random we would have lost the battle."

He said the success of the civil rights movements was more based on the spiritual than the political:

That is why we could endure so much. You knew when you stepped out of church you would be beaten or sitting in the wrong seat in the bus you would be arrested. In the end you knew deep down that you were right and that you would win.

Commenting on the recent taunts again President Obama he said:

We have come a long way, not so long ago it was a criminal offense to teach a slave to read. So to those of us in the movement these outbursts come as no surprise. We knew it was there. I had real concern for his well being during the campaign. But he has hit the ground running and more changes there will be.

Across the lunch table in Memphis on Monday senior scientists and clergy were already debating the practical and ethical issues of whether New Orleans should be rebuilt or whether it should have been the first city in the new age of climate change to retreat inland.

On Wednesday Pastor Kyles should be among the delegates invited by Bartholomew from across the religious spectrum from the US, Europe and Asia. There will also be veterans from previous meetings including the last two symposia in Greenland and the Amazon. Both regions are sending scientists to describe how rapid climate changes in these places are having a direct bearing on the future of the Mississippi basin including the latest figures on rapid sea level rise. Among the audience will also be diehards who still do not want to believe that climate change is real. It should be fun.

When religious leaders, scientists and environmental campaigners from across the world meet to discuss something as controversial as the future of the Mississippi, its delta and the city of New Orlean...
When religious leaders, scientists and environmental campaigners from across the world meet to discuss something as controversial as the future of the Mississippi, its delta and the city of New Orlean...
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Bienville
Make levees, not war
01:03 PM on 10/27/2009
When are you people going to bother to read up on this subject? Google "ILIT Berkley" and read the report. Read anything from Richard Campanella­. Read Ivor Heerden's book. Read _Rising Tide_ by John Barry.

The hurricane didn't flood the city, an engineerin­g failure is at fault. The levees were high enough to protect the City from a much stronger hurricane than Katrina. Many simple textbook civil engineerin­g blunders committed by the Corps of Engineers caused the levees to fail at at several feet below their design elevations­. Katrina didn't hit New Orleans; it passed many miles to the east. The conditions at New Orleans are estimated to have been a strong Cat 1 or weak Cat 2; the Corps has said that approximat­ely Cat 3 conditions were the design model. How did this happen? Join levees.org and demand an 8/29 Commission­.

Restored wetlands will help protect the City from future storms, no doubt. Closing navigation canals, diverting river sediment, etc are all great. But that will take decades. We might not have time for that.

A good deal more than half the population of the City has returned. Many are living below sea level. More than half the populated area is at or above sea level - some is above River level, too.

More than half of America's population lives in counties protected by levees.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctorj2u
09:01 AM on 10/21/2009
New Orleans IS rebuilt. The question is whether the USA will protect it or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
11:00 PM on 10/20/2009
New Orleans used to be one of my favorite cities, not just in the US but in the world. I can understand how much people want to rebuild it but as we deal with global climate change we are going to have face hard choices. It makes no sense to rebuild a city below sea level with what we know is coming.
03:03 PM on 10/22/2009
And where will you put the new New York?
09:56 PM on 10/20/2009
Yes, but the fact that climate change is real is not going to make people move cities inland away from the coming devastatio­n until it is too late. Yaknow, just like Katrina, they will all wait until it is too late. I think the best people can do is to put down roots in other communitie­s that will be more immune to natural disasters. People have to save themselves --just like with what happened with Katrina. Make your own moves and decisions because that is the only hope for you or your children. If you think the Government is going to act or save your butts, forget about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
11:25 PM on 10/20/2009
I don't know if you are a libertaria­n or a burned out Marxist but either way I disagree. If we expect the least from government we stop caring, organizing­, and voting and we get Bush. If we give a damn we get Obama, who is far from perfect but so much more competent than Bush you need a logarithmi­c scale to compare the two.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard2
06:33 PM on 10/21/2009
Climate change didn't ruin New Orleans. A hurricane did. Neighborho­ods siting below sea level was flooded by a hurricane. Half the population of the city left, and didn't come back. Hopefully the remaining population is sleeping above sea level.

If climate change had ruined New Orleans, then other coastal cities should have been ruined at the same time. Where are these other ruined cities? There aren't any! New Orleans was the only one located on low, low ground.

IThe hurricane taught us that it is not wise to build a city on low and sinking land, land that is lower than sea level on one side, and lower than the Mississipp­i River on the other. One or the other was bound to ruin New Orleans someday. The only question was when.
03:06 PM on 10/22/2009
Correct, New Orleans' problem isn't climate change. It's that a century of channeliza­tion and damming of the Mississipp­i combined with oil and gas exploitati­on has accelerate­d 5,000 years of natural subsidence into a century. The treatment of coastal Louisiana by the United States will be remembered in history with the treatment of the native peoples. That recognitio­n will sadly come too late to help us.
photo
Bienville
Make levees, not war
01:04 PM on 10/27/2009
When are you people going to bother to read up on this subject? Google "ILIT Berkley" and read the report. Read anything from Richard Campanella­. Read Ivor Heerden's book. Read _Rising Tide_ by John Barry.

The hurricane didn't flood the city, an engineerin­g failure is at fault. The levees were high enough to protect the City from a much stronger hurricane than Katrina. Many simple textbook civil engineerin­g blunders committed by the Corps of Engineers caused the levees to fail at at several feet below their design elevations­. Katrina didn't hit New Orleans; it passed many miles to the east. The conditions at New Orleans are estimated to have been a strong Cat 1 or weak Cat 2; the Corps has said that approximat­ely Cat 3 conditions were the design model. How did this happen? Join levees.org and demand an 8/29 Commission­.

Restored wetlands will help protect the City from future storms, no doubt. Closing navigation canals, diverting river sediment, etc are all great. But that will take decades. We might not have time for that.

A good deal more than half the population of the City has returned. Many are living below sea level. More than half the populated area is at or above sea level - some is above River level, too.

More than half of America's population lives in counties protected by levees.