iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Paul Helmke

GET UPDATES FROM Paul Helmke
 

In the ATF "Fast and Furious" Controversy, Congress Needs to Question Its Own Behavior

Posted: 06/29/11 12:01 PM ET

If California Rep. Darrell Issa and other congressional members who are in lock-step with the NRA bosses want to get to the bottom of the ATF gun trafficking operation, they need to start looking at their own actions and lack of action. By blocking and loosening laws to prevent gun violence they, too, are culpable in ATF's "Fast and Furious" apparent debacle.

This poorly-executed operation had agents skulking around gun shops to watch and possibly document numerous illegal firearms sales in Arizona. The unstopped gun runners then resold about 2,000 assault weapons to violent Mexican drug cartels. Further tragedy unfolded when two of the guns were found at the murder scene of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in December 2010.

On Thursday, I'll be testifying at a congressional forum chaired by Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings on the issues of America's weak gun laws and the ATF operation that has put the spotlight on gun violence that touches too many lives in America and Mexico.

The testimony from Terry's family members during the recent ATF hearing called by Rep. Issa was heart-wrenching. I've witnessed that kind of pain over and over again in the many years I've worked as a mayor and as President of the Brady Campaign -- victims senselessly killed by guns made too easily available to dangerous people and devastated survivors struggling to deal with the consequences of it all.

At the bidding of the gun lobby, a majority of congressional members, Democrats and Republicans, continue to keep the nation's gun laws weak and full of holes that disreputable gun dealers and dangerous people exploit to the peril of citizens on both sides of the border.

Rep. Issa and others can point fingers at the ATF for mounting a failed mission, but it is Congress that prevents the ATF from getting an annual inventory from dealers on guns sales to address the problem of guns "disappearing" from gun shops with no record of sales. That stops the agency from quickly shutting down corrupt shops.

Congress allows dealers to destroy criminal background check records after 24 hours, preventing the ATF from learning how well shops are following the Brady background checks requirements. Through the Tiahrt Amendment, Congress limits the ATF's ability to disclose gun trace data to the public so residents will not know whether there is a dealer in their midst with a track record of selling to dangerous people. ATF trace data have shown in the past that only 1 percent of gun dealers are responsible for about 60 percent of gun sales traced to crime scenes in this country.

Too many federal officials appear deaf to the majority of Americans who want reasonable gun laws so they don't end up becoming targets. These officials appear to respond only to the pleas of the gun lobbyists who are terrified that rapidly declining gun ownership -- as a recent study by the Violence Policy Center found -- will decimate the gun industry's profits.

So, despite the killing of Agent Terry, the vicious murders of thousands of Mexican citizens and the wounding of one of their own, Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are pushing even more legislation to protect gun dealers from disclosing to whom they are selling firearms. The so-called "ATF Reform Act of 2011" (S. 835 and H.R. 1093) won't make anyone safer. Instead, it would make it even more difficult for the ATF to stop corrupt gun dealers. The bills would require the ATF to show that a dealer not only violated the law, but had the specific intent to do so. It's another loophole for corrupt gun dealers to snake through.

So rather than look at their complicity in the ATF's record in stopping gun trafficking, predictably, Congress' probe has narrowed to make the acting FBI Director Kenneth Melson the primary target. He's being pressured to resign for not properly managing the operation. But many federal officials, including Rep. Issa, are not doing their part to end the lawlessness along the border and in our communities.

I was on a panel on border issues during the U.S. Conference of Mayors Annual Meeting in Baltimore 10 days ago. It was chaired by Mayor Raul G. Salinas from Laredo, Texas, who is frustrated that congressional members have been horn-locked so long, that pressing borders issues, such as immigration reform and drug trafficking, have been ignored. The trafficking of illegal guns across the U.S.-Mexican border is not usually linked in conversations about immigration reform. But gun trafficking has become another border issue that has gotten out of control.

It is time for Washington's politicians to look out for average people who do not deserve to have unethical gun dealers -- and the gun lobby that shields them -- pushing illegal guns into their neighborhoods.


Follow the Brady Campaign on Facebook and Twitter. This entry, along with past entries, has been co-posted at the Brady Campaign online.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 189
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robgrut
05:22 PM on 07/12/2011
Holder really should go for the deaths caused by this operation. He is not a good AG.
10:30 PM on 07/08/2011
page 16 of the stimulus act provides $10,000,000 to the ATF for the Project Gun Runner-Fast and Furious. I tried to post the whole paragraph but it looks like hufpo blocked it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Blu Steel
I Love Voice dialogue
11:50 PM on 07/08/2011
seems as though they are trying to bury this
02:25 AM on 07/09/2011
The world has turn upside down. The term liberal would seem that one would be against this kind of police misbehavior. At least in the old days it was. What's wrong with this picture? This is why I can't call myself a liberal anymore. And they have the gall to say it is nothing and try to spin it into pushing gun control. It almost looks like a set up. They also sold 1000 weapons to the ms13 gang in Honduras. What is happening to our country. It is getting bigger.
10:27 PM on 07/08/2011
page16 of the stimulus act

For an additional amount for ‘‘State and Local Law Enforcement
Assistance’’, $40,000,000, for competitive grants to provide
assistance and equipment to local law enforcement along the
Southern border and in High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas to
combat criminal narcotics activity stemming from the Southern
border, of which $10,000,000 shall be transferred to ‘‘Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Salaries and Expenses’’
for the ATF Project Gunrunner.
10:49 PM on 07/08/2011
Thank for finally posting it.
09:00 PM on 07/08/2011
Weak and full of holes!
10:48 PM on 07/08/2011
gbfive, I want to post something but at the hufpo free speech is forbidden
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WuzYoungOnceToo
02:43 PM on 07/07/2011
As always, the perpetually irrelevant Paul Helmke attempts to deflect attention from the truth via the pathetically transparent use of smoke and mirrors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robgrut
10:28 AM on 07/07/2011
Eric Holder should be gone over this. Selling guns to gangs used in murders is inexcusable.
01:29 PM on 07/07/2011
IMO, taking gun away from law abiding citizens so they do not have an effective means to defend themselves against violent attackers is equally inexcusable. Yet people like Helmke, Hanigan, and Sugarman are not held to answer for the innocent lives lost due to the gun laws they help pass.
10:35 PM on 07/08/2011
hupo blocking my posting again. $10,000,000 for fast and furious, page 16 stimulus pakage
07:10 PM on 07/06/2011
Paul is always blaming the wrong person. Its just par for the course.
photo
Iconcoclast
complicated laws are opportunities for scoundrels
05:11 PM on 07/06/2011
ATF director Melson just testified to a congressional investigator that Fast and Furious was intentionally providing firearms to Mexican gangs, often over the objections of both local agents and gun store owners. He also testified that the DoJ was covering this up and refusing to cooperate with the investigation--an impeachable offense for Eric Holder.

When the very organization expected to enforce the national firearm laws intentionally breaks the law, how can any honest person argue that the problem is insufficient regulation? The answer to that is simple: no honest person can. Which leaves the Obama administration and dishonest organizations like Brady.
06:28 PM on 07/06/2011
Gotta love a good scandal. I wouldn't be surprised if Obama is fully apprised of the situation already, knowing about it this whole time while his AG tries to cover it up.
photo
Iconcoclast
complicated laws are opportunities for scoundrels
07:05 PM on 07/06/2011
The scandal seems to go as high as Holder. Holder clearly lied to Congress and the DoJ was responsible for F&F knowingly selling guns into Mexico without any means of tracking (or even notifying Mexican officials). The DoJ is responsible for hundreds of deaths on the Mexican side and at least two deaths on the US side of the border as a result of F&F. And the only reasonable justification seems to be to generate propaganda for greater federal gun laws.

I would doubt that Obama really knew what was going on, however. He isn't known as President Present for nothing!
10:37 PM on 07/08/2011
money for it in stimulus package
01:37 PM on 07/06/2011
"So rather than look at their complicity in the ATF's record in stopping gun trafficking, predictably, Congress' probe has narrowed to make the acting FBI Director Kenneth Melson the primary target. He's being pressured to resign for not properly managing the operation."

Apparently, Mr. Melson has become a star witness blowing the whistle on higher-ups! I wonder who was hoping that he would resign. Certainly not Issa's panel. I wonder who is running scared now.

Care to amend your note so that you are not leaving on a low-note AKA business as usual?
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
12:46 PM on 07/06/2011
Paul, congratulations on your retirement from BC. Please as a last blog, regale us with the victories you have led your organization to achieve. Meanwhile we wait to see if BC will ever do anything that would actually control violence. Your entire effort is to lobby for feel good, accomplish little legislation..
10:23 AM on 07/06/2011
What a sweet gift. I venture back after a long absence to find Paul retiring from the Brady Campaign. No doubt Paul is resigning because his tenure with the Brady Campaign has been an utter failure and a complete disgrace.

He instituted a blog with comments at the Brady Campaign website to garner support for their cause but only found a plethora of rational logical minded individuals able to successfully counter argue his every post.

Not once has Paul EVERY entered the comment section of either blog to provide rational logical support for anything he has stated.

I even remember the one time Sarah Brady came to support the cause. She made three posts that lacked any substance or logical support for the gun-control agenda. She wouldn't even address some of the most basic gun related questions posed to her. Instead, she rambled on about watching sunsets. Ultimately, Paul had to yank the comments sections from the blog, but we migrated over to HuffPo to continue debunking his every column.

The entire gun-control movement is a sinking ship built on empty promises, made decades ago, that most average Americans see has never come true.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
01:30 PM on 07/06/2011
Do you remember Daedelus/LeeClayton/JohnnySalt? It has gotten to the point where he is burning through 2 or 3 screen names a day
02:33 PM on 07/06/2011
Yeah, I remember him. Who is he now?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 PM on 07/07/2011
Ah yes, tales from the days of yore..................when Paul closed the BC Blog to comments because of the technical "revamping" of the website. They revamped the website, what, 3 years ago, at least?

Now, Paul has resigned. I wonder if it was his idea. No matter, this is clearly another 'victory' for the BC, if you subscribe the their idea of 'logic'.

Sorry to see you go, Paul. Who's going to replace you, Kelli? ;-)

By the way, daedelus, leeclayton, etc., etc., lasted the longest as 'Guffman', so we have been referring to him (and identifying him for the mods) as 'Guffie' for some time.

It works, because the poor little man can't last longer than a couple of hours, no matter what he calls himself.

Good to hear from you again, Zen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
06:16 PM on 07/04/2011
So Paul--what is your farewell blog going to cover--your "victories" like Heller/McDOnald, the fact you got nothing passed in the first 2 years of Obama?
10:29 AM on 07/06/2011
Maybe a heart-felt apology for all the innocent lives lost to violence (of any kind) because groups like the Brady Campaign work tirelessly to ensure that they, or other law abiding citizens around them, were/are stripped of their ability to effectively defend themselves against criminal attackers that have no regard for the law?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
12:33 PM on 07/06/2011
welcome back--how isEdutilos
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
06:01 AM on 07/07/2011
No, just a heart felt apology to the families of those killed in Dubya's wars.
09:10 AM on 07/07/2011
And that is relevant to the current topic how?

Oh yeah, I forgot when anti-gunners are incapable of arguing the topic of gun-control using facts and logic they immediately throw out fallacies like appeals to emotion, red herrings, straw men, ad hominem attacks, etc. And of course, one of their favorite red herrings among liberal anti-gunners is a completely unrelated slam on the evil hated one.

This is one reason that the gun-control movement has been losing so much support. Many Americans that have been promised, for decades, that gun control would reduce violent crime are not seeing these results. Instead they are seeing completely hollow arguments supporting a completely ineffective and, in many cases, counterproductive agenda.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Carson
11:28 AM on 07/07/2011
Jim--why the irrelevant display of BDS?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
The Left is not Liberal
10:55 AM on 07/01/2011
In the meantime, the "Fast & Furious" weapons have started turning up at crime scenes in the USA:

http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/weapons-linked-to-controversial-atf-strategy-found-in-valley-crimes

Thanks a BUNCH, Eric Holder!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
The Left is not Liberal
10:53 AM on 07/01/2011
Washington politicians are the problem, NOT law-abiding gun owners. The problem here was political appointees (cough-ERIC HOLDER-cough) who were "giddy" when people were killed with these weapons.

We need more control of WASHINGTON, not more control of guns.
05:08 PM on 06/30/2011
Amazing twists and turns here. Yet again. Gun industry has had record sales the past few years. I don't think they're terrified of anything.

It's amazing that the gun control lobby can turn a failed effort to cause controversy over guns into another controversy about guns. It's not the US's weak laws, it's not corrupt FFLs, it's not the law-abiding gun owner. The laws don't help, and the ATF is culpable for hundreds of murders it facilitated. But once again, Helmke cares only about his agenda.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:00 PM on 07/03/2011
Record sales and who do you think are buying these guns?
Next question is why?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:28 AM on 07/04/2011
Are you kidding? You do know that over 99% of gun sales in America are to normal, law-abiding people, right?
"Who do you think are buying these guns?" I'm not sure what you were implying.
Gun owner = criminal now? Boxer, Feinstein, Sarah Brady all own guns.

That is like saying Brady support = German Nazi Party because they supported gun bans too. Clearly a false connection.

Why?
Because I like to target shoot, collect firearms, and have a means of self-defense.
Why do I have to explain myself to you for exercising a basic human right that has been recognized since the beginning of recorded history?
And one that is now fully protected by the Second Amendment (whether anti-gunners like it or not, thank you Supreme Court).

Why do people drive sports cars when a Prius is more efficient? Do people only buy them to speed and break the law? Or do they mostly enjoy them at normal speeds?
Same thing.
09:51 AM on 07/04/2011
Americans. Because they can.