More

Paul Klein

Paul Klein

Posted: September 11, 2008 06:33 PM

The Passion of an Exemplary Art Collector


June Spiezer is the most passionate, exemplary collector of art I ever had the pleasure of working with, though working seems like entirely the wrong word.

June, and her husband Francis, who is no longer with us, have been collecting predominantly Chicago art for decades and there's an exhibition of a glorious portion of their collection that opens Sunday at the Johnson Gallery on the Carthage College campus in Kenosha.

There are certainly lots of reasons to collect art. For me, and the Spiezers, it's about the passion and vibrancy of being stimulated. Invariably it's a personal thing. Even the most loving of harmoniously married couples often disagree about what kind of art moves them. That's okay.

But for Francis and June Spiezer it was the passion that moved them both. And beyond the passion they personally experienced in every work of art they acquired, it was the passion the artist put into the work that they sought. They insisted on getting a sense of the artist's soul, knowing the artist, embracing the vision and giving back to the artist the passion they got out of the artist's effort.

2008-09-11-Paschkehhf775.jpg


The Spiezers certainly weren't wealthy in the traditional sense of having money. They were wealthy in a more important way. They were wise, fun and young, even as they got old, even as Francis was making his exit. When I had a gallery they'd say things to me, usually after an hour or two-long conversation filled with love and a few off-color jokes, "Paul, we want to buy this painting (or drawing, or sculpture). We just love it. Only problem is we are presently paying off 4 other pieces around town and we can't even start on this one for 5 months, not even a down payment. Is that okay?" Of course it was okay, these people were the best.

I remember introducing June to the director of the Museum of Contemporary Art at the time and asked her to tell him how many works of art she and Francis owned by Chicago artists. Without missing a beat June said "287." I was amazed. I had no idea.

For June and Francis collecting was not about keeping art in crates, it was about living with the passion and the joy and hanging it on the walls of their not very large 3 bedroom apartment.

As the time came 15 years ago or so to consider what to do with the collection for perpetuity, it was clear that neither of Chicago's major museums had the alacrity, wisdom or foresight to show interest in the collection that reads like a who's who of Chicago art. But the Rockford Art Museum did, so the best collection of Chicago art resides out of town. That's a shame for us and a shame for our institutions.

2008-09-11-Siglerkljh78s.jpg

Too often our laudable museums follow the money and not the art, pursue the glitz and the bling and not quality or substance. Too often their perspective is skewed by the myopia of confusing genuine with hyperbole.

Take for example the relatively new phenomena of museum guided collecting, which is alluded to in the literature and title of the Collecting for Chicago exhibition of drawings at the Art Institute. It is suggested that major donors were told what the museum wanted to ultimately receive as a donation. Think about it. The collector is encouraged to become the emotionally disengaged custodian of something they really never wanted. Yes, the museum gets the art they want. Yes, it makes for a handsome exhibition. And yes, it is wrongheaded.

The Spiezers collected for themselves and for love. And love is about reciprocity. Their love helped, inspired, and propelled artists who knew for once that their effort to communicate was appreciated, received and returned.

2008-09-11-yoshidabiiiif2.jpg

There's an unusual condition the Spiezers placed on their collection when they gave it to the Rockford Art Museum. They mandated that the collection be shown publicly every 10 years. It can't lay in hiding like most donations. And it's beautiful to see a fabulous selection of the highlights at Carthage College.

The works on exhibit at Carthage are often seminal works by significant Chicago artists. And a lot of the reason they're seminal is that the Spiezers couldn't afford, or wouldn't pay exorbitant prices to acquire art with bloated prices. They'd acquire art that excited them by artists on the way up - not necessarily young, new, in, or de rigueur, just affordable.

2008-09-11-LutesIShouldHaveCalled2008_06hhuhsd66s.jpg

Here's a sampling of the artists in the show: Phyllis Bramson, Roger Brown, Antonia Contro, Tom Czarnopys, Susanne Doremus, Julia Fish, Josh Garber, Michelle Grabner, Steven Heyman, Richard Hull, Gary Justis, Terry Karpowicz, Jackie Kazarian, Mike Lash, Jim Lutes, Gladys Nilsson, Jim Nutt, Ed Paschke, Dan Ramirez, Joe Siegenthaler, Hollis Sigler, Tony Tasset, Chuck Walker, Margaret Wharton, Ann Weins, Karl Wirsum and Ray Yoshida.

The Spiezer's collection is about love and the passion, power and joy of art. This is a wonderful exhibit to see, to share and appreciate.

A lot of people love June. She's a very special lady.

Thank you,
Paul Klein

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:46 PM on 09/12/2008
The Spiezers collected Chicago like a documentation of a time [and collecting supports the art and the artist to live with $$$. I know Dorthy B. who documented many many art events from the 60s to 2000 + and met her at the Smithson opening in LA a few years ago. Each of these people are important to the art culture of New York or Chicago..for the art -- art of the world. [we must think large].
recently I was at an artists home who played with her new video camera documenting the 1996 group of Earth Artists at Arte Sella. this too becomes an important time to hold on to now 12 years later. Why don't more people THINK to work with the arts.. the art is important to us all.
04:03 PM on 09/12/2008
Wonderful article, Paul. It's shameful that neither of Chicago's major museums had any interest in the Spiezer's collection...these are important artists.

It would be interesting to hear from other collectors and learn what is their driving force in collecting art. Thanks too for sharing your thoughts on your collection, Paul.
11:40 AM on 09/12/2008
The fact that art institutions in Chicago have treated Chicago artists with disdain is nothing new. The paltry few representations of Chicago artists in the collections of the Art Institute and the Museum of Contemporary Art are embarrassing at best. While pathetic it is not surprising. Even the relationship between the Art Institute and its own school is one of the red headed step child variety.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Klein
10:56 AM on 09/12/2008
For the last few years I’ve been focusing on collecting Chicago art. And most of it is small. We moved into a home with low ceilings, lots of windows and small walls. Most art is under 18 inches. That means there can more of it and prices are lower. We tend to prefer breadth and don’t have more than 1 work by very many artists. It has rapidly become a pretty real collection and there are interesting visual dialogues between pieces. It has taken on a life of its own.