iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Paul Krassner

Paul Krassner

Posted: August 10, 2009 12:12 PM

The Mystery Behind the Manson Murders


Charles Manson was never a hippie. His real family included con artists, pimps, drug dealers, thieves, muggers, rapists and murderers. He had known only power relationships in an army of control junkies. Manson was America's Frankenstein monster, a logical product of the prison system -- racist, paranoid, violent -- even if hippie astrologers thought that his fate had been predetermined because he was a triple Scorpio.

In the course of my research, I met Preston Guillory, a former deputy sheriff at the Malibu Sheriff's Department, which aided the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department in the original raid of the Spahn Ranch. Guillory had participated in that raid, and I interviewed him at an apartment in San Francisco. He stated:

We had been briefed for a few weeks prior to the actual raiding of Spahn Ranch. We had a sheaf of memos on Manson, that they had automatic weapons at the ranch, that citizens had complained about hearing machine-guns fired at night, that firemen from the local fire station had been accosted by armed members of Manson's band and told to get out of the area, all sorts of complaints like this.


We had been advised to put anything relating to Manson on a memo submitted to the station, because they were supposedly gathering information for the raid we were going to make. Deputies at the station of course started asking, "Why aren't we going to make the raid sooner?" I mean, Manson's a parole violator, machine-guns have been heard, we know there's narcotics and we know there's booze. He's living at the Spahn Ranch with a bunch of minor girls in complete violation of his parole.

Deputies at the station quite frankly became very annoyed that no action was being taken about Manson. My contention is this -- the reason Manson was left on the street was because our department thought that he was going to attack the Black Panthers. We were getting intelligence briefings that Manson was anti-black and he had supposedly killed a Black Panther, the body of which could not be found, and the department thought that he was going to launch an attack on the Black Panthers.

Manson was a very ready tool, apparently, because he did have some racial hatred and he wanted to vent it. But they hadn't anticipated him attacking someone other than the Panthers, which he did. Manson changed his score. Changed the program at the last moment and attacked the Tates and then went over to the LaBiancas and killed them. And here was the Sheriff's Department suddenly wondering, "Jesus Christ, what are we gonna do about this? We can't cover this up. Well, maybe we can."

I bet those memos are no longer in existence. The memos about what Manson was doing. Citizens' complaints. All those things I'm sure have disappeared by now. It shows the police were conscious of the fact that he had these weapons in violation of his parole. You've got at least involvement here on the part of Manson's parole officer, on the part of the Sheriff's Department, probably the sheriff himself, and whoever gave him his orders. Manson should have been [imprisoned] long before the killings, because he was on parole, period. He was living at the Spahn Ranch with an outlaw motorcycle gang. I feel that, to say the least, the sheriff of Los Angeles County is an accessory to murder.

The raid was a week after the Sharon Tate thing, and the intelligence information was coming in for about three weeks prior to the raid. They just didn't want any arrests made. It was obvious they wanted the intelligence information we were gathering for some other reason. Three days after they were arrested, 72 hours later, they were all released -- lack of evidence -- after this mammoth raid. This raid involved two helicopters, 102 deputies and about 25 radio cars, and all the charges were dropped against everyone.

It appeared to me that the raid was more or less staged as an afterthought. It was like a scenario that we were going through. There was some kind of a grand plan that we were participating in, but I never had the feeling the raid was necessary or that it required so many personnel. Now, if you were a police official and you were planning a raid on the Spahn Ranch, utilizing 102 deputies and helicopters and all that, one would think that with all the information coming out a month prior to the raid, wouldn't you have them under fairly close surveillance? If you did have them under fairly close surveillance, wouldn't you see them leave the Spahn Ranch to go over and kill seven people and then come back?

So the hypothesis I put forward is, either we didn't have them under surveillance for grand-theft-auto because it was a big farce, or else they were under surveillance by somebody much higher than the Sheriff's Department, and they did go through this scenario of killing at the Tate house and then come back, and then we went through the motions to do our raid. Either they were under surveillance at the time, which means somebody must have seen them go to the Tate house and commit the killings, or else they weren't under surveillance.

You have to remember that Charlie was on federal parole all this time from '67 to '69. Do you realize all the shit he was getting away with while he was on parole? Now here's the kicker. Before the Tate killings, he had been arrested at Malibu twice for statutory rape. Never got [imprisoned for parole violation]. During the Tate killings and the Spahn Ranch raid, Manson's parole officer was on vacation, so he had no knowledge of Manson being incarcerated, so naturally Manson was released, but why wasn't a parole hold put on him?

It's like Manson had God on his side when all these things are going down, or else somebody was watching every move he made, somebody was controlling from behind the scenes. Somebody saw that no parole hold was placed. Manson liked to ball young girls, so he just did his thing and he was released and they didn't put any hold on him. But somebody very high up was controlling everything that was going on and was seeing to it that we didn't bust Manson.

Prior to the Spahn Ranch raid, there was a memo -- it was verbal, I would have loved to Xerox some things but there wasn't anything to Xerox -- that we weren't to arrest Manson or any of his followers prior to the raid. It was intimated to us that we were going to make a raid on the Spahn ranch, but the captain came out briefly and said, "No action is to be taken on anybody at the Spahn ranch. I want memos submitted directly to me with a cover sheet so nobody else can read them."

So deputies were submitting memos on information about the Spahn Ranch that other deputies weren't even allowed to see. We were to submit intelligence information but not to make any arrests. Manson was in a free fire zone, so to speak. He was living a divine existence. We couldn't touch him....



And so it was that the presence of racism had morphed the Sheriff's Department into collaborators in a mass murder. But who was the higher-up that gave them the order to leave Manson alone? I was certainly prepared to believe that's what occurred. I had been gathering piece after piece of a mind-boggling jigsaw puzzle, trying to make them all fit snugly into one big cohesive picture, but without having any model to pattern it after.

I concluded that the brainwashed Manson family actually served as a hit squad for a drug ring run by mobsters he had met in prison. But, he wrote to me, "I've always ran poker games and whores and crime. I'm a crook. You make the reality in court and the press. I just ride and play the cards that were pushed on me to play. Mass killer, it's a job, what can I say."

The above is excerpted from my 1993 autobiography, Confessions of a Raving, Unconfined Nut: Misadventures in the Counterculture. Simon & Schuster has since reverted all rights back to me, and an expanded edition will soon be published online by New World Digital.

Follow Paul Krassner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ZenBastard

Charles Manson was never a hippie. His real family included con artists, pimps, drug dealers, thieves, muggers, rapists and murderers. He had known only power relationships in an army of control jun...
Charles Manson was never a hippie. His real family included con artists, pimps, drug dealers, thieves, muggers, rapists and murderers. He had known only power relationships in an army of control jun...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:30 AM on 08/11/2009
I don't think we have ever gotten the whole truth in this case. I find it really hard to believe Manson had this kind of hold on all of these people.
07:41 AM on 08/11/2009
"I find it really hard to believe Manson had this kind of hold on all of these people."
Really? Bush, O'Rielly, LImburger, Beck, Coulter, Palin, Falwell ad infinitum.
01:24 AM on 08/11/2009
Much of what Bugliosi claims about "Helter Skelter" has been debunked by other Manson writers. Even Vab Houtenm Atkins, and Krenwinkle, say that was not a motivator. I am not a fan of Charlie's but I have never been convinced that he orchestrated these murders. I think it was the work of Tex Watson, and his pal that was in jail.

Manson is not nuts. He is acting. He is giving media what they come to see him for. CHarles Manson did not kill any of these nine people. Linda Kasabian told Bugliosi what he wanted to hear to save her hide.
photo
ranchero42
Cherished Memories? NRA'll Rifle Thru 'Em
10:03 PM on 08/10/2009
It's easy to paint the local law enforcement with this; but does anyone doubt this originated in the Governor's Mansion? Ronald Reagan was known to abuse his authority with law enforcement when he could no longer hold sway over his daughters. Getting hippies to leave California en masse was one of his wet dreams. My uncle paid my parents a surprise visit in 1969; his bike traded for a sports car, no time for a shave and a haircut. Who doubts the GOP is waiting for their next opportunity?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dosadi
Political agnostic
08:56 PM on 08/10/2009
Now let's sit back and think a bit. Manson's cry to arms was "Helter Skelter" A plan to get the whites and blacks to war with each other. Manson's plan was to somehow ensure the blacks would look like they were winning then he would come forth as a savior to lead the whites to victory. This "Helter Skelter" plan has been re-worked by the Republican party. They want the poor, uneducated whites from the south to raise hell until something happens, then they (the Republicans) can ride up on white horses and save the day. This is the only plan the Republicans have to return to power. They tried every lie you can think of but still lost the election. In spite of the lies told about President Obama he won. Now they are going to lie about anything they can to discredit this president. Health care reform is just argument they use to bring about a revised version of "Helter Skelter" The republicans will let these innocent people be dupped and lied to so in the end the Republican party can look like the heroes as they save the nation from the policies of a black man. Birther's, palling around with terrorists, and now socialism are being thrown into the fire in hopes something catches on. This could end badly with a torn devided nation. Helter Skelter is the dumbest idea to come down the pike.
08:47 PM on 08/10/2009
Mae Brussel when she was alive, had a very interesting perspective on this Manson fellow and the murders committed by the followers in his group "the Manson Family". After reading the article on HP about the sherriff' s department not acting and the orders stating such, it gives one pause to think hard about what Ms. Brussell stated as her opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tena
08:00 PM on 08/10/2009
Well I totally agree that Manson was no hippie - he was the quintessential con. Sociopaths are manipulators anyway and when they've spent quite a bit of time inside, they get much better at it. I recognized him in most of my clients when I was still practicing; I did felony appeals.

I have no reason to doubt the rest of it. Those were some very strange times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
06:26 PM on 08/10/2009
Mr. Krasner thanks for this article. There were a lot of things wrong with the hippie movement. Self involved, too much drugs, etc. But it was never a movement of violence. The distortion of the Manson story was a way for the MSM at the time to destroy the movement and get middle america to be afraid. Fear makes control a lot easier.
01:21 PM on 08/11/2009
I've read in a number of different sources that the entire Manson scenario was meant to be used to discredit the Hippie Peace/Love movement and scare middle class America into rejecting the social revolution that was taking place then.

He had long hair, ergo, he was a "hippy." Of course all the Hells Angels of the day had long hair and beards, too, but they weren't exactly harbingers of peace, any more than Manson was. But the main stream press were given their meme by the corporate powers, and they ran with it for all they were worth.

The ultimate over reaction to the peace, free speech, civil rights, woman's rights movements was the paper written for the Trilateral Commission in 1975 that outlines exactly what steps should be taken to reduce the amount of "Democracy" in America--because too much freedom is, well, a threat! The paper is called, "The Crisis of Democracy,"

http://www.trilateral.org/projwork/tfrsums/tfr08.htm
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1442950

Many rumors have surrounded Manson and who ran him, and why. Krassner's inside info on how the cops let him go for so long certainly fits in with his being a tool to destroy the best of the 60's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
02:34 PM on 08/11/2009
I've read similar sources. This will sound like its venturing into tin foil hat land but I think its possible there was some CIA or other cointel type program involved in both Manson and the Jim Jones massacre. Unfortunately, I've never seen anything that could be considered solid proof but there are some interesting coincidences and possibilities. I usually don't try to advocate those so strongly because they are so difficult to prove and sound to many like crazy conspiracies, where as other things that are out in the open, such as the trilateral commission document you reference are indisputable and pretty damning all on their own.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReportThis
04:30 PM on 08/10/2009
This was inane when it was published in 1993. It hasn't gotten better with age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
06:23 PM on 08/10/2009
If its so insane then point out the inconsistencies in the logic or the facts stated which aren't true. Just labeling something insane is no argument.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
06:31 PM on 08/10/2009
Sorry "inane" not "insane", my same argument applies though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balzac
03:20 PM on 08/10/2009
Thank you Paul, for straightening out those squares who'd like to disseminate the propaganda that Charles Manson was a hippy. He was not.
04:08 AM on 08/11/2009
None of these people were hippies, not Manson, not the girls, not the guys. Manson was a con man and a predator and his followers were brainwashed sons and daughters of the middle class. They had about as much in common with hippies or the hippie culture as the Hell's Angels. Less, if anything. By the way, I wasn't a hippie either, too old and way too cynical, but I enjoyed their company and their philosophy (such as it was)--in an age when the government was being run by criminals and supported by racists and corporate sleaze and the average man in the street couldn't see past the pot-smoking and casual sex to what was really going on and the damage it was doing to the country, hippies made a lot of sense.
only1Demvoter
eschew Obfuscation, end Subterfuge...
02:50 PM on 08/10/2009
Thanx for the repost Paul... Spot on, as usual.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMfkVGCU_BA

I will forward the link this article to Gabrielle.


-ralph
02:42 PM on 08/10/2009
There is a predisposition to enlarge the context in which a person lives their life, both on the part of individuals and "those trying to sell papers" (if you'll pardon my outmoded expression). That's how the Mansons get to cast shadows on the peace-love movements, when the only shadows they should be casting is on themselves (okay, not as do-able as one might hope).
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:35 PM on 08/10/2009
Vincent Bugliosi wrote that, although Charles Manson held anti-black beliefs, he liked how African-Americans were willing to fight the police. He believed that the murders would get blamed on the Black Panthers, leading to a race war.
02:03 PM on 08/10/2009
Using one group of criminals to wipe out another group of criminals - I don't see what the fuss is about. Governments have always done that, it's nothing shocking at all.
photo
Marlyn
If I'm wrong, let me know.
02:07 PM on 08/10/2009
The Black Panthers were criminals?
03:26 PM on 08/10/2009
Yeah what about due process?
03:32 PM on 08/10/2009
I would like to see a response by Mr. Bugilosi. Why wasn't Manson picked up for parole violations prior to the Tate murders?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
06:24 PM on 08/10/2009
Putting aside questions of due process and the rule of law, you might ask the relatives of Sharon Tate what all the fuss is about.
01:42 PM on 08/10/2009
"Three days after they were arrested, 72 hours later, they were all released -- lack of evidence -- after this mammoth raid. This raid involved two helicopters, 102 deputies and about 25 radio cars, and all the charges were dropped against everyone."

What a shame, and to think of the sheer waste and cost of such an effort.
06:26 PM on 08/10/2009
More the shame is that they actually weren't released for lack of evidence. They were released, because the raid was executed on a different day than what was printed on the warrant.

http://newrealfilms.com/lesliemynameisevil
01:28 PM on 08/10/2009
As I think back on the Manson murders, there was never a time when I thought Charlie was a "hippie". Stark, raving mad - yes. A complete lunatic - yes. A sick, twisted mental degenerate - yes. But not a "hippie".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:47 PM on 08/10/2009
You're so right! I was a young teenage hippy at the time, and nothing Manson did resonated with me. He seemed to me at the time - and he seems to me today - to be just another small-time criminal who found his niche and had a short, brutal ride in the limelight. His trip had nothing to do with peace and love.
10:28 PM on 08/10/2009
Of course he was not a hippy but many small minded people thought "hippy" was anyone with long hair, sandals, and even more living in a "commune' with "free love". Funny how lies have a way of making the rounds so quickly and taking roots so fast, while it's so hard for truth to be recognized and respected.
05:29 PM on 08/10/2009
In the mind of the general public he was, and it scared the hell out of them.
01:31 PM on 08/11/2009
So this plan hatched by conservatives to destroy a real social movement away from the slavery of consumerism and militarism, worked.