More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Paul Rieckhoff

GET UPDATES FROM Paul Rieckhoff
 

It's Time for the President to Prove He's Brady or Eli for Vets

Posted: 01/24/2012 7:47 am

If the NFC and AFC title games from this past weekend reminded us of anything, it's that America loves clutch performances. The first three quarters are great for backdrop, but it's performing when the pressure is at its highest that creates the best memories and the biggest stars. A quarterback that can perform under pressure makes all the difference in the world. For some of you, that means Tom Brady. For Giants fans like me, it's been Eli Manning all season long. When the game is on the line, the great players step up.

Same goes for politics. Tonight, President Obama is set to give his third State of the Union address before an audience of millions. It's a momentous speech not just because the clock is ticking on his legacy and because it's an election year, but it's the first address in eight years without U.S. troops on the ground in Baghdad. The Iraq War is over and the Afghanistan War is winding down. America is on third down. And tonight's speech is a defining moment for the President to rally our entire country's support for the folks who have put it all on the line for the last ten years. The folks we call the New Greatest Generation. For a decade, the almost 2.4 million veterans of these wars have carried the burden of a nation all by themselves. Now, it's time for the nation to return the favor. And it's up to the President to lead the way.

As all eyes turn to Capitol Hill tonight, I'll join 20 fellow Iraq vets on the House floor and millions nationwide and overseas who are looking for three crucial promises from the President:

1. A commitment to end yet unemployment. As the jobless rate for Iraq and Afghanistan-era veterans rose to 12.1 percent in 2011--climbing for the fourth consecutive year--the President must encourage Congress and the public and private sectors to support our troops by hiring them. The VOW to Hire Heroes Act of 2011, which IAVA helped spearhead, was a crucial start. But it was just the tip of the spear. In 2012, we need the President and Congress to rally the private sector to do more, while creating policies in Washington that make it easier for employers to hire new veterans, especially as the Department of Defense downsizes the force under the President's new defense strategy.

2. A promise to protect the Post-9/11 GI Bill and other critical Department of Defense and VA benefits. The Post-9/11 GI Bill has sent nearly 500,000 veterans and their families to college to date. But right now it's under the siege of for-profit predators and potential budget cuts. Our Commander-in-Chief must call on Congress to stand firm in a bipartisan front against any cuts to this invaluable benefit. As he rolls out his new Defense strategy, the President must also commit to protect military pay, retirement benefits and healthcare for military families and retirees. We have an obligation to ensure the long-term health and financial stability of our nation's troops and veterans--now is not the time to nickel and dime them.

3. A focus on suicide. 393 service members from all services were killed in action in Operations Enduring Freedom and New Dawn last year. By comparison, the U.S. Army reported 278 soldiers may have committed suicide in 2011--and that's just one branch. After losing nearly as many troops to suicide as to combat in 2011, the President must devote the country's full attention and resources this year toward stemming this crisis and destigmatizing invisible wounds. The First Lady's partnership between Joining Forces and the country's top medical schools to treat invisible wounds is a step in the right direction. But the VA and Pentagon do not have this problem under control yet. The President must issue a broader call to action that reinforces the need for more military mental health providers and a national suicide prevention campaign between the Departments of Defense and VA, veterans groups and community-based nonprofits nationwide. Too many lives are at stake.

So as he takes the spotlight tonight, the President must bring these life and death issues impacting our troops, veterans and their families to the forefront. He needs to put Congress and the entire country on notice that our troops are coming home--and we have a bargain to uphold. Iraq and Afghanistan veterans have paid their fair share for our country. Now, it's show time for the rest of America.

It's fourth quarter. Play clock is counting down. And 2012 needs to be the year for all Americans to step up to support them.

Will the President lead the charge and prove his clutchness by showing he has vets' backs in real, meaningful ways that transcend words? Or squander the opportunity?

Stay tuned. The game is on the line.

cross-posted at IAVA.org

 
 
 

Follow Paul Rieckhoff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PaulRieckhoff

 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lenguss
01:56 AM on 01/25/2012
I hate to be a spoil-sport and am all for supporting our vets (of whom I am one) and having jobs available for them. But I remind Rieckhoff that almost all vets through Vietnam were draftees, sent to fight often against their will in wars that became harder to understand. Vets of Iraq and Afghanistan and all our other incidents are volunteers, paid for their efforts, men and women who chose this profession. This doesn't make them any less heroic where they were in fact heroic. But it does mean that the rest of us owe them (that is, the unwounded vets) only opportunity. By the way, Rieckhoff should lose the sports rhetoric; its inappropriate and belittles the vets.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:05 PM on 01/24/2012
I faced induction in '72, faced being sent against my will to kill or be killed. Soldiers should welcome unemployment, the alternative is war. We could fix unemployment, just invade another country for oil. No thanks.
08:14 PM on 01/24/2012
"As the jobless rate for Iraq and Afghanistan-era veterans rose to 12.1 percent in 2011--climbing for the fourth consecutive year--the President must encourage Congress and the public and private sectors to support our troops by hiring them"

As I said years ago, there needs to be a plan for the troops coming home . . . work with them to have a plan whether it be to attend school or training programs.
photo
modeforjoe
We had the experience, but we missed the meaning
05:02 PM on 01/24/2012
Considering that our wars these past 50 years have harmed the USA more than helped it, it is questionable whether anyone nowadays should thank veterans for their "service." Service to what, we should ask. Service to whom? Who has benefited from these wars? Certainly not the American people.

All veterans who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan owe those peoples a huge apology. Our veterans are not evil; but they accepted a job and benefits run by evil foreign policy masters. First they should apologize; then they should go after the criminals who sent them into harm's way for no good reason.
photo
T Trump
Sarcasm / Freedom / Truth
04:39 PM on 01/24/2012
I too am looking for crucial promises from the President. Promises made to Vets should by all means be kept along with promises to the American people on Social Security and Medicare. I am sick to death of the unsteady course from Congress the Senate and the President. The American people deserve better from our government.
03:54 PM on 01/24/2012
Hey Paul! youre barking up the wrong tree...go sic the GOP if you wnna protect Vets
03:02 PM on 01/24/2012
"The folks that we call the New Greatest Generation"? Who is this we? I think that this may be a little premature.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ftkl1234
03:48 PM on 01/24/2012
I think it's a mistake and trap for candidates and the President to use the word (promise) that only gives false expectations and lead to all the disappointment he's getting. To push for or words like that give a more realistic idea of what can be accomplished. Folks should remember that the President is the leader but only part of the Administration team and has to be a team player.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:12 PM on 01/24/2012
As a Boomer, I agree. 40K of us died in Vietnam, most of them unwilling recruits. Then the draft ended, and since then less than 10K have died in all wars and terrorists acts: 6K in Iraq, 2K in Iraq, relatively small, safe wars. My parents were the Greatest Generation, but we Boomers sacrificed more than any other that followed.
02:45 PM on 01/24/2012
Now the new Vets will see and feel what it was like to be a Vietnam Vet! First the American People say they love you and then they say your UGLY!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:17 PM on 01/24/2012
No, today's vets will be revered and respected. But read history, Korean vets were treated even worse than Vietnam, and lost twice the casualties. Americans were so tired of war after WWII they ignored Korea, literally. If you want a great US history, read The Glory and the Dream by William Manchester.
02:15 PM on 01/24/2012
Whatever else we may owe veterans, the truth should be one of them. Comparing the unemployment rate of a particular segment of veterans to the entire workforce isn't exactly a good match. Consider this: the unemployment rate for veterans age 18 to 24 at the end of 2010 was around 21%, while the unemployment rate for non-veterans in that age group was around 18%. But because there are a lot fewer veterans than non-veterans, the two rates are statistically indistinguishable.
Further, as you examine the government's own statistics comparing veterans in other age ranges to non-veterans in the same ranges, you find that veterans at each step have lower unemployment rates than non-veterans.
And when you break down veteran unemployment rates for any group by race/ethnicity, guess what? You find that Black and Hispanic veterans have much higher unemployment rates than Whites. Maybe the slogan should be, "hire a vet of color!"
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:20 PM on 01/24/2012
When someone posts something that seems obvious, I get suspicious. Post links, I've often found I was wrong and avoided making a fool of myself. If black vets live in high-unemployment areas more than whites, say Detroit, then what you say would be true, but somewhat meaningless. I'm a math major and a software engineer, stats are only as good as what they really show. I don't trust them, they have to prove it to me.
08:35 AM on 01/26/2012
"stats are only as good as what they really show." I couldn't agree with you more. These are national statistics, put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They are the ones everyone quotes (or thinks they're quoting) when they talk about veterans. But what they show (2010 averages) is that while the unemployment rate for White veterans of Gulf War II is 10.7%, for Black Gulf War II veterans it's 14.7%, almost 50% higher. It's also 14.0% for Hispanic Gulf War II veterans. It isn't Detroit (or Miami or Los Angeles or Washington, DC), it's the national figure.
I would suspect that the problem with the 18-24 year olds, veterans and non-veterans, is that most of them (those 18-21, at least) probably lack college degrees, but it's still worse if you're Black or Hispanic. Why would a veteran who completed honorable service be less likely to find a job if they are Black or Hispanic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
salvy859
war is not the answer
02:13 PM on 01/24/2012
I"m all for our vets, they have laid it all on the line, them and their families . For the most part our media does not report the war ,our politicians very rarely mention our troops and the American people who are untouched by the war have confused "support for our troops" with ribbon bumber stickers. 10 years is way to long for our nation to be at war. If not for the soldiers who have served and the families of these serviceman most americans don't want to know. These kids deserve the american puplic to stand up and say enough is enough because if we don't do it who will
photo
modeforjoe
We had the experience, but we missed the meaning
05:08 PM on 01/24/2012
There has been lots of suffering all around. Cultures destroyed by our "brave" troops; families smashed; wounded returning home. Service for these individuals was a choice; it was a job. What they couldn't see was that the job they were sent to do was evil. The real heroes are those who didn't put their shoulder to the carnage that we brought to the region. That's real service.
01:32 PM on 01/24/2012
Vets get the shaft because repubs view them as expendable and indeed useless post service. They repeatedly vote against any measures that provide health care, education, or job training for vets. Worse than this however are the active duty military who vote for repubs because of their desire to support uneeded weapons systems, while simultaneously cutting benefits for the veterans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
webbandit
USAF Veteran
02:08 PM on 01/24/2012
Agreed!
03:33 PM on 01/24/2012
I don't agree. In my 24 years of military service, it was the democrats that turned a viable force into a hollow shell when they were in power. The republicans invested in military pay and benefits, and put teeth back into the finest armed forces in the world. During the Carter administration, we had to canabalize parts to keep aircraft flying, and many of us spent our own money for parts to keep needed equipment running. Reagan turned that around in a few years. Clinton didn't do the military any good either. I'm neither republican nor democrat, but I can report on my life's experiences.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
09:23 PM on 01/24/2012
The biggest favor any President can do for vets is, don't start wars. Most wars happened under Dems, Af and Iraq are the exceptions. Bush killed and crippled thousands of your brothers invading a country under false premises for oil. No Dem ever did that much wrong to you. Me, I'm a Boomer, LBJ and Nixon killed us. 4x as many of us, 40K died in Vietnam vs 10K in all wars and terrorists acts since.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Prapanna
01:08 PM on 01/24/2012
Looking for promises that probably won't be kept? Is that all we are asking of our President?
photo
WI Patriot
Defending the Constitution.
12:16 PM on 01/24/2012
One of the biggest reasons Vets have a higher unemployment rate is because they are in the National Guard, and the employers (both public and private) do not want to hire someone that could be deployed for a year.

I remember after my second deployment (and still unemployed - this is 2006) I applied for a public-sector position which advertised for a specific credential that I had. I was the only applicant with that credential also.

I was not even selected to interview since, per the public employee who was the decision maker - I was overqualified....LOL
10:19 AM on 01/24/2012
Do you mean "critical promises" like he made in his 2009 State of the Union?
"There is, of course, another responsibility we have to our children. And that is the responsibility to ensure that we do not pass on to them a debt they cannot pay. With the deficit we inherited, the cost of the crisis we face, and the long-term challenges we must meet, it has never been more important to ensure that as our economy recovers, we do what it takes to bring this deficit down."

"Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we're starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade."
09:42 AM on 01/24/2012
Paul--I'm all for our Vets--and believe our President has made some great improvments But every two months or so you write about what more the President has to do, Why don't you call out the Congress--start naming names--get them to move--shame them. You have a huge organization behind you and lots of support from the American people--use them to your advantage.
10:58 AM on 01/24/2012
I agree. Why not draw the line in the sand and get to brass tacks on the causes, rather than band-aids for the symptoms? I was extremely disappointed that IAVA stood on the line in the sand that they did concerning the Collateral Murder video. I don't see how a vet organization can take that stance, and still expect progress to be made on Soldier suicides. Soldiers are not robots, despite the process the military puts them through. They are mostly honorable human beings, and some can't and shouldn't accept the military's blind reasoning of a means justifying an end. All of the above demands from the President are fixes for how Soldiers get broken, rather than ideas for ways to stop breaking them irreparably. "Drive On!" looks cool on a tee shirt. It's hardly a recipe for an adult conversation on broken policy.