iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Pearl Korn

GET UPDATES FROM Pearl Korn
 

Now That It's Mitt, What Next?

Posted: 05/07/2012 11:20 am

For months, we have been both entertained and outraged as the political theater of the absurd that was the Republican presidential primary played out across the country. From one state to the next, a collection of mixed nuts attacked each other and President Obama with a wild-eyed hysteria that is, frankly, beneath the office.

We had Herman Cain, the endlessly entertaining huckster with his 9-9-9 plan for economic meltdown; Rick Santorum, the angry wimp in his "trendy" sweater vests; Michelle Bachmann, the darling of the Tea Party and a frighteningly delusional flake; Rick Perry, who kept tripping over his own tongue while displaying a stunning level of ignorance of, well, pretty much everything (this is the best you could do for governor, of Texas?); Ron Paul, whose tinfoil-hat proposals include getting rid of the Department of Education and other key agencies while shrinking the federal government to nothing; "the Newt," with his sheer lack of credibility on pretty much every issue, and who once, as speaker of the House, shut down the federal government in a fit of pique against then-President Bill Clinton; and finally, the last man standing, Mitt Romney, who keeps trying to sell America on his credentials as a businessman, who would ruin -- I mean run -- the country like one of his many business ventures.

Had Mitt been president in 2009, he apparently would have let the American auto industry go belly-up without a bailout. Attention, Mr. Romney: the government is not a business that can be downsized and sold off piece-by-piece, while deep-sixing the employees. But even in your "big business yes/'big' government no" mentality, consistency eludes you. As the "1%" governor of Massachusetts, you gave us the template - along with the Heritage Foundation -- for what has become known in conservative circles as "Obamacare." Your program included severe penalties for not buying into a government mandated healthcare policy that cost way too much and provided only bare-bones coverage. Imagine a system where the penalty for not participating is cheaper than the cost of being in it. Mitt did.

Jump to the present, and Republican presidential candidate Romney continues to distance himself from one of his major "achievements," its merits never discussed in any debate and his authorship of it avoided like the plague. Now, Mitt and his fellow GOP'ers want the Supreme Court to find the Affordable Care Act un-Constitutional. Hypocrisy knows no bounds with this crowd. Meanwhile, the Massachusetts State legislature is looking for ways to cut back on their healthcare commitment, as the ever-rising costs are becoming burdensome. Is anyone addressing the un-harnessed insurers? The cost of healthcare is one of the huge issues that no-one in either party will touch, while the insurers continue to make out like bandits.

In this past primary season, the Republican presidential "contenders" consisted mainly of D-listers and has-beens who offered no credible plans for moving the country and economy forward. They could only muster two simplistic answers to all issues -- lower taxes for the wealthy and smaller government with less regulation on big business. Their limited platforms mainly consisted of how to reverse President Obama's accomplishments over the past 4 years, by unleashing all of the old and tired accusations that Obama is somehow responsible for the state of our economy and the loss of jobs. Yet it was the Republicans who would have let America's automotive industry go into bankruptcy and fail, which would have had serious economic repercussions nationwide and beyond. Today, because the President and the Democrats had the courage to act, the auto industry is thriving. Mr. Romney says that was not a place for government to intervene. Of course, there is never a mention from any of the Republicans that it was their policies -- under the driving hand of "W" -- that were responsible for taking us to the brink of that cliff in the first place.

Mitt is even bringing into question the merits of taking out Osama bin Laden a year ago, bemoaning the millions of dollars it cost to remove one man. Was Mitt really saying that he would have nixed the mission to kill the most wanted terrorist in world history because it cost too much? He did finally agree that anyone would have taken Osama out, including even Jimmy Carter. It was one of the great triumphs of the Obama administration to remove that cancer from the face of the earth, a bold display of leadership and statesmanship by "cool hand" Barack. Another example of Mitt's gross inability to deal with a major issue was his response to the student loan crisis, advising the students to "ask your parents for money," a chilling response that should frighten the stuffing out of everyone. Meanwhile, the interest rate on those loans is set to double to 6.8% on July 1st if Congress does not act.

All of the Republican wooden soldiers have now fallen by the wayside, with only one left standing -- not including that little egomaniac Ron Paul, who has promised to hang around siphoning off delegates until the GOP convention, taking his candidacy to the convention floor. Their messages, which will now, we assume, become absorbed by "the Mitt," were all mainly one and the same: get rid of O, for whatever flimsy, fabricated reason they could offer. Where were their plans for creating jobs, improving the economy, helping students with their loans, saving those sinking homeowners, and building our energy reserves (other than more drilling for oil)? Where was their collective outrage against the "banksters" and Wall Street con artists who fleeced America? They could at least call out the president to ensure that these felons are held accountable for their serious transgressions, and that they are brought to justice for their crimes. Will Eric Schneiderman, New York State attorney general and one of the chairs of the task force on the mortgage crisis, really be given the manpower and financial resources needed to be effective and get to the bottom of this? Nothing of this was mentioned in the Republican presidential debates by these lackeys of the corporate elite, who are only interested in protecting their buddies on "the Street." This was the key issue leading to the Great Recession, from which we have still not recovered and are a long way from doing so.

The issue now is how will Obama make his case for re-election? The young people who supported him in '08 are disillusioned, and many of them are currently sitting on the sidelines while the Obama campaign works to rekindle their involvement and support. They are essential if Mr. Obama is to win. He is now traveling to battleground states, meeting on college campuses and talking to young people about lowered student loan interest rates, which is an imperative. We cannot have future generations unable to afford higher learning if we are to compete in the global economy. In each state, the president has offered a custom-made agenda, pandering to their specific needs. A much broader agenda and bigger vision for America must come from our President if he is to inspire victory as he did four years ago. Greater clarity and specifics are needed as to what the next "Change We Can Believe In" is about. And then he must really deliver. We bought into it once, Mr. President, but we will not be fooled again. Make the case that you will be a different kind of leader this time around, since you won't have the burden of another campaign after this one. Go bold and become the populist, core-value Democratic president we thought we were electing in '08. Martin Luther King gave us his dream, which still resonates, and now it is time for you to give us your grand vision for the future. How will we make that journey? It is up to you to tell us.

A key issue for this bold new Obama to take up would be the great need for our country to pass an amendment overturning the Citizens United decision and get the corrupt money out of our politics. Over $100 million from Super Pacs has already been pumped into the Presidential election. This foul money must be removed. Mr. Obama should also support the Fair Elections Now Act, which would enact public funding of campaigns. Without these two laws, Mr. President, you and all others who care about America will be whistling in the wind, and nothing in our politics will ever change.

So seize on these real solutions, Mr. President, and the people will deliver a huge win for you this November. The Senate has supporters for both proposals, as does the House, with Nancy Pelosi recently coming out in support of an amendment against Citizens United. Make this your cause and take it to your bully pulpit, Mr. President. You will have the support of our country and a grateful people. The quantum leap of "Change We Can Believe In" would finally be at hand, and all other national imperatives could then be addressed and resolved with real solutions and not political sellouts.

Think of the new America that would emerge.

with Jonathan Stone

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
For months, we have been both entertained and outraged as the political theater of the absurd that was the Republican presidential primary played out across the country. From one state to the next, a ...
For months, we have been both entertained and outraged as the political theater of the absurd that was the Republican presidential primary played out across the country. From one state to the next, a ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:43 AM on 05/11/2012
Thanks once again Pearl for some great insights. My hope is that with a second term, there will be nothing to prevent truly bold action--ending both wasteful wars, overturning CITIZENS UNITED, actually coming up with AT LEAST a public option, if not a true single payer system, taking back the hundreds of billions from the insurance industry that could go to more primary care providers, covering more people with health care and not insurance, encouraging young people to enter medicine, paying for an affordable college education, and more and more. Obama looked like the FDR of this generation 4 years ago--maybe we will see that side of him come out.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
01:03 PM on 05/11/2012
Thanks Doc for continuing to be upbeat, which is no easy matter these days. WE really do need to go single payer as the Public Option would never have really provided the lower costs in health care so desperately needed and was estimated to perhaps cover only about 6-7 million which would not have created enough bargaining power with Big Pharma. In the new vision for our President I suggested, I also see him unloading most of the staff he resurrected from the Clinton Administration who had a large hand in bringing our economy to the brink. Summers in gone, Emmanuel is gone and the next one should be Geithner. With many more departing if O is reelected. Time to clean house. Will we see a new Obama in 2013?

I have suggested some bold initiatives for O and will send him a copy of the post and one to Joe Biden. Perhaps it will catch their attention? I too remain upbeat Scott. Without hope for a new day we are done. So much to do to right our country.

Many thanks.
Pearl
01:49 PM on 05/08/2012
'We will not be fooled again'.

That pretty much sums up your column. Some may want to take a chance on being fooled again, not the rest of us.

'Churn the presses, throw money at the problem and pray'

That pretty much sums up President Obama's policies. Getting into more and more unsustainable debt doesn't work on an individual basis, it does not work for companies, and it does not work for governments. It merely delays the inevitable. The creaking, groaning recovery resulting from the staggering amount of debt accumulated should be an eye opener. But we'd all prefer to indulge in wishful thinking instead. Good luck with that.

Personally I think that whoever wins the Presidency is on a hiding to nothing. We've most likely moved beyond the tipping point. Whoever wins the election is going to see a worldwide financial correction that will dwarf 2008.

The level of worldwide debt is simply unsustainable. Once the first domino in Europe topples, it's going to get ugly.

I hate to be a monger of doom and gloom, but I just cant keep ignoring reality.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
10:32 AM on 05/09/2012
This austerity binge around the world is beginning to topple leaders. As we just saw in France. Austerity without pumping money into the economy and creating jobs is finally resonating. Merkel of Germany is not helping as a world leader continuing to push this austerity craziness.

Governments have a role to step in and function for the people and not to cut and cut all services to the bare bones. Austerity around the world is having a necessary backlash.Job creation is the issue as it has alway been here and there. Our President will win on the state of our economy and jobs in Nov. or he will go down. We see the attempts at severe austerity and debt fixation here while evading the creation of jobs. The two parties are in deep contrast and is a window on what must be done to turn our economy around. Fixation on the debt by the right has created a dysfunctional government with gridlock. Our nation has had debt before and survived. Priorities must be realigned. Jobs and more jobs are needed and the debt can then be addressed.
09:39 AM on 05/08/2012
Indeed, the contrasting political ideologies that you highlighted, between President Obama, and the certain challenger, Gov. Mitt Romney, are remarkable! However, the bottom line still remains that, the American people must be able to sort out the same and make a decision. Namely, even though this presidential election also implies that changes ought to be considered; however, I believe that there also must be caution when exercising that "privilege." This, because it's not only a basic right, which is duly owned by the American people, but most importantly, it's a fundamental one needed for the preservation of our Democracy... as we know it (... at this time, it would not be necessary to comment upon the consequence of the disastrous U.S. Supreme Court's "Citizens United decision," and/or the indiscriminate use of "da money," in the context of "Democracy," as it's self-explanatory.) Now, in order to be brief, it's a well known fact that President Obama inherited, to name a few, a very challenging economy, a stubborn stream of job losses, and although the President has made some significant progress in reversing those demanding conditions--...yes, it' also true that a lot remains to be done--however, I respectfully think that Gov. Romney, a.k.a. 1% candidate, does not offer better opportunities for the 99% of the American electorate, or "We the People."
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
01:36 PM on 05/08/2012
Will the American voting public come out en mass and vote? Remember the tragedy of the spartan number of voters who came out in 2010 and gave the House to the Tea Party. Will this be a new day of voter participation? Our most precious possession is the vote.
09:18 AM on 05/08/2012
We all want change, but the guys that write the rules are in office and they'll not change those rules to jeopardize their career. That's why I favor a 100% turnover in November. They will do nothing to threaten the see-saw they are on until they see their jobs threatened by the voters.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
01:40 PM on 05/08/2012
So Jack. If we throw all of the bums out in Nov. how do we know their replacements will be any better unless we first amend Citizens United and go to public funding of elections?
02:05 PM on 05/08/2012
Because the newbies will know that they are one-termers unless they fix the system. Keep on the issue of public funding and Citizens United, but let's not sit on our hands in November.
07:36 PM on 05/07/2012
No it's not Mitt, officially. Look for an upset from Ron Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
06:38 AM on 05/08/2012
Ron has insufficient delegate votes so is going no where as usual, even if he is an annoyance at the GOP convention. It is a given that the Mitt is the candidate to take on Obama.

Don't think Ron can pull off that upset he is dreaming about.
photo
JohnFromCensornati
Free your mind and your ass will follow.
09:46 AM on 05/08/2012
You have to look in one of those alternate universes.
10:23 AM on 05/08/2012
Mitt has insufficient delegate votes too. How is it legally a given? Again, look for an upset from Dr. Paul.
MThomasNC
Retired, Sassy, Senior Citizen
04:00 PM on 05/07/2012
Everybody wants a piece of this president - damn if he does, damn if he doesn't. He can't win with liberals nor conservatives. For liberals, he not doing enough and what he's doing or did, it was too little or not liberal enough. For conservatives, he done too much liberal stuff, he's socialist, a communist, and not good for the country.

How can he be all of these different things. Conservatives don't have a leg to stand on. Their cut taxes, deregulation have brought much harm to this country, but they still preach that it's best for this country. Centrist dems have gone along with cut taxes, regulation under GOP administrations so now they can't speak up about how harmful it is.

I say Obama gets a second term and Hillary comes in for 2016. This 12 year line of democratic presidents will have the country rooted back into it's progressive lean. Just like the 12 years of Reagan/Bush41 moved the country rightward, we need to push country into it's forward progressive leaning where everyone gets a fair share. It's time for the robber barons to go back into their respective holes.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
06:44 AM on 05/08/2012
Agree with all you say except for your last paragraph.For 12 years with those Dems you mention we have not had progressives in office. Sadly they have been Clinton and Obama, far from Progressives. Centrists to the hilt. Clinton was the original Blue Dog you may remember.

Where is the progressive voice in all of the current rancor? They should be out there. Our hope then is the Occupy movement to revitalize the progressive crowd.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
02:54 PM on 05/07/2012
I expect a gigantic U turn in the middle of any street across America! No more tossing out that drippy red meat to GOP extremists!!! The only Romney that may be believed is Matt who said: "I'm not here to talk about President Obama, I think he's great"!!!!


Obama/Biden 2012!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Knollsgerbils
01:07 PM on 05/07/2012
What you wrote, re Romney, says it all, Pearl-" Mitt Romney, who keeps trying to sell America on his credentials as a businessman, who would ruin -- I mean run -- the country like one of his many business ventures."
And honestly, I don't believe a thing Obama says... I wish we had a real choice, as they did in France,
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
06:47 AM on 05/08/2012
Clearly we do need choice and more options. That we always settle for the lesser of the evils is rotten and speaks to the failure of our political system.

O will have to fight for our votes this time around and he knows it.
11:35 AM on 05/08/2012
Americans Elect is working to nominate a third presidential candidate who will actually appear on the ballot nationwide in all 50 states.

They are now certified and on the ballot in 26 states (AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, FL, HI, KS, ME, MI, MS, MT, NE, NM, NV, NC, ND, OH, OK, RI, SC, SD, UT, VT, WI and WY).

The caucus begins on May 15th.

You have a choice; don't waste your vote on the 2-Party Dictatorship for President.

http://www.americanselect.org/
12:38 PM on 05/07/2012
Talk about ridiculous! This must mean that you love what Obama has done to us. And he is such a coward that he has never taken any responsibility for all this debt our children and grandchildren will pay for. That is if we have a country left. Obama has assumed authority and done things no other president would have done with out the approval of the people. Like secretly signing the immigration law in on a Sunday without telling the press! Deceitful, self serving man. He has not interest in helping the poor. He is just looking for the votes by patronizing all our illegals. I think that the expression, "He talks out of both sides of his mouth" fits Obama perfectly.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pearl Korn
01:31 PM on 05/07/2012
Far from it. If you have read some of my blog posts you would know I have been very critical of this President. In this post I do mention his pandering on the campaign trail and indeed offer up some serious initiatives he can take hold of. He would be a different O if he come out and pushes for amending Citizen United and vocally supports the FENA. This would reveal a different President that we could all get behind. Is he up to my challenge? Nothing will change with out these two laws being enacted by Congress. The people have to make O do it.

We can not have the alternative in the White House.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
gladys46
Know Your Interests, Vote
03:00 PM on 05/07/2012
That's the challenge to the electorate ... will they support President Obama fully, will they practice what they're preaching .. change ... if that's what people want stand by President Obama and DO NOT EVER allow the extreme righties (GOPTers) to occupy the legislative branches AGAIN!! OOOh, the remorseful buyers of that 2010 mid-term ... isn't "recalls" very expensive while just getting out and voting is free!!!! I say, shame on all who sat that mid-term out!!!!