More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Pedro Nava

Pedro Nava

Posted: April 28, 2010 01:58 PM

Governor Schwarzenegger's Budget Is a California Job Killer

What's Your Reaction:

Governor Arnold Schwarnenneger's proposed budget can be fairly described as a "cuts only" budget and a job killer. California cannot afford this. According to a UC Berkeley study published in March of this year, a $1 billion cut to the state's In Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program will cost 215,000 hard-working Californians their jobs. A similar $1 billion cut cut to the Healthy Families program means 39,500 people will be thrown out of work, cuts to MediCal means a 35,900 job loss and cuts to CalWorks will cost another 23,200 jobs. And it just gets worse -- 23,000 pink slips have already been issued to California educators and 16,000 teachers and education support professionals aren't getting a paycheck.

Republicans say their number one priority is jobs. What about the jobs of the people who teach our children and care for the sick and elderly? How come their jobs don't matter? What about our classroom sizes? What about the seniors who are currently receiving health care that keeps them out of nursing homes? What about keeping our schools safe and clean? What about the children who will be left without health insurance? What about caring for the disabled?

It may be easy for conservatives to win political points by beating up on California's workers and talking about cuts, cuts, cuts, but it is important to remember that California's employees provide valuable services that benefit all of us. The reality is that California's workers are scientists, teachers, school bus drivers, firefighters, game wardens, and nurses among other things. They teach and protect our children, enforce the law, preserve the environment, care for the disabled, treat the sick, and provide other valuable services. A "cuts only" budget will hurt all Californians. In addition to looking for ways to save money, the Legislature and the Governor must look at possible revenue sources.

I have introduced the Oil Industry Fair Share Act, which will be heard in the Assembly Revenue and Taxation Committee on May 10th, shortly before the Governor produces his revised annual budget.

California is the third largest oil producer in the nation and the only major oil producing state in United States that doesn't have an extraction tax. This makes no sense. Texas oil companies pay $14 per barrel of oil to pay for public schools, police, firefighters and other public services. In California we receive about $4.00 per barrel -- much of which just pays for pollution and spill mitigation, not public services. If my Oil Industry Fair Share Act is enacted, it will generate $1.5 billion a year that can be used to provide critical services that many Californians depend on and often take for granted.

As the May Revision is developed, I would urge the Governor and those in the Legislature that stick to a rigid, abstract ideology to step into the real world where there is governing to do. Only looking at cuts to health care, education, and the safety net when Californians need it most is the wrong approach. We all must move out of our politically entrenched corners and start fighting for all Californians, not just special interests.

 

Follow Pedro Nava on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Pedro Nava

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:54 PM on 05/21/2010
As to the elimination of IHSS in Califonria: the fraud resulting from payments going out to lots of people for deceased people was costly. It seems each entinty was passing the buck to the next area. Now, that needs to be looked into. I am sure Social Security has the same problem too because of greedy people, but what about the real sick people?
05:39 PM on 05/03/2010
The reason that the State has to lay off workers is that we have TOO MANY and WE PAY TOO MUCH to the ones that we already have. Its that simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
02:45 AM on 05/03/2010
I think the biggest problem is this ridiculous 2/3 majority for our budget. Only a 3/4 or an absolute majority could have been more insane.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:38 AM on 04/29/2010
The totally clueless democratic legislature has been killing jobs for years, why are you concerned now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
02:42 AM on 05/03/2010
Because people like you li.e?
07:27 PM on 04/28/2010
Chevron gouged $24 billions in excessive profits in 2008, as per www.tyrannyofoil.com. Schwarzenegger should put an excessive profits tax on these profits, instead of protecting the oil corporations from fair taxation, then, there would be sufficient public funds for all the vulnerable, people programs. Big business lost the fight to eliminate domestic violence funding, so now they are coming back with a vengeance . There is no funding provision for battered women shelters in the proposed budget. Schwarzee picks on the most vulnerable, and not on corporate tax"deadbeats."
03:59 PM on 05/21/2010
Yes, I agree. Maybe the oil corporations got him in public office, who knows what goes on behind the doors of politicians and their special interest groups. I wonder if we are paying for Scharzee;s wife;s traffic violations.....she certaiinly did not have to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevefromSacto
Raging Moderate
04:49 PM on 04/28/2010
Interesting how corwin changes the subject from an oil extraction tax to the salaries of legislators. No answer to the question of why CA is the only major oil producing state without such a tax. No comment on why Texas can get $14 per barrel of oil for public services but California can't. No rationale for why we would rather leave $1.5 Billion a year on the table and cut homecare services for Alzheimer's patients or why we'd rather close schools than tax loopholes.

I agree that continuing to do things that have failed isn't a good strategm. Exhibit A is the Governor's "cuts-only" budget.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:39 AM on 04/29/2010
The hole the state is in requires both cuts and taxes.
03:51 PM on 04/28/2010
I am with you all the way on this one, Nava. There's no way in hell it can be good for our economy to lay off thousands of workers.
02:42 PM on 04/28/2010
I don't know your economic credentials, but overpaying for services (somethingCal has been doing for quite a while) is covered by Hayek's famous 'broken window' paper.You've taken potentially productive use of resources and used them to reward favored ggroups.As partial proof,I diffidently note, Cal's legislature is the highest paid in the country.
Remember ,continuing to do y\things that have failed isn't a good strtegem.
04:44 PM on 04/28/2010
Not sure what you mean by overpay, but if you go look at the CalPers website you'll see that the average benefit for classified school employees is $1134 a month after 16.7 years of service. Teachers are some of the lowest paid professionals with post graduate degrees out there. Last time I checked IHSS workers weren't getting rich off of helping keep seniors out of nursing homes. While there may be some overpayment of executive appointments and the like, most of the people who work for California make a modest living while providing valuable services.
05:08 PM on 04/28/2010
You are correct; IHSS does not even pay a living wage. In Home Supportive Services workers are paid, on average, $10.10/hour. In some counties, they make minimum wage. They receive no vacation time, no sick time, no retirement; most get no health coverage. The average number of hours of care delivered to IHSS recipients is around 85 per month. The cost to taxpayers of keeping somebody in a nursing home is roughly five times the average cost of IHSS.