iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Peggy Drexler

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Peggy Drexler
 

Female Role Models: The Absent Conversation

Posted: 05/14/2012 10:55 am

In my work studying the sons of single and two-mother families, I found deep concern about the lack of male role models for these boys. But shift genders, and girls and female role models is a conversation we seldom seem to have.

Part of that is the fact that 80 percent of the single parent families in the U.S. are headed by females. Combined with two-parent families, it's statistically likely that girls will have a female role model in residence.

Still, we're up against powerful cultural and media currents. The great post-feminist irony is that in an age of hard-won female opportunity, media is channeling that opportunity to a place of hyper-sexualized stupidity. It's not who you are -- it's how hot you are.

Ask a young girl about the females she looks up to, and chances are good that -- after family members -- her list will be crowded with celebrities.

Young women at the most emotionally malleable time in their lives will naturally turn to celebrities for cues on everything from love to dress to sexuality. You don't have to spend a lot of time wading around in the media muck to see that young females are represented by a collection ranging from sad to frightening -- whose claim to celebrity is becoming a coarse side show.

But give girls some credit.

Most are not going to pattern their behavior on women who exit stores without paying or exit limos without underwear. They understand there is no reality show potential in the young women who manage to build public careers without making sex tapes, having sex in communal hot tubs, or collapsing on a Hollywood sidewalk at 3 a.m.

But at the same time, we can't dismiss celebrity's cumulative power. Sex objects in disarray have become the depressing norm. Strong, confident, accomplished women are out there by the legions. But they are going about building lives beyond the peripheral vision of popular culture.

Especially for young girls, peers provide the guide to things socially acceptable and desirable. Studies show very clearly that popular media is a super-peer; a force that can literally shape identities at a time when those identities are in play.

None of that is new. What's new is that technology has made sleaze-celebrity extremely loud and incredibly intimate.

I remember those innocent days when a mother could say: "I don't let my kids watch MTV." Good luck with that today. Celebrity images are blasted at young girls 24 hours a day, pinging from TV screens to computer screens to smart phone screens.

The web has knocked down the appearance of separation between image and real-life. These professional bad examples are fully interactive. Experience enough of the Bad Girls Club, and you could come to accept that the acceptable -- even preferable -- response is a punch in the face.

The problem is more obvious than the solutions. The media culture is a formidable beast.

Still, some are pushing back. Sisters and parents Abi and Emma Moore founded a UK Website called Pinkstinks (pinkstinks.org.uk) to counter marketing and media they see as overwhelmingly focused on girls being pretty, passive, and obsessed with shopping. They pick on pink as the default color for all things submissive and girly.

Their mission is to use multimedia and partnerships to confront the "damaging messages that bombard girls though toys, clothes and media."

The site started when Abi was making a film for CNN about scientist Naomi Halas, who is quietly and anonymously doing ground-breaking work using nano-technology to fight cancer. At the same time, Paris Hilton was being released from jail to a tsunami of media coverage -- including telling Barbara Walters that she found spirituality in jail. And her skin was dry. That was enough for the sisters, and their website was born.

One website -- or 20 -- won't stem the tide. But with a shared and wide commitment to present -- and, if we're lucky, to be -- the real role models, we might lift young girls above it.

 
 
 

Follow Dr. Peggy Drexler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drpeggydrexler

FOLLOW WOMEN
In my work studying the sons of single and two-mother families, I found deep concern about the lack of male role models for these boys. But shift genders, and girls and female role models is a convers...
In my work studying the sons of single and two-mother families, I found deep concern about the lack of male role models for these boys. But shift genders, and girls and female role models is a convers...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 297
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
notnobody
Somebody
09:30 PM on 05/20/2012
Even though this article was well-written and has a very good point, I feel like it generalized things too much.
Not all girls idolize celebrities, just as not all boys idolize action heroes.
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
09:29 PM on 05/20/2012
It doesn't matter how hot you are if you own the company.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cassandra45
"Let us do our best, even if it gets us nowhere."
03:27 PM on 05/20/2012
"Professional bad examples" - well said! When I was 15, Scarlett O'Hara was my role model because she was strong and fearless. When I was in my 20s, I realized Melanie was really the good role model. Now I'm glad that JK Rowling exists, but other than that, not much to be grateful for. Hollywood in particular has a lot to answer for. Good article!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blastrocat
Genetically mutated housecat
09:23 AM on 05/20/2012
The point of this article is astute and well-taken, but are the role models for boys much better? All I see are gun-toting rappers, ultra-violent action heroes and professional "wrestlers." Even the sports figures seem like nothing more than glorified criminals. I would say the lack of decent role models crosses the gender line.
photo
yakmeat
Nearly all of us are both makers and takers.
12:01 PM on 05/20/2012
Agreed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blastrocat
Genetically mutated housecat
04:56 PM on 05/20/2012
I used to serve yak at my restaurant... in fact we were written up in MN Monthly about it. Better than beef!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
04:03 AM on 05/20/2012
Television's what America's been using as an ersatz, low-cost babysitter for, oh, about 30-40 years, now, kids get glued to it and pretty soon the unidirectional video input interface is at full speed, and ongoing. Hard to say just how many hours of TV that kids(and parents, too) watch every day, but suffice it to say it's probably not all that great for you. Put that together with the number of people in this country that are on various kinds of drugs, and you wonder just how tenuous the old grasp on reality might be, for some people. Then again, in our increasingly overcrowded, opportunity-deprived world, could be that such pretend-life, virtual reality, is soup-du-jour, for probably more people In The Future. That is, unless we start shutting off the Idiot Box and ending our cable service in large numbers. That'd be the end of Nielsen, for sure, but also the new beginning of people thinking and making their own decisions, or, deciders, for themselves. Maybe not a moment too soon? It's your life, how do YOU want to live?
11:41 AM on 05/16/2012
I agree a great deal with Dr. Peggy Drexler. This same issue is one of the founding reasons that my best friend and I wanted to hold a women's conference targeted towards young women under 18 to move them away from the belief that they must be "sexy" instead of smart and that behaving the way they see hollywood starlets and reality show stars is not acceptable behavior becoming a young woman in our society simply because that's what we see on television. I hope that Dr. Drexler can speak as a volunteer workshop facilitator at the upcoming I Feel Good: Mind, Body & Soul Women's Conference in Detroit this August on this very topic since we already have it on our agenda. We just need a knowledeable speaker.
01:56 AM on 05/20/2012
Anyone who thinks that a woman has to choose between being sexy and being smart needs to become aware that being smart is a component of being sexy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
postmodernized
All power to the communes.
02:25 PM on 05/20/2012
To some, but certainly not to all men. :(
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
09:31 PM on 05/20/2012
Wow! I don't know if you're a man or a woman, but I know that if you are a guy, with that attitude, you NEVER lack for fine, intelligent female companionship. ;-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:39 AM on 05/20/2012
American women are lost.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
09:42 PM on 05/20/2012
Your posts read like they come from a man who can't get a date. As long as you're looking for a woman to fit your mold and not fixing yourself to be more open and lovable, you'll stay right where you are.
06:24 PM on 05/15/2012
The older I get, the more I look at the phrase "role model" with deep suspicion. Are we actors in a play? Are our lives as men and women performances we put on?

As a girl, I had people whose work or ideas I admired. The same is true of me as a woman, but while I might admire some aspect of their lives or like something they had to say, I don't consider them role models. My life is very different from theirs, and very different from that of my mother and grandmother, who are my most obvious apparent role models, and that is as it should be. I'm not playing a role, so I don't need a model for one.

The notion of a role model is a modern concept, one that I do not think has been adequately tested. Even worse, it's become a kind of scapegoat idea, so that whatever we think is wrong with kids these days, we can blame it on lack of role models. In fact, "kids these days" have been a subject of complaint since humanity started writing things down; generational conflict is one of the oldest plots in existence. If it's down to lack of role models, then we've never, as a species, had role models that worked.
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
10:53 AM on 05/16/2012
Our behaviors, our selves. To the extent that someone does something that you think you should do or would like to do, then they are role models for that behavior. There's nothing overly complicated or sinister or modern about the idea.
12:52 PM on 05/16/2012
I think the notion of a role model is a very old concept but it was mainly men that had role models, outside of the home.
04:10 PM on 05/18/2012
The term "role model" is quite recent, first used by Robert K. Merton in the mid-20th century. So it is quite new. Men did not have role models in the sociological sense, they had mentors, experienced men who taught them their trades. That's a completely different thing, and in my opinion, a more valuable one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DSevere
Deviant mind
01:42 PM on 05/15/2012
You know, it's entirely possible to be smart and hot at the same time. I also think it's good for people of both sexes to do some wild-oats-sowing when they're young. Because otherwise you find yourself one day as an old lady thinking, damn, I had a really boring life.

When I was a teenager, my #1 role model was Joan Jett, who was quite the party girl at the time. And I turned out just fine. So I think people worry about this stuff too much...
photo
jf12
Esta vez saldré como las otras y me escaparé.
03:14 PM on 05/15/2012
I haven't found myself as an old lady yet, but I wouldn't be bored if I did.
04:40 PM on 05/15/2012
I think your giving bad advice. You don't need to look back at life and say you were boring because you did not let some random people poke you with their stick or put your stick in some random people. We need to be thinking on a higher level. You are biased towards the path you traveled and whatever contradicts that might make you feel bad about yourself. I don't think you are being objective. We should teach young people to limit their partners and take the love of the people they are with seriously. This is the way to a healthy, stable family. It won't work for everyone but it does for most.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DSevere
Deviant mind
07:22 PM on 05/15/2012
Au contraire, I don't feel bad at all, I've had a fabulous life.  And guess what, I've been both a very wild girl and married to my soulmate for more than 13 years.  I co-own a business, I love what I do, and I don't have to answer to anyone.  Including you.  
photo
RagMag
still living a Ragtime Life
01:26 PM on 05/15/2012
The world will regain hope when women quit trying to join the male consensus and form a consensus of their own inviting men to participate. Let me know when it’s ready I’m ready to join.
04:42 PM on 05/15/2012
Prior to feminism the female consensus was a sensual mystery to men. Now men know women have no mysteries and they are just as good or bad as other men. I would love women to rediscover the true power of femininity instead of competing to be masculine like they guys.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
07:45 PM on 05/16/2012
How about we all just be REAL and be PEOPLE?

Isn't that one of the ideas you keep pounding, that is, when it suits your particular rant of the moment?

The vast majority of the behaviors that regressive males wistfully refer to as "femininity", are actually more akin to those of a female impersonator. And those behaviors are the SAME behaviors that you keep complaining about, that is, when it suits your particular rant of the moment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PatA
Juan Martinez! Rock Star!
01:36 PM on 05/20/2012
Sexist.
04:36 PM on 05/16/2012
So, men have totally screwed up the world and planet in the last 6,000 years, and now you want women to clean up the mess? Get a clue, dude --- women raised under patriarchy are going to have no more motivation or ability to fix the devastation than are the men.

The world will never regain hope as long as humans continue in their zombie-like flesh-eating predation of the world. For wildlife, it is endgame. For the oceans, it is near endgame. Eventually the toxification of the planet will also make it endgame for humans.

Instead of getting their act together and becoming fully human creatures in the web of life, the continued worship of male gods and machinery and the continued precedence of the unbridled industrial growth monster can only lead to a dead world.

The only hope for the world, her oceans, rivers, mountains and lifeforms is for the rapid extinction of humans.

Instead of fiddling while Rome burns (moderns being largely too stupid to play the fiddle and havign replaced music with loops, Autotune, digitial signal processing and so-called "artists" who cannot even read music), the world is dying while moderns drug themselves with porn, TV, twisted sexuality, patriarchal religions. What a species. Earth destroyers.
photo
RagMag
still living a Ragtime Life
08:36 AM on 05/17/2012
Don't let your romantic disappointments color your faith in female potential. It's not just women but the woman in you.
05:39 AM on 05/15/2012
Wow. I don't even know how to respond to the hypocrisy on display here. This woman has made a CAREER out of telling women that their son's don't need fathers in their lives. She wrote a freaking BOOK about it. In THIS VERY ARTICLE she admits that EIGHTY PERCENT of single parent households in this country are headed by women (in other words, the boys growing up in eighty percent of divorced families don't have a permanent male role model at all.) And yet it's the GIRLS lack of role models we should be worried about. The lack of empathy she shows towards boys and the very real problems they face in today's society is completely disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
03:01 PM on 05/15/2012
Wow - thisarticle is about females, and still this guy can't stand it not being about males. SO MRA!!!
12:54 PM on 05/16/2012
HA!
12:54 PM on 05/16/2012
"This woman has made a CAREER out of telling women that their son's don't need fathers in their lives"

No she hasnt and its obvious you know nothing about her actual work since she doesnt explain her job here at all other than to describe her focus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:05 PM on 05/16/2012
Yes, she has.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ChicagoBob
Save the Earth-It's the only planet with chocolate
04:27 AM on 05/15/2012
Granted, some celebrities are just well managed freaks. BUT, most celebs have made it to the top because they are smart, hard working, and very talented.

Yes, there are many more smart, hard working and talented people who never make it to the rarefied air of big celebrity. This does not mean that picking a celeb as a role model is necessarily a bad choice.

Sometimes hot looks and smarts come together. You can not expect to eliminate candidates just because they are "hot."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:19 AM on 05/15/2012
"But give girls some credit."

I tried that. Burned me every time. Women are always looking to excuse their poor behaviour/low achievement. Didn't get that job? Blame the glass ceiling. Got too drunk and embarrassed yourself? Say your drink was spiked. Losing an argument? Just cry.

You can keep saying it's 'negative images' and 'poor role models' that 'cause' this behaviour, yet girls lap it up like whipped cream off a male stripper's abs. Am I missing something here?

Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but hey... maybe it's a really a pony that got brainwashed by the pro-duck lobby.

Gauche media is just catering to the demands of post-feminist women. Enjoy.
09:45 AM on 05/16/2012
Hilarious! Now my morning is off to a good start. Thank you!
12:56 PM on 05/16/2012
Waaaah I think women are all alike just because i continue to date the same kind of women! get a clue would ya!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 AM on 05/20/2012
Your whingeing, and the feminists lap it up like whipped cream off a male stripper's abs.
photo
Badger33
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
02:07 AM on 05/15/2012
You take your role models where you can find them, regardless of gender, focusing on the traits they have displayed that inspire you. I'm male and I count Jackie Joyner-Kersee and Jimmy Carter among my sources of inspiration.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MissTake1989
Equal means equal, hypocrites.
06:38 AM on 05/15/2012
I shake my head every time I see someone express the need to have someone of the same identity as a role model.

Is the "we are all human beings" mindset just empty words?

Why can't a black girl look up to Steve Jobs?

Why can't a Latino boy look up to Hilary Clinton?

It makes no sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
03:04 PM on 05/15/2012
Gotta fav you for that one.
12:57 PM on 05/16/2012
You seriously dont understand the relevancy of being able to identify with a role model that looks like you? smh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:07 PM on 05/14/2012
This is not a hard formula to figure out:

It's all about our society of frivolous, often pointless, consumerism.

1. Young people (especially girls) are impressionable.
2. TV preys on the impressionable, to get them to buy stuff.
3. Older women rarely mature or become wise these days -> they somehow believe youth is desirable.
4. It's not that being youthful is so venerable. It is that in being youthful, one is a stupid, useful pawn of corporations.
photo
goatini
We are two-legged wombs, that’s all
07:49 PM on 05/16/2012
Girls are no more, and no less, impressionable than boys of the same age.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wombaticus
All new info is analyzed against our experiences.
10:32 PM on 05/14/2012
Human beings are wired to respond strongly to sexual and violent stimuli. This has been a survival trait for millennia, but we are now being constantly bombarded with these stimuli for profiteering purposes.

The deregulation of the commercial airwaves removed any cultural responsibility from television publishers, leaving no argument against those who milk the medium for maximum profits. They know human psychology well enough to exploit, and there are no barriers to doing so.

It would be very difficult to put the media genie back in the bottle with restrictive regulations, given our cultures prevailing position I sum up as "profits uber alles". So, it falls to individual families, particularly parents, to teach their children to be savvy media consumers. A huge portion of parents will be unable or unwilling to do so. It's frustrating, but that is life.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ty2010
07:44 AM on 05/20/2012
They are much less restricted in Europe but the content appears much less damaging.