Humbly Submitted: A New Stump Speech for Hillary Clinton

Posted May 9, 2008 | 10:39 AM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

Dear Senator Clinton:

When I heard that you have now spent about $12 million of your own money on what is looking increasingly like a mathematical impossibility, I had a thought.

Since you're paying for this anyway, and the odds of winning are about the same as W and Michael Moore going out for a beer after an afternoon of brush cutting, why not say exactly what you feel?

Think about it: simple truth as a campaign strategy. What do you have to lose?

I've taken the liberty of putting together a new stump speech.

_________________________________

It's great to be here in (place).

I can't believe I'm standing in the back of a pick up truck. Never owned one - probably never will.

But what am I going to do here in the heartland -- stand on the hood of a Volvo?

As you may have noticed, even with a world-class IQ, and an Ivy League law degree, I'm all of a sudden dropping my g's: workin' hard, talkin' to folks, doin' all I can for America.

I'm not sure how I get away with that. You know I don't talk like this on the Senate floor, right?

I need to set some things straight today.

First is our security.

There are still people out there who would like to kill us.

There aren't a lot of them. But they want to get us so badly that they're OK with killing themselves in the process.

We've had a pretty good run since 9-11.

I really don't know if we have Al Qaeda's home office stuck in caves, or if they are just lying low and enjoying our agony in Iraq.

I don't know how many genuine close calls we've had, or how many were morons who thought they could bring down the Golden Gate Bridge with bolt cutters.

Sooner or later, somebody is going to try to hurt us again.

I hope I can stop them. It doesn't matter what time the call comes in. I'll do the best I can.

What kills me is that I know I contributed to the threat.

I voted to invade Iraq. And I still feel terrible about that.

As it turns out, this is either the dumbest administration in American history, or the most cynically dishonest. Maybe both.

Who knew?

The Secretary of State went to the UN and said he had evidence that a certified lunatic was trying to build a nuclear bomb.

I thought I should vote not to let that happen.

Now: if you elect me, I have a terrible choice.

We can leave.

But the Iraqi Army is a joke. They are never going to shoot at guys from the neighborhood. And they won't attack anything unless we bomb the b'jesus out of it first.

If I pull the troops, the Sunnis and Shiites are going to fight like two mean dogs that have hated each other for years - and just found a hole in the fence.

We'll watch it start from the windows of the last plane out.

Or:

I can keep troops there, and more Americans will die.

This isn't going to be like Korea, where we call a 50-year time out and leave behind thousands of soldiers to play cards.

This time, it's not ideology. It's oil.

As long as the oil is up for grabs, this fight will never stop. For the next 50 years, we'll just be referees with guns.

As for the price of oil, I know I talked about taking on OPEC and the oil companies. But that isn't really going to happen.

First, OPEC no longer cares what a U.S. president says.

Of the 13 members, nine countries tolerate us and four hate us. The president of one of them told the UN that our current leader is the devil and smells like sulfur.

OPEC used to have to deal with us because we were the only super-economy in town. If we went south, so did crude prices.

Now that China and India are talking about putting billions of people in cars, OPEC can sell to us, without listening to us.

It's an all-time seller's market.

Blaming the oil companies makes great sound bites.

I love using my tough-girl voice to say things like: "I'm going to take on the oil companies that are getting rich on the backs of honest, hardworking Americans."

That's great stuff.

But if they were doing anything wrong, we would have caught them by now. They're just in the right place at the right time.

We'll call them into Senate hearings and slap them around some for the cameras. They'll stick to their talking points. And then we'll all go back to work.

It's one of the longest-running shows in politics.

I knew I was going to take a lot of abuse for suggesting they pay for a gas-tax holiday.

The economists say it's useless. The opposition says it's pandering.

I prefer to think of it as a nice gesture.

If you don't want the $35.00 - fine.

I also said I would take on the oil traders.

I really can't do that either.

Oil is now a volatile, global, tradable asset.

And when you have big-money volatility, you have speculators.

These are very smart people who figure out how to beat the market and crush innocent bystanders.

Like the dot coms, Enron and drive-through mortgages, we're probably going to find out something shady was going on.

But by the time we figure it out and pass our next rounds of too-late legislation, other very smart people will be working on something new.

That, my friends, is never going to change.

There is a reason why these people make hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars, and the people we depend on to watch them are working for government pay.

Windmills and solar panels aren't going to get us out of this. It's all about the consumption.

The only thing that will do enough, fast enough to change our oil dependence is to make huge changes in how we live.

And you hate that.

I'm talking about outlawing the manufacture of any car that doesn't get more than 50 miles a gallon.

I'm talking about slower cars and smaller houses.

I'm talking about a national crash program to build nuclear plants - in spite of those who are afraid of them and in places you don't want them.

I'm talking about sacrificing things that we've been telling you all your lives are yours just because you're American.

Other countries want those same things. And now they can afford them.

We're going to have to learn to share.

And you're not crazy about that either.

A few other things.

I feel terrible about those of you who have lost jobs.

I know I told you I can save them. But I can't.

The global economy isn't going to go away, and the jobs aren't coming back. In fact, we're going lose more.

We don't run the world like we used to. It's not that we're getting weaker. Others are getting stronger.

And that's good. People who do business with each other tend not to shoot at each other.

Unless we have trade agreements with Brazil, Russia, India, China and comers like Indonesia and Ireland, we're going to be on the outside looking in.

Besides, trade agreements are just one factor in lost jobs.

Technology is a much bigger one. For decades now, it's been helping us to do more things with fewer people.

What do you want me to do about that? Sanction Microsoft?

The only thing you can do is figure out a way to be where the demand is.

I'll try to help you with that.

But I'm not going to dismantle NAFTA. And you know it.

For the record, I don't like guns.

I see no reason why we should allow anyone to make and sell weapons that have no other purpose than to kill people.

I see even less reason why anybody should be allowed to sell assault weapons that have no other purpose than to kill a lot of people at the same time.

And I really don't think you hunters in Pennsylvania and Ohio believe that if we take assault rifles off the street, we'll be coming after your deer rifles next.

But I'm scared to death of the NRA. These are tough people. They're organized. And they have money.

They beat Al Gore in the state where he grew up.

As long as they have a say in whether or not I win this state, I'll keep telling you how my father taught me to shoot.

But seriously: when do you think was the last time I touched a gun?

I don't hunt. And I have Secret Service protection. Those guys do have the guns.

Actually, there were times in my marriage when having a gun handy would not have been such a good thing.

(Pause for laughter)

On that score ...

I really appreciate that neither the media nor my opponent has dwelled on the fact that my co-campaigner had repeated sex with an unpaid 22 year old Intern in the house where we used to live.

So far, you let me get away with putting my daughter out front to say it's a private matter. That actually worked better than we thought it would.

But I'm worried about the Republicans.

The 527 groups live for this kind of thing.

If they can turn a war hero into someone soft on terrorism, while their own guy can't prove he showed up for National Guard service, think what they can do to us.

So:

I just thought I'd take a shot here, and tell you the truth.

What the hell - it's my money.

There is not much I can promise that I'm sure I can actually deliver.

This job is not nearly as powerful as we like to say it is.

So how about this?

If you elect me, I'll have good intentions, be as honest as the job allows, try to keep you safe, and maybe make things a little better.

Until then, I'll just keep workin', fightin' and doin' the best I can.

God bless you. And God bless America.

Now get me off this truck.

 

Comments
25
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:

"I voted to invade Iraq."

No, she didn't. As she's explained any number of times (to no avail, of course).

"But if they were doing anything wrong, we would have caught them by now."

Price-gouging, in your moral universe, being an okay thing to do, I presume. Gotcha.

"I really appreciate that neither the media nor my opponent has dwelled on the fact that my co-campaigner had repeated sex with an unpaid 22 year old Intern in the house where we used to live."

Yeah, we hardly ever hear about that. And it was barely reported on at the time. I can't believe the pass Hill and Bill have gotten on the (what was her name?) Monica thing.

"If they (527 groups) can turn a war hero into someone soft on terrorism, while their own guy can't prove he showed up for National Guard service, think what they can do to us."

Which is the best reason for NOT having promoted Obama at all costs. I can't believe the Repubs aren't going to eat the guy alive, even with the media shilling for him 24/7.

There will come a point when the Obama-addled will be wishing they hadn't taken out the stronger candidate. Damn, getting back the White House could have been a piece of cake, and now it's not even a sure thing.

The neocons must be delighted....

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 AM on 05/12/2008

Best post of this political season. Way to go.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 05/11/2008

Why doesn't anyone see the obvious elephant in the room? The issue of ultimate importance to Hillary Rodham Clinton is for Hillary Rodham Clinton to become President of the United States. That means that, since she is clearly not going to become President in 2008, wants to do all she can to enable her to become President in 2012. That means, without appearing to be a disloyal Democrat, she wants to undermine Obama's candidacy in any way she can, since, if he wins, she can't run till 2106, when she'd be 70. That's why she's still in this.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 AM on 05/11/2008

Wow. Think that up yourself?

Your bite is at least several weeks old by now. Try to write something fresh, OR check around and see what the latest conspiracy theory is. We've heard this one too many times. Even the yakking heads at MSNBC have likely abandoned it. Well, maybe.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 05/12/2008

Brava.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/10/2008

A master stroke, Peggy. If Hillary were to take the high road and give this speech now, even at this late date, we could have a unified ticket and the 527 trolls jumping out of windows because they could see the GE as beyond their ability to derail the Dems this time. What a great scenario to fantasize about.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 05/10/2008

Terrific article, Peggy

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:21 PM on 05/10/2008

Huzzah.

Well worth the wade.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 PM on 05/10/2008

The whole foundation of this great speech is healthly humility not to be confused with humilation whichis what Hillary inflicts on anyone who is not for her.. Humiliation is her best weapon in lieu of a gun.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 AM on 05/10/2008

Had she given this speech even once, she would have won the hearts and minds of a whole generation of voters. She would have been where Senator Obama is now. But she didn't.

C'est la vie.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:55 AM on 05/10/2008

I would have voted for the candidate that gave that speech.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 05/09/2008

I still would.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 05/10/2008

except your pass on CheneyOilCo, I thought you covered bases pretty well... with one glaring exception... the basis for your premise:

"Since you're paying for this anyway...."

Yes, she has "lent" her campaign her own (Bill's influence peddling payoffs) money, but she fully expects the Obama campaign to pay off all her campaign debts... including the funds she lent herself (probably with hefty accumulated interest as well).

All the Obama supporters who will be paying Clinton's debts deserve a "truthful" line or two reflecting the absolute cynicism that goes with her "attack for pay" strategy.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:41 PM on 05/09/2008

You lost me when you had her speak about the Secretary of State going to the UN talking about a lunatic with a nuclear bomb. There was nothing in the National Intelligence Estimate, that she had a copy of to read, that said Sadaam had a bomb and the evidence was sketchy at best he was even able to build one. Very weak. It would be very bad for her to say that because it's textbook Clintonian triangulating.

By now most of us know that Bush was lying his ass off and she had access to the evidence at the time that proved it. Hillary's position on this war, her refusal to apologize for going along with Bush and his band of Neocons on not only Iraq but the Bankruptcy Bill and a plethora of other legislation she never bothered to fight as Senator.

Hillary would say on the stump all over America what a 'fighter' she was and during her 6 years in the Senate she never fought this administration. She's buddies with Lieberman and McCain. Her allies in the Senate were right-wing lobbyist beholden establishment types like Dianne Feinstein. That's who she is and that's not what this country needs.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:05 PM on 05/09/2008

"There was nothing in the National Intelligence Estimate, that she had a copy of to read, that said Sadaam had a bomb and the evidence was sketchy at best he was even able to build one."

Doesn't matter anyhow... she didn't take the time to read it before voting.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 05/09/2008

You have no idea how close to the mark you are. Sit back and wait. In exactly five days, Hillary will be speaking like that. Not line by line, but take not of your lines. She will sprinkle them all over her speech and will try to tie them to an old experience she had somehwere in a state that is just about to vote!!!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:27 PM on 05/09/2008

Someone should give Hillary a shot in her ample behind of whatever it is that would make her speak truthfully. She really believes Americans are idiots, that we don't get on the internet to check out these stories we hear about her and Bill's private life, in particular their taste for other women....both of them. Hillary needs to be vetted and vetted properly. She believes that us Americans should believe her when she stands up on stage and declares herself the most transparent politician there ever was. PLEASE! America needs to know exactly who we are dealing with here when it comes to the Clinton's. It's no wonder the poor, the blue-collar and the uneducated white people of America vote for her, unfortunately, they probably can't afford a computer and internet connection. They don't know Hillary at all. DC does though and they voted for Obama.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 05/09/2008

"Hello, everybody I'm absolutely thrilled to be here at my very first Winter Meeting of the RNC planning committee and it's about time!"

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:55 PM on 05/09/2008

Very entertaining and realistic, Peggy. Not realistic in the sense that ANY politician would be so candid, of course. But if any politician were injected with some sort of truth drug and proped on the back of a pickup, that's the sort of thing he/she would say. To be fair, the truth is like brocolli. We know we should be all for it, we talk a good game about the importance of health, but when we're hungry we keep raeching for the Fritos. If you're in the business of selling food, you'll get rich on chips and grow poor on veggies.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:46 PM on 05/09/2008

Ahhhh. THAT explains B.O.'s "universal" health plan--the one that promises precisely the opposite of universal care. He's just playing the song his supporters want to hear.

That's a relief. I was thinking maybe he didn't know what "universal" meant.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 03:35 AM on 05/12/2008

If were talking of her being completely truthful, we'll have to edit a few lines first.

"The Secretary of State went to the UN and said he had evidence that a certified lunatic was trying to build a nuclear bomb. I thought I should vote not to let that happen."

Instead:

"The Secretary of State went to the UN and said he had evidence that a certified lunatic was trying to build a nuclear bomb, and being the certifiable idiot that I was who additionally cowered under the unpleasant prospect of being perceived as soft on national security, I fell for the entire charade hook, line and sinker."

Rather than: "I voted to invade Iraq. And I still feel terrible about that."

Instead: "I voted to invade Iraq, so what? Everybody makes mistakes. And just because you've never made mistakes that have secured the deaths of over a million people, civilian and military alike, the fact that you forgot to mow the lawn last week is no worse than the "mistake" I made. So no. Not only do I not feel terrible about it, but I wil take it to the grave that my so-called evaluations of the data at hand are perfectly consistent with the arrogance and stupidity which I have always embodied. In short, I wouldn''t have done anything differently"

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 05/09/2008

Humm, these are the best lines for this article--and they aren't written by the author.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 05/09/2008

If only. Not gonna happen. If she said these things she would still come in second (to Obama) but she would regain the respect of millions of people who once admired her but now wince at every lie, half truth and inanity that comes from her lips.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 AM on 05/09/2008

Brava!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 AM on 05/09/2008

Sorry, your post makes too much sense and admits too many mistakes. That's not Hillary's style.

Hillary's campaign called Obama supporters cultists, elitists, idiots, and even rapists.
Hillary's campaign alienated black voters with repeated "he can't win, he's black" wink wink talk.
Hillary's campaign alienated Latino voters with "Richardson is Judas"

If this is the guarded version of Hillary, I really don't want to see the vileness that she really would like to say...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 AM on 05/09/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 

 
 
Related Tags
 

 Site  Web ask.com