iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Dreier

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Dreier
 

Occupy Our Homes: The Next Stage of the Occupy Movement

Posted: 12/06/11 11:05 AM ET

Criticized for focusing more on what it is against than what it is for, the Occupy Wall Street movement has now found an organizing issue it can embrace. Perhaps because so many Occupiers have recently been evicted from their encampments in cities across the country, they have found common cause with the growing number of American families facing foreclosure. Last week, after the Los Angeles Police Department evicted Occupy LA from the park outside City Hall, Mario Brito, one of the group's lead organizers, said that the movement's activists would begin to set up occupations at the homes and country clubs of major bank executives reside and to work with other groups to protest the growing wave of foreclosures.

More and more homeowners facing wrongful foreclosure evictions are taking a bold stand by resisting banks' unfair actions. They are deciding to stay in their homes and fight. When the banks or sheriffs come knocking on their doors, they are saying "we're not leaving."

One of the leaders of the "Occupy Our Homes" campaign is Rose Gudiel, who last month, with the help of community and union activists, successfully battled OneWest Bank and Fannie Mae to keep her home after they ordered her evicted from her home in La Puente, a working class suburb of Los Angeles. Inspired by Gudiel's gritty example, other homeowners are taking action. Today, two other families in the Los Angeles area will be linking arms with friends and neighbors to resist eviction from foreclosure.

Ana Casas Wilson grew up in the same house her family has owned since 1975 in South Gate, another working class suburb of Los Angeles. She now lives there with her husband James, a school custodian, her mother, a home health care worker, and her 17-year-old son. Ana, who has cerebral palsy, has been an advocate for the disabled and is active in several local community and service groups.

In 1990, Ana took over the home from her family and refinanced in order to make extensive repairs. Eventually, their loan was sold to Wells Fargo. In 2009, Ana was diagnosed with stage four breast cancer, forcing James to quit his job as a security guard in order to help take care of her. Ana has now recovered after a double mastectomy and the family now has three stable incomes in the household. They have long been able to make payments -- but the bank stopped accepting them. Ana and her supporters got the bank to temporarily hold off enforcing the eviction order. But Wells Fargo has refused to reconsider the Wilsons for a loan modification, even though they likely qualify based on their current income.

Art D., his wife, and with their four children, ages 11, 10, 8, and 7, moved into their modest three-bedroom Inland Empire home, east of Los Angeles in 2003. (The family asked that its last name not be revealed until today.) It was their first home and represented the American dream they had worked their whole lives for. Art has worked for over 21 years as a supervisor at a metal finishing company which makes parts for the aerospace industry, and before that he served five years in the Marine Corps.

In 2009, due to the economic crisis, Art was working fewer hours, making it harder for him to make his monthly mortgage payments. He applied for a loan modification with his bank, JP Morgan Chase, and was given temporarily lowered payments. After he made four payments, Chase notified Arturo that they were rejecting him for a permanent modification, they wouldn't accept further payments, and they would be foreclosing on his home, even after he provided the bank with paperwork showing that his income had recovered to its previous level. In November 2010, the house was sold at public auction and in June the family was evicted from their home. Although Art and his family have relocated to an apartment in Orange County, they are determined to get their home back from the bank that took it from them unjustly.

Ana, Art and their families have decided to take the courageous step of reclaiming their homes. Joined by supporters, they will take direct action today to challenge Wall Street profiteering that has created a housing crisis for millions of families.

Actions will include "reclaiming" houses that banks are leaving vacant and "home defense" to stop banks from foreclosing and profiting further from the economic crash they created.

The protest at the Wilson home will take place at 12:30 p.m. at 8968 San Juan Avenue in South Gate. At 3 pm, protesters will meet at the parking lot at Ralph's grocery store at 3350 La Sierra Avenue in Riverside, before moving to Art D.'s home. (Contact ACCE organizer Peter Kuhns at (213) 272-1141 for more information).

Homeowners in other cities -- including New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Portland, Oregon -- will be taking similar actions.

The "Occupy Our Homes" campaign is led by a coalition of community groups, unions, and faith-based organizations. In California, the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) and ReFund California has taken the lead in mobilizing public outrage at banks' irresponsible actions. They are part of a national network of organizations that includes the New Bottom Line, New York Communities for Change; Take Back the Land, and SOUL (in Chicago). In Los Angeles and elsewhere, Occupy Wall Street activists have jumped on this bandwagon to channel their anger against the financial industry and its grip on our political system.

The current economic tsunami was caused by the greedy and short-sighted practices of the major Wall Street banks. Taxpayers gave Wall Street banks a $700 billion bail-out through the federal TARP plan, and another $7.7 trillion in nearly interest-free loans of taxpayer money through the Federal Reserve. Bank profits in the third quarter of 2011 were more than $35 billion -- higher than they were before the crash. According to the analysis of the "Occupy Our Homes" campaign:

  • Banks created a housing bubble, deliberately designing predatory loans with balloon payments, variable rates, and other features that would yield short-term profits while preying on families least able to pay.
  • Banks knew that many of these loans could not be repaid, but they didn't care because they planned to package and re-sell the mortgages to investors who then were left holding the bag.
  • The economy crashed as a result of this bank-created house of cards, putting tens of millions of Americans out of work. Unemployment is overwhelmingly the primary cause of foreclosures.
  • More than 6 million Americans have lost their homes, often through illegal foreclosures, and another 5 million are at risk. Many homeowners were told that if they stopped making payments, they could qualify for a lower rate. When they did so, the banks put them in default and initiated foreclosure.
  • The banks still claim that they should be able to collect mortgage payments based on the value of homes before the crash they caused, rather than current value. At least one in four homeowners is now "underwater" -- meaning the bank wants them to make payments on a higher mortgage than what the house is worth.
  • Wall Street is draining hundreds of billions of dollars from communities by demanding artificially inflated mortgage payments -- money that is needed to support local jobs and small businesses and get the economy working again for the 99%.


Peter Dreier teaches politics and chairs the Urban & Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College. His next book, The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame, will be published next year by Nation Books.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:26 PM on 12/27/2011
If banks cannot foreclose on properties securing mortgage notes, they will stop issuing them. If you make it more expensive to foreclose, the banks will charge more interest. Those of us who borrow within our means will end up paying because others recklessly borrowed more than they could afford.

And your statement about banks seeking payments for more than the house is worth makes it seem like the payments are tied somehow to the value of the property. They are not. The payments are tied to the amount of the loan. The house is just security. And yes, if you borrow $x amount, at at x interest, that is what you have to pay back. You received all the money. You have to pay it back. This is not rocket science here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
12:19 PM on 12/10/2011
If you occupy a property that you don't own you are a trespasser, clear and simple. If you call for squatters to "occupy" properties that they don't own you are engaging in a criminal conspiracy to commit criminal trespass. Simply organizing a movement to do so and taking a single affirmative step towards doing so is enough to have you arrested for conspiracy. Now that the Occupy Movement has moved into the encouragement of criminal behavior on a grand scale, it will be interesting to see if they find themselves in some real legal trouble.
04:46 PM on 12/07/2011
When I see a homeless family and I know there are vacant foreclosed houses in the area, I wonder why some government agency cannot arrange fot that family to "occupy" that home until a paying owner or tenant is found. Of course, there would have to be arragement with the family that they would be given 30 days to leave and find a new dwelling.. And hopefully within that time, the family would be gviven more time to rebuild their lives. We all need help at some time. I just see the waste and wonder why no one is doing anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
04:33 PM on 12/10/2011
Who is going to look at a home with an eye towards a purchase when it has been occupied by people who are, for all intents, squatters? How will these people obtain utilities? Do you think that the gas, water or electrical providers will be providing utilities to people who have no ownership or leasehold interest in the property? Are you suggesting that we should create yet another governmental agency to administer yet another program fraught with problems? What is the mechanism by which you would remove these people if a buyer were to be found? How would you deal with a secondary “We Occupied It We Are Homesteading!” movement? What casualty or liability insurance company would offer coverage to the occupiers? In the interim who would be liable to the property owner for damages done to the premises? Your intent may be well meaning but it hasn't been thought through.
01:01 PM on 12/07/2011
Well now that they will be occupying homes, does that mean they will learn to use a toilet??
12:59 PM on 12/07/2011
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
Thomas Jefferson
06:40 PM on 12/07/2011
Great quote which I found earlier. Please support state constitutional commissions. Occupy your state capitol.
11:32 AM on 12/07/2011
I know a person who bought a home 10 years ago the price sky rocked so he took a second loan out he had a lot in North Calf. With the money from the second load he build a house and paid for the construction with bank money as the housing market turn down he decided not to make payments on the first or second loan, lived in the house for over a year before the foreclose took place. So think about it he now has a free house and lived a year free in the first house. This is a disgrace to all hard working Americans whom work hard and do the right thing.
The second person I know who got into trouble used her house as an ATM machine, travel the world taken holiday and now the price of her house dropped she’s pissed and demanding the Bank give her a loan modification. Oh! she makes over 100 thousand a year.
11:11 AM on 12/07/2011
Bring it ALL down. Power to the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
04:43 PM on 12/10/2011
Nice bumper sticker. Are you an anarchist or simply really, really late waking up from that nap?
10:50 AM on 12/07/2011
Get back their homes, a worthy cause, the banks created the problems as the sought to make profit from the spoils of an overinflated housing market. Say No! and take it to the bank!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JubalTHarshaw
Just Passing Through...
04:42 PM on 12/10/2011
Do you believe that people should be expected to honor their obligations? How many people bought homes that they could not afford? Should those who honored their obligations and paid their debts be punished so that those who did not can be rewarded? Are adults held to understand the contracts that they signed? Who decides who gets “forgiveness?” What are the criteria by which you sort out those who used their homes as an ATM to buy toys or make frivolous improvements? Are those who bought a house expecting to jump on the “flipping” bandwagon to be treated differently? The devil is indeed in the details. Your opinion is warm and cuddly and in all likelihood well intentioned, but it is economic fantasy.
10:32 PM on 12/10/2011
The economy was a fantasy Deregulation and corporate greed led to banks lending money to people who were not qualified to take out home loans or equity loans on a fake premise that the house is worth the overinflated amount. Most homebuyers were buying for speculation rather than actual ownership so they could turn around and sell being able to make initial purchase with low interest adjustable rates. Another fantasy!!! That drove up the price of housing. Interest rates are still low but with the burst of the bubble jobs were wiped out which has led to loan defaults. So really do you think this is cuddly and cosy. Not at all. The middle class is being pushed into poverty. We are not the ones getting the raises instead we are told that times are tough while the corporations make the profits. I believe I have an obligation to make my payments and I do but not without sacrificing food or heat or Christmas By the way when did a corporation become human
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
10:37 AM on 12/07/2011
This article makes it seem as though the foreclosure crisis was the sole fault of the banks. It ignores the many people who lied about incomes in order to own homes they knew they could never afford. To support these people who equally contributed to the sad state of our economy is insane.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
10:03 AM on 12/07/2011
John Mytown bought the mortgage that the bank bundled Rose Gudiel home into. John is a 72 yr old disabled senior that was depending on Rose paying her mortgage so that he could pay his heating bill this winter. Rose has lived in the home for 19 months now without paying. John doesn't know why he still has to pay his bills if no one else does. In fact, if Rose's house isn't foreclosed on and sold to recover some of his money he won't be able to pay and will lose his own home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
09:46 AM on 12/07/2011
Contract law was the basis of America. Rule of law was why we have been successful. If this continues, no one will pay their mortgage. That will be the downfall. Keep fiddling, america is burning. When the law isn't enforced for contracts, I see no reason to continue paying taxes.
05:27 AM on 12/07/2011
Professor! Banks did not create the housing bubble! The federal government did, By law the banks were forced to write these loans based on unworkable criteria then freddie/fanny would buy them. The senators and congresspeople then made trades on the preferred purchasers and the firms that mixed the government mandated mess in with other loans to create derivatives, If the now failed ows wanted an issue it would simply be roll up two steps to the source of the corruption and inequities to the corrupt federal government, who double dipped this boondoggle twice before it ever got to Wall Street!!!!
11:08 AM on 12/07/2011
The government didn't create credit default swaps and mortgage backed securities...and then lie about their value in order to pay 9 figure bonuses to people who don't give a DAMN about anything except getting their bonus to an even 10th figures.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
01:25 PM on 12/07/2011
No, the government just forced others to come up with them, they didn't do it themselves. The government tried to force the banks to eat the bad loans, but bankers have always been smarter than the government, so they bundled them and sold them any way they could.
02:00 PM on 12/07/2011
No they simply created a toxic asset class then offered to buy them and resale them through freddie/fanny. They did have full knowledge of the bundling going on and many inside the government steered the junk to favored brokerages and traded on their knowledge of the inside dealings.
11:18 PM on 12/06/2011
'Underwater'
www.occupyholestreet.com
Graphic Commentary on Hole Management
photo
TomTheSeal
Represent our wishes; best interests are arguable
10:07 PM on 12/06/2011
Our elections, our 401-K's, our jobs, our homes, our first amendment rights, our Constitution, our tax money for bailouts and bonuses, equal justice under the law, our media, our money supply, interest rates and credit policy, and, literally, our country - taken by the 1%'ers.

We can not let this stand. We can not let this government, that has not, does not, CAN not, represent us because it is paid millions to represent others, go on.

Our ONLY hope is a movement to let people in all 50 states VOTE to secede from this government and institute a new one. If any state votes against secession, the movement will fail - it's all 50 or nothing.

This government can't be fixed.

50 State Secession !
Freedom !
A New U.S.A. headed by a new government !
07:37 PM on 12/27/2011
What nonsense. Nobody has to vote to "secede" from the government. If people were as united as you posit, they would vote in candidates who would write laws supporting what the people who voted for them wanted. This idea that there is this huge majority out there that cannot make its wishes known through normal political channels is a fantasy held by those who wrongly think that everyone agrees with them but somehow nothing changes. In fact, while there is a fair amount of agreement that there are problems, people are far from united about the right solutions to our problems.
09:34 PM on 12/06/2011
I really don't see how the bank is the bad guy here.
The home buyer went to the bank for a loan.
The bank loaned the money at a known rate.
The buyer (for whatever reason) stopped paying the mortgage.
The bank forcloses on the secured asset.

If you don't want the bank to take your house, pay them the money you promised.