NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Guber

Peter Guber

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Guber

Book Adaptations: Best And Worst (PHOTOS)

Posted: 01/ 8/11 12:47 PM ET

In recent years, there has been a continuing dialog that books were no longer a major source of intellectual properties for movies. Anecdotal evidence that seemed to support that included the fact that the audience was growing younger, their attention span shorter, and their bandwidth was convulsed with noisier and interactive media. Most of the studios abandoned their robust New York literary operations.

But a funny thing on the way to this demise -- Harry Potter and Twilight. Their celebrity proved to be another marketing tool for these film combines. Good old fashioned words on the page were becoming hits again. With books becoming franchises, like Potter and Twilight, and franchises being the holy grail of the movie business because of the seeming certainty they provided for a company's production slate -- everyone was digging and clawing -- not just for comics and graphic novels, but for hard covers. Their literary celebrity and business success fueled the interest of directors, stars and studios.

2010 movies, especially this year's hits, are rampant with book titles. The most successful book audience is tiny compared to the population a movie must generate to be successful. So, it's not just capturing the book's audience. It's corralling and iterating the book's creativity. A cautionary tale -- there are no guarantees. Turning 350 pages into 90 pages is a daring feat often alienating the old book audience and disappointing the new film audience. But, oh boy when it works!

There will always be an argument of the best and worst adaptations of books to movies. The list that I've created doesn't mean it is the best or worst movie, but that it is the best adaptation of a book to a movie.

Best Book To Movie Adaptations
1 of 16
Alice In Wonderland: Book title: "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" and "Through The Looking Glass"

Tim Burton can turn the dictionary with Johnny Depp and his wife in it into a hit.
Total comments: 216 | Post a Comment
1 of 16
This Book-to-Movie
Awful
Awesome

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Book-to-Movies
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

 

Follow Peter Guber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@PeterGuber

In recent years, there has been a continuing dialog that books were no longer a major source of intellectual properties for movies. Anecdotal evidence that seemed to support that included the fact th...
In recent years, there has been a continuing dialog that books were no longer a major source of intellectual properties for movies. Anecdotal evidence that seemed to support that included the fact th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 216
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amber Troska
I like puppies.
08:49 AM on 01/10/2011
I was highly disappointed in Alice, but it was not a direct adaptation, but rather a sequel or "inspired by." The plot is Tim Burton's own and not to be confused with the books (Wonderland and Looking Glass), which is probably one of the reasons it was not very good. I usually love Burton's films, but this one lifted concepts from the originals without retaining any of their original absurdity. The film was linear and too "Disney." And why was Crispin Glover's body computer animated? That made the least sense of anything and distracted me through the whole film, that and Mia Wasichowski's (I'm sure that is misspelled) inability to realistically interact with anything on a green screen.
photo
Erzsebet Gilbert
author, expat, traveler
08:28 AM on 01/10/2011
How are the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Misery, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, and Remains of the Day not on here? All of the above are magnificently faithful to the original literature, and brilliantly acted and directed. LOTR is one of my dork-obsessions, Kathy Bates is terrifying, Jack Nicholson nails Randal P. McMurphy, and I could quite sincerely both read and watch Remains of the Day repeatedly and consecutively. Anybody on the same page, er, frame, with me here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:43 PM on 01/10/2011
I think this is supposed to be just films from the past year or so.
photo
Erzsebet Gilbert
author, expat, traveler
12:54 PM on 01/10/2011
D'oh! I guess that explains some... Still, everybody ought to see and read those... :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
10:28 AM on 01/30/2011
All of those movies were faithful to the books, and the best ever were the Lord of the Rings movies. Other books faithfully reflected in the movies were Dr. Shivago, The Razor's Edge (Bill Murrary version), and Lawrence of Arabia.
11:49 PM on 01/09/2011
While I like the best and worst kinda lists usually...this was pointless. The only reason to flip through these photos was to see the wrong movie for Fair Game displayed.
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
07:42 PM on 01/09/2011
huppa
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:30 PM on 01/09/2011
Timeline was bad.  So was Cold Mountain even though it was marginally better than the book it was adapted from.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LisaLisa1234
10:28 AM on 02/08/2011
"Timeline" was one of the worst book adaptations I've seen. It took one of my favorite fluff books & mangled it beyond recognition.
02:07 PM on 01/09/2011
Worst: Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief. They really screwed up a wonderful book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:56 PM on 01/09/2011
I thought Burton's Alice was a big disappointment. It looked great but he took all the charm and wit out of the books and turned it into just another slay the evil CGI monsters movie.
02:13 PM on 01/09/2011
Definitely agree. This Alice is my choice for most overrated movie since Forrest Gump ... another superficial shlockfest.

I have no idea what Guber means by this list. Best adaptations of books to movies? Some were ok, but Fair Game? Guardians of Gahoole?

I think the list is just a compendium of random titles that he happened to see this week. It's incomprehensible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:22 PM on 01/09/2011
Even though it was panned I thought The Men Who Stare at Goats (inspired by the book of the same name which was excellent) was very funny and entertaining. I think one reason a lot of people didn't get the movie is they didn't realize how much of it was actually based on fact, that the military really did blow millions investing in paranormal warfare over the years.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:31 PM on 01/09/2011
The book had a funny bit about how one Army official said that the rioter-subduing chemical goop used in Somalia wasn't a complete failure because it took the rioters twenty minutes to figure out they could climb over it rather than the original estimate of five minutes.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
benji85
11:20 AM on 01/09/2011
I liked the Green Zone, but then again I haven't read the book.

Gulliver's Travels peaked my interest when I heard they were redoing it, but then I saw their add-ins to modernize it, along with Jack Black in it just turned me off. It is a great piece of art as the original and doesn't need altering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:20 PM on 01/09/2011
I read Life in the Imperial City and I loved Green Zone. There was no way you could make a drama out of the original book without doing what they did. The movie was more an "inspired by" then an adaptation.
10:38 AM on 01/09/2011
You've got the wrong "Fair Game" on that list.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leege
12:38 PM on 01/09/2011
I guess that's what happens when you don't pay most of your staff.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 AM on 01/09/2011
Don't all movies start with a "book?" The title of this article should indicate it is about good and bad movies based on writers' themes.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
benji85
11:16 AM on 01/09/2011
If you count a script as a book then yes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chino1138
09:52 AM on 01/09/2011
Once again, people, this list is supposed to be on movies released in 2010 (except for the Harry Potter and Twilight series, which were released over several years, including 2010). So LOTR was not intentionally left of this list, although I will say this list is half-baked at best.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
01:53 AM on 01/11/2011
Once again, people, this list is supposed to be on movies released in 2010 (except for the ones that weren't).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gronkie
Radical Independent
09:45 AM on 01/09/2011
I've always thought that one of the worst adaptions was The Shining. The only people who seem to like the movie are those who didn't read the book. I recently watched it again, and it seems like the movie was made by two different people. The first half is interminably boring, the second half is passable, but neither does the intensely scary book any justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
12:24 PM on 01/09/2011
I think it depends what you are looking for. I don't watch horror movies (or read horror books) for the most part. I agree as a conventional horror film The Shining was probably boring but as a psychological film -- about the decay of a man's mind -- I thought it was amazing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gronkie
Radical Independent
10:31 AM on 01/10/2011
Read the book. If you liked seeing his mind slowly erode, then you'll love the book. Plus there were so many other things that were in the book that were better. For instance, in the book, he was carrying some sort of mallet from a croquet-like game. The scene where Danny was hiding, hearing his father coming down the hall, slamming the mallet from one wall to the next, calling for Danny to come out and take his medicine was absolutely terrifying. Not everything King has written has been great (some of it has been downright awful), but this was the book that made me realize that he had the potential to be a truly great author. It is still among his very best, along with The Stand and the Dark Tower series.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
09:12 AM on 01/09/2011
Lord of the Rings trilogy are up there in best-adapted screenplays. "Eragon" needs to be remade; it was as if a 16 year-old made a movie based on a book written by a 40 year-old instead of the other way around. Keep Jeremy Irons and do that one over. What about Steinbeck's "Grapes of Wrath" and "East of Eden"? Great movies, but the former is a better adaptation than the latter was. "Cuckoo's Nest" better than its book?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
donnyraindog
Hi Mom!
09:30 PM on 01/09/2011
agree with you on grapes of wrath and would add only half jokingly that it is almost as good as a folk song the ballad of tom joad -woody guthrie.
photo
Sunflo
Leave a mark, not a stain.
09:02 AM on 01/09/2011
Bad: Dune, Bonfire of the Vanities
Good: The Color Purple, The English Patient, Remains of the Day
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:24 AM on 01/10/2011
I liked "Bonfire of the Vanities"

I've never read the book, so I don't know how it was as an adaptation, but it was still a good movie

"The English Patient" was pointless